Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

1866-1883
DANFS entry

Post Reply
User avatar
Randi
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Randi »




On the weather page, please enter: date, locations, distances (knots and fathoms), courses, and all the weather data in the columns outlined in red in the spreadsheet.
However, entries such as Ebb and Flood in the knots and fathoms columns can be omitted. In this case and other cases where no distance is specified, entries in the courses steered column indicate the ship's alignment rather displacement and can also omitted.
It is not necessary to record Leeway or State of the Sea.
However, ice mentioned in the weather grid should be transcribed using the magenta State of the Sea column.

On the events page please enter: ice, location information, and sailing information.
Aurorae, volcanic, and seismic activity should be reported in the forum.
The names of US Navy and Coast Guard ships met should be noted. This gives the science team a chance to compare weather readings. You can include all ships mentioned in a single entry without a time or any additional data.
Other events are optional.

One person can do both weather and events (Stream 1), but the system also allows one person to do the weather page (Stream 1) and a second person to do the events page (Stream 3).
Unlike in OW3, where three transcriptions were required for each page, we are doing only one transcription per page.

Every transcriber needs to enter the date.
The date is used to organize the pages.



See Ashuelot — General for some general background and discussion.
See Ashuelot — Examples for a quick introduction to transcribing or a refresher.

See Transcribing Guide to learn how to transcribe the data.
Post in Ask Questions Here or this topic if you have questions.

OW web site: Ashuelot

Direct links:
User avatar
sleepyowl
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:01 am

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by sleepyowl »

Just found out there are going to be a couple of other new ships available for everyone, so if it's OK I'm going to reserve a few more years on Ashuelot ... I'm quite keen on transcribing ships in Asia, and they seem hard to come by.

So I'd like to reserve 1869, the entire year.
User avatar
Randi
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Randi »

User avatar
sleepyowl
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:01 am

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by sleepyowl »

Jan to Dec 1869 completed! Moving on to 1874 now. ;)
User avatar
sleepyowl
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:01 am

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by sleepyowl »

For 1869, I didn't find many interesting things to note down, just the following (these are the ones I didn't think worth including in the xml files) :

117 15 Jan 1869
0600h Mt Fusyami visible for the first time since our arrival

027 24 April 1869
0500h saw signs of a large conflagration in the direction of Yeddo

032 29 April 1869
2300h Discovered a large fire on shore in foreign settlement

006 4 Oct 1869
0500h At sunrise all the men of war in harbor dressed ship ("grande pavoisement") with Austrian ensign at the main, in commemoration of the birth of Francis Joseph, Emperor of Austria

028 26 Oct 1869
0500h At sunrise dressed ship overall in anniversary of the birthday of the Mikado

079 16 Dec 1869
Fusi Yama visible completely covered with snow
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4867
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Michael »

sleepyowl wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 7:04 am Jan to Dec 1869 completed! Moving on to 1874 now. ;)

Very good!!! I'm calculating the voyage for Omaha 1877. As soon as I finish it, I'll get started on this one. :D :D :D It will be a change from the west coast of South America.
User avatar
Randi
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Randi »

Good work!
User avatar
sleepyowl
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:01 am

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by sleepyowl »

Michael wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 1:50 pm
sleepyowl wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 7:04 am Jan to Dec 1869 completed! Moving on to 1874 now. ;)

Very good!!! I'm calculating the voyage for Omaha 1877. As soon as I finish it, I'll get started on this one. :D :D :D It will be a change from the west coast of South America.
Okay :D :D :D
User avatar
sleepyowl
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:01 am

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by sleepyowl »

Randi wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:24 pmGood work!
Thank you :D :D :D

:owl:
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4867
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Michael »

The USS Oneida has been mentioned a few times. This short Wikipedia entry is worth reading.
User avatar
Randi
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Randi »

This is all we have for USS Oneida for 1869.
I guess the rest was lost when the ship sank.
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4867
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Michael »

Here's one of the mentions of Ashuelot. At 2010 they exchange signals as Ashuelot enters the port of Hiogo.

Image
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4867
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Michael »

On 14 August, we tow the USS Idaho out of Nagasaki harbor. Then, on the 20th of September, we tow her out of Yokohama and she is dismasted by a typhoon the next day. This is an interesting vessel to read about.
User avatar
Randi
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Randi »

I checked, but we don't have the logs for USS Idaho :(
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4867
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Michael »

The voyage for 1869 is done. Many thanks to SleepyOwl for her meticulous work. This was a real challenge for both of us as there were many cases of times and places that were partially obscured. Most of the pages did not lie flat, so the writing on the left hand edge of the Event Page wasn't visible, and many images were of poor quality. Nevertheless, we were able to add another 33 new places to Matteo's Find Place database of place names.

You can see a plot of the voyage here and, for more detail, you can download the KML file and view it with Google Earth. There were a few mentions of people, which you can see here.

These are the weather statistics for this voyage:
  • 8739 records for DirT
  • 8715 records for Kts
  • 8654 records for Baro
  • 8654 records for Attd
  • 8615 records for Dry
  • 8751 records for Wet
  • 8752 records for Water
  • 8740 records for Weather
  • 8047 records for Clouds
  • 8728 records for Clear
There were 86395 weather records for Ashuelot in 1869.
Ashuelot travelled a total of 5197 miles.
User avatar
Randi
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Ashuelot (1869) — Discussion: Questions, Comments, and Coordination

Post by Randi »

Great job
Sleepyowl and Michael !
Post Reply

Return to “USS Ashuelot”