Old Weather Forum

Old Weather: Classic => The Dockyard => Topic started by: AvastMH on 19 December 2012, 12:24:22

Title: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 19 December 2012, 12:24:22
Add your questions and comments to this topic.



If you need help transcribing see:
Jamestown -- Reference: Transcription Example and Log Description (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3534.0)

Guides for US logs: drawing entry boxes, transcribing and editing (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3078.0)
Getting Your Sea Legs (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?board=4.0)
The Logs and FAQ (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?board=7.0)
Handwriting Help (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?board=8.0)
Technical Support (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?board=14.0)


If you are interested in the names of crew members see:
Jamestown (1844) -- Crew Lists (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3512.0)






For information on some of the ships mentioned, see: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg84150#msg84150



Directions for Keeping the Log (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_002_0.jpg)



List of all known log books:

1: 25 Dec 1844 - 13 Apr 1846

2: 14 Apr 1846 - 16 Aug 1846

3: 13 Jul 1847 - 29 Jul 1848

4: 30 Jul 1848 - 15 Aug 1849

5: 16 Aug 1849 - 11 May 1850

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852

7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854

8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855

9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857

11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858

12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859

13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860

14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862

15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863

16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864

17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 March 2013, 12:14:15
There is more discussion on transcribing weather from remarks further along in this topic:

1. Philip has asked us to record air and water temperatures and pressures when they are given in the events as sometimes happens when there is no weather grid: Temperature + Pressure (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg67083#msg67083).

2. Additionally, Craig came up with the idea of trying to capture text descriptions to supplement the information given in the weather grid or to create a grid: Wind force and weather (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg67981#msg67981). Camiller and I have been doing that. It is entirely up to you if you do that or not. I have to admit that I'm not entirely sure it is worth the effort. Philip thinks that it is an interesting idea, but he is not at all sure he will be able to use the data - though future analysts might.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 16 March 2013, 12:41:42
 ;)  Will do!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 16 March 2013, 13:05:35
Warning for the faint at heart - page 3, 2 lines in, and we've already got the lash out....  :P :-\ :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_006_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 16 March 2013, 13:45:56
In general for all these really old ships:

I totally agree with Randi, when there are no charts just transcribe the weather description as written, as an Event.  The analyst team will then have it on their computer screens without having to decipher handwriting - which is a huge gain from their POV.  They already know this happens in all the blank book logs (no pre-printed tables.)

Whenever you find numbers, codes or a chart, make it fit into the weather data as best you can.  The Beaufort code was fully developed by this time (http://climate.arm.ac.uk/scans/abbrev/Beaufort.html), but it is clear the US Navy was not yet in love with it in the 1840s.

As to the punishment, yes we are back in difficult history. 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 March 2013, 13:59:25
All three of the later Jamestown logbook-batches do have normal logbook formats.

Transcribing descriptions of the weather is, currently, optional, but if you don't want to do it, you might be happier on another ship.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 16 March 2013, 20:05:04
I think this is just a case of 'let's not bother too much since we're only just equipping the ship' (oh yes - some loooooong lists of gear are coming up, but nowhere near the calibre of the Jeannette). They open the log on xmas day 1844, and we know that there's a proper log on the go by the 8th Feb '45.
Do you reckon it's worth trying to squeeze the info in the weather boxes then? - it's flimsy 'light airs, a bit cloudy with snow'. I think it's better as events myself.  8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 16 March 2013, 21:50:10
I agree, that's a sentence, not a set of instrument readings.  When they give more precise numbers, etc, we can play with getting them into our readings boxes.  They aren't the first ship who left weather readings to the port authorities. ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 20 March 2013, 17:43:05
On the January 7, 1845 page 4 more men get 12 lashes each. This does not seem like a happy ship and they are just starting their commision. i guess this log is not for the squemish. Back to the important stuff I am running into long lists of gear including 10 colt pistols and 10 colt rifles. weather information they give the wind directionand things like "light breeze". Some of the handwriting is hard to read. If I can make out weather information i will print it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 22 March 2013, 17:50:42
This is from the Naval OR on what this ship did during the "Great war of the rebelion" American civil War part 1
may 1861 Philidelphia
Jun off Charlestown blockade duty
July off Savannah
August Fernandina Florida burned the grounded bark Alvarado which had been captured by the raider Jeff Davis
August St Johns Florida captured the schnoor Aicbirth
September off Savannah captures and scuttles the fishing smack Colonel Long 14 tons
October off Willimington
December Cape fear NC captures the sloop Havelock
January 1862 at hampton roads needs repairs
February off Wilmington
April near Wilmington grounded steamship Nashville a blockade runner gets away
May captures British brig Intended off Wilmington later to hampton roads then Philidephia navy yard for overhaul

end of part 1 from Series I vol 5,6,& 7



corrected Fernddia Fernandina spelling.  JB
source: http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/j2/jamestown-i.htm
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 23 March 2013, 16:32:29
part 2
September 1862 orders to proceed to the East Indies via the Cape of Good Hope with stops at Montivadeo and Rio De Janaro
March 1863 at capetown
May Batavia
June Macao
September Yokohoma
Dececember to China
April 1864 Macao
July Yokohama to help guard the US Minester
September chartered the steamer Ta-Kiang and fought an action at Shimonoseki
January 1865 Japan to Macao
April Macao
Jun to August Macao to Mare Island Naval Yard California
from the Naval OR Series I Vols 1,2,&3
I hope this is of some interest it looks like this ship really did some traveling during the war.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 23 March 2013, 18:55:09
If it doesn't add to the sea ice project, it most certainly adds to all the global projects half a century before our RN ships.  I'll bet that is an interesting voyage.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Dean on 23 March 2013, 19:54:28
Warning for the faint at heart - page 3, 2 lines in, and we've already got the lash out....  :P :-\ :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_006_0.jpg

That's where the phrase 'The cat's out of the bag' came from! :-X
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 March 2013, 04:26:28
Well, maybe/maybe not...
Let the cat out of the bag: http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/let-the-cat-out-of-the-bag.html
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: amilasiu on 26 March 2013, 18:01:15
Jamestown1886 - no date on the weather log page? Date only appears on the opposite (detailed log entry) page. Or am I blind? Seems weird NOT to put date on left (both) pages...

Or I am blind  :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 March 2013, 18:13:05
Usually there is only one date per pair of pages.
Just transcribe the date on the page where is appears.

I hope you are enjoying transcribing. Don't hesitate to ask questions!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 26 March 2013, 18:19:54
Nope, you are seeing true.  To understand, picture the weather and comment pages both showing in an open book.  The whole 2 page spread is that day's log, and when handling the paper book that would be obvious.

Our scanners took a single picture of that open book, and the computer then cut the picture in half so we see one page at a time.  The jpg links to the scans (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=1073.0) are joined at the hip as far as our computers are concerned - any dates and locations recorded on page xxxabc_0.jpg (weather) will automatically be applied to page xxxabc_1.jpg (comments) and vice versa.

Type what you see and know it will all come out okay.  :)

-------------------------------------
added:  Hi, Randi.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 March 2013, 03:59:41
For some slightly more detailed instructions, see How to look at log pages before and after the one you are working on (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3489.msg62863#msg62863)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 10 April 2013, 17:57:29
On the 44 log, I assume the "F" column is wind force?! What scale is it? Was Beaufort used here?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 10 April 2013, 18:04:25
If it is K then F it is Knots and Fathoms measured by an old fashioned 'chip' log - basically a little sea anchor attached to a line with knots in it that spools out proportionally to the ship's rate of advance when the chip is cast into the sea. Used for navigation.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 April 2013, 18:46:23
http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3534.msg57995#msg57995

And, if it follows the same pattern as Corwin (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3273.msg56442#msg56442), a 'fathom' is a tenth of a knot - and a knot is one 120th of a nautical mile. See A treatise on navigation and nautical astronomy: http://books.google.fr/books?id=pnEDAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA28&dq=fathom+knot+tenth&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n5KiULbgE6ea1AWUiIGIDA&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 10 April 2013, 19:02:05
I see! I had fathoms mentally wired with depth under keel or so and thought "Naaaa....can't be!" Hence the confusion on my part. So, does it help if I add the weather description to the events tab in addition to the usual table? I did this anyway on the first few pages in order to acquaint myself with the handwriting and characteristic style.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 April 2013, 19:08:35
Philip does not currently use weather information in text form.
He, or others, might use it at some future time.
The rule is still 'what interests you'. All the information will be saved.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 10 April 2013, 19:19:43
Okay, they're mostly one line only, so no big deal.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 15 April 2013, 21:44:22
It looks like Clewi blew past me as Captain of the Jamestown. This ship is about to start its commission on anti-slave trade patrol off the coast of africa. For those of you who expect alot action there wasn't much. The USN captured 58 slave ships from 1820 to about the 1870s(?) and only 2 or 3 during the period 1841-1859. See the books the "Royal navy and the Slave traders" Bernard Edwards and "The Slave Trade" Hugh Thomas. Also note: alot of sailors did die of disease mostly during these operations. Also note my first 160 or so posts may not have been all that accurate.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 15 April 2013, 21:48:33
James, you can't have been that much more wrong than anyone else here.  Give yourself some wiggle room. ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 23 April 2013, 19:41:24
In looking through another book on the history of the USN I have some errata: The USN captured 5 slavers in 1820,10 during the 1845-1850 period and 25 during the period 1859-1861. I will probably make more changes when i have more information.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 April 2013, 07:20:24
Note that for Jamestown 1866 (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol019of067/vol019of067_057_0.jpg) the fathoms in the heading (next to knots) are one eighth of a knot and not the modern 6 feet!


I have done the reverse computation to evaluate the ratio between knot and fathom.
Here are my results for logs around USS Jamestown - vol019of067_08x (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol019of067/vol019of067_084_0.jpg):
1- 60 knots and 31 fathoms vs 64 knots => 0.129,
2- 150 knots and 88 fathoms vs 160 knots => 0.114,
3- 134 knots and 24 fathoms vs 139 knots => 0.208,
4- 147 knots and 62 fathoms vs 155 knots => 0.129,
Conclusion: the ratio seems to be arround 1/8.
Note: This ratio is confirmed by the more often value of fathom column (0 and 4) for (0.0 and 0.5 knot).



http://books.google.fr/books?id=pnEDAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA28&dq=fathom+knot+tenth&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n5KiULbgE6ea1AWUiIGIDA&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
says
"Sometimes (...) the knot is divided into ten parts; more frequently perhaps into eight.

On Corwin (http://www.cosmik.com/oldweather/corwin_example_1001-1.jpg), at least on the pages I looked at, a fathom was a tenth of a knot. Some later logbooks changed the heading to knots and tenths (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/USS%20Bear/Bear_1894/pics2%20018_0.jpg). I was as startled at Corwin's log as jpiquard was here, so I did quite a bit of digging ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 11 May 2013, 20:09:57
I got the book Africa Squadron the US Navy and the Slave Trade 1842-1861' Don L Canney. Which deals with the USNs anti-slave trade operations during this period . It has accounts of the Jamestowns 1845-46 and 1855-57 cruises. On the first cruise the Jamestown captured 2 slavers. one was the Merchant detained by the sloop HMS Cygnet off Sierra Leonne and releases her to the Jamestown on 12 March 1845. The US courts released the ship and its master. The second was the Robert Wilson drivn into the US base at Porto Prayo in the Cape Verde islands do to bad weather the Jamestown was there at the time searched the ship and found her equipped for a slave voyage seized her with portugese approval. This time the Federal courts in the US confiscated the ship and gave the master William Von Pfister 3 years in prison and a $1000 fine in April 1847 he received a full pardon.  One hopes this is of some interest.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 May 2013, 09:02:47
Really amazing and saddening to see how the courts failed to support the anti-slavery efforts across the board.  It explains a kind of build up to the Dred Scott decision (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford) by the Supreme Court in 1857.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 12 May 2013, 13:04:57
It's still surprising that they confiscated William Von Pfister's ship and fined him. This was in 1847. Was there a U.S. law against the slave trade at that time or was it confiscated for other reasons?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 May 2013, 19:26:06
It's still surprising that they confiscated William Von Pfister's ship and fined him. This was in 1847. Was there a U.S. law against the slave trade at that time or was it confiscated for other reasons?

A long time before:  http://history1800s.about.com/od/slaveryinamerica/a/1807slaveact.htm
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 12 May 2013, 21:42:46
Interesting. Thanks, Janet.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 15 May 2013, 07:49:10
I notice the Jamestown (1844) is on sea time so I am recording PM and AM. I haven't got far enough yet to observe if they change to civil time when in port.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_036_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 15 May 2013, 08:15:26
Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 15 May 2013, 08:21:10
It doesn't change.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 16 May 2013, 09:23:37
At 9.30 called all hands to muster and read a general order from commodore Skinner for the suppression of duelling.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_042_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jil on 16 May 2013, 15:42:49
 :o Had there been an outbreak of duelling?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 16 May 2013, 16:27:12
You can read a little of the book Africa Squadron and the book reviews on amazon. com. I am glad some of you found this interesting. You may also know that in 1819 a law was passed called the Slave Trade suppression act which allowed the navy to operate off Africa. In 1820 the law was changed to make slave trading the same as piracy which carried the death penalty. Only one man was hung for this crime. Most of the rest either got short jail sentences of a few years and were often pardoned !? Some slave ships that were captured were confiscated but in other cases the judge through the case out and the ship was released. In a few cases the Captains of the USN ships that captured the slave ships were sued by the slave ship owners!? This was a frustrating time for the USN however in the 1858-1861 period the US finally sent an adequate force to operate off Africa the squadrons success rate increased.
 As for dueling before this time there was a lot of dueling between officers in the USN and around this time the Navy decided to put a stop to it. Also note: there was still dueling going on between civilians in the US even a few cases of women dueling women. I know some of this sounds a little strange but things like this did happen.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 16 May 2013, 17:45:36
Thanks for this information, James. I was wondering about the dueling too.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 17 May 2013, 09:11:35
Here's what you might call a motley crew:

Quote
Received the following Kroomen - Jack Will, Ben Coffee, Poor Joe, Jack Saove, Jack Everyday, Jack Frypan, John Peter, Jack Roberts, Mosquitoe, Jack Crowbar.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_047_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 17 May 2013, 09:19:10
They got rid of some of the worst the following day:

Quote
Discharged Jack Neverfear and Bottle Beer (Kroomen)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 17 May 2013, 10:01:02
They got rid of some of the worst the following day:

Quote
Discharged Jack Neverfear and Bottle Beer (Kroomen)

These guys joined the crew in Porto Praya on 19. Feb. They came from the Macedonian.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 17 May 2013, 13:18:02
The Macedonian might have been unloading its trouble makers. Of course, I am only going by the names, but Crowbar sounds like someone you might want on a construction job, but not sailing a ship.  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 17 May 2013, 19:19:20
Kroomen - not a misspelling: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seedies_and_Kroomen
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 17 May 2013, 22:24:01
Thanks, Kevin. That gives us a bit of perspective on these men.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 May 2013, 03:42:06
See also Seedies and Kroomen (also Kroumen or Krumen) in the OWpedia (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3209.msg52138#msg52138) ;)

It has Kevin's reference and some other info.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 18 May 2013, 12:28:47
Thanks, Randi. You have been doing a great job of documenting everything!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 May 2013, 13:54:32
 :-*
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 19 May 2013, 09:13:27
The Jamestown is at Cape Palmas, Liberia on Mar 15, 1845. I am surprised that they received fresh beef there. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_053_1.jpg


"Maryland in Liberia" was colonized by African Americans in 1834. This article http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/dissertations/AAI3076640/  says that because of low immigration, high death rate and disease fatal to large livestock, agriculture was not successful. The beef may have been left by supply ships but they wouldn't be able to store if for long in that climate.


Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 19 May 2013, 13:20:36
In my opinion, unsuccessful beef production in terms of failing to create a thriving ranching economy does not rule out being able to trade what fresh slaughtered beef you do have to passing ships for considerably more wealth than what you can get selling it to your equally impoverished neighbor. 

Everything I've read or seen documentaries on says that both Liberia and the British Sierra Leone to their north were founded by whites who meant well, but had zero understanding of agriculture in that climate and the abilities and health risks to the colonists they were sending.  Someone who only knew raising cotton in the US should not have been expected to immediately know how to do subsistence farming in equatorial Africa, especially when their white governors were thinking only in terms of generating trade to keep their organizations afloat.  I have to wonder when your dissertation lists the primary crops as sugar and coffee.  Did they mean to keep that colony totally dependent on cross-Atlantic trade forever?  Were they even thinking about making them self-sufficient?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 May 2013, 08:52:41
Craig has noted that when the Jamestown is in port (e.g., http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_054_0.jpg) sometimes there are no formal weather records, but the air and water temperatures are recorded intermittently in the remarks.

Silvia also noted this on Bear.

Philip has asked us to transcribe this data as Weather Records using the end time of the watch.
Please see Bear -- Reference: Transcription Example and Log Description (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3615.msg62962#msg62962) an an example.


This example from Jamestown is slightly more complicated because they are using nautical days (see: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3191.msg51629#msg51629)

Philip says to please add AM & PM to avoid confusion.

For the above page:
Hour |Wind Dir |Force |Bar Height |Ther Attached |Dry|Wet |Water |Weather Code |Cloud code |Clear Sky |
6 PM8382
8 PM8282
4 AM8081
8 AM8182
meridian8282
   
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 20 May 2013, 11:56:12
And "8 - 12 PM" becomes "midnight"?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 May 2013, 12:00:26
Yes.
In this example, there wasn't any data, so I left it blank.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 May 2013, 07:12:26
I would be curious to hear from Philip how much use is it to have only wind direction, without force and air pressure, when doing weather reconstructions? Of course, the wind force is given in the remarks, but we ignore this. When at sea less than half of the entries contain temperature readings; the rest are simply wind direction.

On the other hand, perhaps it's best that I not know if it is not at all useful because I would really hate to be transcribing it for nothing  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 May 2013, 07:42:07
You are asking us to guess not only what climatologists will do with it now, but what they will want to do with it in the future.  I've no answer to that except, if we don't put it in there will always be a hole in the data.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 May 2013, 07:50:39
I am only asking what Philip is able to do with it now. I didn't say I wouldn't transcribe it anyway. Getting this sort of feedback from the science team is interesting to me.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 May 2013, 07:53:01
Me, too. :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 May 2013, 07:57:17
Here is  confirmation that the flourish we sometimes see following a wind direction is a "d"  - see the date - April 3'd 1845. (of course, I entered 03/04/1845)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_063_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 22 May 2013, 08:38:45
The first one in the example at 2 PM is "S'd + W'd". This is the most common notation. Sometimes its "N'd + E" and then "NE", all mixed together on the same page. Not sure what the difference is. I entered it exactly by TWYS rules.  :-\ Do with it what you want .
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: philip.brohan on 22 May 2013, 09:22:50
We can infer quite a lot from just the wind direction: in the UK for example, if the wind is from the West the weather is mild, if it's from the East it's hot (in summer) or cold (in winter) - this is because of the difference between the stable maritime climate of the north Atlantic and the variable continental climate of Eurasia.

So we're interested in what controls the wind direction - particularly in major climate modes like the North Atlantic Oscillation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Atlantic_oscillation), and the storm tracks. And this study requires observations - long-term fluctuations in UK climate are very much long-term fluctuations in the circulation (wind direction) something which it's still very difficult for our climate models to reconstruct.

From directions alone we can construct Westerlyness indices - measures of the fraction of the time the wind is from the West - see for example Dennis Wheeler's work reconstructing long-term UK climate variability http://hol.sagepub.com/content/16/1/39.abstract (http://hol.sagepub.com/content/16/1/39.abstract) or http://www.meteohistory.org/2005historyofmeteorology2/10wheeler.pdf (http://www.meteohistory.org/2005historyofmeteorology2/10wheeler.pdf)

Of course we'd much rather have wind force, pressure, temperature, ... as well. but there is value in just directions.

I would be curious to hear from Philip how much use is it to have only wind direction, without force and air pressure, when doing weather reconstructions? Of course, the wind force is given in the remarks, but we ignore this. When at sea less than half of the entries contain temperature readings; the rest are simply wind direction.

On the other hand, perhaps it's best that I not know if it is not at all useful because I would really hate to be transcribing it for nothing  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 May 2013, 09:59:43
Thanks, Philip. I will enter wind direction with more enthusiasm now.. Clewi and I could even add "light breeze", "moderate breeze", etc. from the remarks into the Wind Force column

...  just kidding!  ;)

This link http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/bibliography/related_files/sgp0102.pdf says that the North Equatorial Countercurrent flows eastward into the Guinea Current in the Gulf of Guinea between July to September. From January to May the North Equatorial Countercurrent disappears and the surface flow is westward everywhere in the western tropical Atlantic.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 May 2013, 10:11:19
The first one in the example at 2 PM is "S'd + W'd". This is the most common notation. Sometimes its "N'd + E" and then "NE", all mixed together on the same page. Not sure what the difference is. I entered it exactly by TWYS rules.  :-\ Do with it what you want .

You"ve probably noticed that sometimes the log has two directions in the same box, separate by a comma. Presumably these are not concurrent.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 22 May 2013, 10:17:50
A comma? Nope.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 May 2013, 10:29:04
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_064_0.jpg

midnight  "S, W'd"
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 22 May 2013, 10:32:24
This guy's handwriting is quite ambiguous. Later another guy takes over, and there I haven't seen a comma, yet. It's usually a "+", reading "S'd + W'd". But I guess in this case it's the same thing anyway.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 23 May 2013, 07:45:16
What do you think he is trying to say for wind direction at 1 PM (nautical time)? This is obviously not a comma separating the two components. I am gussing N'ly E'd

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_065_1.jpg

Aha, I saw on the following page that the squiggle separating the components is an ampersand. So perhaps N & E'd ?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 23 May 2013, 08:02:06
I agree.  It's the only interpretation that isn't gobbledygook.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 May 2013, 09:04:52
Not at all sure, but could it be some form of by?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 23 May 2013, 09:09:32
I was thinking that too, Randi, but when he intends "by" he writes it very clearly. Also, as I mentioned, I have seen this squiggle on other pages and it is obviously and ampersand in those cases. Perhaps Clewi will have a comment.

Would "by" and "and" be interpreted differently in terms of direction?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 May 2013, 09:58:26
Landlubber thinks so.
N by W is a specific compass point: http://www.cosmik.com/oldweather/81b50ee993e7__1294265292000.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 23 May 2013, 11:34:24
The same sign shows up in the events from time to time, there clearly meant to be "and" (by context), could either be a stylized ampersand or a "+". Since the next guy writes a "+" I have interpreted this as a plus, too. I wasn't sure if it is an ampersand anyway, but there was one comment in the events, I don't recall where it was, where it really looked more like a "+". Whatever, I always entered it as a plus-sign, and the more I saw, the more convinced I was. I don't think that it means "by", because he wrote it as such ( 9 PM, 1 AM and noon in the example above).

Here is an example:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_170_1.jpg

Noon - 4 PM: N'd + E'd
6 to 8 PM: NE
8 to midnight: N + E
4 to 8 AM: N + E'd

All by the same guy! Good luck with those!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 23 May 2013, 11:50:52
That's not the same handwriting as in the April logs, Clewi. I agree that it looks like a + in the October log page.

I am guessing that "&" and "," are equivalent and mean that the wind changed directions during the hour, but that's for the science team to decide.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 23 May 2013, 11:56:26
Of course it is not the same. The whole point was to show how they recorded wind directions on this ship in a better handwriting. I guess that i.e. "N'd + E'd" means variable winds from that quarter, whereas N by E or NE are specific directions.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 23 May 2013, 13:23:04
Point well taken.  :-[
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 28 May 2013, 08:46:59
When in port the wind direction is often given in the remarks so I transcribe it as a weather observation. Usually it is N'd & E'd while in the Cape Verde Is. and sometimes the log keeper writes N'd & E'd trade . Other times just "trade". Since "trade" denotes a wind direction will the science team be able to use this?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 May 2013, 09:00:26
I'll check with Philip...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 May 2013, 15:51:55
Quote from: philip.brohan
Hi Randi.

 I don't know exactly what use could be made of it. Some good work has been done with quantification of wind descriptors - see for example the CLIWOC dictionary http://www.knmi.nl/publications/showAbstract.php?id=641 .

'Trade', does not tell us about wind strength - it's an indicator of the type of wind. I'd GUESS that Craig's ship is in the North-East trades, which are famously regular and reliable, and the entry essentially says 'weather as expected' I.e. 'nothing to report'.

 In the short term I think we will pass that observation to the scientists simply as a wind direction of NE. There is value in that (it tells us that any local storms are not reaching the ship location) - though we'd rather have pressure and temperature etc.

Cheers, Philip

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 28 May 2013, 16:31:08
That was my point, that it is a synonym for NE - not for wind strength. The latter is given as well but Philip can't use this information unless it is numeric.

So when I see "trade" I will enter it NE in the wind direction.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 29 May 2013, 13:03:04
Quote from: philip.brohan
In the short term I think we will pass that observation to the scientists simply as a wind direction of NE. There is value in that (it tells us that any local storms are not reaching the ship location) - though we'd rather have pressure and temperature etc.

Cheers, Philip


I find it very frustrating that we are spending so much time going through these very old logs and not picking up useful information, such as cloud cover, precipitation and wind force. I understand all the arguments against using non-coded data from the remarks but, with all there is left to do with the US logs, I don't see the day when someone else will come back and capture this information. Of course, we could enter it in Events but this more difficult (because of box proliferation).

From my admittedly limited perspective it seems that some prioritizing of logs might be useful for climate science, at least. Ships that sit for long periods in a ports where other sources of meteorological data are available could receive a lower priority while voyages of ships that are travelling in areas where the biggest data gaps exist should get highest priority. Ships? logs that are very difficult should perhaps be reserved for those with experience and who also visit the forum. If this were done certain conventions could be agreed upon that would allow entering a wider range of data.

I understand that allowing non-coded data in the Weather Observations cells complicates things for the programmers, but it happens anyway. We will often get wind directions that are not in a standard format (such as N?d & E?d or N?ly and E?ly). I propose that we pick up wind force information, for example. This could be limited to a dozen or so key terms such as breeze, wind, gale, light, fresh, moderate, strong, etc. If Philip doesn?t have the time to convert these into numeric values at this point, at least the data would be there in a standard format to process in the future. Entering the data into Event boxes is much more time consuming for transcribers and it is not arranged in a way that is as amenable to processing. (I have had a lot of experience in writing programs to parse and organize data). Similar conventions could be perhaps be established for weather codes and cloud cover.

I anticipate that there will be a lot of objections to this proposal but I think it is worth having a discussion about it. There is a huge amount of work to be done and there are not many people doing it (if you exclude the many people who join and only do a few log pages and then give up). I think the science team can get a lot more value out of the dedicated people who visit the forum if we are used in a more rational way. Treating everyone as basic data capturers worked well for the UK ships, but I think the circumstances have changed with the US logs. There appears to be enough work ahead of us for many years. Why not try to make the most of us who are experienced and are willing to work together to get the most out of the logs?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 29 May 2013, 13:32:03
Craig, assume they are all smart enough to have a search engine to search out specific terms used to describe wind and weather.  Assume caring transcribers like you have transcribed everything you think should be used.  Assume the climatologists are smart enough to run that search to look for those terms when they are ready to work on that data.

Work like this is a long term resource that future climatologists will be keeping an eye on for years.  Our work is much appreciated.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 29 May 2013, 15:52:48
I can certainly make those assumptions, Janet, but I know that unless there is some concerted effort between three transcribers and the project team to provide something coherent, the data won't be used for climate models.

For starters, I will probably be the only one capturing these items unless Philip encourages us. Second, we would have to agree on what exactly to capture and where to put it, and third, we would need to reserve some ships for experienced people who visit the Forum.

I am not disputing the fact that our work is much appreciated. However, there is a big difference between what gets recorded in Remarks and what get's recorded in Weather Observations.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 29 May 2013, 18:48:27
I hear you.  I think the difference between us is, I thinking 2 or 3 layers.  First the climatologists get the numerical data - quick, logical, easy to put into databases fast.  Then, when there is a time, getting someone - student labor? - to go more carefully through the comments on weather and interpret in into digital spreadsheets.  And for that, it absolutely does not need more than one.  No one is using an algorithm to determine accuracy.  So any one transcriber's efforts are valid and will be used when the time comes for it.

I've worked with data.  The judging of accuracy between the numerical and prose is night and day.  They cannot be handled the same.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 29 May 2013, 21:01:51
I think we are converging upon agreement, Janet. Philip does not have time now to deal with non-code text. Where we diverge is the assumption of future "student labor" or whatever. I doubt this will happen. What is certain is that there are three of us going through each log page now, and the incremental cost of picking up the necessary information is small if it can be entered easily. You are right that once it is in electronic format it will be easy to convert it to codes, assuming we standardize the way we enter it. If the climate team is satisfied with only using the work of one transcriber, that is fine with me and I will volunteer to do it. Remember, though, that handwriting sometimes makes it difficult to decipher the text.

I find it extremely wasteful for us to go through the thousands of log pages and only pick up wind direction and sporadic temperature readings when we could be picking up other valuable information (referring to logs like those of Jamestown 1845). I think the arguments for ignoring this are a hangover from the UK logs when we had a lot more volunteers and standard log formats that were filled out relatively well. Circumstances have changed. This doesn't have to affect the current edit software. Non-expected text entries in Weather Observation fields can just be ignored (especially if only one person is entering them).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 29 May 2013, 21:27:54
Again, I hear you.  If I understand Philip's needs (I may be wrong), climatologists in general need every bit of historical data they can get their hands on.  Soon.  Anything is 100% more than they had for some of these oceanic areas.  They need to start building models now, both their funding and their ability to address the conditions we need to cope with sociologically demand it.

Once they have the easy stuff, they will be seriously itching to fill in the spaces.  And very, very quickly in the annals of naval recording, you have to start interpreting prose accounts to get the best possible effect.  There will still be huge banks of "fog of ignorance" demanding answers.  Bare in mind, they might be able to create another Zooniverse project to have amateurs convert the prose to digital - again with demanding 3 to 5 duplicate conversions.

My experience in quality control says, we must avoid first transcribing and then converting in the same operation.  That, I believe, is condemning the process to produce either bad transcriptions or bad conversions - both happening on the same text from different volunteers.  They simply require different thought processes.  And that includes what you want to do.  IF Philip would allow it, I'd have to say you should do straight transcription for a week of logs, and then go back and convert it.  I would not trust most volunteers to not get the two procedures confused.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 30 May 2013, 07:27:45
I agree. I wasn't thinking of converting the words into codes while transcribing. The important thing now is to pick up the text while we are going through the logs. At some later point someone could figure out how to convert them to codes. I think that step would be the fun part because most of it could be done mechanically. For instance, the table already exists to convert wind force terms into codes.

Now that I think of it, since the weather remarks are only given 6 times a day, it doesn't make as much sense to mix them in with the hourly weather observations in the same capture window. I could just put the time along with the remarks in an Event box. For example, here is 04/06/1845

If I transcribed these, I would leave the "interesting" remarks to the others to pick up. But I won't volunteer to do this extra work unless Philip says that it is not necessary to have 3 copies of these weather remarks. I want to be assured that it is worth my effort.

And to make it easier, I would be like to omit re-entering the time. So could Philip deduce the time by the position? For example, if I put the Event box beside the Weather Observation box could the time of Event be deduced from the Weather Observation? Since I would be using Event only for weather there shouldn't be any confusion.  I tried it and it's too much of a bother to position the Event boxes. It's easier just to enter the time.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 30 May 2013, 09:04:06
In this project, comments remain optional.  Do what you feel will let you relax and know this issue is covered.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: philip.brohan on 30 May 2013, 09:15:04
The core issue, I think, is Craig's comment "I want to be assured that it is worth my effort". I agree with this wholeheartedly - one of the core principles underlying oldWeather is that we are all working collaboratively on the project and we don't waste anybody's time.

One of my jobs is to take the weather observations as transcribed, convert them into standard formats, and get them used in current scientific projects. This is more difficult for some sorts of data than others, and I concentrate my effort on the sorts of data that we know we can currently use, and where there is lots of data in the same format - that's what is efficient. The user interface for oW is designed to help capture that data (the regular format temperature, pressure, wind etc.)

Of course many of us are now experts in reading and understanding the logs, like Craig, and we can capture pretty much anything, but that doesn't mean I can convert it into standard formats, or my colleagues know how to use it in their research. We'd like to have it, and I'm sure we could eventually use it, but rare and unusually-formatted data is always going to be a low priority, so it may take a long time.

So while this is useful data, and I like Craig's idea for how to capture it - I can't guarantee to hold up my end of the bargain and turn it into science - there is a risk that transcribing it is a waste of your time because it won't be used. I can't assure you that it is worth your effort.


Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 30 May 2013, 09:23:46
Thanks, Philip.  That boils down to whether you feel like an optimist or a pessimist.  They both seem to stand an equal opportunity of being right.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 30 May 2013, 10:27:32
I am willing to take a chance and capture the weather remarks if they will potentially be used even though there may only be one transcription rather than three. Can I get an affirmation on that much, at least, Philip?

I would also be happy to work on converting them to codes once the remarks have all been captured. I could write a visual basic routine to assist in this process, once we have all agreed upon the mapping between words and codes.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 May 2013, 15:44:07
Thank you for your feedback Philip.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 31 May 2013, 11:32:50
It think this situation falls to some extent into the same category as the database and geographical place names initiatives, even though it is specific to a couple of ships. I understand that Philip doesn't have time to deal with data that is not in a readily usable form. But, if we capture it on our own and convert it into usable codes then at some point Philip or somebody else may become interested. However, there are a couple of obstacles to making it happen. First, without keeping a separate file (and the extra work that entails) we won?t have access to the data that is typed into the Events boxes unless Philip is willing to extract it for us. Second, how do we deal with the three-transcribers problem? Although triple transcription is not required for Remarks information, once it becomes weather data it may be necessary if it is to be of comparable quality as the regular coded information. Arguably, the biggest uncertainty with the wind force and especially the weather conditions and cloud cover information is not the quality of a single transcription, but the vagueness of the information provided and how this is converted into codes. Wind force terms are relatively good, but cloud descriptions are usually not more specific than clear, passing clouds or simply ?cloudy?. This may be the main reason why Philip  hesitates to deal with it now, even if we do all the work.

We have heard Philip say that wind direction data by itself is of some use but it is clear that without wind force it doesn?t say very much, especially without air pressure data (which Jamestown-1845 doesn?t have). A compromise solution might be only to pick up form the Remarks the words for wind strength and convert those to codes. My guess is that this is the indicator, of those available, that would be most useful and it is the best described.

So, should I just forget all this and get on transcribing as usual, or do you think there is something we can do to make a useful product without bothering Philip (other than, perhaps, a file extraction or two)? If the verdict is that we absolutely need more than 1 transcription is anyone else interested?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 31 May 2013, 11:45:28
I am, at the moment, transcribing ALL events (whole watch into 1 event, then cut and paste for people, ships, etc.). I am still on Thetis, but can soon change to Yukon or Jamestown. Given my current transcription rate, I'm not sure it will make much difference :( ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 31 May 2013, 12:15:40
That's encouraging, Randi. I am willing to go back to the beginning of Jamestown and transcribe all the weather information.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: philip.brohan on 31 May 2013, 12:26:29
Whatever you decide - don't start a separate file. Anything you transcribe is captured in the database - I may not have the capability to analyze it all (soon), but if you or anyone else have a serious plan to do your own analysis, I am sure we can arrange it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 31 May 2013, 13:12:50
Thank you, Philip.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 31 May 2013, 14:38:37
We are still using the results of an Old Weather-like project set on foot by the German physicist Felix M. Exner more than 100 years ago. Just in ways unimaginable to Dr. Exner and his colleagues. Using 'rescued' data he was able to produce the first maps of winter pressure and temperature anomaly associated with what is now recognized as the Northern Annual Mode (or Arctic Oscillation) in 1913. 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 31 May 2013, 14:58:17
In other words, let's capture the Jamestown data even if they are not in a convenient format?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 31 May 2013, 14:59:34
Bottom line, comments are optional.  You've heard what is now and what might be.  It is most important to do with it what makes you most comfortable.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 31 May 2013, 15:19:23
That's encouraging, Randi. I am willing to go back to the beginning of Jamestown and transcribe all the weather information.
I assume you are talking about the 1845 voyage?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 31 May 2013, 15:49:51
That's encouraging, Randi. I am willing to go back to the beginning of Jamestown and transcribe all the weather information.
I assume you are talking about the 1845 voyage?

Yes, that's the one I am now doing.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 31 May 2013, 18:18:12
If its compelling. On the other hand, there is a lot of great material to work with that is easier to analyze.

By the way, we've been having some interesting discussion about how the US National Archives might use OW output to transform the public/research experience around one-of-a-kind documents by enabling word-level search.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 31 May 2013, 18:19:53
Now that would be interesting!!  It would completely solve the "are weather comments findable and usable" question.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 01 June 2013, 08:58:09
Jamestown gets a barometer  8)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_109_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 01 June 2013, 20:44:28
We begin to get barometer readings in the Remarks now - July 9, 1845: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_112_1.jpg

I am adding them into the Weather Observations corresponding to the end of the watch, along with the temperatures, until advice to the contrary. So, for the first watch from 1 to 4 PM I will put 30.22 into the 4 PM entry.

I'll bet he's pretty proud of his new barometer  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 01 June 2013, 20:58:07
That is perfect - he probably coddles it like a new toy.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 01 June 2013, 21:13:32
Not only that, he is assiduously recording temperatures at every watch. Before the barometer he was pretty lax about it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 01 June 2013, 22:48:48
New toys motivate all kinds of things. :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 June 2013, 06:43:25
Typing the whole page of events into Notepad and then pasting it into the event box works well.
This makes it easy to cut and paste from one watch to another and one day to another.
(I also paste it into Word to make sure I haven't added any misspellings.)

(On Thetis, where events were more detailed, I did one watch per event box.)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 02 June 2013, 07:23:24
You may get tired of typing entire pages for the Jamestown, Randi, because most of the text is usally just descriptions of sailing manoeuvers. On the other hand, maybe  you won't  ;)

In thinking ahead to the possibility of converting the weather terms to codes, it might be more useful to have each watch in a separate Event box, since they will ultimately need to be matched to the corresponding hourly weather entries. It would be useful to have Philip's input on what we might do in anticipation of this.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 June 2013, 07:42:48
Each watch starts with the time, so it should be possible to split them up.
Right now I have weather grids with 24 records/page, so I'm recording all the watches is one single event (much easier ;) ).
I'll see what happens when there are no weather grids...

PS - I'm not transcribing Expended and On Hand. I'm not that crazy - and I am a lousy typist ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 June 2013, 15:53:48
Cover of logbook 1844-1845

(http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_002_0.jpg)(http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_002_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 02 June 2013, 15:56:05
Now that was elegant.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 04 June 2013, 08:58:04
It is interesting that the Jamestown met the Yorktown in 1845. We don't have the Yorktown logs for that period, it seems?

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_131_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 June 2013, 09:11:19
I think it must have been a different Yorktown: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Yorktown_%281839%29
Ours is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Yorktown_%28PG-1%29
http://www.naval-history.net/OWShips-USNShipsList.htm#Yorktown
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 June 2013, 09:28:08
Our Yorktown was launched in 1888.
http://www.naval-history.net/OWShips-USNShipsList.htm#Yorktown

I think you met this ship:
DANFS: http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/y1/yorktown-i.htm
Quote
The first Yorktown?laid down in 1838 by the Norfolk Navy Yard and launched in 1839?was commissioned on 15 November 1840, Comdr. John H. Aulick in command.

I can't find an image of her, only her sister ship Dale.
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/USS_Dale_%281839%29.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 04 June 2013, 11:10:53
Are these logs in the pipeline?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 June 2013, 11:38:31
I do not believe so.  No one told Gordon to expect them, anyway.  He never mentions this vessel, just Yorktown (2).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 June 2013, 12:34:01
Silvia wanted to enter temperature and pressure data from the Remarks page when there was no weather grid.

Then Craig wanted to add wind direction and Philip said " I suggest putting as much as possible in the weather ob - if there's wind, add it in."

So, for the attached example, I asked if entering "light breezes" and "pleasant" was going too far.

Philip replied
Quote
Hi Randi.
  I would say put it in - let's capture as much as possible.
  I have to remind you that I can't guarantee to analyse it successfully (we should be able to use the temperature, even if we don't get three repetitions, but the rest is speculative). But it is great to see it being captured.
Cheers, Philip




Note that, like transcribing remarks in general, this is entirely optional.

I am only doing this when there is no weather grid (as here: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_048_0.jpg)



NOTE:
1. The end time of the watch is used.
2. Although only "light" shows in the Force box, I actually entered "light breezes".
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 04 June 2013, 18:40:51
Well, this is a lot easier that putting the information into Event boxes  8). 

Does this mean we can put "pafsing clouds", "clear" , "rain", "intermittant rain" in the Weather code box, as well as "moderate breeze", "fresh breeze" "moderate wind", etc. in the Force box? That would be perfect! It would take me half as long to do a page.

I have been using Event boxes for weather terms since 06/06/1845 and I am near the end of August now. Is there any point in going back and loading everything into the Weather Observation boxes?


Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 June 2013, 19:04:17
Every transcriber who isn't a forum member is doing it in events, so no point in going back.  All of these older free-form logs are going to be difficult.  If it is a letter-coded box, you can input what the log keeper wrote.  I don't know if the force numbers box will allow that, but you can try. 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 June 2013, 19:08:56
Well, this is a lot easier that putting the information into Event boxes  8). 

Does this mean we can put "pafsing clouds", "clear" , "rain", "intermittant rain" in the Weather code box, as well as "moderate breeze", "fresh breeze" "moderate wind", etc. in the Force box? That would be perfect! It would take me half as long to do a page.
Yes! I thought it would be easier to do - and easier to use also ;D
(I hope you meant passing clouds?)


I have been using Event boxes for weather terms since 06/06/1845 and I am near the end of August now. Is there any point in going back and loading everything into the Weather Observation boxes?
I don't think so - you could always do it later if you wanted to.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 June 2013, 19:09:40
Every transcriber who isn't a forum member is doing it in events, so no point in going back.  All of these older free-form logs are going to be difficult.  If it is a letter-coded box, you can input what the log keeper wrote.  I don't know if the force numbers box will allow that, but you can try.
It does
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 June 2013, 19:14:19
Go for it! :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 04 June 2013, 19:23:28
The log keeper does write "pafsing clouds".
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 June 2013, 19:44:33
except us transcribers are supposed to be able to translate that germanic thing in the double 's' - miracle workers and seeing back over time, you know. ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 04 June 2013, 20:24:30
Is that another "TWYS, yes but ..."   ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 04 June 2013, 20:36:19
5 March 1845 4 more men flogged. This ship is not for the faint hearted!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 June 2013, 03:32:35
Is that another "TWYS, yes but ..."   ;D

Well, since we don't have the double 's' key on our keyboard, we have to do the best we can - like when they draw a picture of an anchor :D
(it usually looks like a 'p' to me)
http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3534.msg58942#msg58942
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 05 June 2013, 06:06:27
5 March 1845 4 more men flogged. This ship is not for the faint hearted!

This is a fairly frequent event on the Jamestown. " a doz of the Cats" as he says. You get used to it - although the crew mustn't have  :D They could have probably been thankful that it wasn't a baker's dozen.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 05 June 2013, 06:13:32
Interesting comment on the calliagrapy, Joan. My nib days are in the distant past. I think it was in grade 4 or 5 that we graduated to ball point.

I am still not sure whether to put ss or fs, Randi? It does often look like a "p" but I afsumed it was an "f".
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 June 2013, 06:59:31
Quote from: AvastMH
A very good description of how that odd double ss came about is given in Wiki's description of the long s written like a capital B.  The split '0' or loop on a '6' (or in other round forms) comes about because the shape of the letters is formed by pressure on the nib rather than the angle of the nib.
Joan
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 June 2013, 07:15:54
Interesting comment on the calliagrapy, Joan. My nib days are in the distant past. I think it was in grade 4 or 5 that we graduated to ball point.

I am still not sure whether to put ss or fs, Randi? It does often look like a "p" but I afsumed it was an "f".

As I understand it, it is not actually an f or a p but a "long s". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_s and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F)
I think it is correct, and far less confusing, to transcribe it as ss. If people really want to know what the log books look like, then they should look at them.
However, I think it is up to you.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 05 June 2013, 08:19:22
"ss" it is.

It's a real (light) breeze transcribing the Jamestown now! In fact, it's pafsing marvellous!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 June 2013, 09:11:05
 ::) ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 June 2013, 10:28:38
I hope the historians enjoy the "25 Bushels of Coal" ;D



Rec'd 12 bags of charcoal from Navy Store Keeper.
and
3 cords of wood (not sure if that is for construction or heating)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 05 June 2013, 10:49:08
It might make them peckish  ;D :D :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 07 June 2013, 09:03:25
Occasionally the log keeper indicates the weather conditions for "the first part" and "the latter part" of a watch. Since we enter the end time of the watch, I have only been entering the weather for the latter part.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 June 2013, 12:20:58
That makes sense to me.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 07 June 2013, 13:04:25
It very much makes sense.  If there are changes also from the previous watch, my instinct would be to time it at mid-watch (end of the first part.)  Consistent with current Philip-instructions.

Keeping in mind that is still all optional.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 June 2013, 15:42:42
NOTE: This only applies when there are no weather grids.

I have updated this example based on discussions with Philip and Craig.
If you are willing to, you can also transcribe the wind direction, wind force, and weather. Some of these descriptions, like "light breezes" (as a wind force), will not be useable in the current analysis, but they may be used in the future. Some entries are straightforward, but some are a compromise between TWYS and mapping to the fields. Just do your best ;)

Craig has noted that when the Jamestown is in port (e.g., http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_054_0.jpg) sometimes there are no formal weather records, but the air and water temperatures are recorded intermittently in the remarks.

Silvia also noted this on Bear.

Philip has asked us to transcribe this data as Weather Records using the end time of the watch.
Please see Bear -- Reference: Transcription Example and Log Description (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3615.msg62962#msg62962) an an example.

This example from Jamestown is slightly more complicated because they are using nautical days (see: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3191.msg51629#msg51629)

Philip says to please add AM & PM to avoid confusion.


For the above page:
Hour |Wind Dir |Force |Bar Height |Ther Attached |Dry|Wet |Water |Weather Code |Cloud code |Clear Sky |
6 PMS'd + W'dlight breezes8382cloudy, light rain
8 PMWest'dlight breezes8282passing clouds
4 AMvariablelight breezes8081squally appearances, heavy rain, vivid lightening
8 AMWest'dlight airs8182cloudy, vivid lightening
meridianvariablelight airs8282squally appearances



Don't forget that we are learning how to handle many of these cases as they arise ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 June 2013, 09:01:05
Sometimes there are minor differences between what is recorded in the weather table and what is written in the logs. For example, at 6 PM the table says "Calm" for wind direction whereas the remarks say "light airs". http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_175_0.jpg

I am transcribing the information from the table. I only add remarks information when there is nothing in the table for that item.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 11 June 2013, 13:47:24
That sounds good, the easiest way to get consistency.  I see it very easy, for it to be really calm when you right the hourly readings, and have a Light Airs spring up when you are summarizing the past log. 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: philip.brohan on 11 June 2013, 16:22:02
I've started to process the transcriptions from the Jamestown - it's early days in the transcription, but I'm checking that all the ingenuity being put into the transcriptions is coming through in the processed data.

My current favourite check is the markup video (http://blog.oldweather.org/2013/04/10/markup-videos), these worked well for the Rodgers, Manning etc. making nice little short videos. For the Jamestown, they still work, but it's not so much an animated short as a three-reel epic: the videos last for 1 second per page + 0.1 seconds per item transcribed, and the result for Jamestown 1844 already runs for 1 hour 27 minutes.

I've still got a couple of bugs to work out (my software is currently confused by nautical days), but it's looking good - in particular we are getting the weather from events.

Thanks, Philip.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 June 2013, 16:39:49
 ;D

Thank YOU!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 11 June 2013, 16:50:38
Thank you very much.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 June 2013, 17:13:51
Very neat, Philip!

I can't imagine why the Jamestown 1844 runs for so long. Clewi and I have only done about 300 to 400 pages each.  ??? 
Perhaps it's because Randi is transcribing everything  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 June 2013, 17:28:41
and I've done a whole 8 pages so far ::) ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 June 2013, 18:47:23
We just met the American Barque "Madonna":
http://books.google.fr/books?id=MISSqOqfrRIC&pg=PA79&lpg=PA79&dq=%22Madonna%22&source=bl&ots=uO0wZwBa1f&sig=30L02E7FJfmu1qMMdxU9rIn_dHg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jue4UdHEMMKxO9T1gYgJ&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Madonna%22&f=false
background:
http://books.google.fr/books?id=eU3SH0XvFYoC&pg=PA104&lpg=PA104&dq=richard+lawlin+%22Madonna%22&source=bl&ots=fe-MP62GZP&sig=ClVB9s3TNCHXA1hqLrWL3K4U7Vk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=W-u4UYHIMIrvOcmagbAC&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=richard%20lawlin%20%22Madonna%22&f=false

So have the French - some years earlier ;D:
http://books.google.fr/books?id=E7YTAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA5-PA63&lpg=RA5-PA63&dq=American+Barque+%22Madonna%22&source=bl&ots=cKmBp7iSH9&sig=514ltDBzU7BvlCGWiXmsxp1S6hQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jue4UdHEMMKxO9T1gYgJ&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=American%20Barque%20%22Madonna%22&f=false
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 June 2013, 08:18:30
Good find, Randi. Here's a map from Donald L. Canny's book.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 June 2013, 12:58:32
Beginning about mid November 1845 the day's log spills over onto a second page. For the first few times, the date is recorded on the second page but after that it is not. Of course, I don't transcribe what is not there.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 June 2013, 13:18:27
 :-* ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 14 June 2013, 07:47:36
It's not to clear what is going on here http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_191_0.jpg but the Yorktown has taken control of the American Schooner, "Merchant". The following page describes it as the "Prize schooner". I suppose it must have been a slave ship.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 June 2013, 09:14:31
http://books.google.fr/books?id=MISSqOqfrRIC&pg=PA80&lpg=PA80&dq=American+Schooner,+%22Merchant%22&source=bl&ots=uO0w-qAaVc&sig=0oKnYViJyrynu8Xzkf9KX8MNdzA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NAa7UaqkI4aiO4rWgKgE&ved=0CFYQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=American%20Schooner%2C%20%22Merchant%22&f=false

http://www.pdavis.nl/SL1845.htm

not too helpful :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: propriome on 14 June 2013, 09:55:20
Here's a wiki article describing the "African Slave Trade Patrol":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Slave_Trade_Patrol#Africa_Squadron

Quote
VesselCaptorDateLocation
Merchant   Jamestown (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Jamestown_(1844))   12 March 1845   Sierra Leone   

Jamestown captured also the "Robert Wilson" almost one year later, on 15 January 1846.
The Commodore Perry was the ship commanding the Africa Squadron (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa_Squadron)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 June 2013, 10:07:56
Here's a wiki article describing the "African Slave Trade Patrol":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Slave_Trade_Patrol#Africa_Squadron

Quote
VesselCaptorDateLocation
Merchant   Jamestown (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Jamestown_(1844))   12 March 1845   Sierra Leone   
...

 :o
No we didn't.
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_052_0.jpg
and we were off the coast of Liberia: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3640.msg67939#msg67939
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: propriome on 14 June 2013, 10:23:20
 :o :o

That's quite odd... maybe a date mismatch on wiki?

On the logpage Craig has reported, they're in Sierra Leone and captured the Merchant... ship, location and captor seems right... the logpage date is 3 December 1845, wikipedia record is 9 months earlier ???

It seems the list in wiki entry comes from Canney, D.L., "Africa Squadron", Potomac Books, 2006, pp. 233-234
It's partly available on Google Books: http://books.google.it/books?id=_E6WNW3ELi0C&pg=PT4&lpg=PP1&dq=&q&f=false#v=onepage&q&f=false , but pages 233-234 are not available.

Here though: http://books.google.it/books?id=MISSqOqfrRIC&printsec=frontcover&dq=&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2xy7UZVW8vjhBJjSgZAB&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
On the page 80 the capture of Merchant is enlisted as happening on December, and page 233 is available.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: propriome on 14 June 2013, 10:46:40
Mystery solved ;D ;D ;D ;D

The wiki article author has had a little problem with the american date format.
The capture is listed in the mentioned book on page 233 as happening 12/3/45

He has read it, European style, as 12 March 1845, instead than 3 December 1845  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 June 2013, 11:07:48
  ;D ;D ;D

(http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_0490.gif)



But he seems to have gotten most of the other ones right ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: propriome on 14 June 2013, 11:23:10
Yup, was cheking too... probably he was distracted only while transcribing that one :) (and obviously - Murphy Laws never fail - the only one we were actually looking for ;D)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 14 June 2013, 12:56:31
And that one date in the Wiki article has now been corrected.
(Thanks to Kathy Wendolk, we have formal permission to use our logs as acknowledged sources for fixing mistakes.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Slave_Trade_Patrol#Africa_Squadron
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 14 June 2013, 13:26:31
Wow, a lot has happened since my post this morning  8). Good work, Mateo! (I hope I have your name right?) And Janet for fixing the Wiki article.

The Canney book does provide a good account of what happened. The logs just leave one guessing. If it weren't for Google Books there is a lot we would never know.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 14 June 2013, 13:39:59
For fixes like this, we don't need the logs to tell the story, just tell us the particular detail involved.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: propriome on 14 June 2013, 14:47:16
Thank you Craig :)

And thanks Janet as well for the wiki fix (there would be another page with the wrong date, which describes specifically the Africa Squadron only: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa_Squadron)!

PS: It's Matteo with a double t, but it's close enough ;) ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 14 June 2013, 15:43:32
Second article also fixed.  They don't know about each other, neither as a reference to the other at the end.  I also added those "See also" refs. ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 June 2013, 16:04:09
Wow, a lot has happened since my post this morning  8). Good work, Mateo! (I hope I have your name right?) And Janet for fixing the Wiki article.

The Canney book does provide a good account of what happened. The logs just leave one guessing. If it weren't for Google Books there is a lot we would never know.

If it weren't for the logs, we wouldn't be looking at Google Books ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 14 June 2013, 16:26:18
If it weren't for climate change, I wouldn't be looking at the logs.  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 June 2013, 16:41:16
King Freeman from Cape Palmas came on board
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_054_1.jpg

He was the king of one of the native tribes.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 19 June 2013, 09:06:51
Quote from: philip.brohan

 In the short term I think we will pass that observation to the scientists simply as a wind direction of NE. There is value in that (it tells us that any local storms are not reaching the ship location) - though we'd rather have pressure and temperature etc.

Cheers, Philip


Just to make sure we are all on the same page, as it were, if the log says "moderate trades" without specifying the direction, I am putting "N'd & E'd" in the wind direction and "moderate trades" in the wind force. I put "N'd & E'd" rather than "NE" because there are minor variances in how he records the trade winds and without a specific direction we can't be sure that it was exactly NE. He records N'd & E'd much more often than "NE"

I know that "trades" is not a wind force but I put in "moderate trades" just to show that this is what was written.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 June 2013, 10:16:09
I have passed the question on to Philip ;)



I am waiting for clarification, but I do NOT think converting "trade" to  "N'd & E'd" is going to be acceptable because it is not TWYS. Don't forget that these transcriptions are not just for Philip but also for future users. They will need to know what was in the log rather than our interpretations.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 June 2013, 18:28:47
We should not input information not in the log. If it says 'trade' put in 'trade', if "N'd & E'd trade", put in either "N'd & E'd" or "N'd & E'd trade". In both cases that's a direction - it says nothing about the force so leave the force box blank. If it said 'moderate trade', or 'gentle trade', moderate and gentle would be acceptable force entries (if the current interface will take them - I haven't checked).

It's great to select appropriate information from the log - we must not make inferences from the log while transcribing. (We can do that in post-processing and editing steps, and we will, but not while transcribing). Stay as close to TWYS as possible.

Cheers, Philip


Thank you very much Philip!

Force accepts "moderate breezes" and "light airs", so "gentle" should not be a problem.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 20 June 2013, 08:41:35
I went back and changed my transcriptions to conform to Philip's indications above.

I think it will be fairly easy for someone to codify the weather information from the remarks section of the logs. The wording has been very consistent.

Wind force is mainly: calm, light airs, light breezes, moderate breezes, fresh breezes, strong breezes, or simply light, moderate, fresh or strong when combined with "trades"

Weather conditions are mostly: pleasant, clear, hazy, passing clouds or cloudy. There has rarely been rain or stormy weather so far in the voyage.

This is based on the beginning of the logs to February 1846, in the Cape Verde Islands, Canaries and off the coast of Liberia and Sierra Leone.

The barometer readings appear to be inconsistent. They don't vary much and when they do they don't seem to be related to the other conditions, such as rain and strong winds.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 20 June 2013, 10:02:20
Thank you for taking this on, Craig.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: philip.brohan on 20 June 2013, 10:54:02
Thanks Craig.

 From the Cliwoc dictionary (http://www.knmi.nl/publications/showAbstract.php?id=641) we will be able to translate the log terms to Beaufort forces as:

  calm = Force 0
  light airs = 1
  light breeze = 2
  fresh breeze = 5
  moderate = 4

And so on for many others - this assumes the American crew of the Jamestown used the same vocabulary as English mariners of the same period, which is likely, but we'll have to check.

So that looks very promising.
 
As for the inconsistent barometer - that's a reflection of life in the tropics. In the high latitudes where most of us live, the atmosphere is approximately geostrophic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostrophic_wind) - the pressure and the Coriolis force balance each other to form cyclones and anti-cyclones: revolving wind systems which dominate the weather. So the pressure varies a lot as the cyclones move through and there is a strong relationship between the barometer signal and the weather. In the tropics the Coriolis force is much less, the winds are trades rather than cyclones, the pressure (and so barometer) varies much less, and rain comes from squalls and showers rather than from cyclones. So it's not well signalled by the barometer. You still need to keep an eye on the barometer in the tropics though, because if it starts to fall, that means a tropical storm (i.e. trouble).

You can sort-of see the difference in this video (https://vimeo.com/68078220) note the generally smooth behaviour of the winds close to the equator (north-east and south-east trades), and the much more cyclonic behaviour further away.
I went back and changed my transcriptions to conform to Philip's indications above.

I think it will be fairly easy for someone to codify the weather information from the remarks section of the logs. The wording has been very consistent.

Wind force is mainly: calm, light airs, light breezes, moderate breezes, fresh breezes, strong breezes, or simply light, moderate, fresh or strong when combined with "trades"

Weather conditions are mostly: pleasant, clear, hazy, passing clouds or cloudy. There has rarely been rain or stormy weather so far in the voyage.

This is based on the beginning of the logs to February 1846, in the Cape Verde Islands, Canaries and off the coast of Liberia and Sierra Leone.

The barometer readings appear to be inconsistent. They don't vary much and when they do they don't seem to be related to the other conditions, such as rain and strong winds.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 20 June 2013, 11:43:44
Very interesting, Philip. The barometer sometimes drops suddenly but nothing has happened so far. I am looking forward to a bit of variety.  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 June 2013, 19:04:52
These guys take wind direction seriously!
SWbyW 1/2 W
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 20 June 2013, 19:47:00
Yeah, then they follow that with a N'd & W'd.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 21 June 2013, 08:38:28
I still find the weather pictograms on the right to be useful, even though they can be amusing when I type in words. For example, "clear" gives my dark clouds, lightning and driving rain whereas "cloudy" gives me the same thing but rain falling veritically. "pleasant" gives me dark clouds, lightning and snow whereas "hazy" is represented by dark rain drops falling at an angle.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 June 2013, 13:22:53
I've noticed them too - here and on Yukon 1 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 June 2013, 11:45:18
My log keeper tends to write lbs as lbs.
Since he sometimes crosses his l's, I thought this was just a quirk.
However, I discovered that it is a valid form: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_%28mass%29
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 27 June 2013, 07:45:52
Good detective work, Randi. That makes me feel better about it.  ;) :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 28 June 2013, 08:49:10
A new record - 15 on the sick list.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_042_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 02 July 2013, 08:33:31
I couldn't find the thread where we used to indicate pages inserted in the logs

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_067_1.jpg

to

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_069_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 July 2013, 09:05:19
Neat!

http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3390.0

Although here is fine too.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 02 July 2013, 11:48:48
There was a case in WW1 when the entire crew of a merchant ship was struck with blackwater fever on the west coast of Africa (see 'The Strange Ordeal of the NORMANDIER') - which left them drifting helplessly in mid-ocean when they couldn't keep up steam. So there might likely be plenty of this in the JAMESTOWN logs I'd guess.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 02 July 2013, 11:56:59
Could be, Kevin. When they got to Boston from the Caribbean they discharged 5 seamen to the navel hospital.

In July 1847 there were 6 people on the sick report and they were anchored in Boston Harbor.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 02 July 2013, 12:20:34
In July 1847, while in port, the Jamestown is on civil time. During the 1846 voyage they were always on nautical time. I will have to get used to this.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 July 2013, 13:06:56
 :o :o :o
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 03 July 2013, 08:30:59
The ship is in dry dock in Norfolk on August 1, 1847. 20 men on the sick list. I think they have a lot more people aboard now, though because there are some marines with them. I think I saw a total of 135 or so (crew and passengers) when they left Boston.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_015_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 03 July 2013, 10:31:18
Sounds like they definitely have some kind of flu going through the ship - hope it is of the 24-hour type.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 July 2013, 07:03:38
The wind direction recorded for the 1846-7 Jamestown voyages is almost always approximate, such as "S'd & W'd" or "N'd". It is very rare to see SW or N. Of course, one could expect some variation during a 4 hour watch but even at sea when they report hourly it is not more precise. This is in contrast to the more recent ships' logs where entries such as S'ly or E'ly are relatively rare. I wonder if this imprecision is due to the quality of their instruments, or perhaps more recent measurements are not as precise as the log keepers would like us to believe?

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 July 2013, 07:16:15
I'd guess that the early wind directions covered the entire watch and the more recent ones are at the time of the recording.
Perhaps that was because they so heavily dependent on sails in the early periods.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 July 2013, 08:12:12
Sounds reasonable Randi.  I think Yukon 1875 was a sailing ship. I checked the logs and the wind directions were more precise than those of the Jamestown. I suppose it depends on the log keeper as well.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 11 July 2013, 14:11:58
I'm not sure I'd give more weight to one or the other (N or N'rly) in terms of precision. There are a couple of reasons: the entry for the hour is generally the officer's subjective impression of the wind over the period, or if at the hour is estimated by looking over the compass and at the sea surface, pennants etc,  and more or less taking into account apparent wind (due to ship's motion) and compass error (deviation and variation)... The latter can be quite large in the high latitudes because of the proximity of the magnetic pole and because the dip of the compass card can be so large that it jams. (Dip is due to the fact that the nearer the magnetic pole the ship is, the more vertically inclined are the magnetic lines of force.) In more modern times ships often had a 'wind wheel' - a sort of round slide-rule that showed true wind direction given apparent wind and ship's motion variables.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 July 2013, 15:38:30
So when we see
Quote
SW by W 1/2 W
we should roll our eyes  ::)   
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 11 July 2013, 21:03:55
I wouldn't roll my eyes but neither would I write a paper on the 1/2 point trend W. That said the more precise reports might be traceable to the younger officers.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 15 July 2013, 08:43:52
Water temperature no longer recorded  :(

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_103_1.jpg

No entries for the rest of this log book.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 15 July 2013, 11:21:44
There was a yarn you'd hear occasionally about a passenger on a great transatlantic liner asking each of the deck officers in turn what the ship's position was - the youngest pricking the chart with a sharp pencil ranging to the old sea dog captain putting his spread hand down mid ocean. Probably a nautical legend. The moral of the story, though, goes to the importance of understanding the role of doubt (uncertainty) in safe navigation. In the days of the hambone (sextant) +|- a mile or so was about the best you could do when making landfall from sea, and it was usual to consider the position always somewhere inside a pretty big circle of possibility until transitioning to coastal piloting. Nothing to do with per se, but...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 15 July 2013, 12:15:50
This is a bit like the useless precision the people tend to publish in statistical tables. The computer makes it easy to give numbers to many decimal places, even though they are meaningless.

I would really like to have a better idea of how much detail is useful in the climate models. Philip once conceded that there is probably not much extra information in 24 hourly readings than in 12. We only get 7 readings per day when in port, but sometimes they split up a watch between "first part" and "last part" but normally not specifying the exact time. Would it make any difference if we assigned the "first part" to half way through the watch, rather than only recording the last part to the hour corresponding to the end of the watch? I suppose this would violate TWYs unless the exact time is given but how useful would this extra precision be anyway? I would love to see how all this looks once it has been "reconstructed"
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 15 July 2013, 15:21:50
I think the objectives in sticking to the 24 readings are manifold. Some may be practical (or not) in terms of reanalysis, but mainly Philip has an eye out for other uses now and in the future which would be scuttled if we took the wrong shortcuts (common with past data recovery projects dating back to the World Weather Records in the 1920s). Indeed, the first project Philip and I will be working on next month is using JEANNETTE data to investigate differences between that drift and the high-resolution vectors generated by 30-odd years of data from the International Arctic Data Buoy Program (IABP) and/or the PIOMAS sea ice model. Here the hourly wind and pressure, and the daily drift of the JEANNETTE, will be very interesting indeed. We ARE working on ways to make the minimum useful transcription unit easier to manage (for an individual) since the US logs tend to have so much data in them.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 15 July 2013, 16:17:00
I am looking forward to knowning what the MUTU consists of and your plans to make it easier to manage, Kevin. Also, there must be some geographical and chronological priority ranking, given the vast number of log books and the limited number of OW transcribers. In other words, there might be some data gaps that are more important than others. If so, would this suggest a preferential ranking of ships' logs to transcribe?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 15 July 2013, 17:58:48
There are a number of ideas that have been brought up, from setting watches to developing some kind of real-time indicator (highlighting) of what has/has not been transcribed on the page at any given moment. I have heard that the problem is surprisingly intricate from a developer's point of view. Not to transcribe less of the information but to make the dividing of it among crew more efficient (if that's the word).

The selection of the ships that are put on the site are carefully considered in light of known regional and temporal data gaps, especially the Arctic and sub-Arctic oceans (and secondarily due to our current remit, the Southern Ocean, SE Equatorial Pacific...); the war years, and pre-1920 data outside the steamer tracks is pretty much all good. We do end up with some things photographed that we don't put up on OW for various reasons but will appear on the National Archives site.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 18 July 2013, 09:03:29
It is possible to squeeze a bit more information from the logs since, occasionally, they will split the watch into "first part" and "last part" with regard to weather. Our convention is to record the time at the end of the watch. When they split it into two parts we could indicate the first part at an earlier hour. For example, if the watch is from 4 AM to 8 AM we could show the first part at 6 AM and the last part at 8 AM. This is arbitrary, for sure, but no more than assigning the observations for the entire watch to 8 AM.

Here is an example where they split the first watch http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_128_1.jpg.

The concern is always that if  transcribers don't join the Forum they will not know what the convention is, but they won't know to assign the observations to the end of the watch either.

 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 26 July 2013, 08:24:52
It looks like the Jamestown, the Decatur and the Poropoise are participating in a regatta:

Quote
During this watch this ship has outsailed the Porpoise, and the Porpoise, the Decatur.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_187_1.jpg  4 to 8 AM
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 27 July 2013, 08:58:15
After many months of only wind direction and temperatures, the Jamestown is recording air pressure again. They are now north of the tropics so perhaps they consider the barometer readings to be more useful.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_010_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 27 July 2013, 10:30:06
Hurricane season in that neighborhood, which might explain the renewed interest in the glass. Keep an eye out for long slow swell and line squalls in series that sometimes occur with 'tropical wave' precursor. Square-rigged ships may be forced to run off downwind as the lines pass through.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 27 July 2013, 17:05:41
Thanks, Kevin. I will.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 28 July 2013, 09:09:24
If anyone ever gets around to using the weather remarks they might wonder if anything useful can be deduced from the frequently used expression "pleasant weather". One frequently sees in the logs the combinations: "clear and pleasant" , "cloudy but pleasant" and "pleasant with passing clouds". Also frequent are "passing clouds", "cloudy" and "clear" by themselves. Unfortunately for us, the log keeper is concerned about his writing style and likes to vary his remarks even though the weather conditions are stable. So the most we can say is that "pleasant" indicates no precipitation with temperatures and wind strength within a comfortable range, low humidity and possibly cloudy but not threatening. Of course, you knew that anyway  ;D.

Have a pleasant day! (Oh, and he also writes "fine weather".)

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 July 2013, 09:18:58
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Danny252 on 28 July 2013, 17:52:56
Would people be up for some 1886 notes in the Reference topic? The logkeeper has some odd ways of writing numbers - his 3s, 4s and 5s can be a bit funny at times, as I've seen discussed somewhere.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 July 2013, 17:58:24
Just post the examples here for now - we don't have an 1886 example at the moment.
I am sure they will be useful!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Danny252 on 28 July 2013, 18:24:03
Perhaps I'll have to transcribe a suitably interesting '86 page, then (assuming I can read it)!

The 1886 logkeeper's numbers vary a lot - within prose, they are quite legible, but the numbers for temperatures and so on look completely different. The kudos for deciphering these go to whatever post I found them in:

(http://i.imgur.com/YpU38Am.png)
"2" - this is identified by the bottom end pointing to the right, which fits no other number with that many squiggles.

(http://i.imgur.com/EdIFZvP.png)
"3" - differentiated from 2 or 5 by pointing to the left at the bottom, and the definite flick at the top.

(http://i.imgur.com/EkWiIpY.png)
"4" - gets a bit stretched at times, and might be confused with something else (it looks a bit like a H here, for example).

(http://i.imgur.com/iMw7uym.png)
"5" - can resemble a 3 at times due to the distance between the two strokes, but lacks the top flick of a 3. I've also come across 2s with a smudge near the top which can also resemble a 5, but their bottom end points the wrong way.

(http://i.imgur.com/q5kwdw6.png)
To compare, this is the "prose" form of 2.

(http://i.imgur.com/ZTeZOkk.png)
And here we have three different 3s! "3" with no flick on the first column, cursive and non-flick in "30.13", and a flick in "73" in the last column.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 July 2013, 18:48:03
OK, take a look at my 'quick fix' ;)
http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3534.msg57994#msg57994
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 28 July 2013, 20:21:00
That works well, I think.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 02 August 2013, 08:58:19
I still think their barometer is not worth very much. This day it's stormy with strong winds and rain and the barometer has hardly moved.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_058_0.jpg

The previous day was  pleasant until the evening and the barometer rose from 30.07 to 30.10

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_057_1.jpg

If they used the baromether to catch fish it would probably be more useful.

The following day the barometer drops to 29.90 and it is stormy. It might be good for telling what has happened rather than what will happen.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 04 August 2013, 08:54:15
U.S. Ship Yorktown arrives at Funchal on December 19 1848

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_074_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 August 2013, 09:10:48
I think it was this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Yorktown_%281839%29

"Ours" is more recent - one of those newfangled contraptions with steam engines: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Yorktown_%28PG-1%29
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 04 August 2013, 09:20:04
It says this Yorktown struck an uncharted reef off the northern coast of Maio on the 2 September 1850.

Quote
The crew of Yorktown lived on Maio Island for over a month which, according to Parker, relaxation was the norm and the crew did little more than "relax and play in donkey races." On 8 October, the USS Dale arrived to pick up the crew and they were transferred to the USS Portsmouth which sailed for Norfolk, arriving in December 1850.[2]

Donkey races sound like great fun  ;D

Might we be getting the logs for the Yorktown 0 ?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 05 August 2013, 08:30:03
Met U.S.S. Constitution  - "Old Ironsides" 29/12/1848 http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_079_1.jpg

This is the description of her voyage:

Quote
Mediterranean and African Squadrons[edit]Further information: Anti-Slavery operations of the United States Navy
The Andrew Jackson figurehead as depicted by Harpers Weekly in 1875 Constitution began a refitting in 1847 for duty with the Mediterranean Squadron. The figurehead of Andrew Jackson that had caused so much controversy fifteen years earlier was replaced with another, this time sans the top hat and with a more Napoleonic pose for Jackson. Captain John Gwinn commanded her on this voyage, departing on 9 December 1848 and arriving at Tripoli on 19 January 1849. She carried Daniel Smith McCauley and his family to Egypt. McCauley's wife gave birth en route to a son, who was named "Constitution Stewart McCauley". At Gaeta on 1 August she received onboard King Ferdinand II and Pope Pius IX, giving them a 21-gun salute. This was the first time a Pope set foot on American territory or its equivalent. At Palermo on 1 September, Captain Gwinn died of chronic gastritis and was buried near Lazaretto on the 9th. Captain Thomas Conover assumed command on the 18th and resumed routine patrolling for the rest of the tour. Heading home on 1 December 1850, she was involved in a severe collision with the English brig Confidence, which sank with the loss of her captain. The surviving crewmembers were carried back to America, where the Constitution was placed in ordinary at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in January 1851.[163]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Constitution#Around_the_world
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 07 August 2013, 07:48:02
I wonder what the Jamestown is doing in Spezia Italy? The American steamer Alleghany is there too. Are they looking for U.S. slave traders in the Mediterranean?

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_092_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 08 August 2013, 13:04:42
Here's a transcription of the log of the USS Constitition in which is recorded her encounter with the Jamesown (Dec. 1848)

http://www.captainsclerk.info/shiplogs/log15.html
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 08 August 2013, 20:12:14
Those have to be the skimpiest transcriptions anywhere.  They don't even give the ship's location!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 08 August 2013, 21:03:34
Yes, it's just the interesting highlights. I note that flogging was as frequent on the Constitution as on the Jamestown.

I also am learning that the US had a considerable presence in the Mediterranean at that time. They even had a commodore for that region, who's death is noted in the Jamestown logs. I think the Jamestown went to Genoa for repairs. They were caulking for over a week. There were several US supply ships present.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kathy on 09 August 2013, 01:47:31
The shores of Tripoli my friend. There was trouble with the Barbary pirates thru 1830.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 09 August 2013, 06:57:01
Thanks, Kathy. I had heard the name but I wasn't aware of the significance of Tripoli and I had no idea where the Barbary coast was (that must be an English rendition of "Berber"). However, the Jamestown was supposed to be patrolling off west Africa for slave ships and this was 3 decades after the Barbary wars.  ???
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kathy on 09 August 2013, 09:15:01
One thing I forget is that the slave trade was a two way street in North Africa.  According to Wiki, over a million Europeans were inslaved up thru the end of the 1800s.  So, I think the US had ships in the region for both reasons (under the once bitten, twice shy theory with regard to the pirates). For the life of me, I can't remember when the US banned the importation of slaves.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 09 August 2013, 10:17:23
As President, on March 2, 1807, Jefferson signed the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves and it took effect in 1808, which was the earliest allowed under the Constitution. In 1820 he privately supported the Missouri Compromise, believing it would help to end slavery.[27][29] He left the anti-slavery struggle to younger men after that.[30]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolitionist#Abolition_in_the_North

However, it wasn't until the 1840s that it did any serious prevention.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 August 2013, 10:58:52
Mention of Jefferson reminds me of an article I read about him in Smithsonian magazine:
The Dark Side of Thomas Jefferson (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/The-Little-Known-Dark-Side-of-Thomas-Jefferson-169780996.html#ixzz2bTp2CuH2)
A new portrait of the founding father challenges the long-held perception of Thomas Jefferson as a benevolent slaveholder



Asterix - I also read about Lapham?s Quarterly recently in Smithsonian magazine ;D
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/Lewis-Laphams-Antidote-to-the-Age-of-Buzzfeed-174943751.html
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 09 August 2013, 11:09:03
In the Mediterranean, I found Slavery in the Ottoman Empire (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_Ottoman_Empire#Decline_and_suppression_of_Ottoman_slavery) in Wiki.  The dating and specifics are very vague, but it gives a timeline for some kind of active slavery.

Quote
Due to European intervention during the 19th century, the Empire began to attempt to curtail the slave trade, which had been considered legally valid under Ottoman law since the beginning of the empire. One of the important campaigns against Ottoman slavery and slave trade was conducted in the Caucasus by the Russian authorities [31]

A series of legal acts was issued that limited the slavery of white people initially and of those of all races and religions later. In 1830, a firman of Sultan Mahmud II gave freedom to white slaves. This category included the Circassians, who had the custom of selling their own children, enslaved Greeks who had revolted against the Empire in 1821, and some others. Another firman abolishing the trade of Circassian children was issued in October, 1854. A firman to the Pasha of Egypt was issued in 1857 and an order to the viziers of various local authorities in the Near East, such as the Balkans and Cyprus, in 1858, prohibited the trade of black slaves but did not order the liberation of those already enslaved.

However, slavery and the slave trade in Ottoman Empire continued for decades, as legal texts like the above were not backed by a penalty system. It was not until 1871 that a circular of July 20th of that year introduced the penalty of one years imprisonment for those who practiced the slave trade.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 09 August 2013, 13:22:00
Mention of Jefferson reminds me of an article I read about him in Smithsonian magazine:
The Dark Side of Thomas Jefferson (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/The-Little-Known-Dark-Side-of-Thomas-Jefferson-169780996.html#ixzz2bTp2CuH2)
A new portrait of the founding father challenges the long-held perception of Thomas Jefferson as a benevolent slaveholder


What a terribly sad and cruel story! Fortunately, we have Washington, Lincoln and many other Americans as good moral examples - not to mention the many unsung, heroic women. I read another important article http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/08/201388151721676330.html about the enormous greed for another black "product", oil. (Don't be put off by the Aljazeera source). It shows how renewable energy will likely come in a very distant second in the extremely lucrative "Third Carbon Era". I can't help thinking that human greed will be the ultimate downfall of civilization.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 August 2013, 14:48:21
I remember a picture of the Exxon Valdez (later Exxon Mediterranean) with a caption along the lines of

"His driving didn't do this. Ours did."

I don't agree 100%, but it is a VERY good point.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 09 August 2013, 15:56:49
I remember a picture of the Exxon Valdez (later Exxon Mediterranean) with a caption along the lines of

"His driving didn't do this. Ours did."

I don't agree 100%, but it is a VERY good point.

I definitely see it as shared responsibility.  We asked him to drive a vehicle containing environmental poison, and he did a flat-out lousy job while at the wheel.

...
I read another important article http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/08/201388151721676330.html about the enormous greed for another black "product", oil. (Don't be put off by the Aljazeera source). It shows how renewable energy will likely come in a very distant second in the extremely lucrative "Third Carbon Era". I can't help thinking that human greed will be the ultimate downfall of civilization.

I am extremely frustrated at everyone's refusal to invest in any alternative energy because it won't be the magic trick that fills all our needs by itself.  It makes investing in enough different methods near impossible.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 August 2013, 16:10:15
I remember a picture of the Exxon Valdez (later Exxon Mediterranean) with a caption along the lines of

"His driving didn't do this. Ours did."

I don't agree 100%, but it is a VERY good point.

I definitely see it as shared responsibility.  We asked him to drive a vehicle containing environmental poison, and he did a flat-out lousy job while at the wheel.

I agree with you.
I think the caption was more for effect than to be taken strictly literally.
The point was to draw attention to that fact that if "we" didn't consume huge amounts of gas he wouldn't have been driving.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 09 August 2013, 16:13:15
I wonder what the old world countries thought of getting that particular unlucky vessel and it's employer now driving around in their ports.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 August 2013, 08:37:57
Quote
The port in a state of Blockade by the Neapolitan Squadron
  29/04/1849 Palermo

The Jamestown has been anchored in the harbor for several weeks by this date. The blockade began a few days earlier but it doesn't seem to have prevented foreign ships from entering and leaving the harbour.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_140_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 August 2013, 09:45:24
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_142_1.jpg

03/05/1849 The situation in Palermo is getting dangerous and ships are leaving the harbour. 

08/05/1849
Quote
From 8 AM to Meridian The Sicilian and Neapolitan Troops engaged about 9 AM in the Plain, South of the City, and were still fighting at Meridian. A steamer of the Blockading Squadron lay close enough in shore, to participate somewhat in the action, while the rest of the Fleet, 2 Frigates, 8 Steamers and 3 Transport Brigs, lay to in the offing, five miles distant.

Meridian to 4 PM The Sicilian Barque "Julia" shifted her Berth, with assistance from this Ship. The Fight was hot up to 3 PM. At 4 the Firing had almost ceased. None of the Squadron were engaged.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 August 2013, 09:47:18
 :-\
http://www.ohio.edu/chastain/rz/twosicil.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicilian_revolution_of_1848
http://biography.edigg.com/Giuseppe_Garibaldi.shtml
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 August 2013, 12:11:05
This is why the Jamestown was in Italy - it had nothing to do with slave ships.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 August 2013, 13:46:12
12/05/1849 Palermo

Quote
The Neapolitan Fleet off the Harbour, the Sicillian Falg was hauled down on shore and the white one hoisted instead


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_146_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 11 August 2013, 14:20:29
15/05/1849 Palermo

Quote
The Neapolitan squadron of three Frigates, Ten steamers, one Ketch, Seven Gun Boats, and four Transports, hove too within a mile of the Forts, The Neapolitan Army marching from "Bagand" along the road to the entrenchments, White flags flying upon the Castle, and Forts

This ends the battle.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_148_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 11 August 2013, 17:02:11
Utterly amazing!!  None of my history teachers ever said anything about all of Europe going up in revolt in 1848, or of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies.  Wonderful and frightening reading.  Thanks.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 August 2013, 06:43:46
Quote
At 9 opened the Gun deck Hatches, found 162 Dead rats.

This was the result of smoking the ship the previous day.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_158_1.jpg

oops, not finished yet:

Quote
found up to this time 208 Rats and 6 Cats in the Hold
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 13 August 2013, 06:53:52
Quote
At 9 opened the Gun deck Hatches, found 162 Dead rats.

This was the result of smoking the ship the previous day.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_158_1.jpg

oops, not finished yet:

Quote
found up to this time 208 Rats and 6 Cats in the Hold

They really should have saved the cats before smoking.   :P
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 August 2013, 08:21:25
I suppose it was too hard to catch them. They would have needed Caro on board for that job.  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 13 August 2013, 08:23:47
Utterly amazing!! None of my history teachers ever said anything about all of Europe going up in revolt in 1848.....

 :o :o :o

And France 1830?

or of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies.

That's more obscure unless you're Italian, I guess. However, the Italian unification - and the steamrolling of the Two Sicilies in the process - is an interesting topic. I've re-played this in Paradox' Victoria II. I took control of the Two Sicilies, and got almost instantly stomped into the ground by Sardinia-Piedmont and the French.  I hate it when this happens!  ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 August 2013, 08:37:06
You seem to have come out of it unscathed, Clewi ;D

I think there was a whole rash of revolutions across Europe about this time. This was pointed out by someone recently to put the "Arab Spring" into perspective. Most of the circa 1850s revolution countries eventually reverted to monarchies and it took another 2 or 3 generations before democracy took hold for good.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 August 2013, 08:39:06
The Jamestown consistently logs both Observed and DR lat/longs at noon. Is there any point in capturing both?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Clewi on 13 August 2013, 08:50:44
You seem to have come out of it unscathed, Clewi ;D

My ego took a few dents and scratches.  ;)

I think there was a whole rash of revolutions across Europe about this time. This was pointed out by someone recently to put the "Arab Spring" into perspective. Most of the circa 1850s revolution countries eventually reverted to monarchies and it took another 2 or 3 generations before democracy took hold for good.

Plus two World Wars. The aftermath of the Restauration of 1815 ff, I think.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 August 2013, 09:15:49
The Jamestown consistently logs both Observed and DR lat/longs at noon. Is there any point in capturing both?

The noon observed are what Philip really wants.
Quote from: Philip
What we really want is the best noon position - any other positions are just gravy.

 So I think we should tell people that: please enter at least one position - in order of desirability:

Noon Obs
Noon DR
Other time obs
Other time DR
Port name
Place or landmark name

At least one of these if possible from every page. (We want both lat and lon, best of each) If they want to enter more that's useful, but not vital.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 August 2013, 09:41:29
Thanks, Randi. Noon Observed it is  8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 August 2013, 10:53:39
I was confused about the 4-8 AM wind force till I found this: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3458.msg56129#msg56129

light baffling airs ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 August 2013, 12:23:09
At least we know they are using official terminology but too bad they don't define the terms. I see, for example, that they have "pleasant weather", which is the most common weather description where the Jamestown has been. They will write "pleasant but cloudy" or "Pleasant with passing clouds" so one might assume that pleasant alone implies clear, but it's not clear  ;D

Also, I have been putting "squally" in the weather code box but it should really be in the wind force, I think. Similarly, calm and light airs describes wind force but if I put them there the wind direction box will be blank unless Philip takes the information from wind force, which he probably won't on the first pass, at least.

After having done a lot more pages I am pretty sure that most often, "pleasant" means sunny. An indication of this is here http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_022_0.jpg. You can see that during daylight he puts pleasant but at midnight he puts clear.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 August 2013, 12:57:31
...
Also, I have been putting "squally" in the weather code box but it should really be in the wind force, I think. Similarly, calm and light airs describes wind force but if I put them there the wind direction box will be blank unless Philip takes the information from wind force, which he probably won't on the first pass, at least.

I debated it briefly myself, but I put "squally" in the weather code box because the Beaufort Code has "q" for "squally". With the RN ships I sometimes saw q in the weather code box, but I never saw "squally" in the wind force box.

Since the log has a column for wind direction I never take that from the remarks - unless there are ONLY remarks. I don't mind adding to the table, but I hesitate to "overwrite" it. :-\
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 August 2013, 14:14:51
I agree. For example, if the Remarks say "Light variable breeze" and the table has "Sd & Wd" I put "Light variable breeze" in the wind force and 'Sd & Wd" in the wind direction. But there is no table or the table has nothing for that hour I put "Var" in the wind direction and "light breeze" in the wind force.

The log keeper tries his best to cover the conditions during whole watch so sometimes instead of "variable" he will write "Sd and Sd & Wd". I would like to know what Philip does with that.   I'll bet he just codes "SW" and gets on with it. ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 August 2013, 14:26:28
Quote from: email from Philip
I think we should stick with TWYS - transcribe as "N'd & E'd trade".

We'd need to convert that to 'NE' (I think) for scientific use, but that's a problem for post-processing.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 August 2013, 14:42:52
Where in my example did I not TWYS? 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 August 2013, 15:11:27
You were asking about
Quote
"Sd and Sd & Wd". I would like to know what Philip does with that.   I'll bet he just codes "SW"

I was simply quoting a reply from Philip to an earlier question which suggests he will indeed probably convert it to SW (or maybe SSW :-\).

 ;D

No accusations (at least, not at the moment) ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 14 August 2013, 12:14:31
I heard a new name for a wind - "Bora". It comes out of the N or NE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bora_(wind)

The Jamestown is now in Trieste. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_181_1.jpg

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 14 August 2013, 12:38:26
That log keeper knows his local weather patterns.  I'd heard it used in literature, but didn't know which wind it was.  Thanks.  :)

http://www.weatheronline.co.uk/reports/wind/The-Bora.htm
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 15 August 2013, 09:30:49
I have to hand it to Capt. Sam Mercer for his excellent log keeping (at least, for assuring that it is done properly). When at sea there are 2-hourly temperature readings and barometer readings every watch. In port, there are temp and bar readings every watch, with minor exceptions. The wind force and weather conditions are very well described and he even records variations within a watch when necessary. This is in stark contrast to the early voyages for which the weather records were sporadic. Too bad they don't measure water temperature anymore, but given this is 1849 we can't complain. The barometer readings seem to be more credible now than they first appeared.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 16 August 2013, 08:30:51
The Jamestown is now in Constantinople (as it was then called)  03/09/1849

Quote
The American Consul visited the ship and was saluted with 9 Guns. Blacked the Yards.

Here's a short note on the colour of the yards over the centuries:

http://modelshipworld.com/index.php?/topic/1607-why-are-yards-painted-black/
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 21 August 2013, 08:12:38
They are beginning to report two temperatures on an irregular basis but they label them both "Ther". See 4 AM and midnight.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_062_1.jpg

It has been about 2 years since they stopped recording sea temperature. Should we assume that the first is air and the second is sea?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 August 2013, 08:34:46
I will ask ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 21 August 2013, 08:44:46
I checked back to see if they had received a new thermometer in the previous week, but they hadn't. The second temperature is consistently about 4 to 8 degrees lower than the first. We are in mid-December in Genoa.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 August 2013, 08:48:57
Philip says he doesn't know but to go ahead with that assumption.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 21 August 2013, 09:11:19
It's getting very confusing now. When there is only one temperature reported it is in the mid 40s. But look at Meridian and 4 PM on this page. The water temp is certainly not 64. I wonder if the high one is the temperature near the thermometer. There is no consistancy to this.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_068_0.jpg

I think the best thing is to ignore the high temperature until a reasonable pattern appears - perhaps when we go to sea.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 August 2013, 09:18:48
Very strange!
They have two temperatures three times and one of those times they appear to be reversed.
Yes, it is probably better to ignore it for now.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 22 August 2013, 00:25:42
Context may eventually provide a clue. For example, early on the surgeon would often have berth deck and spar deck temperatures recorded - in which case you might see the relationship between the two switch morning and evening as the night air cooled faster than the air trapped below decks and then the reverse after sunrise. That's why we often started out sleeping on deck in the tropics and then went back to our racks in the wee hours.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 August 2013, 03:31:18
Wonder what Philip will make of that ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 August 2013, 06:46:59
I looked ahead when they went to sea and there was only one temperature recorded in the table, so it was probably not water temp in the Remarks. When in port and there are two temps recorded for the same hour, the lowest one is consistent with single temperature recorded for other hours during that day. This makes me think that people on different watches were not consistent in how they recorded the deck temperature.

So I went back and deleted any entries for the deck temperature that I had put in the Water column. I could put it in the Ther Attached column from now on, though. It makes sense that they are recording the deck temperature now. This is the first time they have experienced temps in the low 40s and even 30s. Perhaps they didn't think a temperature adjustment was worth the trouble previously. Or perhaps the captain chatted with a captain from another ship and learned that an adjustment is necessary.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 August 2013, 07:09:18
We've made 2 entries for the same hour before, when we knew they were tucking 2 readings from different intruments into the same box.  We could do that again, matching the consistent temp with all the other readings and the odd temp by itself.  Philip seems to say he wants both numbers, classed as type according to your best guess.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 August 2013, 07:53:00
I think Kevin's observation is correct, Janet. This one shows it very well: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_073_0.jpg

If they are consistant, the one before the pressure is spar deck Dry temp and the second one is berth deck Ther Attached.

4 AM    46
8 AM    44
12 AM  54 48
4 PM    56 44
8 PM    43 53
12 PM  40

So I will record them as such.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 August 2013, 07:57:07
But the previous one makes me doubt it: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_072_1.jpg

At midnight it would be 48 on the spar deck and 34 on the berth deck! Surely, it must be the opposite.

Of course, this was New Years Day so perhaps they had had a bit too much rum  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 August 2013, 08:19:55
There is really no rhyme nor reason to the their temperatures http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_073_1.jpg Even the single temperature jumps all over the place in this one. I think someone must be opening and closing the port hole near the thermometer.

I think the best solution is to record the temperature before the pressure as Dry and the one following it as Ther Attached, no matter how strange it looks. I will leave it for Philip to figure out.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 August 2013, 08:31:03
Or, since you are in port, just don't worry about the second temperature until it is clear what it represents.

I don't think we should assume that it is thermometer attached since that should always be recorded with the pressure.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 August 2013, 08:38:30
that's fine, Randi. The problem is determining which is the Dry temperature. As soon as I think I have it figured out I see a counter example.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_075_0.jpg

In this one the outside air temperature is obviously the one following the pressure ( 4 AM and midnight). I will go with this assumption for a while and see how it works. If this continues to be more or less consistent, I will go back and correct the previous ones.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 August 2013, 08:53:32
Switching between temperature positions seems rather strange to me ::) :-\
I wonder if it is worth recording :-\
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 August 2013, 09:18:52
I went back and reviewed a number of pages and I think choosing the temperature following the pressure for Dry gives the most reasonable results. When there are two, the one preceding the pressure is almost always higher and the one following the pressure is the most consistent with the surrounding single temperature readings. I think in cases where there are inconsistencies the log keeper probably confused the two. (I noted that he recorded a pressure as 39-point-something at one point. The "39" was the same as the temperature).

If you agree, I can go back and enter the one preceding the pressure (when there are two) as Ther Attached. It may not necessarily be "attached" but Philip can decide if he wants to use it or ignore it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 August 2013, 12:23:43
I'd make that nice but optional.  You've already done a lot to get things into the right boxes.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 August 2013, 13:31:33
Craig - do you want the link for my ocd avatar? ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 August 2013, 14:45:38
It's that bad, is it?    :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 August 2013, 16:51:08
Randi, don't scare off a dedicated perfectionist with labels, he's too good at this project.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 August 2013, 16:54:58
Why do you think I am offering it ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 August 2013, 17:01:21
Don't worry, I'm a committed OWer. Perfectionist has never been my one of my attributes, though.  I aim for good enough but very occasionally I overshoot.  ;D

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Dean on 23 August 2013, 00:14:47
Don't worry, I'm a committed OWer. Perfectionist has never been my one of my attributes, though.  I aim for good enough but very occasionally I overshoot.  ;D

Aim for the moon. If you miss you'll likely hit a star!! ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 26 August 2013, 06:22:31
In the lat/long he is indicating degrees, minutes and seconds but also put in  periods. Often he only uses periods but he obviously doesn't use them as decimal points.

When he indicates degrees, minutes and seconds I record spaces but if it's periods, I put them in. What would you put for the bottom Longitude?

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_114_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 August 2013, 07:34:15
For the last long I would put 22 01 08 W (since there is a " for the W above) and I think by Chrono would make it observed.

The very last line appears to be the current?

Periods and spaces as separators are treated the same - which is why we need to convert fractions (3 and 1/2 deg would be transcribed as 3 30)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 26 August 2013, 08:22:57
I know about fractions but I thought there was a difference between d/m/s and decimals? I guess if we saw a decimal greater than .60 this would give it away, but I never have so I assume his decimal and his d/m/s is the same thing, which as you say, we represent with either spaces or periods.

I tried to look up help on lat/long to clarify this but I couldn't find it. We used to have a reference post that described all this. Sometimes I need a reminder  ;D

Strange that they have the noon readings at the bottom too. I suppose they wrote it down there first in the order that they measured it and then copied it to the designated place.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 August 2013, 08:43:06
There is a big difference between d/m/s and decimal degrees. Philip is assuming that all latitudes and longitudes are entered as d/m/s (or d/m).
Some log keepers use periods or dashes between numbers rather than spaces.

For locations I have Type What You See - Yes, but ... (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3191.msg51629#msg51629), but other info is scattered here and there.

Quote
Strange that they have the noon readings at the bottom too. I suppose they wrote it down there first in the order that they measured it and then copied it to the designated place.
Strange, but darned lucky to have more readable writing.
I'm so used to the older Jamestown logs that I only looked at the end ::)

Hope this makes sense ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 28 August 2013, 08:48:04
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_130_0.jpg

Weather at 4 to 8 AM 
Quote
Calms and cats paws
  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 August 2013, 09:21:22
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 30 August 2013, 07:52:26
Quote
sent the Boatswain to drag for our Hodge & Hawkes


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_003_1.jpg  (8 AM to Mer - first day)


Quote
Antique Adv.card Keokuk Iowa Ia Hodge & Hawkes Colchester Rubber Co.overshoes
found in:http://victoriantradecardsforsale.com/category/uncategorized/page/6/

Somebody lost his overshoes!  ;D


Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 30 August 2013, 08:11:42
In volume 6  (April 1851) the handwriting is a somewhat peculiar.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_004_0.jpg

Notice the flourish at the end of certain words. This could mistakenly be interpreted as the letter "g" in some cases. For example, they referred to what looked like the "US Steamer Engineerg" in a previous page.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Dean on 30 August 2013, 09:07:09
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_130_0.jpg

Weather at 4 to 8 AM 
Quote
Calms and cats paws
  ;D

Sailed with a bunch of them yesterday! Just enough to move the boat! :D

Check out Def #2 in first listing. Means 'light winds.'

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cat%27s-paw
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 30 August 2013, 09:12:51
Thanks, Dean. I took a nice picture on the Ottawa River on a calm summer's evening when there were ripples like that.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 August 2013, 09:35:44
"In volume 6  (April 1851) the handwriting is a somewhat peculiar. "
 ::) That applies to most of Jamestown (1844) ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 30 August 2013, 09:58:52
 ;D

Well, there was one log book that was very legible. He probably got demoted for that.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 31 August 2013, 13:30:07
I don't know if I got all this down correctly, but it seems there was a bit of a disagreement about how the deserters were treated:

Quote
26/05/1851

8 AM to mid't. Confined Ina Caudo (OS) in double irons for attempting to desert in the Dinkey. Ino Simond (Sea) in double irons for reporting himself as one who intended to desert with Ino Caudo (OS)  Signed Chat Heart



27/05/1851

8 AM to Mer. Ino Simons (sea) Ino Caudo (OS) were released from confinement by order of Captain Downing. Herman Engleking (Mos) was transf'd on board from the Marine Barrack - crew promiscuiously employed - Ina Caudo (OS) & Ino Simons (Sea) left the ship (without permission of Mid's Thorton then in charge of the deck "and reported to me as deserted") *


* The appendage to the above remark was made (after having signed them, by request of the Cap. Downing. Signed Chat Heart

Note by Captain Downing. The Captain commanding the station having informed me that it was reported to him that off. Heart had refused to sign the remarks made by the Med. of his watch in relation to the desertion of Caudo Symonds. That Officer corrected in his own hand writing the above - he has since appended the note without informing his Commander of it, which seen below. Signed Cap. S W. Downing

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_013_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Helen J on 31 August 2013, 14:09:50
I wonder whether 'Chat' is actually 'Chas' short for Charles?  But I don't have my eye in to this writing at all, so I could easily be wrong ....
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 31 August 2013, 14:46:01
Very elegant writing - but not very readable.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 31 August 2013, 16:27:48
You have to wonder what the crew was up to, though:

Quote
crew promiscuiously employed
   ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 31 August 2013, 16:40:58
I was discretely ignoring that.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 01 September 2013, 07:06:19
I am very disappointed that there are no temperatures recorded in log books 6 and 7 going from June 1851  to May. 1854.  Vol. 6  begins with hourly temperatures for both Air and Water but after a few days there are only pressure readings and only for each watch. Of course, I skipped through the log books and might have missed some pages with temps. but if there are any, they aren't done consistently.

This is Capt. Samuel Downing and his faithful Lieut Chas Deas. (You were right Helen J, it is "Chas" and it is not "Heart' but 'Deas". At least the writing improves).

I think we should have them redo the voyage and get those temperatures! Didn't they understand that these would be important for our climate models a century and a half later? And there's no excuse because Jean-Baptiste Joseph Fourier discovered the principle of the greenhouse effect in 1827. Talk about lack of foresight!   :( :( :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 02 September 2013, 09:24:06
Another instance of clarification by Capt. Downing:

Quote
* The remark 'confined Francis P. James (OS) in additional confinement for insolence' needs explanation. Part of the writing being in an erasure at the in the hand writing of Lieut. Deas - Francis P James was for obscene language and insubordination and insolence, placed in solitary confinement by being blindfolded then being there being no means of confining him in a separate apartment, in my orders. signed S. W. Downing.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_028_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 03 September 2013, 08:28:14
The log keeper has been entering the cardinal points in the lat/log only for DR. He draws a line after the lat/longs for the Obs

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_040_0.jpg

Now that we are near the equator it could get confusing. Of course TWYS. Perhaps I should enter the DR as well in these cases?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 September 2013, 08:38:24
Quote
Perhaps I should enter the DR as well in these cases?

I think that would be a good idea.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 03 September 2013, 12:11:18
Good thing I checked back. We have been in the southern hemisphere for about a week!

In some cases this is shown as a negative North

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_041_0.jpg

But in the preceeding page you will see a definite South

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_040_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: philip.brohan on 03 September 2013, 17:10:05
http://oldweather.org/transcriptions/5225c2d8f277332d58003cbc/edit

Here's a perfect example of redundant information. If the ship had been in port there would be a report for each watch with exactly the same information that is in this table. Philip would have to assume that the wind direction was the same for each hour between the watches. In other words, he would assume dittos. So there is no point in me wasting time entering thousands of redundant dittos with corresponding hours when this is what  Philip will assume anyway in their absence.

Of course, if there had been blanks then this raises some doubt but there are very few blanks in the Jamestown's wind direction column. But even if there were blanks, what else could Philip assume but the wind direction that was last recorded?

What we are trying to do here is to extract all the weather information in the logs. This information then goes into the permanent marine climate database, and generations of future researchers will use it for all sorts of purposes. Each researcher will use a different subset of the observations, and make different assumptions about missing data.

When we have transcribed observations in the past, we've always left out information that was of low current priority, and we've always ended up regretting not entering what we left out. (I'm looking at the moment at some transcriptions made in the 1950s  - onto punched cards - which left out ship names, data in port, and rounded the positions to the nearest degree - these omissions made sense then, but they are a terrible nuisance now).

So for this reason, please transcribe all the weather observations - even those that look almost useless to us now. I'm betting that even the dittos will be vital to someone at some point.

Hi Janet -

Dittos are not the same as missing values (blank). If they are not entered reliably across the project then there is a serious risk of getting bad data where none should be (and this would be bad).

- Kevin
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: philip.brohan on 05 September 2013, 14:30:15
I do agree, by the way, that our current interface is rather inefficient for inputting observations that don't change (much) from hour to hour. (Yet another issue we never thought of when designing it). If this is going to occur often (probably in early logs) we need to do something about it.

The solution is not to skip observations, but to improve the interface. I'm not promising to make a change soon, because we have to be very careful about changing our operational system, but I'd be interested in suggestions for how to efficiently input such observations, without impeding input of ordinary obs. Or confusing novice users. Any ideas?

Remember also - it's not a race. It's fine to take a break. Maybe try another ship.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 05 September 2013, 14:58:16
Well, one idea might be to use the Excel "drag" option in which you copy cells down a column. The display table on the right of the capture screen could  be expanded to include more variables and it would have to be modified so that we could manipulate it without having to go back to the weather observations screen (this has been suggested before by one of our members). Any value that is repeated vertically could be dragged as far down as necessary. If there are only observations for each watch then you couldn't drag but it is not much of a burden to type 7 rows per log page. I can imagine this would be tricky to program, though.

I should add that an empty table, with hours 1 to 24 already inserted, could be present on the screen at the beginning of each new log page. The columns would correspond to the fields in the capture screen.

I am not racing, Philip, even though it may sound like it  ;D. I try to keep a steady pace. It would be even more frustrating to transcribe a "full" table. The Jamestown is only reporting air pressure and wind direction at the moment, except for what's in the Remarks. I only get frustrated when I do unnecessary typing. Being able to enter the ditto was a blessing but even blessing have their limits.  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 September 2013, 12:00:00
Here's the Jamestown page from 14 June 1845:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_100_0.jpg

Can someone help me interpret the location readings down in the bottom right?   Latitude is marked "Obs'd", but longitude looks like "Chr"   
I recorded it as 2 separate locations: latitude as Observed, and longitude as Dead Reckoning. 

Thanks!

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: propriome on 16 September 2013, 12:08:58
Hi camiller,

You've read it right, that longitude is measured Chr.

It should stand for Chronometer (which is this item: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_chronometer). The longitude has been calculated knowing the GMT time and the ship local time. The difference allows to know the longitude relative to Greenwich and therefore the real position.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 September 2013, 12:56:55
Thanks, Propriome!  That makes so much sense.  I thought it might mean "chart"!   Sounds like it should be entered as an "observed' location then, correct?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 September 2013, 13:11:44
Thanks, Propriome!  That makes so much sense.  I thought it might mean "chart"!   Sounds like it should be entered as an "observed' location then, correct?

Yes. As long as it is measured in some way, it is observed. So, they make a single entry.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 September 2013, 13:21:18
Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 September 2013, 14:51:26
The UK ships were easy! the US ships really keep us on our toes!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 September 2013, 15:52:09
Interesting. Do you think some of that is b/c the UK ships were all military and the US ships are such a mix?

The UK ships were easy! the US ships really keep us on our toes!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 September 2013, 16:05:05
US ships are both a mix of different services (Navy, Revenue Service which became Coast Guard, Coast and Geodetic Survey, and Fish Commission) and a much longer time period 1844-1946 (at a minimum).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 16 September 2013, 16:08:58
Interesting. Do you think some of that is b/c the UK ships were all military and the US ships are such a mix?

The UK ships were easy! the US ships really keep us on our toes!

Very much yes, plus other stuff.  Any time officers are dealing with an all-civilian non-commissioned crew, there is a sense of independence that can't be ignored.  Life needs to be looser.  Which applies to the Coast Guard and Fish Commission ships, not the Navy ships.

But more than that is the log book format and written instructions (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3458.0) for that.  The RN books allowed one very narrow column for comments, and most definitely didn't include entire prose descriptions of the weather already measured.  Let alone requiring hourly instrument readings!! 

Also involved is the long time span.  All navies evolve changes in how they print and use logbooks over time.  Our RN fleet was confined to a 12 year period within the same agency, and the printed log formats were identical, with a few exceptions for merchant ships and trawlers.  Here we are seeing a century of format changes for 4 different agencies.

Interesting times in OW!! ;)



What Randi said.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 September 2013, 17:54:26
Makes sense.  I really enjoy seeing those 19th century log books.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 16 September 2013, 18:35:41
They are a blast aren't they!! I love them too. The RN was easier...but the richness of the use of sails is a lot of fun.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 16 September 2013, 19:59:22
I like the the "pasfing" clouds  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 18 September 2013, 08:36:02
Back to the Jamestown 1844 again. It's just like old times  ;D

I am curious to hear from Philip or Kevin how useful the weather data are from this ship? We are currently in Rio. There have been no temperature readings in this log book (Air or otherwise). The pressure readings are erratic, fluctuating between 29.00 and 29.50 when the weather is generally "pleasant". The only consistent "usable" information is wind direction, but always approximate ("Sd & Wd", for example). I am recording the wind force and weather conditions but Philip will not be using them. Are log books like this as useful as those for the other ships on our list, even though it is a time period for which we have very little weather data? The earlier log books for this ship had temperature data, at least.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_075_1.jpg

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 September 2013, 11:11:24
I'm finally getting to do some transcribing too.

Looks like our log keeper is having some trouble with nautical days ::)

Quote
From 6 to 8 P.M moderate breezes & hazy. Inspected the crew at
qrs. A6.45 lost sight of the island of St Nicholas. The N.W.
point bearing pr Compass SbyW 1/2 W. Took in the royals & flying
Jib. At 8 hauled up the Courses & furled the topgallant sails
     Sig'd H.J. Hartsteine.
         
From 8 to meridian light breezes & cloudy.
     Sig'd J J B Walbach
         
From midnight to 4 A.M. light breezes & clear
     Sig'd S.E Woodworth
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_096_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 18 September 2013, 11:18:38
They forgot to tell Woodworth  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 September 2013, 11:25:34
Walbach
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 18 September 2013, 11:55:04
Yes, Walbach.  In more recent log books they abandon sea time, along with flogging.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 September 2013, 15:49:54
We just met the USS Preble (http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/p11/preble-ii.htm) at Ilha de S?o Vicente, Cape Verde (http://www.geographic.org/geographic_names/name.php?uni=-1900841&fid=1506&c=cape_verde).
Quote
The Preble saluted the Commander with 13 guns which was returned by us with 7.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 18 September 2013, 18:31:45
Back to the Jamestown 1844 again. It's just like old times  ;D

I am curious to hear from Philip or Kevin how useful the weather data are from this ship? We are currently in Rio. There have been no temperature readings in this log book (Air or otherwise). The pressure readings are erratic, fluctuating between 29.00 and 29.50 when the weather is generally "pleasant". The only consistent "usable" information is wind direction, but always approximate ("Sd & Wd", for example). I am recording the wind force and weather conditions but Philip will not be using them. Are log books like this as useful as those for the other ships on our list, even though it is a time period for which we have very little weather data? The earlier log books for this ship had temperature data, at least.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_075_1.jpg

It appears, insofar as the Jamestown goes, the amount and kind of data varies rather unpredictably. However, 'useful' can't be defined entirely by whether one of us is using a particular kind of observation currently. For example, if there is an event like a hurricane then a few weather remarks will become interesting to us, and very valuable to specialists in tropical cyclones. Regular instrumental data do appear again on the Jamestown but I can't say off hand when exactly.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 18 September 2013, 20:47:06
From my cursory browsing, it seems that Volume 8 begins to show temperatures again and pressure readings are also present - but I don't know how consistently. The instrument data are only recorded for the 7 watches in this book.

I have been recording wind strength from the remarks so a hurricane would be noticeable. But since this is optional, probably not everyone will pick it up and Philip says he will not be using it for now anyway. It took me several months to get to page 49 in Book 6 - and I don't pick up many of the Remarks - certainly not all the floggings, which would take forever to record. I am just thinking that if Philip wants to get some useable data in a hurry, given our limited resources it might be better to start the Jamestown 1844 at book 8 or later (and add the earlier books at a later time). Of course, there is considerable interesting material for the historians.

In any case, Kevin, I think I will jump ship for the time being for this reason (not to mention the pesky dittos I complained about earlier) unless you make a strong case for continuing it. (I might come back if and when the vertical transcription option is implemented). Clewi stopped transcribing the Jamestown long ago; Randi is moving ahead but I'm sure she won't be able to resist the floggings  ;D  For some reason this ship doesn't have a star rating on the active vessels page but it is certainly not a good one for beginners.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 18 September 2013, 20:57:41
Fixing the 4-star icon (Very Challenging for experts only) is on Stuart's to-do list, it comes up blank. But that is most definitely the rating given Jamestown (1844).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 19 September 2013, 00:32:09
No, I would recommend skipping ahead to the Civil War era or even later when the Jamestown was in Alaska, or perhaps trying the Albatross or one of the new ships about to come on line.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 22 September 2013, 21:26:29
At the 8 to midnight note on the page below, does it say "mod breeze and hazy?"

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_106_0.jpg

Thanks in advance!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 September 2013, 21:31:59
That's what I think it is, camiller.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 September 2013, 21:36:05
I think, "mod breeze and cloudy" with the 'dy' mostly cut off by the computer - it looks exactly like 'cloudy' in the 4pm to 8pm paragraph.

Thank you for being brave to take this one on - it really is the most difficult, the didn't have standard log formats that much before the Civil War (US).



Hi, Craig.  I admit it is difficult, but I hold with above.



It is "hazy".   :-[
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 22 September 2013, 22:14:24
Don't forget that they are on nautical time, Janet. I think you are looking at 8 to meridian (at the bottom).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 September 2013, 22:46:19
At the 8 to midnight note on the page below, does it say "mod breeze and hazy?"

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_106_0.jpg

Thanks in advance!
Don't forget that they are on nautical time, Janet. I think you are looking at 8 to meridian (at the bottom).

Craig's right, Carolyn - I read the  wrong paragraph.  Ouch.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 September 2013, 03:58:15
Ink, the log keeper is using ink !!!



New log keeper too...
Watch out for 7 vs. 9
and J vs. P - and vs. I as well ::)
 ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 23 September 2013, 12:07:40
Thanks, all!  "Hazy" took me by surprise b/c it's the middle of the day, not too hot, and otherwise cloudy.   I forgot to mention that on that same page at the bottom, there is an entry above the lat/long that questions the original.  I entered it as a separate location entry, for lat. only and 'typed what I saw.'  So, I officially got to enter a "?" ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 23 September 2013, 12:36:13
The Jamestown's in Madeira now and not using a table for weather records, apparently.  There are weather data written in the remarks, though:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_108_0.jpg

Should I enter these as weather observations, as in previous cases with winds?

Carolyn
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 23 September 2013, 12:56:59
Thanks, all!  "Hazy" took me by surprise b/c it's the middle of the day, not too hot, and otherwise cloudy.   I forgot to mention that on that same page at the bottom, there is an entry above the lat/long that questions the original.  I entered it as a separate location entry, for lat. only and 'typed what I saw.'  So, I officially got to enter a "?" ;D

We use "~" because that can't be confused with something the log keepers may actually use for real someplace in the book.  It can also be used in the middle of a word if part of it is legible.

Quote
The Jamestown's in Madeira now and not using a table for weather records, apparently.  There are weather data written in the remarks, though:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_108_0.jpg

Should I enter these as weather observations, as in previous cases with winds?

That is exactly what Craig has been doing.  Use the words they use in the correct box.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 23 September 2013, 13:06:57
Thanks, Janet!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 23 September 2013, 14:13:18
You will find the instrument data very irregular, camiller. They eventually get a barometer and are quite diligent in recording pressure. But after that they stop recording temperatures. Then there is a log book where they hardly record anything. Where I am now they are very good about recording pressure, as well as wind direction. Wind force and weather are usually in the remarks. If you read over this thread you will see my comments on this as I went along. Spoiler alert - you will see some quotes about the "War of the Two Sicilies"

Philip said he could not use the remarks data right now because he hasn't time to put it into code form. But I transcribed it anyway, thinking that if we don't do it now, it probably will never get captured. The wind force terminology is quite regular so I think it will be usable. I am not so sure about the weather descriptions, though. He uses "pleasant" a bit too freely in my opinion. The words "clear", "passing clouds", "cloudy" and "rainy" can be directly coded though.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 23 September 2013, 15:08:33
You will find the instrument data very irregular, camiller. They eventually get a barometer and are quite diligent in recording pressure. But after that they stop recording temperatures. Then there is a log book where they hardly record anything. Where I am now they are very good about recording pressure, as well as wind direction. Wind force and weather are usually in the remarks. If you read over this thread you will see my comments on this as I went along. Spoiler alert - you will see some quotes about the "War of the Two Sicilies"

Philip said he could not use the remarks data right now because he hasn't time to put it into code form. But I transcribed it anyway, thinking that if we don't do it now, it probably will never get captured. The wind force terminology is quite regular so I think it will be usable. I am not so sure about the weather descriptions, though. He uses "pleasant" a bit too freely in my opinion. The words "clear", "passing clouds", "cloudy" and "rainy" can be directly coded though.

Good to know, Craig.   I agree about transcribing the weather remarks into the "weather observation' tab;  hopefully, that make it easier to use at some point.   

Carolyn
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 23 September 2013, 15:53:52
Once it has been digitized, it will act as a bribe to get climatologists to figure out a way to use it.  Left out entirely, going back after it would feel like way too much work for your average already over-worked climatologist.  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 September 2013, 16:02:09
Regarding the "(32 00 ?)" on http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_106_0.jpg

See http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3404.msg55002#msg55002

 :-\
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 23 September 2013, 16:19:49
First, it's not red.  It looks to be the same ink in a different handwriting.  After-the-fact editors seem to try to make their notations easy to differentiate.

Second, the corrected location is consistent with the previous day
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_105_0.jpg
and their destination, Funchal (lat 32.6431 at the modern harbor.)

I think it is a contemporary correction to a copy error.  The only question in my mind - and I don't know the answer - is whether you put in both or just the corrected data.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 September 2013, 16:25:33
Since the original reading is not crossed out, I think it should be transcribed :-\
I agree that it is incorrect.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 23 September 2013, 17:34:29
Then we should do both.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 24 September 2013, 12:32:01
You will find the instrument data very irregular, camiller. They eventually get a barometer and are quite diligent in recording pressure. But after that they stop recording temperatures. Then there is a log book where they hardly record anything. Where I am now they are very good about recording pressure, as well as wind direction. Wind force and weather are usually in the remarks. If you read over this thread you will see my comments on this as I went along. Spoiler alert - you will see some quotes about the "War of the Two Sicilies"

Philip said he could not use the remarks data right now because he hasn't time to put it into code form. But I transcribed it anyway, thinking that if we don't do it now, it probably will never get captured. The wind force terminology is quite regular so I think it will be usable. I am not so sure about the weather descriptions, though. He uses "pleasant" a bit too freely in my opinion. The words "clear", "passing clouds", "cloudy" and "rainy" can be directly coded though.

The barometer arrives!
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_109_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 24 September 2013, 12:46:19
They are very zealous in the beginning.  I wished I had been there to encourage them to keep on recording, especially when they ditched the thermometers.  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 24 September 2013, 14:45:57
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_110_1.jpg

Several other Apprentice Boys:
Viz. Daniel Bishop    What does Viz. mean?
Rich'd Johnson
G T Hill    or is it G J Hill?
Tho's Jones

and
Ja's E Land   We know his middle initial now!

Carolyn, we are not old fashioned enough.  I didn't know 'viz' either and had to google it.  It is not part of a name.
Rich'd, Tho's and Ja's, with and without the apostrophes, are the 18th century common abbreviations for the first names Richard, Thomas and James.  And the second initial in "G.T." looks identical to the 'T' in Tho's

Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viz. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viz.)
Viz. (also rendered viz without a period) and the adverb videlicet are used as synonyms for "namely", "that is to say", and "as follows".
...
Viz. is an abbreviation of videlicet, which itself is a contraction from Latin of "videre licet" meaning "it is permitted to see"...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 24 September 2013, 14:58:53
Thanks, Janet and Craig!

  I'll have to edit that entry :( 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 14 October 2013, 13:48:16
Perhaps this has been discussed and I missed it, and it's extraneous to transcribing:  Why are the fathoms recorded while at sea always less than 10 (in my pages, anyway)? 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 14 October 2013, 14:06:20
Fathoms is a length measure, used by navies to measure both line lengths and water depth, being exactly 6 feet long.  What context is the log keeper using it in?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 October 2013, 14:36:41
This is a special case.

See A treatise on navigation and nautical astronomy: http://books.google.fr/books?id=pnEDAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA28&dq=fathom+knot+tenth&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n5KiULbgE6ea1AWUiIGIDA&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false (pages 27 and 28).



AND http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg65952#msg65952
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 14 October 2013, 14:52:58
I see I'm repeating earlier discussions! This makes so much more sense than the ship's never being in water deeper than 60 feet while in the open ocean!  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 October 2013, 06:41:31
Here (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol056of067/vol056of067_046_0.jpg) you can see a log page that has knots and fathoms printed with fathoms struck out and tenths written in.
But, as noted above, in 1884 and 1866 it seems to knots and eighths.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 October 2013, 08:57:18
 8)

Here (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol056of067/vol056of067_046_0.jpg) you can see a log page that has knots and fathoms printed with fathoms struck out and tenths written in.
But, as noted above, in 1884 and 1866 it seems to knots and eighths.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 October 2013, 10:42:37
On August 11, 1845, in Porto Grande:

"At meridian commenced firing 21 minute guns as a tribute of respect to the memory of Andrew Jackson (Dec'd) Ex President of the United States."

Jackson had died June 8, 1845

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_129_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 October 2013, 18:52:34
camiller passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 October 2013, 06:13:26
Mentions of Jamestown + Yorktown:
Voyage to a Thousand Cares: Master's Mate Lawrence with the African Squadron, 1844-1846 (http://books.google.fr/books?id=eU3SH0XvFYoC&pg=PA215&lpg=PA215&dq=yorktown+august+1845+africa&source=bl&ots=fe0NX55DTO&sig=f0fjRC1n6BvB3sMn5BebLcY1LLY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WtxsUrfTEMea0AWG3IHADQ&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=yorktown%20august%201845%20africa&f=false)

This is not "our" Yorktown, it is an earlier one:
Yorktown (http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/y1/yorktown-i.htm)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 27 October 2013, 08:22:01
You caught that before, Randi  ;)

http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg71193;topicseen#msg71193
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 October 2013, 08:40:30
I know, but this is different info ;) ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 27 October 2013, 08:48:42
I should have guessed. That will teach me for not reading the fine print  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 October 2013, 13:36:27
Great find, Randi!  I've seen the earlier-than-OW-"Yorktown" mentioned in the "Jamestown's" log.  The author's preface and acknowledgement make very interesting reading, especially with respect to our OW transcription rules.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 October 2013, 13:53:06
29 August, 184[5]:

"Sent on board the "Preble" a broken Barometer to be returned to the United States."

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_138_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 27 October 2013, 15:32:33
Great find, Randi!  I've seen the earlier-than-OW-"Yorktown" mentioned in the "Jamestown's" log.  The author's preface and acknowledgement make very interesting reading, especially with respect to our OW transcription rules.

What is in that preface for rules very nearly equals our editing rules.  We do that on a different (hidden) board so that newbies who just come here as lurkers won't accidentally read the wrong rules.  Everyone here with the title of "Ship history editors" above their avatar is involved - it is a second function of the project, Citizen History not Citizen Science, that is publicly known but requires status upgrade to see.  See EDITING THE SHIP HISTORIES (http://www.naval-history.net/OWShips-LogBooksWW1EDITGUIDE.htm) on Gordon's site.  He is our historian-in-chief.  Some of the few completed American ships are also being edited.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 October 2013, 15:47:25
 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 October 2013, 15:51:13
And the background info we can't add to the transcriptions but can add here will be very useful!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 October 2013, 15:59:34
Nice to get more of 'inside look' into what happens with this information besides the science, Janet and Randi :)   I liked  Gillilands' acknowledgement to the original "transcriber" who had typed out the log, and the mention of the "Preble," which I just encountered in "Jamestown's" log.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 27 October 2013, 16:32:42
How do you get to read the preface? It is not available when I browse the book.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 October 2013, 16:35:52
How do you see that?
I get some pages, but I go from Contents to page 44 with "Some pages are omitted from this book preview" in between.



Aha! You make me feel better, Craig!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 27 October 2013, 17:15:38
How do you get to read the preface? It is not available when I browse the book.

I went to the link given above in Randi's post.
I clicked "clear search" to stop confusing myself.
I clicked on the picture to get the cover as page 1.
I used the forward arrows to walk myself to the Table of Contents, and there clicked Preface.

I know it won't let me read the whole book, but it gave me that much.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 October 2013, 17:25:50
 ???
Front cover
click arrow -> copyright info click arrow -> Contents click arrow -> page 44
Preface is not click-able in the Contents
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 27 October 2013, 17:45:12
Then different people get different sample pages.  Why isn't everything easy and simple?  [Sigh]

This is the same link, with search set for "Preface"
http://books.google.fr/books?id=eU3SH0XvFYoC&pg=PA215&lpg=PA215&dq=yorktown+august+1845+africa&source=bl&ots=fe0NX55DTO&sig=f0fjRC1n6BvB3sMn5BebLcY1LLY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WtxsUrfTEMea0AWG3IHADQ&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=Preface&f=false
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 October 2013, 18:11:29
I get different sample pages depending on what I search for.

With your link, and if I search for "preface" with my link, I get five results.  Page vii, the table of contents, I can see entirely. The other four only show a couple of sentences.

From Carolyn's comments I have the impression that she has been reading whole pages.

Nice to get more of 'inside look' into what happens with this information besides the science, Janet and Randi :)   I liked  Gillilands' acknowledgement to the original "transcriber" who had typed out the log, and the mention of the "Preble," which I just encountered in "Jamestown's" log.
I do not see this acknowledgement.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 27 October 2013, 18:25:31

After it opens all of page vii for me, I abandon the search process and go up to the next page arrow.That arrow works for me for the whole Preface and the start of chapter 1.  (She puts her cleaned up, edited log fragment in italics, and then adds all her notes and background material.)  Since this is a limited sample, there are no promises.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 October 2013, 18:33:02
 :P
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 October 2013, 21:14:57
I can see whole pages. This is what I do:

Click on Randi's link;
go over to the little picture of the book's cover to the left of the enlarged page;
click on that;
scroll down to see whole pages, including a Table of Contents that is linked to the chapters.
skip around the book with the arrows and search tabs at the top, right.

I've only looked at a few pages, but I think the "omitted pages" are blank.

How cool to see a more fleshed out, relatively contemporaneous description of what's in the Jamestown's logs!  I'll have to read more.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 October 2013, 03:40:39
 :o ??? >:(

Starting from the book's front cover and scrolling down or using the arrows gives me the attached :P

If I do searches, I can get snippets from pages between the contents and page 44.

I wonder if it is different if you are in the US?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 28 October 2013, 12:46:48
 You might be right, Randi.   When I get to the ToC, every section is linked (ie - in blue).

The picture is getting more complicated from my end now, though - I can scroll down and see complete pages to Page 24,but after that I get a blank page and the message that I've reached an unavailable page or reached my viewing limits for that book! I can jump to some chapters, but can only scroll down a couple pages before getting the same message.  And some sections are off limits all together (bibliography).

 Oh well, it's good to know about this book.  Thanks for posting the link.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 October 2013, 13:43:34
 :o ??? :o ??? ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 October 2013, 16:05:18
We meet the store ship USS Southampton
http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/s15/southampton.htm

And a bunch of people get punished - names added to http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3512.msg67819#msg67819
Moses Toppan and Thomas Hines are in trouble again :o
Quote
At 10
inspected the crew at quarters. Read the Articles of War + mustered the crew_ At 11
called all hands to witness punishment + flogged the following
men - Viz. with 12 lashes of the cats each Cha's S Burrett (O.S.) for
disrespect + gross abuse of an officer + the service. Moses Toppan
(Sea) for being drunk on duty + smuggling liquor. Wm Wilson for
threatening to strike Mr. Allmand and refusing to go on
board ship after breaking his liberty three days. John Brown 1'st
(sea) for abusing a sentry on post + striking him after being relieved.
Coleman Stevenson (O.S) for breaking his liberty + abusing the American
Consul at Palmas + drawing his knife on him. James Baxter (OS) for
abusing + striking Rich'd Taylor threatening him after being confined +
abusing the sentinel at different times. Thomas Hines (Sea) sealing
whiskey insolent + mutinous conduct to the commanding officer of the
U.S.Store Ship "Southampton". John M Michaels being drunk on duty
Joseph Fletcher (Lands) abusing a sentinel on post.
Interesting to see that "abusing the American Consul at Palmas + drawing his knife on him" and "abusing a sentinel on post" get the same punishment ::)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_140_0.jpg

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 29 October 2013, 16:55:37
 :o  And the day begins and ends so placidly "Sailmakers employed making new top foresail for the Yorktown!"  I like that weather data, squeezed in at the very end ;D

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 30 October 2013, 20:19:59
Yet another variation on recording pressure at 4 - 8 AM!  Normally I've been transcribing pressure w/ decimal points, but transcribed this one as "29o 98'/100" because it's so unusual (I hope!).

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_143_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 31 October 2013, 03:27:35
I had one of those too, but I transcribed it as
29 98/100
and asked Philip for confirmation.
In the past he did not want the 'o' and the ''' - http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3944.msg75520#msg75520

I only type a decimal point if the log keeper has included it.



As in 8 to meridian here http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_143_0.jpg
29.99/100
 ::)



This should be good training for Philip for the whaler logs that we will be getting ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 31 October 2013, 08:40:09
8 Sept 1845 - Porto Grande, Cape Verde
Quote
At 11 the Commodore visited the English frigate "Calliope" + was saluted with 9 guns which was returned.
Probably http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Calliope_%281837%29
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 31 October 2013, 18:49:54
Nice link!  How did you transcribe the name of that Portuguese vessel?

Maybe I will switch to a space for the non-existent decimal in the pressure readings.  I just couldn't resist the degrees-minutes notation mixed with a fraction based on an invisible decimal point! 

And whalers will be added? Can't wait for that.  BTW, will USAT ships that sailed in Alaska during  WW2 be scanned?  My dad sailed  between Seattle and Alaska then.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 31 October 2013, 19:31:30
I'll get back to you tomorrow ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 31 October 2013, 19:32:19
Do you have ship names to look up, Carolyn?  The currently-known-possible ships are listed on Gordon's history index, with histories linked to many ship names.  http://www.naval-history.net/OWShips-USAShipsIndex.htm
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 31 October 2013, 20:11:49
I do, but filed away.  I'll dig out the info and take a look.  Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 31 October 2013, 21:20:51
The Navy has this online:  The Aleutians Campaign: Combat Narratives (http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/aleutians_campaign.htm)
Since it was written at the time as an official report, it has much more detail than usual for our side, but was generated before solid detail on the enemy side had been gathered.  The do mention the presence during action of the Army transports President Fillmore, Morlen, North Coast, and Delarof - none of whom are on Gordon's short list - and various merchant vessels.  Just use your browser search on the text.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 November 2013, 03:23:37
Nice link!  How did you transcribe the name of that Portuguese vessel?
I took the easy way out and did "Portuguese" Big of War "Vouga" (though I didn't manage to do it with a straight face ;)) Earlier it was called Portuguese Man of War Brig "Vouga". I couldn't find that one, but I did find some more recent destroyers by that name http://www.battleships-cruisers.co.uk/portuguese_navy.htm. They seem to use the names of rivers.

Quote
And whalers will be added? Can't wait for that.  BTW, will USAT ships that sailed in Alaska during  WW2 be scanned?  My dad sailed  between Seattle and Alaska then.
Whalers and a couple of ships with typed logs were supposed to be "soon" ::). I suspect that Arfon's departure didn't help matters. I don't know of any USAT ships (however, I don't know that much about forthcoming ships), but Charleston has escorted USAT ships.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 01 November 2013, 03:36:43
I suspect, since we are having our logs chosen by NOAA and an archivist with a naval specialty, that no one even looked at the Army owned ships.  But without question, it's very possible some of our ships may be escorting them or sharing a harbor with them.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 02 November 2013, 12:53:37
My father never talked of seeing combat.  He did talk about being in convoys in the Atlantic; and the fear they felt when they left a convoy (something along the lines of "all alone, with one little gun on our bow").

Speaking of guns, and back to the Jamestown: 
Sept. 13, 1845, while in harbor, without any context:

"Fired two shells and a round shot."

Is this target practice?  The next day, they also mention bringing the ship around to be broadside to the target

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_145_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 November 2013, 14:40:34
It sounds like it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 November 2013, 06:22:37
It looks like some of our officers joined the Confederate side. See http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3512.msg67819#msg67819 for more details.

Going South: U.S. Navy Officer Resignations & Dismissals On the Eve of the Civil War (http://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/g/going-south-u-s-navy-officer-resignations-dismissals-on-the-eve-of-the-civil-war.html)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 10 November 2013, 18:58:59
Very interesting find! Thanks.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 24 November 2013, 16:30:05
According to Wikipedia's African Squadron page, the Jamestown should be capturing it's only 2 vessels "soon".  I'm transcribing late November, 1845, and the ships are captured Dec 3 and Jan 15.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa_Squadron

I'll post the urls if I transcribe those pages.  If I don't, is there a way to read pages transcribed by others now, or will we have access at the end of the project like with the RN ships (if memory serves me....)?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 November 2013, 16:32:33
How to look at log pages before and after the one you are working on (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3489.msg62863#msg62863) ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 24 November 2013, 16:47:59
 :) I forgot about that option! thanks.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 November 2013, 03:25:23
Yes, when the ship is done you will be able to look at all pages.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 November 2013, 10:46:34
Ironclad Captain: Seth Ledyard Phelps & the U.S. Navy, 1841-1864 (http://books.google.fr/books?id=F7upmCqjOxQC&pg=PA42&dq=Chipman+jamestown&hl=en&sa=X&ei=uq-UUuRX5b3KA9rYgKgK&ved=0CFEQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=jamestown&f=false)

Talks quite a bit about life on the Jamestown - and less than flatteringly about the anti-slavery effort.

Discipline here: http://books.google.fr/books?id=F7upmCqjOxQC&pg=PA42&dq=Chipman+jamestown&hl=en&sa=X&ei=uq-UUuRX5b3KA9rYgKgK&ved=0CFEQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=seaman%20butler&f=false

Also

The African Repository, Volume 22 (http://books.google.fr/books?id=Fx4SAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA184&dq=Chipman+jamestown+phelps&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VK-UUr2mF4WxywO8pICICw&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Chipman%20jamestown%20phelps&f=false)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 30 November 2013, 23:10:40
Dec. 3, 1845, Sierra Leone.  The Jamestown finally captures a slave ship, the American Merchant Schooner "Merchant":

"Received on board Charles Morrell late mate of the American Schooner Merchant delivered out of prison by Gov. Ferguson, upon the requisition of Commodore Skinner."

"Acting Master Isaac N. Morris and Midshipman W'm. R. Thomas left the ship with the following men viz, James Robinson, (O.S.) W'm Jameson (Sea), Thomas Hines (Sea), Jno McMichael (Sea), Lorenzo D Fish (Lds) and Thomas Keeler (O.S.) to take charge of the American Merchant Schooner "Merchant". Passed Midshipman J. C. Beaumont reported for duty as Acting Master. Sent on board the Schooner Merchant the following articles viz 6 cutlasses, 2 prs pistols, 2 powder flasks & 2 lbs priming powder, 36 pistol balls and 6 - Pistol flints."

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_191_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 01 December 2013, 00:41:23
I found the followup on that event.
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030213/1846-02-02/ed-1/seq-2/
New-York daily tribune., February 02, 1846, Image 2
About New-York daily tribune. (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-2VQgqPKQzIo/Upq9MUz0yYI/AAAAAAAACmg/aHeHY6C3rJo/w419-h505-no/slaver+Merchant+1.GIF)
(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-PoCcAaB28Jo/Upq9MkvKEPI/AAAAAAAACmc/m0M9o_KCy_A/w427-h385-no/slaver+Merchant+2.GIF)


This came up later, only I found it first.  Apparently "Merchant" was a repeat offender.
The Caledonian., April 04, 1846, Image 3
About The Caledonian. (St. Johnsbury, Vt.) 1837-1867
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn84023252/1846-04-04/ed-1/seq-3/#
(https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-rGbzV0L5oZk/Upq10y7-uPI/AAAAAAAAClk/fRApKBgPTVY/w702-h505-no/Yorktown+slaver+convicted.png)

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 December 2013, 04:04:51
 8) 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 01 December 2013, 12:55:08
Yes, so cool!  That first article explains the connection between that prisoner and the taking of the Merchant.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 December 2013, 03:40:52
camiller passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 02 December 2013, 10:16:14
 :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 December 2013, 15:00:36
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_186_0.jpg

26 November 1845 USS Marion joins African Squadron.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Marion_%281839%29
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 17 December 2013, 15:20:05
 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 December 2013, 10:02:33
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_189_0.jpg

29 November 1845 At 4. H.B.M. Brig "Sea Lark" in sight on lee beam.

http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/S/04192.html
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 December 2013, 12:40:03
Great note about the Sea Lark!

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 December 2013, 12:41:40
The logkeeper did something I'll be doing in a few weeks - recorded the wrong year!

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_210_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 December 2013, 13:00:46
Welcome back!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 December 2013, 13:04:51
Glad to be back, after a week of holiday travels!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 December 2013, 13:22:34
Can anyone make out the scribbles after "Lat" at the bottom?  I recorded  the location as "observed", but there's no specific mention of the method.  Is this OK?  Thanks!

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_211_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 December 2013, 15:10:32
 :P

It looks like D16 - written over something else. I can't read the 16 as an R, but maybe it was written over an R? It makes no sense to me. On the other hand, the ditto for long seems to indicate that it does apply to position.

This is a case of "best guess". I think observed and DR are both correct in this case. I would lean to observed because I have never seen a position given as DR in this log.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 December 2013, 15:15:57
Thanks. You're seeing more than I am!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 December 2013, 22:09:22
Beginning Jan. 15, 1846, Porto Praya, the Jamestown captures its 2nd, and last, slaver:
"At 6.20 dispatched Lieut Chip-man to the American Schooner "Robert Wilson", took possession of her and placed a guard on board"
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_212_1.jpg

Jan. 17:
"At 2 sent a boat and removed the guard of Marines from the Schooner "Robert Wilson"."
"Rec'd from the Amer'n Schooner "Robert Wilson", James Hill, and from the Amer-ican Consul, James Griffin, a deserter from the U. S. Steamer "Col. Harney"."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_213_1.jpg
About the Harney: http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c11/colonel_harney.htm

Jan. 31 after several days in port sending Jamestown crew to the Robert Wilson to get it ready for sea:
"At 11.20 the American Schooner "Robt Wilson" went to sea. At 11.50 got underway and stood to sea in chase of the "Robt Wilson"."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_220_1.jpg

Feb. 1:
"At 1 fired a gun as a signal to the Robt. Wilson to heave to."
"Hove to and sent a boat on board the Robt. Wilson.  Lieut H. L. Chipman and Mid'n S. Phelps to take charge of her, Transferred to her as crew, James Beddinger (Sea), Francis Mellen (Sea) John Williams (Sea) Jas Robinson (O.Sea) Jno Pauline (Sea) Alex Kinnier (O. Sea) Karl. F. Shultz (Mar) Ferd'n Eckstein (Mar).  Returned to her James Griffin (2d Mate) _ Sent as Passengers to the U.S.  G. W. Rush, James Hamilton, Jos. P Morris & Jno Shute  At 3.10 the Schooner gave three cheers,_ returned them.  Filled away and stood up for Porto Praya."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_221_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 December 2013, 02:47:03
http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3512.msg77815#msg77815
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 December 2013, 11:19:27
Thanks for reposting!  I see the "capture" continues and will update my post.

As always, thanks to you and the others on the forum who have the know-how and energy to provide such great background information about the logs.

I tried to find info about the "Robert Wilson", but was unsuccessful.   The search did turn up a Great Lakes captain of the same name (and time) who helped slaves escape:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Wilson_%28ship_captain%29


Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 December 2013, 11:25:49
Thank YOU.

He sounds like a wonderful person.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 December 2013, 11:49:01
Randi reaches the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 December 2013, 11:57:26
 :-*
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 27 December 2013, 12:04:21
ShipIndex list the schooner, with no other info available free as usual.
Quote
Robert Wilson (Schooner; 1824, Campobello)
Apparently built in New Brunswick, Canada.

As to newspapers, Polynesian., August 29, 1846, Page 60, Image 2, Honolulu [Oahu], Hawaii (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015408/1846-08-29/ed-1/seq-2/#date1=1836&index=4&rows=20&words=Robert+Wilson&searchType=basic&sequence=0&state=&date2=1848&proxtext=%22Robert+Wilson%22&y=11&x=10&dateFilterType=yearRange&page=1)
The National Archives online collection of pre-1923 newspapers (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/) is wonderful and easy to search.

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-XywSEgxluyc/Ur2lmA88-zI/AAAAAAAACw8/kef2BfBLYlE/w402-h359-no/Jamestown-Yorktown+1846+news+1.GIF)
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-xZduNBUctCU/Ur2lmMbet3I/AAAAAAAACxA/Stc2Igl9O-4/w406-h402-no/Jamestown-Yorktown+1846+news+2.GIF)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 December 2013, 12:17:46
 8)

Quote
As always, thanks to you and the others on the forum who have the know-how and energy to provide such great background information about the logs.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 03 January 2014, 11:47:35
Can someone help me out with that last word below, please?  I've transcribed it as 'brig', but the log (prev. day) mentions that the coopers are attending to beef and pork on shore, so maybe it's beef?  I'd probably go with 'beef' except for the dot above the word.   Thanks 

"Sent the Coopers to the Custom House to overhaul the Brig."

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_227_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 January 2014, 12:19:28
8AM to Meridian
I see
Portuguese Brig
and
overhaul the Beef

So, for Commences I would say Beef + an accident - it is larger than the dots on most i's ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 03 January 2014, 12:42:03
"Overhaul the Beef" it is!  This is one of the weirder comments I've transcibed. ::)  Thanks.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 January 2014, 09:56:27
camiller passes the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 04 January 2014, 14:57:51
 :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 05 January 2014, 18:30:53
Feb. 16, 1846:

"At Meridian fired 13 minute guns as a mark of respect to the memory of the late Commodore Jesse D. Elliot."

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_229_0.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Elliott
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 05 January 2014, 18:45:08
Now that is a man who led an "interesting life", as in the Chinese curse.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 05 January 2014, 19:39:02
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 09 January 2014, 00:33:12
Feb. 22, 1846, Porto Praya:

Celebrating George Washington's birthday:

"At Sunrise hoisted our colours and the American Ensign at the Fore & Mizen in honor of the day. At 8 the Portuguese Brig of War hoisted her colours with the American Ensign at the main."

"At Meridian fired a salute of 17 guns in honor of the day."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_232_0.jpg

The celebration continues on to the Feb. 23 page:

"At 5 Minutes PM the Portuguese Brig of War "Douro" fired a Salute of twenty one guns with the American ensign at the Main, which was answered by this Ship with the same number, with the Portuguese ensign at the Fore."

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_232_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 09 January 2014, 11:08:49
Coincidentally, I just transcribed the Feb. 22 1881 page of the Jamestown 1879.

Quote
At meridian a salute of 21 guns was fired in honor of Washingtons Birth-day. Barometer rising. Expended 21 4 lb Saluting Charges VIII inch 26 Cannon Primers. At 1.00 dressed ship.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 January 2014, 12:56:39
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 09 January 2014, 18:15:12
 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 10 January 2014, 17:31:26
Feb. 24, 1846:

"Sent 10 Bbls of slush to the Velasco."

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_233_0.jpg

I thought I read this wrong, but no:
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/slush-fund.html

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 January 2014, 17:45:31
Interesting - although not at dinner time ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 10 January 2014, 18:09:52
 ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 12 January 2014, 11:51:18
Feb. 27, 1846"

"Sent the Stream Anchor to the Boxer. Launch transporting provisions - 1st Cutter watering the Brig.  Sail makers making a jib for the Boxer. Armorers on shore repairing ironwork for the Boxer."

This brig "Boxer" seemed to be in such bad shape, that I did a quick Google for it.  Not much popped up, but this bio. has some interesting tidbits and relates a sad event that occurred on the Boxer (see page 18).

http://books.google.com/books?id=iIlC9Qs0gtUC&pg=PA15&lpg=PA15&dq=us+brig+boxer&source=bl&ots=YxEp1yvF9t&sig=ddogTkd1VbhRXF5dvZBpVGv1Ah0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=iq_SUu67LuvisAS02YKADA&ved=0CEMQ6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=%20boxer&f=false
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 January 2014, 12:11:55
Good find!!!
Very interesting information about a sailor's life.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 12 January 2014, 12:19:46
Yes.  These stories teach me so much about ship's life, too.  Did you read the part about how the the ship was out of money at the end of the month and served no food, at all?  The seasoned sailors knew they had to lay in a few stores, but the new guy (a teenager, at that!) had no clue.  Fortunately his dad was visiting and took him out to eat!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 January 2014, 12:26:36
I found some of the story of the Boxer in the Library of Congress Newspapers.

New-York daily tribune., April 08, 1846, Image 2 (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030213/1846-04-08/ed-1/seq-2/#date1=1845&index=0&rows=20&words=Boxer+brig&searchType=basic&sequence=0&state=&date2=1846&proxtext=brig+Boxer&y=-221&x=-1002&dateFilterType=yearRange&page=1)
(https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-cpy75GU4rI0/UtLDJeHBLnI/AAAAAAAAC-s/pBpArL7QKyo/w506-h546-no/New-York+daily+tribune.%252C+April+08%252C+1846%252C+Image+2.JPG)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 12 January 2014, 12:32:10
 8) 8)  Thanks, Janet!  That explains all the repairs being done to the Boxer!  I only copied a sample to this topic.  Interesting  to see all the ships' names in the paper, having seen them in the log.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 January 2014, 12:42:44
What I really like about this marine report, and don't see at all in others, is the only vessel to arrive in the Port of New York was the Velasco.  The paper reported every vessel she had news of.  I wish more of the newspapers online were that complete.  It totally explains the exchange of crew from Boxer and to Velasco.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 January 2014, 14:56:06
Excellent!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 19 January 2014, 21:23:19
March 13, 1846:

"At 30 Minutes (PM) the 1st Cutter returned having spoken the American Whaling Barque "Powhatan" of Warren, R. I. 40 days out with small pox on board  sent an officer on shore and obtained permission for her to enter the Port. At 2.30 she came to on our starb'd quarter about half a mile distant."

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_241_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 01 February 2014, 17:20:21
This is my first end/start of new log.  Do I do anything besides save the pages?

After April 13, 1846,
This log page is blank:
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_257_1.jpg

The next 2 pages are halves of scanner info.  The chart says it's volume 2 of 67, and ends 8/16/1846.
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_001_0.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_001_1.jpg

2 more scans are of the outer cover.  The next 2 have no ship records, but do have some small notes, which I transcribed as events. 
The ship's log begins right away on the next page with no introduction.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 01 February 2014, 17:23:53
Scanner information was never part of the original log, and blank pages have nothing - including no headers - to transcribe, so a simple "Finished with this page" does it.  :) 

This is very typical of log starts - some logbooks have written identification on the front, but that's all to expect.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 01 February 2014, 17:26:31
Thanks for the quick reply, Janet!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 February 2014, 14:01:16
camiller passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 02 February 2014, 18:57:13
 :D Thanks, Randi!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 06 February 2014, 12:25:22
The Jamestown meets the US Barque Marion, April 27, 1846, in Porto Praya:
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_010_1.jpg

While looking for info about the Marion, this British collection of letters concerning the capture and trials of slave trading vessels popped up.  It has some interesting letters, and I see some ships' names that I recognize from the logs.

http://books.google.com/books?id=xnRbAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 February 2014, 13:24:01
They seem to have some of the letters online.  Nice.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 06 February 2014, 14:23:00
Yes, we've seen this before - sort of hit or miss what you can access without buying the book.  I saw one letter from a British officer in South Africa to an office back in England complaining about the fact that all the slave trade on the east coast of Africa was conducted by US ships. 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 February 2014, 15:28:41
Yes, we've seen this before - sort of hit or miss what you can access without buying the book.  I saw one letter from a British officer in South Africa to an office back in England complaining about the fact that all the slave trade on the east coast of Africa was conducted by US ships. 

True, and the main reason we were very active in slaver repression.  It wasn't meant as being cop to the world, it was very domestic.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 06 February 2014, 15:50:42
I didn't realize that in the 1840's the US was apparently the only, or at least, the dominant,  slave trading nation on the African East Coast, according to that one letter.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 February 2014, 16:12:39
Not as a nation, as private smugglers.  It stopped being legal to import any slaves from anywhere much earlier.  And the ships we are transcribing are proof the gov't did not support them.  Tho all other attitudes toward slavery were down right terrible.

Quote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_Prohibiting_Importation_of_Slaves
The Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves of 1807 (2 Stat. 426, enacted March 2, 1807) is a United States federal law that stated that no new slaves were permitted to be imported into the United States. It took effect in 1808, the earliest date permitted by the United States Constitution.

This act, a part of the general trend toward abolishing the slave trade (led by Great Britain), ended the legality of the U.S.-based transatlantic slave trade. However, it was not always well enforced, and slavery itself continued in the United States until the end of the Civil War and the adoption of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 07 February 2014, 11:12:59
There are some really cool, albeit tedious to read, letters in that book! One set appears to explain a mix up involving our own Jamestown and the British officer on the Penelope, all through correspondence, and how they looked forward to meeting personally to talk it over if the 2 ships were ever met up.  I transcribed the remarks in the log pages recording the visits.  Now I know that they were discussing much more than pleasantries!

I've only skimmed through sections of the book, but the basic sentiment seems to be that the British Naval Officers all around the Atlantic are upset with continued slave trading, especially by ships sailing American flags, which they might change before getting to port, and the indirect support of slave trade by the British shipping industry.  The British officers seem to be doing a lot of explaining justifying their boarding or capture of vessels that they think are involved in slave trade.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 February 2014, 11:39:19
I remember that one of the books I found was fairly angry about the US Navy's lack of zeal regarding catching slavers.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 07 February 2014, 11:55:59
That book was in my mind, too, Randi.  I just ran across it in another search.  Ironclad Captain expands on those British letters in the book that I found by describing how the British Navy itself was horrible to slaves that it 'saved', either enlisting healthy males, or indenturing others to British in Africa.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 13 February 2014, 20:43:47
Fire in Porto Praya!

May 13,1 846
"At 3.35 discovered one of the Custom houses to be on fire. _ Sent the Launch and 3rd and 5th Cutters with men to render assistance."
"Sent a gang of men on shore to rescue the U S Stores from the burning Custom house"
"Working party on shore breaking our provisions from the ruins of the Customs house."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_018_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 14 February 2014, 12:04:35
Pfeffern?sse for the Jamestown? ;D

"Received from the "Southampton" 15 Boxes of Cocoa and 4 boxes of Pepper."
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 25 February 2014, 11:45:10
On June 25, 1846, in Porto Praya, a very distinguished ship joined the Jamestown and the African Squadron:

"At 9.40 the U S Brig Dolphin and U S Frigate_ "United States" bearing the broad pendants of Commodore George C Reed Arrived; the latter 22 days from Boston_ At 10 (AM) saluted Commodore Reed with 13 guns  hauled down the blue and hoisted the red broad Pendant _ The salute was returned gun for gun_ At 10.30 Commodore Skinner visited the United States Frigate "United States"
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_040_1.jpg

The "United States" was the first frigate constructed for the US Navy after the Naval Act of  1794 and was named by George Washington.  It would have been nearly 50 years old at the time it reached Porto Praya!  It would finally be captured, scuttled, recaptured, and broken up during and right after the Civil War.  In addition to naval action, the ship is connected to our literary history:  Herman Melville was aboard as an ordinary seaman.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_United_States_%281797%29

If I understand it corrrectly, the changing of the broad pendants indicates that Commodore Reed is the most senior officer (blue pendant) and so Commodore Skinner is "now" second ranked, and so flies the red broad pendant.

How exciting to see our logs reach all the way back to the formation of the US!



Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 25 February 2014, 12:12:16
26 June, 1846, Porto Praya:

"At Meridian Fired 13 minute guns as a testimony of respect to the Memory of the late Commodore Crane"
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_041_0.jpg

Commodore William Montgomery Crane had been in the US Navy since at least 1799 and held many offices.  He was also brother of the real-life Ichabod Crane.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_M._Crane
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 February 2014, 14:20:59
Fascinating!

I love all the stuff you discover doing these logs ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 25 February 2014, 14:41:24
Me, too!  These logs combined with the internet are great.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 February 2014, 10:44:02
Ships "met" ;)

(Argentine?) Schooner 18'th of April
20/05/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_056_1.jpg


HBM Ship Actaeon
Jan. 2, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_091_1.jpg
Jan. 5, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_093_0.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Actaeon_%281831%29


steamer Alleghany
21/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_091_0.jpg
22/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_091_1.jpg
23/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_092_0.jpg
24/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_092_1.jpg
25/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_093_0.jpg
01/02/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_096_1.jpg


American Brig Amazon
02/09/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_020_1.jpg
09/09/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_024_0.jpg


HBMS Amphitrite
Jan. 23, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_102_0.jpg
Probably:
http://www.worldnavalships.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10309
http://www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1056
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/A/00238.html


Steamer Argentina
22/12/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_118_1.jpg


HBM Brig Arab
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/A/00291.html
http://www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1066
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_027_0.jpg


French transport Aube :-\
14/04/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_123_1.jpg
Probably:
http://www.shipscribe.com/marvap/711.html


US Brig Bainbridge
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_172_0.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_186_1.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Bainbridge_%281842%29
http://www.civilwar.com/weapons/union-ships/146972-bainbridge-1842-1863-.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1862/06/29/news/arrival-of-united-states-brig-of-war-bainbridge.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1863/08/27/news/loss-us-brig-bainbridge-additional-particulars-disaster-list-crew.html


English Barque Bitt~~~
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_148_0.jpg


British War Steamer Blazer
Probably:
http://www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1135
http://figureheads.ukmcs.org.uk/?p=1721
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/B/00591.html
03/01/1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_092_0.jpg


H.B.M. Brig/Brigantine Bonita
Possibly: http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/B/00622.html
06/05/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_134_1.jpg
11/05/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_137_0.jpg
13/05/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_138_0.jpg
13/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_024_1.jpg


U S Brig Boxer
Dec. 21, 1847. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_085_1.jpg
Jan. 2, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_091_1.jpg
Jan. 3, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_092_0.jpg
Jan. 5, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_093_0.jpg
through Jan. 13, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_097_0.jpg
Jan. 16, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_098_1.jpg
Jan. 17, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_099_0.jpg
19 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_130_0.jpg
21 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_131_0.jpg
22 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_131_1.jpg
23 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_132_0.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Boxer_%281832%29


American Brig Brandywine
16/05/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_139_1.jpg


English Packet Brig Brilliant
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_171_1.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_026_0.jpg
14/09/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_026_1.jpg
16/11/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_058_0.jpg


HBM Brig Britomart
7 Feb 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_109_1.jpg


Steamer Brother Joanthan
http://maritimeheritage.org/passengers/Brother-Jonathan-5October1852.html - possibly this voyage!
http://www.maritimeheritage.org/ships/ssBrotherJonathan.html
http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/tf5g5010kj/?layout=metadata
http://www.slc.ca.gov/Info/Shipwrecks/BJ-History.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brother_Jonathan_(steamer%29
http://www.oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/brother_jonathan_ship_/#.V3ZVZaKt8_g
12/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_153_0.jpg


H.B.M. Steamer Bull Dog
http://britainsnavy.co.uk/Ships/HMS%20Bulldog/HMS%20Bulldog%20%281845%29%203.htm
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/B/00727.html
03/03/1849: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_111_1.jpg


English Barque Catarine Green
10/09/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_024_1.jpg


French Steamer of War Catinat :-\
Possibly: http://www.shipscribe.com/marvap/321c.html
07/03/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_037_1.jpg


HBM Steam Frigate Centaur
http://www.britainsnavy.co.uk/Ships/HMS%20Centaur/HMS%20Centaur%20(1845)%204.htm
http://www.worldnavalships.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10869
06/05/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_134_1.jpg
21/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_026_1.jpg
12/02/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_032_0.jpg


French brig of War Chasseur
20/05/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_056_1.jpg


American Brig Chickasaw
http://www.immigrantships.net/v16/1800v16/chickasaw18361003.html
https://books.google.fr/books?id=U6ZWAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA24&dq=Semaphoric+Land+Marine+Telegraph+Chickasaw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj1iP-r3ObOAhUkCcAKHeGvCC4Q6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=Semaphoric%20Land%20Marine%20Telegraph%20Chickasaw&f=false
Perhaps the one mentioned here... Slavery in America: A Reprint of an Appeal to the Christian Women of the (https://books.google.fr/books?id=YTVEAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA219&lpg=PA219&dq=American+Brig+%22Chickasaw%22&source=bl&ots=lwg8IyzuuM&sig=UClkLy0Y0NiFxA1Ah-ppDd7c_GU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj8geeu2ebOAhVJNhoKHb-uDI0Q6AEIWzAM#v=onepage&q=American%20Brig%20%22Chickasaw%22&f=false)
22/10/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_003_1.jpg


American Barque Chilton
Possibly: http://immigrantships.net/v12/1800v12/chilton18491110.html
03/02/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_097_1.jpg


American Barque Clarissa
05/04/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_128_0.jpg


American Barque Clintonia Wright
https://archive.org/stream/africanrepositor257amer_1/africanrepositor257amer_1_djvu.txt
http://www.nytimes.com/1860/11/28/news/marine-intelligence-cleared-arrived-below-miscellaneous-spoken-c-foreign-ports.html
https://newspapers.library.in.gov/cgi-bin/indiana?a=d&d=PKMDC18491003.1.2
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83009597/1847-09-04/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
12/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_153_0.jpg


British Mails steamer Clyde
25/08/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_016_1.jpg
Maybe: http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/royalmail.shtml
http://www.clydeships.co.uk/list.php?a1PageSize=&ship_listPage=6&vessel=CLYDE&a1Order=Sorter_name&a1Dir=ASC&a1Page=2
http://www.clydeships.co.uk/view.php?a1PageSize=&ship_listPage=6&a1Order=Sorter_name&a1Dir=ASC&a1Page=3&ref=5517&vessel=CLYDE


English packet Brig Comet (possibly Cornet)
14/11/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_057_0.jpg
03/12/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_066_1.jpg


French Brig of War Comete :-\
Jan. 17, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_099_0.jpg
Possibly: http://books.google.fr/books?id=BLFLAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA351&lpg=PA351&dq=comete#v=onepage&q=comete&f=false


U.S. Ship / U.S. Frigate Congress
10/07/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_167_0.jpg
19+20/07/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_170_1.jpg


American Ship Conrad
22/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_158_0.jpg


Argentine Steamer Constitution
20/05/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_056_1.jpg


Brazilian Frigate Constitution
https://books.google.fr/booksid=fY2Nij1XLfgC&pg=PA32&lpg=PA32&dq=Brazilian+Frigate+Constitution&source=bl&ots=Zh5xadsYZv&sig=GC4UKRVLV4xnDwHTg09bV9idOHo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwimheD9ytLNAhWJnRoKHWFlDEAQ6AEIMDAD#v=onepage&q=Brazilian%20Frigate%20Constitution&f=false
13/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_153_1.jpg


English Barque Constitution
13/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_087_0.jpg


U.S. Ship Constitution
28/12/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_079_0.jpg
29/12/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_079_1.jpg


Argentine/Buenos Ayrean Steamer of War Correo
https://books.google.com/books?id=58pJAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA239&lpg=PA239&dq=Argentine+Steamer+War+%22Correo%22
20/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_026_0.jpg
22/12/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_118_1.jpg


English Packet Steamer Countess of Lonsdale
http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/brock.shtml
http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/generalsnc.shtml
07+08/09/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_183_1.jpg

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 February 2014, 14:33:15
reserved
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 March 2014, 06:03:20
HBM Brig Dart
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Dart
http://home.wxs.nl/~pdavis/Ships.htm
Jan. 19, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_100_0.jpg
09/09/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_024_0.jpg
23/11/1848 - Returned to US: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_061_1.jpg


H.B.M. Sloop Dauphiney
Possibly: Daphne
     http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/D/01271.html
     https://books.google.fr/books?id=imFEBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA407&lpg=PA407&dq=Daphne+1838&source=bl&ots=i8nb2xGp-s&sig=FsV0JAPP73jTVimodb4U69rVDUE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizhOeI49bNAhUK7BQKHW69AYUQ6AEIdDAV#v=onepage&q=Daphne%201838&f=false
     http://pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1318
     http://collections.rmg.co.uk/collections.html#!csearch;authority=vessel-306271;browseBy=vessel;vesselFacetLetter=D
19/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_156_1.jpg
20/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_157_0.jpg


U.S. Sloop of War Decatur
http://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/d/decatur-i.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Decatur_%281839%29
Quote
In the account below historian Lorraine McConaghy uses the story of black sailor Robert Shorter to indicate that while the Civil War freed nearly four million slaves, it also set in motion the status decline of antebellum African American seamen.

The eleven years Robert Shorter served in the U.S. Navy tell us much about the profound change affecting him and all black sailors during the Civil War.  Shorter served on the sloop-of-war DECATUR throughout that ship's commission in the Pacific Squadron, 1854-1859, and continued to serve in the Navy during the Civil War, first on the frigate BRANDYWINE, and then on the steamer FAHKEE, through the war's end in 1865.  His experience is typical of many free black men whose skills on warships under sail earned him a responsible antebellum position, only to lose ground because of the ascendancy of steam-powered warships and seagoing prejudice against unskilled black sailors, often escaped or recently freed slaves or "contraband" as they were often called.
- See more at: http://www.blackpast.org/perspectives/eleven-years-u-s-navy-strange-saga-robert-shorter#sthash.uNkbcfDH.dpuf
Reminiscences of Seattle, Washington Territory, and the U.S. Sloop-of-War "Decatur" during the Indian War of 1855-1856  (http://www.sos.wa.gov/legacy/publications_detail.aspx?p=45)
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_186_1.jpg
25/08/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_016_1.jpg
01/09/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_020_0.jpg
26/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_047_1.jpg
28/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_048_1.jpg


English Schooner Despatch
15/04/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_143_1.jpg
02/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_035_1.jpg


H.B.M. Steamer Devastation
02/09/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_020_1.jpg
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/D/01356.html
http://pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1342
http://www.britainsnavy.co.uk/Ships/HMS%20Devastation/HMS%20Devastation%20%281841%29%202.htm


U S Brig Dolphin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Dolphin_%281836%29
Report and charts of the cruise of the U.S. brig Dolphin, made under direction of the Navy Department (1854) (https://archive.org/details/reportchartsofcr00unit)


Brazilian Man-o-war Steamer Don Alfonzo Segundo
29/09/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_189_0.jpg


Brazilian Man of War Steamer Don Pedro Segundo --- corrected to Paranese
31/12/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_021_0.jpg
01/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_021_1.jpg


Sardinian Sloop of War Eagle
04/06/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_060_0.jpg


English packet Brig Eclipse
28/10/1848 - Shipped: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_048_1.jpg


American Barque Eldorado
20/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_026_0.jpg


U.S. Ship / Store Ship Erie
http://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/e/erie-i.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Erie_%281813%29
http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/86/86154.htm
26/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_047_1.jpg
28/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_048_1.jpg
29/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_040_0.jpg
30/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_040_1.jpg
21/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_091_0.jpg


H.B.M. Brig Express
www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1422
http://www.britainsnavy.co.uk/Ships/HMS%20Express/HMS%20Express%20(1835)%205.htm
18/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_156_0.jpg


American Barque Fanny Major
http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/705242
http://www.maritimeheritage.org/captains/wakeman.html
http://www.maritimeheritage.org/vips/montez.html
http://www.maritimeheritage.org/inport/1860s.htm
20/04/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_141_1.jpg


French Steamer of War Flambart
http://www.shipscribe.com/marvap/422f.html
https://books.google.com/books?id=tl8CAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA340&lpg=PA340&dq=flambart+french+steamer
20/11/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_011_0.jpg
26/03/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_042_1.jpg


American Ship Florence
23/11/1848 - Returned to US: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_061_1.jpg


French Sloop of war Galathee :-\
Probably:
http://www.shipscribe.com/marvap/311c.html
http://www.netmarine.net/bat/smarins/galatee/ancien.htm
19/01/1854 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_129_0.jpg


U.S. Ship Germantown
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Germantown_(1846)#Brazil_Squadron.2C_1853.E2.80.931857
19/01/1854 and 20/01/1854 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_129_0.jpg


English Ship Gilmore
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_171_0.jpg


French Man of war schooner Giroubelle / Gironbelle
05/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_083_0.jpg


HBM Steamer Gorgon
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_162_0.jpg
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/G/02026.html
http://warshipsresearch.blogspot.fr/2011/11/british-paddle-steam-frigate-hms-gorgon.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Gorgon_%281837%29


American ship Grecian (guessing!)
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_120_0.jpg
Might be the Clipper ship Grecian - http://www.maritimeheritage.org/PassLists/Ship-Grecian-11August1852.html
https://www.mainememory.net/artifact/6153
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/clementsmss/umich-wcl-M-3494cof?view=text


American Brig Helen
Possibly: http://www.immigrantships.net/v2/1800v2/helen18361013.html
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/natureplus/community/wallace100/blog/tags/brig_helen?fromGateway=true
Quote
"I am afraid the ship's on fire."
18/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_156_0.jpg


American Barque Henry Shilton
13/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_153_1.jpg


HBM Brig Heroine
07/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_038_0.jpg
10/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_039_1.jpg
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/H/02253.html
http://www.familytreeservice.co.uk/RoyalnavyshipsHeroine.html


Herirtzer - Very uncertain of spelling
13/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_024_1.jpg


American Ship Jno Baring
http://immigrantships.net/v11/1800v11/jnobaring18420825.html
16/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_155_0.jpg


French Frigate Joan of Arc
Possibly: http://www.netmarine.net/bat/croiseur/jeannedarc/ancien.htm
20/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_157_0.jpg
21/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_157_1.jpg


French Barque Julie
Jan. 4, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_092_1.jpg


American Barque Juniatta
http://www.levantineheritage.com/paint1.htm
04/12/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_014_1.jpg


HBM Brig Kingfisher
https://books.google.fr/books?id=_E6WNW3ELi0C&pg=PT127&lpg=PT127&dq=HMS+Brig+Kingfisher
https://books.google.fr/books?id=sQSTAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT138&lpg=PT138&dq=HMS+Brig+Kingfisher
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/I/02596.html
02/02/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_107_0.jpg
07/02/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_109_1.jpg
15/11/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_057_1.jpg


HBM Steamer Locust
also Her B.M. Steamer Locust - this was the time of Queen Victoria (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Victoria)
http://www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1705
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/L/02758.html
https://books.google.fr/books?id=QRSL5B5QihEC&pg=PA47&lpg=PA47&dq=HBM+Steamer+%22Locust%22
http://docvirt.com/docreader.net/DocReader.aspx?bib=livrosmp&pagfis=1840
31/08/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_181_1.jpg
30/09/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_189_0.jpg
26/03/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_042_1.jpg


American Whale ship Logan
Dec. 16, 1847. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_083_0.jpg
Probably:
http://www.nmdl.org/aowv/whvoyage.cfm?VesselNumber=371


English Ship London
15/11/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_057_1.jpg


American Hermaphrodite Brig Lyra
25/08/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_016_1.jpg


American Barque Maddon
01/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_021_1.jpg


American Screw/Propeller Manuelita Rosas
Probably:
https://www.smashwords.com/extreader/read/266938/19/one-hundred-eighty-landings-of-united-states-marines-1800-19
https://books.google.com/books?id=KpJdAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA4&lpg=PA4&dq=American+steamer+Manuelita+Rosas
05/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_022_1.jpg
07/02/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_030_1.jpg


American Barque Maria of Baltimore
04/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_082_1.jpg
05/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_083_0.jpg


HBM Brig Mariner
Jan. 15, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_098_0.jpg
Probably:
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/M/02908.html
http://www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1740


Brig of War Maypeo (last two letters uncertain)
20/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_026_0.jpg


Schooner Mirandi
15 Apr 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_143_1.jpg


American Ship Monterey
13/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_153_1.jpg


American Brig Natches
11/30/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_013_1.jpg


American Barque Nehemiah Rich
12 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_126_1.jpg
"The American Barque Nehemiah Rich, 60 days from New Orleans with 129 negro emigrants came in and anchored"
17 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_129_0.jpg
19 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_130_0.jpg
22 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_131_1.jpg
https://archive.org/stream/emigrationtolibe01newy/emigrationtolibe01newy_djvu.txt
"The Nehemiah Rich, from New Orleans, Jan. 7, with 129"
http://rootsrevealed.blogspot.fr/2012/06/when-compelling-pieces-of.html
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 March 2014, 09:39:42
American Barque O. J. Hays
Probably named after the person https://archive.org/stream/missionsmissiona00reid/missionsmissiona00reid_djvu.txt
31/12/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_021_0.jpg


H.B.M. Steamer Odin
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/N/03300.html
http://www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1830
http://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?fldrs=64622&uid=389
05/04/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_128_0.jpg


American ship Panama
30/11/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_013_1.jpg


HBM Brig Pantaloon
18 Aug 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_013_0.jpg
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/P/03390.html
http://pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1851
http://www.gac.culture.gov.uk/work.aspx?obj=26624


Paraense
https://books.google.com/books?id=kpfoCgrp7SsC&pg=PA51&lpg=PA51&dq=paraense+brazilian+ship&source=bl&ots=FvD-KBh06g&sig=4ZvMutWDP7fZLUb9v0QiUbXkOAw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjLxv3UtNjQAhXJNSYKHWK-BIUQ6AEINDAG#v=onepage&q=paraense&f=false
31/12/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_021_0.jpg
01/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_021_1.jpg
11/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_024_0.jpg


American Barque Pathfinder
http://www.worldcat.org/title/copy-of-log-book-diary-of-george-robert-wilson-a-passenger-of-the-ship-barque-pathfinder-from-new-york-to-san-francisco-apr-17-1852-sept-27-1853/oclc/039332080
https://books.google.fr/books?id=k3lkAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA184&lpg=PA184&dq=American+Barque+%22Pathfinder%22+1852&source=bl&ots=paLRCeb-8Y&sig=il20PfigfsoMLqA2L3nWf_hxAsw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwik-pyB0NLNAhVFWxoKHa6iBhoQ6AEILDAC#v=onepage&q=pathfinder&f=false
http://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=DAC18521003.2.9
13/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_153_1.jpg


Paraense
31/12/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_021_0.jpg


English Steam Frigate HBM Penelope - Bearing the Broad Pendant of Commo. Sir, Charles Hotham
Dec. 24, 1847. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_087_0.jpg
Jan. 4, 1848. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_092_1.jpg
http://www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=1864
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/Gazette/Slave_Trade/Slave_Trade2.html


American Barque Peytona
28 Jun 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_180_1.jpg
Maybe: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~npmelton/sfbtayl2.htm


HMB Brig Philomel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Philomel_%281842%29
http://www.worldnavalships.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11892
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/P/03492.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/hm-brig-philomel-capturing-the-slaver-condor-off-the-coast42658 (painting 1880, capture of Condor 1850)
25 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_133_0.jpg


H.B.M. Steamer Plumper
https://queenboroughrevenuestation.wordpress.com/2010/08/22/special-force-for-revenue-service-defence-of-the-frontier/
https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/0174/report.pdf
http://www.sos.wa.gov/legacy/images/publications/SL_unitedisland/SL_unitedisland.pdf
15/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_154_1.jpg


U S Brig Porpoise
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Porpoise_%281836%29
http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/OnlineLibrary/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-p/porpois2.htm
19 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_130_0.jpg
21 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_131_0.jpg
9 Jul 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_186_0.jpg
10 Jul 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_186_1.jpg
14/09/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_026_1.jpg
05/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_037_0.jpg
06/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_037_1.jpg
13/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_041_0.jpg


U.S. Sloop of War Portsmouth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Portsmouth_%281843%29
http://archives.brooklynnavyyard.org/index.php/Detail/Object/Show/object_id/5657
12/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_040_1.jpg


English Packet Prince, Mail Steamer PrinceEnglish Mail Steamer Prince
12/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_153_0.jpg
29/09/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_189_0.jpg
20/10/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_003_0.jpg
23/12/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_018_1.jpg
31/12/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_021_0.jpg
02/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_021_1.jpg
20/05/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_056_1.jpg


H.B.M. Ship of the Line Prince Regent
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/P/03657.html
http://www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=34
http://dbpedia.org/page/HMS_Prince_Regent_%281823%29
01/04/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_126_0.jpg
03/04/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_127_0.jpg


Steamer Princeton
"She later served in the Mediterranean from 17 August 1847-24 June 1849." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Princeton_%281843%29
http://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/p/princeton-i.html
02/03/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_111_0.jpg
03/03/1849: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_111_1.jpg


Steamer Princeton (II)
http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/86/86608.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Princeton_(1851)
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_026_1.jpg


French Steamer of War Proney
Probably Prony http://www.shipscribe.com/marvap/321b.html
24/12/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_019_1.jpg


French transport Proserpine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_frigate_Proserpine_(1809)
http://www.shipscribe.com/marvap/ships16.html
17/05/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_140_0.jpg
18/05/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_140_1.jpg


H.B.M Brig Ranger
06/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_037_1.jpg
07/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_038_0.jpg
10/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_039_1.jpg
12/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_040_1.jpg
13/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_041_0.jpg
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/R/03800.html
http://www.britainsnavy.co.uk/Ships/HMS%20Ranger/HMS%20Ranger%20%281835%29%2010.htm


English Brig Rapid
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/R/03807.html
25 Mar 1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_133_0.jpg


U. S. Stores Ship Relief
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Relief_(1836)
http://www.shipscribe.com/usnaux/AF/af-relief.html
12/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_153_0.jpg
05/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_022_1.jpg
08/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_023_0.jpg
11/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_024_0.jpg
15/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_025_0.jpg
20/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_026_0.jpg


H.B.M. Steamer Rifleman
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/R/03943.html
http://collections.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/66788.html
http://collections.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/68074.html
13/01/1853 and 14/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_024_1.jpg


American Brig Rob't Wing
Probably:
http://research.mysticseaport.org/coll/coll069/
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/Partagas/1865-1870/1866.pdf (Storm 3)
http://www.nytimes.com/1865/06/13/news/marine-intelligence-cleared-arrived-below-by-telegraph-foreign-ports.html
https://books.google.com/books?id=-aRUAAAAcAAJ&pg=RA6-PA32&lpg=RA6-PA32&dq=american+brig+robert+wing+-BRIGADIER
https://books.google.com/books?id=fABaAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA1410&dq=american+brig+robert+wing- http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_033_1.jpg


American Barque Saint James
15/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_154_1.jpg


English Ship S~rasbans ? ? ? of Glasgow
16/11/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_058_0.jpg


French Steamer of War Sesostress  :-\
Possibly: Sesostris http://www.shipscribe.com/marvap/421h.html
https://books.google.com/books?id=a_lEAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA68&lpg=PA68&dq=french+steamer+of+war+SESOSTRIS
07/03/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_037_1.jpg


HBM Steamer Styx
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_159_1.jpg
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/S/04447.html
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~morgan/cheryl/styx.html


Hamburgh Barque Sylphide
http://www.immigrantships.net/v8/1800v8/sylphide18480722.html
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/86414920
15/11/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_057_1.jpg


U.S. Schooner Taney
Possibly:
http://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/t/taney-i.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USRC_Taney_%281833%29
http://www.uscg.mil/history/webcutters/Taney_1834.asp
24/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_092_1.jpg
31/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_096_0.jpg


English Frigate Thetis
21/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_091_0.jpg
24/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_092_1.jpg


American barque Treybosset :-\
07/09/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_183_1.jpg


Ship Thomas Watson
https://books.google.fr/books?id=TaWjAQAAQBAJ&pg=PT365&lpg=PT365&dq=ship+thomas+watson
http://www.maritimeheritage.org/ships/Clippers_T-to-Z.html#Thomas-Watson
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2006.05.0302%3Aarticle%3D3
24/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_159_0.jpg


American Barque Thorndike
Possibly: https://books.google.com/books?id=I0lHAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA115&lpg=PA115&dq=american+barque+thorndike
06/03/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_037_1.jpg


English Barque Tomatine
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nzbound/wellington.htm
http://www.familytreecircles.com/u/ngairedith/?&next=1571
31/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_050_0.jpg


US Brig Truxton
(Also spelled Truxtun in the log)
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_050_0.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_156_0.jpg
(http://media.mutualart.com/Images/2012_07/05/03/035602525/ef347e7e-d6d5-4e9e-84ca-57ea24ad1073_570.Jpeg)
The US Brig Truxton Outward Bound from Boston by Louis Dodd
"Images are copyright of their respective owners, assignees or others"
http://books.google.fr/books?id=9dwJB-iKPXsC&pg=PA273&lpg=PA273&dq=Brig+truxton&source=bl&ots=3lQT_NTCPX&sig=C2mnIMciDdk6VG0xGN6Ciqg5C0o&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I1ivUZqDK8OrPNbTgdAE&ved=0CCsQ6AEwATgK#v=onepage&q=Brig%20truxton&f=false


U S Frigate United States
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_United_States_%281797%29 (thanks Carolyn ;))
http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/u/unitedstates.htm
http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/shipprofiles/p/ussus.htm
30/12/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_080_0.jpg
02/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_081_1.jpg
04/01/1849 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_082_1.jpg


Barque Valley ~~~~~
15/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_154_1.jpg


H.B.M. Ship Vengeance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Vengeance_%281824%29
03/03/1849: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_111_1.jpg


H.B.M. Steamer Vixen
07/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_023_0.jpg
21/01/1853 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_026_1.jpg


Barque Wagram
13/06/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_153_1.jpg


HBM Brig of war Water Witch
http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/W/05190.html
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_159_0.jpg


English Barque William Hyde
http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&d=WI18520602.2.17&cl=CL1.WI&l=mi&e=-------10-TS-1----2%2522burlington+street%2522--
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nzbound/wmhyde.htm
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/page/1516035


English Ship Yeoman
07/09/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_023_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 03 March 2014, 10:28:23
In an article about marine archaeology, up popped a reference to the discovery of the wreck in the Cape Verde Islands of a ship that was mentioned many times in the logs of the Jamestown - the Yorktown! 

Here's the Wikipedia entry for that first, short-lived USS Yorktown - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Yorktown_%281839%29
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 March 2014, 15:42:27
 8) 8)

Found this earlier, but the link doesn't work at the moment, and a fresh search doesn't work any better Works now ;D Voyage to a Thousand Cares: Master's Mate Lawrence with the African Squadron, 1844-1846 (http://books.google.fr/books?id=eU3SH0XvFYoC&pg=PA215&lpg=PA215&dq=yorktown+august+1845+africa&source=bl&ots=fe0NX55DTO&sig=f0fjRC1n6BvB3sMn5BebLcY1LLY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WtxsUrfTEMea0AWG3IHADQ&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=yorktown%20august%201845%20africa&f=false)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 03 March 2014, 15:50:35
Ooh, thanks for refreshing us on this.  Link doesn't work for me, either  :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 04 March 2014, 15:18:36
Can anyone read the name of island in the last 2 paragraphs that looks like Yacheo or Zacheo?  Google (and a few OW refs) turn up nothing with either of those names near Mona or Puerto Rico.  The only other island in the Mona passage is to the north - Desecho Is.  Close, but not quite the same.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_049_0.jpg

Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: asterix135 on 04 March 2014, 15:36:37
There is (or was) a Zacheo

http://books.google.ca/books?id=nFQvAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA17&lpg=PA17&dq=zacheo+puerto+rico&source=bl&ots=DrVmSpDpnr&sig=XhmzwuC0POYnbGQ1ufR9Y38pG_k&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_ywWU-xFybDJAeSKgYgB&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=zacheo%20puerto%20rico&f=false
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 04 March 2014, 15:39:15
 :D :D :D

Thanks!  It is the same as Desecheo.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 March 2014, 16:12:13
I couldn't see inside the book in asterix's link, but I did find this one:
The American coast pilot: containing directions for the principal harrours [!] capes, and headlands, on the coast of North and South America, 1833: http://books.google.fr/books?id=BPANAQAAMAAJ&pg=PR18&lpg=PR18&dq=zacheo+island,+west+indies&source=bl&ots=wFGP--TDav&sig=rm-bGwKPbHoTaRYx42NE_DSPY74&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fjQWU67vEuzU4wTqn4H4DA&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=zacheo%20island%2C%20west%20indies&f=false

Here are a couple of maps:
West India Islands and Caribbean Sea, 1879: http://historicalcharts.noaa.gov/historicals/preview/image/H01514-11-1879
West Indies , 1849: http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~229793~5508202:West-Indies-?sort=Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No&qvq=q:puerto%2Brico;sort:Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No;lc:RUMSEY~8~1&mi=5&trs=338
Isla de Puerto Rico, 1851: http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~3339~340017:Isla-de-Puerto-Rico-por-el-Teniente?sort=Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No&qvq=w4s:/when/1851;q:puerto%2Brico;sort:Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No;lc:RUMSEY~8~1&mi=1&trs=2
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 04 March 2014, 16:28:03
Thanks!  Those 2 piloting books are key because they confirm that both names go with that island. 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 05 March 2014, 12:46:19
For more information on the slave trade see the books:
Africa Squadron
Royal navy Vs the Slave traders
The Slave Trade Hugh Thomas

One problem the USN and the RN had was the USN could only arrest American ships and the RN could usually only arrest British ships. The slave traders knew this and carried all sorts false flags and papers. Sometimes arresting even a US ship could be a real headache for the Captain of the USN ship responsible. The courts often released the captured ships. The Masters of slave ships if convicted usually got short jail sentences and in 3 cases pardoned!?. In two cases the USN Captains who captured slave ships had the cases thrown out the ships released and they were sued by the ships owners!? One sort of feels sorry for these men. Note: there was plenty of money to be made in slave trading so they could afford good lawyers and often bribe there way out. Add to this there were more than a few pro-slavery people in America at this time.
 One should also point out slave trading in the US carried the death penalty at this time. The master of the slave ship Storm King Capt N. Gordon was captured by the USS San Jacinto and no doubt expected to get off, but the US Civil War broke out and he was tried convicted and hung in 1862. He was the only man in the US to be hung for slave trading.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 05 March 2014, 21:45:15
Thanks.  This topic has compiled quite a collection of books about the naval involvement in the slave trade.  It's been a very sad eye opener for me.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 March 2014, 04:47:43
camiller passes the 3000 mark!


 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 07 March 2014, 19:49:35
Thanks.  I'm looking forward to getting to "home port" in a few weeks.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 08 March 2014, 15:12:26
The Jamestown is "shewing" its "coulors" again!
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_053_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 March 2014, 15:22:07
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 08 March 2014, 15:35:32
Another Caribbean place-name book, if it's not already listed:

Military Notes on Cuba
http://books.google.com/books?id=dLSCAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA179&lpg=PA179&dq#v=onepage&q&f=false
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 10 March 2014, 09:29:38
July 25, 1846  On its way back to home port, the Jamestown "discovers Carysfort Light", near Key Largo, FL.
 http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_055_1.jpg

 " The lighthouse has an iron screw-pile foundation with a platform, and a skeletal, octagonal, pyramidal tower, which is painted red. The light is 100 feet (30 m) above the water. It is the oldest functioning lighthouse of its type in the United States, completed in 1852."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carysfort_Reef_Light
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 March 2014, 16:21:34
Does anyone know what the note about the current, at the bottom right of the page, means? 

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_055_0.jpg


Quote from: Kevin
This appears to be set (direction) and drift (speed/distance offset) of the current over some interval. The problem is knowing what the 30 miles refers to. You typically need to compare something like the DR position with a fix, where the set/drift explains the difference between the two. I didn't see it again on nearby pages...?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 10 March 2014, 16:39:55
Thanks for the explanation.  I haven't seen that type of note before or since (only 2 days) in the logs.   Could the ship have been using some location on shore as a reference, like the Pan of Matanzas?  If it means anything, they recorded both "observed" and "dead reckoning" positions on the page below. 

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_053_1.jpg

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 13 March 2014, 13:09:33
For a few days, the log-copier left one log-keeper's name (Walbach) in pencil instead of writing it out in ink, like he did for all the others. 
I wonder what's up with that?

Example: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_060_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 March 2014, 14:45:26
Strange!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 13 March 2014, 15:38:30
August 5, 1846,
"At 9.30 [pm] discovered Cape Cod light"
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_061_0.jpg

What a welcome sight that must have been! Nearly back to Boston after more than a year away. 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Helen J on 13 March 2014, 15:49:23
For a few days, the log-copier left one log-keeper's name (Walbach) in pencil instead of writing it out in ink, like he did for all the others. 
I wonder what's up with that?

Example: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_060_1.jpg

Perhaps he wasn't sure of the spelling and meant to check it?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 13 March 2014, 16:00:16
Oh, that might explain it!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 March 2014, 16:46:45
Even though the Jamestown has many years of service left,  the log descriptions of departures and preparing the ship to be decommissioned are sad... I guess taking such good care of everything helped keep it afloat for so long.

Aug. 14, 1846,
"Sent down all the Steering Sail booms and made every preparation for dismantling the Ship."
"At meridian Commodore Skinner addressed the Crew and left the Ship."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_065_1.jpg

Aug. 16- 17, 1846,
"At 4.30 (P.M) gave the Crew liberty until Monday morning next."
"At 10 (AM) Captain Cunningham came on board and addressed the crew. 
At 11 Put the Ship out of Commission and discharged the Crew."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_066_1.jpg

I wonder how many crew were around to hear the Captain if they were given liberty the previous day?  ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 March 2014, 17:01:00
Have a look at http://www.naval-history.net/OWShips-USNShipsList.htm to see future voyages - but I am not sure if all are included. I know Craig went on well past where we are!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 16 March 2014, 17:10:19
It spent a couple of years in the Mediterranean during the revolutions in Europe - 1848 and thereabouts, protecting American interests. I made a couple of posts on this near the beginning of this thread.  It tagged along with the USS Constitution and was quite proud of the fact. You will enjoy the War of the Two Sicilies. Keep on plugging. ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 March 2014, 17:10:46
Between Craig, Naval-History, and the logs themselves, I've been getting lots of previews!  The decommissioning on the last page scanned is so sad.  A few days before the last entry, the weather instruments are removed and the logs say things like 'no thermometer, ship decommissioned'.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 March 2014, 17:12:31
Just like clockwork, Craig!   ;D Thanks for the all the advice and encouragement!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 March 2014, 17:44:53
First pages of a "new' cruise, not a new log that I can tell,  are very interesting. :o  I'm saving as ' I've finished with this page"  Should I do anything else ???  Thanks.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_067_1.jpg
letter dated Apr. 8, 1861 about signals

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_068_0.jpg
A list of ports and arrival dates in 1846, ending at Martinique
 
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_068_1.jpg
A page from what appears to be another log, with a very messy chart, entitled "List of Rigging required on board the U. S. Frigate Congress"

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_069_1.jpg
A page glued in entitled " Fog Signals", with a list of signals of different ships


After that are the scanning record pages
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 March 2014, 17:54:23
"I've finished with this page" is fine.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 March 2014, 18:12:42
Phew! Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 March 2014, 18:22:08
Keep on plugging. ;D

Just got a look at the handwriting in the new log.  Now I know why you wrote that, Craig! ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 16 March 2014, 20:51:20
Perhaps the log keeper is the same guy who does the flogging. His hand is probably shaking from all the exertion  ;D

You would be surprised to see the Bear logs, Carolyn. I don't remember seeing a court martial in the last two log years. Occasionally, some crew are put in irons but only for a short while. Perhaps it's the temperature up north that makes the difference.  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 17 March 2014, 19:12:32
Ugh, I must have repressed those entries of  lashings!  Didn't you say they stopped them in the 1850's?  We're up to 1848 now....

Interesting idea about the connection between weather and corporal punishment... ;D  Given this winter, I can see how everyone might be a little more restrained in the cold.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 March 2014, 03:17:10
Quote from: http://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/organization-and-administration/ranks/enlisted-personnel/ratings-and-the-evolution-of-jobs-in-the-navy.html
When President Millard Filmore signed the 1851 naval appropriations bill on 28 September 1850, flogging as a form of punishment in the US. Navy was legally abolished: "Provided, That flogging in the navy, and on board vessels of commerce, be, and the same time is hereby, abolished from and after the passage of this act."
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 18 March 2014, 20:26:51
 :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 March 2014, 11:44:54
Can anyone read the name of island in the last 2 paragraphs that looks like Yacheo or Zacheo?  Google (and a few OW refs) turn up nothing with either of those names near Mona or Puerto Rico.  The only other island in the Mona passage is to the north - Desecho Is.  Close, but not quite the same.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol002of067/vol002of067_049_0.jpg

Thanks!

I'm getting some familiar looking pages ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 23 March 2014, 12:12:06
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 23 March 2014, 12:17:01
The 1847 logs start in the AM!  Do I still need to type AM and PM?  The ship is in port, so the weather is in the remarks section, recorded for each watch only.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 23 March 2014, 12:23:14
No.  For all ships, the assumption is we are on calendar days beginning at midnight.  Those that choose to start differently are the only ones needing am/pm.

Just a reminder, because I wasn't sure I remembered it correctly.
Philip has asked us to transcribe this data as Weather Records using the end time of the watch.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 23 March 2014, 12:37:27
Yeah, no more am/pm! Thanks for getting back to me and for the reminder; I have been entering time as end of watch.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 March 2014, 14:19:59
No.  For all ships, the assumption is we are on calendar days beginning at midnight.  Those that choose to start differently are the only ones needing am/pm.

Just a reminder, because I wasn't sure I remembered it correctly.
Philip has asked us to transcribe this data as Weather Records using the end time of the watch.

There are a few logs with the weather data in double columns (http://www.cosmik.com/oldweather/corwin_vol_206_127.jpg). In that case am/pm should also be included.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 March 2014, 14:21:29
The 1847 logs start in the AM!  Do I still need to type AM and PM?  The ship is in port, so the weather is in the remarks section, recorded for each watch only.
:o :o :o
I don't know if I can cope with that ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 23 March 2014, 17:10:10
 ;D ;D


So glad this log is not from the Jamestown: :o
Quote
There are a few logs with the weather data in double columns (http://www.djcosmik.com/oldweather/corwin_vol_206_127.jpg). In that case am/pm should also be included.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 25 March 2014, 08:41:43
Jul 22, 1847, at sea from Boston to Norfolk:  "No thermometers on board" 
 http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_009_0.jpg

This page also has the first example of an interesting variation in lat/long recordings:  superscripted degrees, seconds, and minutes separated by double periods.  Single period separating partial seconds!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 25 March 2014, 09:31:42
Randi passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 March 2014, 10:59:25
 :-*
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 25 March 2014, 15:38:11
Randi passes the 2000 mark!

 8) 8) 8)

That's worth about 5 times that number if you recorded all the lashes, Randi  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 26 March 2014, 06:22:08
What I meant to say is that 2000 WRs drastically understates all the great work you do for the project, Randi.  8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 March 2014, 08:23:09
 :-* :-* ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 March 2014, 18:47:34
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 28 March 2014, 09:00:44
uh, oh....

July 28, 1847, off eastern Delmarva Peninsula:

"At 12.43, while standing on in sight of land, head= =ing per compass S 1/2 W we suddenly shoal=  =ed our water from 7 to 3 fathoms, when the ship struck bringing up in 17 feet water on the extreme outer edge of Winterquarter shoal.  All the steering sails & light sails were taken in, the larboard anchor got ready for letting go, the boats hoisted out and the stream anchor taken out on the larboard bow where having previously sound= =ed and found 7 1/2 fms water it was let go.  In sounding there was found a current of about 3 knots setting to the Wd.  The ship in the meantime forging to the Sd having been lightened by starting the water and heaving overboard 1200 round and 48 grape shot, 18 Cwt Bar and flat Iron, 1 roll of Sheet lead, 6 BBls Tar, 5 Bbls Beef, 4 half Bbls Port, 1 keg Butter  1 Bbl Lime"

July 30, 1847, at anchorage in Norfolk, soon to go to drydock:
"Pumped the Ship out  She having made 17 inches in 8 1/2 hours"

July 31, 1847, going into drydock:
"The Construction with a Gang from the Yards hogged the Ship."
"At 12.30 hauled into Docks and Secured the Ship in her berth  Loosed the light Sails. Started our water."

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_012_0.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_014_0.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_014_1.jpg
hogging a ship: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hogging_and_sagging

September 22, 1847, finally leaving port:
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_041_0.jpg

The log entries between those dates resemble typical log entries for the ship in port in addition to noting all the movements necessary to put the ship in dry dock.  Unfortunately, the logs do not describe why the ship is in dry dock or what happens to it while it is there.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 March 2014, 09:28:36
Delmarva Peninsula (http://www.geographic.org/geographic_names/usaname.php?uni=588432&fid=usageo_529)

Winterquarter shoal (http://historicalcharts.noaa.gov/historicals/preview/image/AR06-00-1852)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 28 March 2014, 09:35:26
Note: the log does not say "Delmarva Peninsula".  I used that as a current day reference b/c the log just says 'land'.  I should also have added "Atlantic Ocean side" of Delmarva since the ship will be sailing up the Chesapeake Bay side in a couple days!  Beautiful area.
Delmarva Peninsula (http://www.geographic.org/geographic_names/usaname.php?uni=588432&fid=usageo_529)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 29 March 2014, 17:27:54

"Ripraps"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rip_Raps
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 15 April 2014, 14:44:54
The 'current' Jamestown, 1844, logs jumped right from the African Squadron voyage, ending in Sept., 1846,  to the voyage starting July, 1847,  but Naval_History. net says that the ship brought food to Ireland in the spring of 1847.  Will we transcribe those logs?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 15 April 2014, 14:58:55
I don't know :-[
Sometimes the logs weren't scanned in order because some of the volumes required conservation.
However, some may be missing or omitted.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 15 April 2014, 17:01:24
Ok.  It was a short voyage, and in commonly-traveled waters, so maybe it was low priority.  Sounds interesting, though.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 15 April 2014, 17:54:00
I remember ;) that Joan found this:
http://irishboston.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/may-16-1847-uss-jamestown-returns-to.html
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 April 2014, 11:06:43
Very touching.  I do hope we see those logs.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 16 April 2014, 13:16:11
:o  This looks interesting, but it has a sad ending.

Sept. 10, 1847, 3.40 am:  "At 3.40 sent the 2'nd Cutter to recover one of the men who was attempting to swim ashore."
There were many punishments Sept. 10, but none for desertion.

Sept. 13: "Thomas Malone Deserter was brought on board from the Schooner Mail of New Haven.  He reported that Stephen Decatur (O.S.) went down in the attempt to Swim from the ship."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_036_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 17 April 2014, 10:39:03
Sept.  15, 1847:
"Received in the Purser's Department 7 Pea, and 56 Monkey Jackets ~ 47 - Trousers 50 Sou'westers, all of Gum Elastic."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_037_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 April 2014, 14:30:50
camiller passes the 4000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 18 April 2014, 16:40:56
 ;D thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 18 April 2014, 16:45:58
Can anyone read the name of the steamer in the  4 - 8am paragraph?  Many thanks for looking!

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_038_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 18 April 2014, 18:38:24
I think it is "...Steamer Joseph.  Receiving..."
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 19 April 2014, 14:14:47
OK, thanks.  I'm so used to reading combinations of the letters looking like  f, h, p, q, or s,  as "ss" that I'm stumped when a more logical explanation appears!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 April 2014, 17:36:16
"in reefing one of the ForeTopman fell from the Top on Deck, recieved but slight injury"
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_044_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 26 April 2014, 19:06:12
How very lucky - he must have had his fall broken by sails and soft stuff on the way down.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 April 2014, 10:51:57
Yes!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 06 May 2014, 17:00:26
We just added another percent to our completion line!  21%  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 May 2014, 21:06:19
(http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_4547.gif)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 May 2014, 03:40:53
Must be Zovacor!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 07 May 2014, 16:38:42
  :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 May 2014, 11:48:53
We meet the USS Boxer - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_055_1.jpg
Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Boxer_%281832%29
In 1846, Boxer was posted to the Africa Squadron, the primary mission of which was the suppression of the slave trade. That assignment lasted until the summer of 1848 when she returned to the United States.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 May 2014, 15:13:42
Zovacor
Welcome to the top 12 !


Zovacor passes the 250, 500, and 750 marks!



:-[ Sorry I'm so late!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 May 2014, 19:47:09
Randi

3000 WR

 ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 27 May 2014, 19:57:45
 ;D 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 May 2014, 03:08:44
Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 May 2014, 08:01:08
Piping aboard First Lieutenant camiller


 ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 28 May 2014, 11:17:41
 :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 28 May 2014, 11:45:59
It seems the Jamestown's crew is now only recording air pressure with decimal places when it dips below 30.00.  Otherwise, they're recording air pressure as    "30. -"

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_066_0.jpg

I'm assuming the barometer is working and that they're only worried about potential storms indicated by lower air pressure?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 May 2014, 13:40:36
Very strange. I had noticed a few 30.- readings myself, but I was assuming that they meant 30.00. HOWEVER, I think you are right. I just looked at a bunch of pages and I didn't see anything over 30.
 ::) ::) ::)

Just in: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_079_0.jpg (8 December 30.02 and 30.-)
I wonder if they were having problems with their barometer and got it fixed while at Monrovia :-\
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 29 May 2014, 18:24:37
Interesting....

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 31 May 2014, 17:41:59
Zovacor passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 08 June 2014, 21:18:22
How do I transcribe the symbol for 'solar' next to observed lat/long? 

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_070_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 08 June 2014, 21:27:18
How do I transcribe the symbol for 'solar' next to observed lat/long? 

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_070_1.jpg

"Solar".
I'll have to update my Abbreviations (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=639.0) to include that - until now it had only been used as"sun" as in sun rise.  The X with 4 dots is "star" or "stellar".
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 08 June 2014, 21:41:48
Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 June 2014, 04:33:35
How do I transcribe the symbol for 'solar' next to observed lat/long? 

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_070_1.jpg

I don't transcribe it because there is no place to put it on the location tab :-\
It is simply observed.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 09 June 2014, 10:17:43
Oh... should I take out the "solar"  I wrote in front of the lat. and long?  Will a word there confuse the post-transcription process?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 June 2014, 14:26:08
I think that would be better to take it out.
As far as I know, only the actual latitude and longitude should be entered in the Lat and Long boxes.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 09 June 2014, 16:10:11
place name is good for labels + lat/long numbers if you want that.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 June 2014, 17:53:46
I'm not sure. I have this from Philip:
Quote
For places, all I'm using at the moment is the name of the place, so "Melville's  Monument" would be enough, but, as we've previously discussed, "Melville's Monument bore S55E (p.c.)" is better with the future in mind. I've no idea what the squiggle in brackets is.
So, the lat and long would probably not be processed.
I think the key point is that it is observed (measured) not whether it is solar, from bearings, or another method.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 09 June 2014, 18:28:02
A good point.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 10 June 2014, 16:00:41
Thanks - on 2 counts.  I'll edit the position entry and shorten all future "place" entries.  I've been adding all the associated position information.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 June 2014, 17:03:30
Let me (try to) clarify:

With "Place Name" Philip would be happy to have bearing and distance information - and even time if it is part of the phrase - for future use.

However, Lat and Long should be under Observed or Dead Reckoning not Place/Port Name and without any additional info.

Lat and long based on bearings go under Observed.

 ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 12 June 2014, 09:04:12
NOW I get it!  ::)  Thanks again!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 12 June 2014, 10:16:18
Nov. 29, 1847

In Monrovia, "Governor Roberts" visits the Jamestown.    This should be Joseph Jenkins Roberts, child of a freed Virginian slave, who immigrated to Liberia and rose to prominence as a business person and government official.  As governor, he asked the Liberian legislature to declare independence, which it did, then was elected the first president shortly before this visit to the Jamestown.  Actually, in November, 1847, he would have been President Elect Roberts in today's US terminology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Jenkins_Roberts
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_075_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 June 2014, 14:24:54
 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 June 2014, 13:21:07
Gina, from the Archives, has confirmed that there is no record of December 7, 1847 in the logbook.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 21 June 2014, 22:38:11
Remind me again, what is the policy of putting text into the weather observation tab instead of the event tab? Seems like when the ship is in port they will record the wind direction, temp, and weather description all in sentence form.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 21 June 2014, 22:57:31
Don't write the sentence.  Enter each piece of weather data from the sentence as if it had been put in a box in a table.  Same rules apply, including use of dropdowns and TWYS if they come up with something creative.

Can you give me an example link?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 June 2014, 03:46:10
Remind me again, what is the policy of putting text into the weather observation tab instead of the event tab? Seems like when the ship is in port they will record the wind direction, temp, and weather description all in sentence form.

There is quite a bit of discussion on the subject in this thread ;)
Here is a good starting point: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg68251#msg68251
also: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg68861#msg68861



Since we are no longer on nautical days, am/pm is optional. Philip cannot get the hour from the position of the entry, but normally he can distinguish am from pm.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 June 2014, 08:04:31
Porto Praya, Cape Verde - 17 December, 1847:
The Brig Almena, arrived from Buena Vista.
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_083_1.jpg
Possibly:
Quote from: http://www.maritimeheritage.org/inport/1849.htm
July 18: Bay State and California Mining Company Brig Almena, 175 tons, built 1835 in Scituate, Massachusetts. Sailed from Boston, January 26, 1849 under the command of Captain Lincoln with 35 passengers. She arrived 172 days later after a stop at Valparaiso. She began trading in the Sandwich Islands, and ultimately wrecked.


Porto Praya, Cape Verde - 18 December, 1847:
Communicated with the ship Heroine 30 days from Fair Haven bound to the Pacific.
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_084_0.jpg
Probably: http://www.nmdl.org/aowv/whvoyage.cfm?VesselNumber=1597


Porto Praya, Cape Verde - 21 December, 1847:
American Brig Potomac - Arrived
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_085_1.jpg
Probably: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Potomac_%281822%29
http://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/cruise-of-the-united-states-frigate-potomac/
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 June 2014, 16:11:01
Royal Navy ships and officers:
The West African Squadron and slave trade (http://www.pdavis.nl/Background.htm#WAS)
The Slave Trade (http://www.pbenyon.plus.com/Gazette/Slave_Trade/Slave_Trade2.html)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 July 2014, 11:27:58
Quote from: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_092_0.jpg
At 10.50 a number of officers and men came on board from the Boxer to witness punishment. At 11 called all hands and punished Hendrick Hellison and Thomas Martin with the Cats the former with 48 and the latter with 24 lashes in accordance with the sentence of the Court Martial.

I'm not sure if these two men are from Boxer or Jamestown.
It must have been serious. I had never seen more than 12 lashes before.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 July 2014, 08:54:05
Danny252
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 July 2014, 08:54:45
Zovacor passes the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 July 2014, 15:49:41
Zovacor passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 28 July 2014, 21:47:34
I think I'm going to set myself a new goal for a while. I'm going to try to break into the top 12 for all ships (that are still transcribing), just to explore what else is out there.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 July 2014, 02:43:03
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 29 July 2014, 09:49:14
Sounds like a weird strategy to me. But whatever floats your boat, I guess.
Me, I prefer to choose one ship and stay on it until it's all done.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 July 2014, 09:53:03
I tend to get confused if I change ships :-[, but it doesn't seem to bother Silvia ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 September 2014, 14:26:58
Zovacor passes the 2500 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 27 September 2014, 12:19:58
Alaska's boring.  Back to 1840s East Africa!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 September 2014, 14:02:12
Zovacor passes the 3000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 November 2014, 15:06:30
Zovacor passes the 4000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 11 November 2014, 17:50:50
593 this ship is off West not east Africa. Sadly things were usually pretty slow out in real life, but the weather is warmer.

540 speaking of the mention of "gum elastic" soldiers sometimes made reference to their "gum blankets" the name for rubber back then which helped keep them dry when it rained.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 13 November 2014, 23:43:29
Yup, I read that later. Meant West Africa but was thinking East Atlantic and I got my wires crossed when typing.

Just finished the logbook ending 7/30/1848! Probably the third and final transcription, so put that one to rest.

Saw the cover slip on the next logbook (7/30/1848 - 8/15/1849). It was photographed exactly 2 years ago and that book is 4 of 69! Long way to go....
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 13 November 2014, 23:47:15
I thought I saw a place to post artwork found within the logbooks.  The search function on the forum isnt working for me. So, I will add it here and hope it gets moved to the right place:

http://www.oldweather.org/transcriptions/546579323f2fd82bc8006ed8/edit
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: elizabeth on 13 November 2014, 23:50:12
I thought I saw a place to post artwork found within the logbooks.  The search function on the forum isnt working for me. So, I will add it here and hope it gets moved to the right place:

http://www.oldweather.org/transcriptions/546579323f2fd82bc8006ed8/edit
oh dear that link did not work for me :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 14 November 2014, 00:22:38
I thought I saw a place to post artwork found within the logbooks.  The search function on the forum isnt working for me. So, I will add it here and hope it gets moved to the right place:

http://www.oldweather.org/transcriptions/546579323f2fd82bc8006ed8/edit
oh dear that link did not work for me :(

That's the link for your private editing - we need to post the .jpg link of the page scan here.  See Posting Links and Images (A Guide) (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=536.0) for how to do both pages and other online pictures, etc.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 November 2014, 03:37:52
I thought I saw a place to post artwork found within the logbooks.  The search function on the forum isnt working for me. So, I will add it here and hope it gets moved to the right place:

http://www.oldweather.org/transcriptions/546579323f2fd82bc8006ed8/edit

You need to use the jpg link, not the edit link.

You can post it here (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4249.0)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 15 November 2014, 23:46:16
Here should be the correct link to the file:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_002_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 16 November 2014, 00:16:45
That is an amazing page - and they respected the art by never filling in the officers' names!  I'm posting it for now in The Letters and Art of Old Weather (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=1616.msg97827#msg97827), tho others may find a better location for it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 November 2014, 04:47:42
There is, and I copied it ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 November 2014, 05:25:04
Zovacor passes the 5000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 December 2014, 14:56:25
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_132_0.jpg

Quote
Called all hands to Muster, the Capt'n reprimanded the crew for the luberly + slovenly Manner of performing their duties in getting the ship underway.
:o :o

(Perhaps the captain should have mentioned something about spelling too)



More than just reprimands:

Quote
Called all hands to witness punishment, when Albert Kermier, Thos. Burns, Geo. Smith (O.S) and Wm Gilmartin (Lds.) for "Neglect of duty were punished; the 1'st two with a dozen each, with the cats, the 3'rd with 9, and the 4'th with one dozen with the Boys Cats.

Quote
Wm Savage and Jas. F. Gilson (Lds) received the former one dozen with the cats for stealing a Jackett, and the latter 6 with the same instrument, for losing one_
I've got my suspicions about how Gilson lost his jacket...

Quote
One doz. with the Colt, was given to Thos. Malone (O.S) for Neglecting to obey the orders of Lieut. Watkins_



And don't forget:

Quote
Exercised the Fore Royal Yard Men, at sending up and down the Royal Yard.

Quote
Exercised the Main + Mizzen Royal yardmen, sending up and down their Royal yards.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 December 2014, 10:41:33
Quote from: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_141_0.jpg
Stewart Thornton and John Basco, (Lds) each received one dozen with the Cats, for jumping ship on the Deck.

Antonio DeCruz (Sea) five with the Cats, for negligently letting a marline spike fall from aloft.

Thos. Burns O.S. one dozen with ditto. for insolence to the Boats'n.

Chalkley Thorne (O.S.) nine with ditto for obscene and profane language

Manuel P Martin and Charles Williams (Lds.) for neglect of duty and disobedience of Orders_ Received, the former nine and the latter twelve with the Cats_

Not entirely sure about "jumping ship on the Deck"
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 January 2015, 17:55:28
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_145_1.jpg

Quote
From 8 to Meridian. Variable winds from the Nd. + Ed. and Sd. + Wd.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 January 2015, 21:22:31
Now THAT is extremely variable!!! ::) ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 January 2015, 10:32:21
Zovacor passes the 6000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 21 January 2015, 00:03:11
Its time to party like its 1849! If 1848 could be summed up in a single word, it would be...pleasant. Sometimes it was nice, sometimes squally, but mostly just pleasant. Happy to say we ended the year in civilized Cadiz and not the forlorn isles West of Africa. 1848 saw the ol' Cat' frequently meting out punishment for liquor, absenteeism, and pugilism...good times. Noted the passing of President John Quincy Adams, and only 6 months or so after the unfortunate event; it is amazing how communications have improved since the 1820s! Onward to calmer waters and likely continued pleasant weather. My resolution for 1849 is to finally figure out how to get consistent readings out of that barometer...

Cmmdr. Mercer
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 21 January 2015, 02:32:45
 ;D 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 January 2015, 03:55:08
barometer :o :o :o
Oh, boy! What excitement I have to look forward to! ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 January 2015, 12:05:11
Zovacor passes the 7000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 February 2015, 15:04:50
Quote from: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_163_0.jpg
Punished John Smith 2'nd (Seaman) with 12 lashes with the Cats for stealing liquor from the Commodores store room by means of False Keys.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 February 2015, 15:50:08
Now that is the worst criminality - doing what is most certain to get caught!!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 March 2015, 10:40:20
d0cent
Welcome to the top 12 !


 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 March 2015, 09:39:08
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol003of067/vol003of067_183_0.jpg

Note that for Observed and D.R. latitude and longitude North (e.g., 27.06.36 North) and West are sometimes written out.
The software does not process the words correctly, so just use N (e.g., 27.06.36 N) and W.
(a minor exception to TWYS ;))

For the "At Sea" at the top of the page, the Location Type is Place Name.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 March 2015, 17:03:22
Very interesting:
Eleven Years in the U.S. Navy: The Strange Saga of Robert Shorter (http://www.blackpast.org/perspectives/eleven-years-u-s-navy-strange-saga-robert-shorter#sthash.uNkbcfDH.dpuf)
Quote
...
The eleven years Robert Shorter served in the U.S. Navy tell us much about the profound change affecting him and all black sailors during the Civil War.  Shorter served on the sloop-of-war DECATUR throughout that ship?s commission in the Pacific Squadron, 1854-1859, and continued to serve in the Navy during the Civil War, first on the frigate BRANDYWINE, and then on the steamer FAHKEE, through the war?s end in 1865.  His experience is typical of many free black men whose skills on warships under sail earned him a responsible antebellum position, only to lose ground because of the ascendancy of steam-powered warships and seagoing prejudice against unskilled black sailors, often escaped or recently freed slaves or ?contraband? as they were often called
...
When he joined the DECATUR?s crew, Shorter was ranked as a seaman, an aristocrat of skill on the Navy?s sailing warships.  A seaman was the highest ranked crewmember, just below the petty officers who were chosen from among the most experienced seamen.  Men classified as ?seamen? were required to have served at least four years at sea and were also certified meaning they had passed an examination of their seagoing abilities.  Shorter exhibited mastery of the dozens of specialized skills on board a mid-century sailing ship, everything from tying intricate knots to setting and taking in sail to firing the ship?s carronades and fighting with small arms.
...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 14 March 2015, 17:34:15
Yes - it confirms the sad things that have happened.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 March 2015, 08:51:30
d0cent passes the 250 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 17 March 2015, 22:56:25
When the Jamestown is in port, there is typically one weather report for a 4 hour or so period of time with the wind direction and strength in the first sentence and the temperature and pressure in the last sentence.  For lack of additional information, I have been entering all data in the first hour listed. I suspect that this may not be correct but I have decided to at least be consistent.  However, here may be proof that I am incorrect. Note that the Meridian temperature is 77, but the "Meridian to 4 PM" value is 73.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_163_1.jpg

Should I be using the last full hour of the period (e.g. 3:00 would be 73)?  I dont really want to go back and correct all my values, but I want to correct and I also want to be consistent with other folks.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 March 2015, 03:34:54
Philip has asked us to use the end time of the watch.
"Meridian to 4 PM" would be 4PM

See these two posts for more details:
http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg67083#msg67083
http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg67981#msg67981
Note that at the time these examples were done Jamestown was on nautical days, so the page starts with 1PM and ends at noon.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 18 March 2015, 22:13:25
Thanks for pointing that out. I can do that moving forward, but any advice about how to rectify all my past entries?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 18 March 2015, 22:26:50
Rule of thumb, if the date or only location are not involved and the WRs are not badly screwed up, let the past be water under the bridge and correct the future.  That includes this.  There are 2 other transcribers for all you pages who can do it right.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 March 2015, 14:50:57
Zovacor passes the 8000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 March 2015, 16:40:07
Note that in 1848:
23 Sept comes before 22 Sept.
 ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 March 2015, 16:41:01
kimma001
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 29 March 2015, 06:57:09
Wooohooo!!! - well done Kimma001!
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 March 2015, 15:11:54
d0cent passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 April 2015, 12:24:25
07/10/1848 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_038_0.jpg

Received fresh provisions for the crew, containing 205 lbs. of Beef and 205 lbs of Vegetables.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 01 April 2015, 19:02:55
Some questions on this page:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_043_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_043_0.jpg)

Do I need to include 'AM' and 'PM' for the records transcribed from the tabular section of the page?

Do I take the wind force and weather description from the comments after they're under way and add them to the corresponding end-of-watch entries from the table?

Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 01 April 2015, 19:31:50
Quote
Do I need to include 'AM' and 'PM' for the records transcribed from the tabular section of the page?

No, as long as the page starts at midnight with noon in the middle and your boxes are in the right order, the computer will assign the default am first then pm for you.

Quote
Do I take the wind force and weather description from the comments after they're under way and add them to the corresponding end-of-watch entries from the table?

Use anything in the comments that is not included in the WR columns.  If "pleasant" is just listed once for a watch, I myself would only add to the end-of-watch record.  But the column readings take precedence.

:)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 April 2015, 03:47:24
Reminder:
If you come across a mention of trades, trade winds, etc. see http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg68861;topicseen#msg68861
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 April 2015, 08:43:43
Got it. I did see one of these recently and entered 'trades' as a direction.

Thanks!

Reminder:
If you come across a mention of trades, trade winds, etc.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 April 2015, 12:01:32
For Hawse and Hawse clear, see OWpedia (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3209.0) ;)

You may also find Terms found in US log books (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3715.0) and Sail and Wind Powered Sailing Terms (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3515.0) useful.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 April 2015, 16:06:46
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_048_1.jpg:

Received fresh Beef and vegetables for the crew_
Recd. from the Store Ship Erie the following articles Viz. 2095 lbs of Bread. 20 doz. Mustard. 24 doz. Pepper.
Recd. from the Erie Store Ship 1905 lbs Bread
10 Pea Jackets. Two Boxes of Tea. 15 Mattrasses




http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_057_0.jpg

Recd. in the Pursers Department the following articles Viz. 3 Bbls. + 1 Bag of rice. 3 Bbls. Sugar. 2 Kegs of Butter and 114 galls. Molasses
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 17 April 2015, 10:03:15
Randi passes the 6000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 April 2015, 10:28:44
Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 17 April 2015, 14:49:32
Randi - I don't know how you do that AND keep us all in good order WELL DONE!!!!  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 April 2015, 15:00:51
Thank you!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 19 April 2015, 16:05:17
December 21, 1848 (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_075_1.jpg)
Funchal Roads, Madiera

From 4 to 8 A.M.   [...] at 8 hoisted the ensign at half mast as a mark of respect to the memory of Commod. Jas. Biddle.

Commodore Biddle died October 1 in Philadelphia (per Wikipedia), so this would appear to illustrate the pace of news travel for them.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 April 2015, 08:16:03
kimma001 passes the 250 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 April 2015, 16:23:01
d0cent passes the 750 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 23 April 2015, 01:12:19
Woot, I'm now only 10,000 shy of the Captain...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 May 2015, 19:10:00
Based on discussions with Philip, the 1am and 6am wind directions would be entered as Calm.
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_089_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 03 May 2015, 22:34:51
Thanks for confirming- that's what I've been doing but there's a lot of nuance to some of these logs.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 May 2015, 03:33:57
Jamestown (1844) is indeed complicated.
If you are not sure about something, don't hesitate to ask ;)
That is in part the purpose of this topic!

(It also warns Philip about possible problems.)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 25 May 2015, 22:19:26
Finished a logbook!  It ended August 15, 1849, in Smyrna.

The next logbook goes until May 11, 1850, which seems much shorter than the one I just completed.

I'm adding this page in the next logbook to the Art of Old Weather, but thought I'd be worth sharing here to.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_002_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 May 2015, 03:13:06
I moved the page to The Letters, Humor, and Art of Old Weather Logbooks (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4249.0)

The Letters and Art of Old Weather is for transcribers contributions ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 31 May 2015, 20:11:39
Sept. 2, 1849. Constantinople. The moon underwent a partial eclipse from 6-8 PM.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_012_0.jpg

I've added a similar note to the Natural Phenomena thread.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 June 2015, 14:33:10
Zovacor passes the 9000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 July 2015, 05:01:21
d0cent passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 July 2015, 05:05:11
Zovacor passes the 10,000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 07 August 2015, 12:25:36
It's April, 1849, and she's in Palermo, Sicily. The last few days have seen the receipt of several trunks and bags of valuables from the Consul, so off to Wikipedia to find out this is near the end of the Sicilian Revolution of 1848. Interesting enough, but this has to be one of the strangest flags I've ever seen.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/Bandiera_dello_Stato_della_Sicilia_%2828.04.1848_-_15.05.1849%29.PNG

Caption: Flag used by Sicilian Separatists
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 07 August 2015, 13:57:31
Wiki says that's the winged head of Medusa in the hub, used by Sicily since 1282 - extremely attention-getting choice of symbols.  Interesting.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 08 August 2015, 03:09:25
My Google-fu is pretty strong today, and I found out all sorts of neat things about the history of that intriguing flag.

1st off, Janet's right about the winged head of medusa dating back to the Sicilian Vespers in 1282. The use of the symbol itself, while only speculative, seems to have come about from a combination of both the rebels rejection of the Anjou rule over the island, and symbolic of the protective element long established by the symbol itself (the goddess Athena wore the likeness of Medusa on her Aegis). In a strange turn of irony, during World War I, the French had ceremonial uniform belts that included likenesses of the winged Medusa head on their bronze belt buckles.

The wheat ears in triskelion seem to be symbolic of Sicily's agricultural heritage, which couples well with the yellow half, which is representative of Corleone, which was a renowned agricultural area during the medieval period.

There are two schools of thought regarding the leg triskelion (or more accurately the trinacria), apparently. I have an opinion which supports the leading thought, and expands on why it has taken the form of actual legs, but I'll save that for the end of this section. The leading thought is that the triskelion, in general, is representative of Sicily's roughly triangular shape. The second thought is that the triskelion represents the three valli of Sicily, back when it was governed by Muslim rule, and the island was split into three administrative districts.

My own personal thought is that as the triskele has been considered a symbol of Sicily for thousands of years, when Sicily was a Greek colony beyond the Aegean, and according to Pliny the Elder, was taken as a symbol because of the island's triangular shape, and that each leg represented the promontory points, and each was given a name, Pelorus, Pachynus, and Lilybaeum. This is given further credence in that Punta del Faro, Sicily's northeastern promontory, was called cape Pelorus, likely named after what is essentially the first known maritime navigational aid and precursor to the modern compass (which in turn was named thus after Hannibal's pilot, although the tool itself predates Pelorus the man by several hundred years). Pachynus was the Latin name of the southeastern promontory, now known as Capo Passero, and thus the second leg of the trinacria is called Pachynus. The third leg is called Lilybaeum, which was the Latin name of the Carthaginian city of Lilybaion (the town which looks at Libya), upon the ruins of which the modern city of Marsala now sits, on the westernmost coastline. All of these things, when combined together point toward the three legs of the trinacria being representative of the island's shape. Taking the appearance of legs, however, seems (to me) to be a bit of humor at the literal meaning of the word triskele - three-legged - replacing the far more common triple spiral pattern of the Mycenaean and Gaulish triskelion (perhaps intentionally done as a rejection of the French, in it's modern form, although the trinacria itself is nearly as old as there has been civilization established upon the island, so that's more than a bit unlikely, but a fun bit of speculation).

The thing that surprises me the most after my little google-fu session here is how widespread the triskele design, in general, is on a global scale. Triple spiral designs are seen in virtually every part of the world as early as the Neolithic. I have a completely speculative theory that this may actually be, at least in part, directly *because* of the Neolithic period. If anyone else here has ever attempted to recreate ancient stone tools, you may (or may not) have noticed that one of the ways to do double duty work of removing large sections of stone, while simultaneously reinforcing weaker sections to prevent unintentional breakage, is to do so in sort of trihedral chunks, which kind of end up imprinting a triskele pattern into the edges, where material gets flaked off. I can't help but wonder if this sort of technique ended up getting ingrained into different civilizations' psyches, and perhaps this is where that symbol comes from?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 08 August 2015, 04:12:39
I like those last thoughts, gives a common source for a common pattern.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 08 August 2015, 09:56:40
April 27, 1849
Palermo, Sicily

From 8 to Meridian

The Neapolitan Fleet Blockading.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_139_0.jpg

They arrived off the harbor the previous day. Craig posted some of the subsequent events - two years ago. Seems we need to pick up the transcribing pace a bit.  ;)

http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg71476;topicseen#msg71476
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 August 2015, 10:09:51
You, d0cent, and I are sharing the third stream ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 08 August 2015, 12:13:11
Ah yes, the war of the the two Sicilies, I remember that.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 August 2015, 05:27:47
kimma001 passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 09 August 2015, 13:35:07
May 29, 1849
Spezzia

From 8 to Meridian.

Painted inside with a dry brush.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_155_0.jpg

From 4 to 8 P.M.

Exercised 1st Division at one hand clapping.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 August 2015, 14:48:28
I'm missing something somewhere :-[
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 09 August 2015, 16:12:52
Nah, just me being wayyyyy too oblique.  ;)

I'm missing something somewhere :-[
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 09 August 2015, 16:38:19
I found that rather confusing too. Next time, please make the joke more obvious - like by using this emoticon:  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 09 August 2015, 19:34:01
I got it - painting with a dry brush has to be about as useful as clapping with one hand.   ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 09 August 2015, 20:30:21
I was actually going for the Zen 'What is the sound of one hand clapping' played against 'Painting with a dry brush'...

A swing and a miss!  :o ::) :-[
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 09 August 2015, 20:34:27
ahhhh sorry.  Don't have enough zen in our lives.  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 09 August 2015, 22:42:48
Someone "painting with a dry brush" sounds like a euphemism for idiocy or insanity along the lines of "playing without a full deck of cards." 

Looks like we are at 30 percent! Good job third stream! I'm at March 1, 1850, so it looks like you are catching up.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 August 2015, 03:35:45
Dry brush painting exists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drybrush
There is more information about painting walls etc., but most of the links are from paint companies.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 11 August 2015, 20:03:18
June 28, 1849
Naples

From 8 to Midnight. Light airs from with nauseable odors from shore.  :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_170_0.jpg

Should I make that the 'weather' entry?  ;)

Same comment the next watch, but a little more legible and without the strike-through...

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_170_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 11 August 2015, 22:37:37
Makes you wonder a bit about Naples in that age - they usually did not log city odors.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 12 August 2015, 07:39:31
Maybe Mt Vesuvius was burping out gases?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 12 August 2015, 08:33:00
Definitely not Vesuvius or Etna, nor Stromboli (surprisingly, honestly, given that it's been continuously active for nearly 2,000 years), Pantelleria, nor Vulcano.

In all honesty, it seems that, given that it's 1849, and Naples has been focusing on more important things (like not being razed by the French/Austrians/Spanish/etc.) it's most probable that it's simply the city itself being a bit more... fragrant, than the modern city we know (which is pretty dirty by modern standards). It's an absolutely lovely city, but imagine nearly a million people (estimating here, as I'm having trouble finding census data for the period, most likely due to the revolutions taking place) crammed together in a pretty small area that's occupied by foreign armies, near the end of a year long war.

Sanitation takes a back seat to imminent survival, and our offended noses and watering eyes are the unfortunate victims in this case.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 August 2015, 09:48:16
That is probably exactly what they are talking about - they are usually precise about volcanic emissions. 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 14 August 2015, 21:23:28
July 30-31, 1849
At sea, out of Trieste

From 4 to 6 [PM]   The report of heavy artillery heard in the direction of Venice.

From 6 to 8 [PM]   firing of heavy guns heard

From 8 to Midnight.   heard heavy firing of guns, bearing WNW (Bombardment of Venice)

Commences   heavy firing of guns heard during the watch in the direction of Venice

From 4 to 8 A.M.   the report of artillery heard in the direction of Venice


Quite a prolonged shelling.  :-\

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_186_0.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_186_1.jpg

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 15 August 2015, 04:53:25
Sounds like it was this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_San_Marco
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 15 August 2015, 05:58:27
This would undoubtedly have been simply part of the siege of Venice, which, from a military standpoint, is one of the most pivotal moments in history (although it has absolutely nothing to do with the night of the 30th/morning of the 31st, aside from being a part of the same siege). While the amount of shelling into Venice is absolutely mind boggling (60,000 cannonballs over the course of about a week at one point in late May), the Habsburg siege of Venice has another significant historic claim.

On July 15, the Austrian forces under the command of artillery Lieutenant Franz von Uchatius, sat aboard the Austrian war steamer "Vulcan", tying bombs to paper balloons of Uchatius' own design (either 2 or 200, depending on whether you take von Uchatius' word, or the word of Lee Kennett, respectively). These balloons were released to float over the city of Venice, where a timed fuse would drop their payloads into the city, so long as the winds remained favorable.

According to von Uchatius, the two he released worked quite well, but he was unable to continue the bombardment as his ship was in need of repairs, and withdrew from the siege after only the two proved his concept viable. Von Uchatius goes on to say that his story can be verified by the captain of the British brig "HMS Frolic", who was near enough to view his bombing experiment, as well as the reactions of the terrified Venetian people.

Kennett's story is a bit different, not only in number of balloons, but also in the efficacy of the bombardment, and the outcome of the experimentation. He had stated that the 200 balloons were caught by unexpectedly fast winds as they climbed above 5000 fathoms, sailed beyond the city, and dropped mostly harmlessly on the mainland. I say mostly, as Kennett also states that several of the bombs exploded in the midst of the Austrian infantry encampment on the mainland side of Venice.

The truth of the matter is probably somewhere in between both stories, although it likely is closer to von Uchatius' account for any number of reasons, including the fact that he was actually there, whereas Kennett wasn't born until nearly 100 years afterward.

Either way, this was the first aerial bombardment of any kind in human history, and is a rather significant event. The city of Venice wouldn't see another bombardment until May 24th 1915.

Edited for spelling.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 15 August 2015, 06:15:59
I do 5 minutes of Wikipedia reading and post a link, and you do a lot of research (I'm guessing at least 20 minutes) and post a whole history essay.  ::)

Guess I'll stick to superfast transcribing.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 15 August 2015, 07:10:51
Short and long research are both pleasant in their own way, Hanibal.  Some like all the detail a lot, others prefer short and terse.  The important thing is to write it out in a way the gives the writer pleasure.  History and background stories are never a contest. 

I personally like both, reading HatterJack to get his slant and skimming your Wiki article to see the pictures.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 15 August 2015, 07:52:27
Was about an hour's worth of research, but I'm stuck at work without a lot else going on, and it was pretty interesting. I actually started with your wiki link, and just kind of fell into the time vortex. Just think of me as a long-winded companion to your Doctor :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 15 August 2015, 08:48:25
Both are helpful, and without the Wiki link there might not have been an essay.
Post a Wiki link anytime you want to!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 15 August 2015, 19:29:04
USS Jamestown
August 3, 1849
Adriatic Sea, south of Brindisi

Commences   A brig on the lee Bow.

From 4 to 8 AM.   The Brig that was to leeward, crossed our bows, and hoisted a British Ensign and pendant, Got the two Bow Guns aft to the Mainmast. Trying our sailing with the Brig, (HBM Brig Racer) at 8 dropped the Brig


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_188_0.jpg

The race is on?  ;)

For a bit more on HBM Brig Racer: History Gone By the Board (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4388.msg113929#msg113929)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 15 August 2015, 20:24:57
August 4, 1849

Called all hands to witness punishment, & punished Peter Clark (Sea) 12 lashes with the Cats for insolence to the Boatswain & saying that the Officer of the Deck might kiss his...

(http://i394.photobucket.com/albums/pp29/rcl111/Misc/aug4_1849_zpste1lslyy.png)

The penciled-in pointing finger is a nice touch, I do hope it's contemporary.  ;)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_188_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 August 2015, 04:10:49
 :o ;D :-X
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 August 2015, 05:16:09
kimma001 passes the 1000 and 1500 marks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 16 August 2015, 12:10:17
The log has 'Paraimo' for the location here:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_191_0.jpg

...and says 'Paraino' in the comments here:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_190_1.jpg

They're somewhere near Athens (mentioned bearings to the Peak of Egina and the "Accopalis"), but I can't find Paraimo/Paraino anywhere as a Greek place name. I'm pretty sure they mean Palaio, just down the coast a bit from Athens. I'll TWYS, but heads up for the editors.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 August 2015, 14:29:09
There is also a Phalerum Bay (Phaleron Bay)
http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~3139~440041

Ormos Falirou: http://www.geonames.org/262518/ormos-falirou.html

That may be the same as Palaio?

 :-\ :-\ :-\

Perhaps not quite: http://www.geonames.org/256075/palaio-faliro.html
 ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 16 August 2015, 18:34:34
August 12, 1849
Doro Passage

From 6 to 8. [PM]   Fresh breezes and passing squalls,?Beating through the Doro Passage.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol004of067/vol004of067_192_1.jpg

It may not have been an easy trip: History Gone By the Board (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4388.msg113986#msg113986)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 17 August 2015, 05:04:45
Having gotten bored with the Concord's monotony, I have taken the plunge and joined this ship.
I know she has very odd formats, but I have reviewed this topic and believe I can handle it.
Just wanted to mention/ask: On this page,  she starts taking "Air" temperatures.
The example in the Reference topic has that column transcribed as Dry, so I will do that unless told otherwise.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_007_1.jpg

Oh, and for the text-only bits (previous pages and morning of the above one) I transcribed the single temperature as "Ther Attached" because they just called it "Ther".
But now that I see them using only the Dry value, I might have been wrong. Sorry.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 17 August 2015, 05:35:33
One more thing: For logbook 5, the crew keep switching back and forth between using the grid and going freehand - sometimes even on the same page!

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_012_0.jpg

Keep a very good eye out for this, fellow transcribers - I've already missed a few WR and had to go back and add them in later.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 17 August 2015, 07:41:16
They use the grid format when they're at sea, the comments when in port, and both on the same page when coming and going. It keeps you on your toes!  :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 17 August 2015, 08:10:08
Yes, I found it very stimulating. I was also recording the written weather comments such as wind direction and strength, etc. Philip doesn't require this when they are in the remarks but I thought that it could be useful for other potential users. However, I'm not sure that I would do it now  if I came back to this ship.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 August 2015, 08:18:30
So far, all temperatures are Dry. From what I have seen, that is the case for some time to come.

Now can see why I had things like "Nd {+}{Space}", Sd {+}{Space}, Ed{Tab}, Wd{Tab}, Northd{Tab}, Southd{Tab}, etc. in my AHK script ;)
Soon your drop-downs will be filled with things like light airs, fresh breezes, pleasant, and passing clouds ;D



Hi Craig! Recording the wind strength and weather description isn't so bad --- except when you get first part of watch/last part of watch or the remarks conflict with the grid.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 17 August 2015, 08:27:44
I agree it's not so bad, Randi. But you know me - always trying to optimize utility. It's more a question of a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Some future data user might want to work with these data but transcribing it takes time that could be used for data that will definitely be used by Philip.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 17 August 2015, 16:53:40
I've been entering the info as such: N'd+E'd (or whatever the direction may be). I've ignored all the "pleasant" weather entries because it rarely seems like it isn't pleasant, so I don't think there is much value in that description.  When at port the entries spanning 4 hours should be entered as the final hour of that timespan, so "Commences until 4 AM" should be entered as 4, etc through the day. I, like Hanibal, don't transcribe the daily non-weather goings on; trying to decipher what is written is challenging especially when it is a long list of floggings and sail trimming. But I find these logs to be fairly easy to enter and fairly predictable in their format, but not mindless or speedy for sure.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 August 2015, 17:48:22
I love reading all the events!
This log got me reading Two Years Before the Mast.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 17 August 2015, 18:22:47
September 14, 1849
Constantinople

From 8 to Meridian.

At 12 hoisted the Turkish at the Fore. Manned the yards, and fired a salute of 21 guns, as the Sultan passed going to Mosque.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_018_0.jpg

Manning the yards was a pretty big deal! For more on the Sultan: History Gone By the Board (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4388.msg114033#msg114033)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 18 August 2015, 22:03:39
October 14, 1849
Alexandria, Egypt

Sent on shore 10 lbs of Priming Powder for the use of the Consul General.

Whatever for?  ???

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_033_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 18 August 2015, 23:10:47
I should add that I do appreciate that others are reading the events with a finer eye. It is fascinating to think about what is going on (or alluded to) if you take the time to stop and reflect on it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 19 August 2015, 05:37:22
October 14, 1849
Alexandria, Egypt

Sent on shore 10 lbs of Priming Powder for the use of the Consul General.

Whatever for?  ???

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_033_0.jpg

At a guess, it's probably tied to the death of Muhammad Ali. John Murray, the British Consul to Egypt at the time reflected that his funeral was rather unfitting a man of his status and for the scale of his accomplishments. The various western Consuls would likely have wanted the powder for gun salutes. Purely speculation on my part, but the timeframe is reasonable, as Muhammad Ali had died only two months earlier.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 19 August 2015, 07:50:21
I should add that I do appreciate that others are reading the events with a finer eye. It is fascinating to think about what is going on (or alluded to) if you take the time to stop and reflect on it.

Yes, some of these events are quite interesting, and I like it when other people post about them.
But I still don't have the patience to transcribe them myself - especially when the ship's handwriting is as bad as this one's.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 19 August 2015, 08:51:17
At a guess, it's probably tied to the death of Muhammad Ali. John Murray, the British Consul to Egypt at the time reflected that his funeral was rather unfitting a man of his status and for the scale of his accomplishments. The various western Consuls would likely have wanted the powder for gun salutes. Purely speculation on my part, but the timeframe is reasonable, as Muhammad Ali had died only two months earlier.

Sounds like a plausible explanation.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 19 August 2015, 08:54:29
October 26, 1849
Valetta

From 8 to Meridian.   Received a load of sand and Holystones.

...and there was much rejoicing.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 August 2015, 09:05:24
They were brought to their knees (http://www.navy.mil/navydata/traditions/html/navyterm.html#holystone) at the reception of such a blessing.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 19 August 2015, 09:27:05
I'm suddenly very happy I'm not the only person who has that bookmarked for people. Also that whole "some nautical terminology has found its way into everyday use" thing makes me chuckle every time I read it. I think people would be surprised by just how much informal English is derived from 17th-early 20th century naval jargon.

I still like that "son of a gun" is an old (like, really really old) navy reference that people don't really get, because of the assumption that there weren't many women on ships. Just because they weren't being paid (by the crown...) to be there doesn't mean they weren't aboard.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 August 2015, 09:49:48
http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4104.0 ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 19 August 2015, 18:56:23
October 15, 1849
Alexandria, Egypt

From Meridian to 4.   Passd. Midspn. E Y McCauley reported for a passage to the squadron.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_033_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_033_1.jpg)

The McCauley family had quite a Naval history: History Gone By the Board (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4388.msg114164#msg114164)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 August 2015, 17:30:47
OK, I've run up against this one now. I've read through the old thread, but still aren't sure what to do with these double, not to mention inconsistent, temperature records. Any current thoughts? Extra entry? Coin flip?

They are beginning to report two temperatures on an irregular basis but they label them both "Ther". See 4 AM and midnight.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_062_1.jpg

It has been about 2 years since they stopped recording sea temperature. Should we assume that the first is air and the second is sea?

... and following.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 August 2015, 17:55:07
I'd suggest going with:
I went back and reviewed a number of pages and I think choosing the temperature following the pressure for Dry gives the most reasonable results. When there are two, the one preceding the pressure is almost always higher and the one following the pressure is the most consistent with the surrounding single temperature readings. I think in cases where there are inconsistencies the log keeper probably confused the two. (I noted that he recorded a pressure as 39-point-something at one point. The "39" was the same as the temperature).

If you agree, I can go back and enter the one preceding the pressure (when there are two) as Ther Attached. It may not necessarily be "attached" but Philip can decide if he wants to use it or ignore it.
but coin flip sounds good too.

I suspect they have pretty good temperature records for Genoa, so it probably isn't worth worrying too much :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 20 August 2015, 18:09:43
The 2013 answer from Philip is:
... Should we assume that the first is air and the second is sea?
Philip says he doesn't know but to go ahead with that assumption. 

The other thing is, I don't think they had good attached thermometers until a little later than this.  Measuring sea temp would have been relatively easy.  Also, if 2 thermometers were mounted in front of them every day, recording both would happen more often.  Therefore going with the sea temp makes more sense to me.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 August 2015, 18:18:57
I saw that, but after reading the rest of Craig's comments and Kevin's comment, that did not seem to be the correct assumption.
Also, most ships don't record sea temperatures when in port.

As Philip has said before, just make your best guess :-\
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 August 2015, 18:24:30
As Philip has said before, just make your best guess :-\

I will do that.  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 20 August 2015, 18:29:47
As Philip has also said, guess exuberantly.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 20 August 2015, 18:33:32
I think I will do what Craig suggested: If, and only if, there are two temperatures, enter the one preceding the pressure as Ther Attached.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 August 2015, 18:40:15
I think it's going to take more than three transcribers to get a set of three matching transcriptions for these pages.  :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 20 August 2015, 18:42:43
That's why Philip has human analysts to look for things.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 August 2015, 18:46:49
Well, Philip has also said that if he gets different answers he will know it was not obvious ;D



That's why Philip has human analysts to look for things.  :)
Yup! Computers aren't going to put us out of work on Jamestown ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 21 August 2015, 05:32:34
Now they've changed to having the first temperature be the highest one - see first entry here:
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_082_1.jpg

I have decided to do this: If there are two temperatures, I will transcribe the higher one as Ther Attached, regardless of wheter it is on the left or right of the pressure value.
This makes the most sense because the lower of the two is always a lot closer to the single temps (ones that are definitely Dry) in terms of value.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 21 August 2015, 06:54:54
We are all guessing here Hanibal, go for it.  In many ways, the original log keepers were still on a learning curve recording weather.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 August 2015, 08:39:35
I'm with Janet - go for it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 21 August 2015, 12:59:29
OK, they've stopped recording temperatures and pressures in the pure-text sections (when in port - they still record it all at sea).
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_003_0.jpg

I don't record the wind directions and weather codes because these are typically very vague - too vague for computers, IMO.
So maybe I should leave these pages for those who record events, because there's nothing I would transcribe except the date - or maybe I should just keep going, since I already skipped through the events parts of many other pages too.

(And yes, I am well aware of how they are now putting 2 days on 1 page)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 21 August 2015, 14:34:51
If the entire part of the log is something you want to skip, you may consider just dropping this voyage.  You are not going to be getting that very much.

It is historically too early to give you all easy codes and numbers.  The Beaufort codes for weather were not adopted formally by the RN until 1832 and his wind strength codes not until 1838.  There is some questions in my mind how long it took to be taken on by the US Navy, since Beaufort kept adjusting it until he was satisfied and the US might still be doubting its stability, and merchant mariners resisted changing to that for decades.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 August 2015, 14:35:57
Silvia wanted to enter temperature and pressure data from the Remarks page when there was no weather grid.

Then Craig wanted to add wind direction and Philip said " I suggest putting as much as possible in the weather ob - if there's wind, add it in."

So, for the attached example, I asked if entering "light breezes" and "pleasant" was going too far.

Philip replied
Quote
Hi Randi.
  I would say put it in - let's capture as much as possible.
  I have to remind you that I can't guarantee to analyse it successfully (we should be able to use the temperature, even if we don't get three repetitions, but the rest is speculative). But it is great to see it being captured.
Cheers, Philip




Note that, like transcribing remarks in general, this is entirely optional.

I am only doing this when there is no weather grid (as here: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol001of067/vol001of067_048_0.jpg)



NOTE:
1. The end time of the watch is used.
2. Although only "light" shows in the Force box, I actually entered "light breezes".
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 21 August 2015, 16:08:43
Actually, I got it wrong in my first post - I do record the wind directions, but only the directions themselves, like "Sd + Ed". I don't add in bits like "moderate breeezes" or so.

But yeah, I think I will take Janet's advice and let this ship be for a while. It's just so confusing, and I got plenty logs left on the Concord.

I should have looked at Randi's post from June 2013 - when I return to this ship, that is exactly how I intend to do it.
My utmost apologies for being too hasty and not checking everything before jumping into the fray.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 August 2015, 17:31:50
You are forgiven!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 21 August 2015, 17:41:17
No problem.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 22 August 2015, 18:10:23
You are forgiven!

Even though I left out the wind force and weather code on over 2000 WR? Thanks!

P.S. I just noticed kimma001 and I are no longer in the same stream - he's done a couple hundred WR recently, but I still get the same page as before.
This is good!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 August 2015, 18:41:49
This does produce a problem for the analysts, Hanibal, and deliberately skipping even non-standard weather readings cheats them of computerized data checks.  But it already happened, and is not worth going back for.  The severe irregularity of this ship helps you here, because it is all going to have to be processed more carefully. 

Let this one go, what's done is done.  Please do not repeat it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 August 2015, 05:23:42
Hanibal94
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 August 2015, 05:26:42
Hanibal94 passes the 1000, 1500 and 2000 marks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 August 2015, 05:28:35
kimma001 passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 23 August 2015, 16:34:01
Let this one go, what's done is done.  Please do not repeat it.

Don't worry - I've definitely learned my lesson, and won't repeat my mistakes.

But for now, I will focus on the Concord. I think she's a better target because she always has the pressure and three temperatures (all four, when at sea) recorded, every hour.
This, in my opinion, means better results for the scientists.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 August 2015, 16:43:00
But for now, I will focus on the Concord. I think she's a better target because she always has the pressure and three temperatures (all four, when at sea) recorded, every hour.
This, in my opinion, means better results for the scientists.

I agree.
I think that Jamestown 1844's most important contribution may be teaching us to handle collecting weather data from the remarks. As you say, there isn't a lot of weather data.
It's a fascinating ship though!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 23 August 2015, 20:17:13
It crosses paths with Old Ironsides a couple of times (perhaps you have gotten that far already). I wonder if the logs for it - USS Constitution - are available?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 23 August 2015, 21:02:03
It crosses paths with Old Ironsides a couple of times (perhaps you have gotten that far already). I wonder if the logs for it - USS Constitution - are available?

All I know is, NARA has the logs and is hungry to get the history in them fully transcribed.  Philip says (correctly) they start before trustworthy weather readings can be gotten (50 years before Jamestown 1844).  Americans like me are hungry to get the Constitution's logs, especially the earliest ones.  Kevin says (correctly) she never much went up into the arctic.  Transcribers like you working on earlier ships that cross her path are hungry to get those logs.

So what are the chances we will get a crack at the Constitution, beginning with her launch in 1797? ;)  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 25 August 2015, 21:44:11
May 8, 1850

From 8 to Meridian   At 11 Commodore Sloat visited the ship and was saluted with 13 guns which was returned with 7.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_136_1.jpg

They haven't been recording the name of the port they're in, but if it's Commodore John D. Sloat (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Sloat) in 1850, it's probably the Norfolk Navy Yard.  ;)

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 25 August 2015, 21:52:54
May 11, 1850
Norfolk Navy Yard

From Meridian to 4   At 2.30 crew left ship - ship placed in charge of officers of the Navy Yard.

At sunset hauled down the colors and put ship out of Commission.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol005of067/vol005of067_138_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 25 August 2015, 22:13:32
I've run into a section of two days per page here:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_003_0.jpg

A forum search turned up the advice to just carry on and enter "Date-data-data-..." twice for each page. Before I dive into it, is that still the current wisdom?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 25 August 2015, 23:42:46
Yes, that is exactly right.  date then location and data, however many times they cram that on.  (You should have seen the page abuse done by some of the British trawler captains of WW1.)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 26 August 2015, 15:30:09
Yes, that is exactly right.  date then location and data, however many times they cram that on.  (You should have seen the page abuse done by some of the British trawler captains of WW1.)

How about the time I got 14 days on one page on the Yukon (which was completed long before you joined the project):

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USCS%20Yukon/Book%201/IMG_4094_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 August 2015, 09:14:21
Yes, that is exactly right.  date then location and data, however many times they cram that on.  (You should have seen the page abuse done by some of the British trawler captains of WW1.)

How about the time I got 14 days on one page on the Yukon (which was completed long before you joined the project):

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USCS%20Yukon/Book%201/IMG_4094_1.jpg

 :o

I guess all they wanted to say was "Today: Weather, all day." Nice details.  ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 August 2015, 09:44:32
 ::) ::)

Link? ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 August 2015, 09:58:20
::) ::)

Link? ;D

Woops, should've included the quote I was addressing...fixed.  :-[

I blame the non-functioning Preview mode.  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 August 2015, 10:50:55
Whoops!
Now I understand :-[ ::) :-[ ::) :-[
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 27 August 2015, 15:50:00
I must admit I have found myself EXTREMELY grateful for Firefox's Autofill function.
Without that, this ship would be a hundred times more tedious than it already is.
At least she's at sea now, so they're transcribing pressure and temperature values as well.
Oh, and I think kimma001 and I are in different streams now. That is good - we won't be stepping on each others toes!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 August 2015, 20:49:49
April 22, 1851
Norfolk Navy Yard


From 4 to 8   Sent the Marines on shore to attend the burial of the late Commodore Barron.

From Mer to 4   At 1.30 fired in company with the Adams & Pennsylvania 13. minute guns as a mark of respect to the late "Commodore Barron".


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_004_1.jpg


Commodore Barron seems an unlikely recipient of such honors: History Gone By the Board (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4388.msg114668#msg114668)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 27 August 2015, 22:39:47
With all the extra attention being paid to this old, neglected ship, I think I am going to move over to the Albatross for some easier transcribing (although, I just got an old refurbished X-Box, so lets be honest about where my limited free time is going for a while).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 August 2015, 03:39:52
 ;D
I'm terribly slow, but I keep working on it. Jamestown 1844 is by far my favorite ship.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 28 August 2015, 16:34:26
May 17, 1851
Norfolk Navy Yard

From 8 to Mer.   Rec'd from the yard "One compass"

I love how he spelled out 'one', and put it all in quotes, a convention usually reserved for the names of ships and important persons; very formal, almost solemn. Appropriate, though, considering how important it is to the health and well being of the ship and crew. Or maybe he was just being sarcastic after the hundredth shout of 'Be careful with that thing, man!'. Now, if they would receive "One thermometer" and "One barometer" I'd have something to transcribe besides the winds and weather.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_010_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 28 August 2015, 21:10:36
It does slightly smack of sarcasm doesn't it?  ;D

I like the apparent mistake on beef volumes - is that 228 tbs (i.e. tablespoons!) of beef (and matching veg) or is that 228 lbs beef (and matching veg?) They got through that lot for lunch - a new lot (224 etc ) arrived in the evening - presumably they were still digesting tough beef from the morning?  :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 August 2015, 05:03:41
kimma001 passes the 3000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 August 2015, 05:04:12
Hanibal94 passes the 3000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 31 August 2015, 19:10:17
June 27, 1851
Funchal, Madeira Island

From 4 to 8   Saluted the Flag of Commodore Aulick with 12 guns which was returned by 9 from the U S Steamer Susquehana

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_027_0.jpg


Commodore John H. Aulick was at this time the commander of the East India Squadron, starting its way to Japan. He shortly managed to irritate a Brazilian diplomat, on board for passage back to Brazil, enough to get a formal complaint lodged against him with the Department of State. This resulted in Aulick getting recalled, with Commodore Matthew Perry receiving command of the squadron and leading its voyage into the history books.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_H._Aulick
http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Aulick_John_H_ca_1791-1873#start_entry
https://archive.org/stream/pottersamericanm03lossuoft#page/290/mode/2up
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 September 2015, 20:16:39
July 2, 1851
Funchal, Madeira Island

From 8 to Mer.

At 11.30 Mr. Schenck American Minister to Brazil & Mr. Pendleton Charge' to the Argentine Republic, & Signor Macedo Brazilian Minister to the U. States visited the ship & on leaving were saluted with 17 guns.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_028_1.jpg


Here we see mention of two of the main players in Aulick's story, Signor Macedo and Mr. Schenck, visiting the Jamestown before they sailed for Rio De Janeiro on the Susquehanna. From there, Aulick made it all the way to Hong Kong before getting notice of his relief, to eventually be replaced by Perry.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 06 September 2015, 07:23:02
I got a little trick for transcribing this ship faster:

Since the wind force and weather code are always given in the text, and always for 4 hours, I only type it out for the first hour of the batch - for the rest, I just type dittos in the correct boxes.
So for this page for example, the 1 - 4 am watch says "moderate breezes, cloudy", so I typed those out for the 1 am WR, but just entered dittos for 2, 3 and 4 am.
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_026_1.jpg

And if a value stays the same for longer, I just keep entering dittos - like with this page, they had "moderate breezes" for the wind force all day long, so I ended up entering 23 dittos for that column altogether.

I know this isn't strictly TWYS - but it's too useful to not do, so I'm gonna keep doing it.
Besides, they put loads of dittos in the wind direction column anyway.



EDIT: Actually, this is a bad idea, and should not be done. See below.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 September 2015, 07:30:13
It's not a good idea  Hanibal, especially putting it out where it gives newbies ideas.  I agree this is not skipping to the human eye, but the computer doesn't know that.  Any time one of the other transcribers makes a typo or misreads a number, your artificial ditto will contemn that datum to the illegible-discard pile.  You are effectively narrowing the error correction of three transcribers down to an unstable two real transcribers.

This is one case where a love of speed hurts the science.  Slower and correct transcription is better.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 September 2015, 07:47:03
I agree with Janet's comments, and in addition:
Why are you entering it every time?
Philip has said only to enter it for the last hour of the watch.



Thank you Hanibal94!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 06 September 2015, 08:47:04
Sorry about this mess. I really thought it was a better idea, but if it leads to unstable results, I will definitely not do it.

Oh, and I only did it for when she was at sea, and they actually used the grid to enter 24 WR/day. (See the example in my previous post).
When she's at port and there's only text, I did it the way Philip asked.



Oh, and one other question: What is to be done when the paragraph of a watch says "First part so-and-so, second part this-and-that?"
Until now, I made 2 WR, stuck the last hour of the first half of the watch in the first WR's hour box, and the last hour of the watch as a whole in the second WR's hour box.

So for a midnight - 4 am watch, the first WR would have 2 am and the second would have 4 am in the hour box.
Is this a good way to do it?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 September 2015, 08:58:09
The problem with recording all hours is that we don't know when the change took place. If midnight - 4 am is clear and 4 - 8 is cloudy we don't know when the transition took place. Filling in clear for 1am, 2am, 3am, and 4am and cloudy for 5am, 6am, 7am, and 8am might be right but probably isn't. Following Philip's policy of using the end time of the watch gives consistent data and Philip knows that he needs to interpret it with a grain of (sea) salt ;)



"So for a midnight - 4 am watch, the first WR would have 2 am and the second would have 4 am in the hour box."
Yes.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 06 September 2015, 09:04:07
The problem with recording all hours is that we don't know when the change took place. If midnight - 4 am is clear and 4 - 8 is cloudy we don't know when the transition took place. Filling in clear for 1am, 2am, 3am, and 4am and cloudy for 5am, 6am, 7am, and 8am might be right but probably isn't. Following Philip's policy of using the end time of the watch gives consistent data and Philip knows that he needs to interpret it with a grain of (sea) salt ;)

OK - so how about I only fill in the stuff from the text for the hour that is the end of the watch, and for the other hours I only fill in things from the grid?
I don't want to just discard anything from the grid.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 September 2015, 09:12:59
I normally transcribe the entire grid (all 24 hours) and then I read through the watches and update 4am, 8am, meridian, 4pm, 6pm, 8pm, and midnight.
If there is a first part/latter part then I will fill in the appropriate additional hour(s) - like 2am.

I hope this is clear. It is not so easy to put into words.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 06 September 2015, 09:25:57
I understood it fine.
In a nutshell: Randi and I are doing the exact same thing when transcribing at-sea pages, which is good.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 September 2015, 09:28:57
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 September 2015, 11:07:00
kimma001 passes the 4000 and 5000 marks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 September 2015, 13:50:09
I understood it fine.
In a nutshell: Randi and I are doing the exact same thing when transcribing at-sea pages, which is good.

Thank you, Hanibal.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 07 September 2015, 12:28:18
Here's a complete list of logs for this ship - I went and compiled them all by hand, as I tend to do with every ship I work on.

1: 25 Dec 1844 - 13 Apr 1846

2: 14 Apr 1846 - 16 Aug 1846

3: 13 Jul 1847 - 29 Jul 1848

4: 30 Jul 1848 - 15 Aug 1849

5: 16 Aug 1849 - 11 May 1850

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852

7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854

8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855

9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857

11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858

12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859

13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860

14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862

15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863

16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864

17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865

Volumes 10 and 18 should be part of this ship as well, but when I tried entering those, I just got error messages.
Oh, and the crew eventually start making full use of the grid:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol017of067/vol017of067_030_0.jpg

I have added this list to the first post of this topic as well.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 07 September 2015, 13:09:57
 8)

'Only' ten years to go for me!

Thanks for compiling this.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 07 September 2015, 14:45:21
This will be the first - maybe only - ship we see that served in the US Civil War.  Even our histories tend to ignore the war at sea, so I'm really looking forward to seeing what they were actually doing. 
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 September 2015, 14:49:45
Me too! ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 09 September 2015, 06:53:53
Volume 14 looks like where all the action will be. Jamestown was pretty active in the beginning of the war as a part of the Atlantic Blockading Squadron as a chaser (which she was incredibly good at, being a very fast, light, and nimble ship in her prime) before being dispatched to the Pacific to protect union shipping against privateers (which wasn't really a thing, as Confederate privateers were smugglers more often than not, and raiding Union shipping was far more dangerous than it was worth to attack).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 09 September 2015, 07:36:57
According to NavalHistory and The Wiki, she did the following before going to the Pacific:

Quote
5 August 1861 - Drove bark Alvorado ashore off Fernandina, Fla, and set her on fire.

31 August 1861 - Captured schooner Aigburth off coast of Florida.

4 September 1861 - Captured and scuttled schooner Col. Long.

15 December 1861 - Captured schooner Havelock.

1 May 1862 - Captured brig Intended off Wilmington.

When I get to the respective pages, I'm gonna transcribe each of these events, because they're unique.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 September 2015, 09:51:16
Good! ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 09 September 2015, 12:11:03
I believe this is the first time I came across a pressure value with a fraction - 6 pm, this page.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_052_1.jpg

I entered it as 29.47 1/2. Hope this is OK.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 September 2015, 12:38:08
Very strange. I'm not quite sure it is a fraction, but I don't have any better suggestions.
I would say that what you have done was correct - TWYS + MYBG. Maybe we'll figure out what it is in the future.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: propriome on 09 September 2015, 12:47:55
I see a barely readable fraction there as well...

Maybe (since that's a measure expressed in inches) one could just enter 29.475 as for other fractions?
TWYS is always right, anyway...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 September 2015, 14:16:42
I'd say that 29.475 would be correct too.
Fractions are tricky because it is rarely possible to TWYS.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 11 September 2015, 21:51:29
October 27, 1851
Rio

Broke out the Hold and restowed provisions; found 81 barrels beef and 29 barrels pork - the Pursers account of the same being 48 barrels of Beef and 77 barrels of pork _

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_071_1.jpg

I imagine that after some time in those barrels the stuff started to look and taste pretty much the same...  :o
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 11 September 2015, 23:40:07
Somebody cheated when doing an inventory.  "First barrel in this row is beef - surely they were stowed right so the 4 behind it are also beef.  Easy written, don't have to crawl across their tops to read labels on each." 

Been there done that, monthly factory supply inventory plus year end fussy one for the tax people.  Really embarrassing if you had to sign the inventory sheets and reality proves your laziness to your higher ups.  (That one I avoided doing, just observed the results in others.)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 12 September 2015, 02:15:59
To say that's an incredible error is a bit of an understatement, but it may not have been the purser's fault entirely. A lot of the provision storage could have been done by the ship's cook (and/or his assistant(s), who may not even have bothered looking at the manifest, and instead just passed it on to the purser, who was equally lazy and just signed off on it taking the word of the crewmen loading the stores.

The bigger problem with the situation, though, isn't the mixup between pork and beef (honestly, when you've been at sea long enough, eating basically the same thing every day, it all pretty much tastes the same without an incredibly good cook with a well-stocked kitchen). The problem lies in the 15 barrels of assorted meats that is missing entirely. Assuming a standard wine cask sized barrel, we're talking close to a ton of food that isn't there to feed the hungry crew. I can't imagine anyone being terribly pleased finding out that they narrowly missed several days of meals because *someone* was lazy.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 September 2015, 03:07:14
That form of sloppy label readings almost always also results in miscounting.  It's inevitable.  And the lazy label reader will frequently over estimate because they instinctively want the bosses pleased with their work.  It can be devastating when you promise a customer delivery on an order you do not have the supplies to produce.

Many people consider taking inventory to be trivial irritating busy work.  It is not trivial at all.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 12 September 2015, 09:34:31
Many people consider taking inventory to be trivial irritating busy work.  It is not trivial at all.

Absolutely not trivial, but it sure can be tedious.  :P
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 September 2015, 08:25:52
Hanibal94 passes the 4000 and 5000 marks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 September 2015, 08:27:39
kimma001 (Bob) passes the 6000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 16 September 2015, 07:09:06
Good news, people - I peeked ahead, and found out that the log book format we're dealing with right now doesn't last.

Starting with Volume 8 (22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855), they stick to the grid - and it stays this way to the very end (I checked all the volumes):
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_010_1.jpg

I am very much looking forward to reaching this, because I hate having to extract info from the text - it slows me down compared to when there's just the grid, especially if you got some really long description like "clear with occasional rain and thunder and lightning in the Nd + Ed".
Plus, the fact that these WR are not complete means I can transcribe the pages even faster than usual - That's gonna be a big help to my goal to pass Silvia and become the new Numero Uno!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 September 2015, 15:44:00
I believe this is the first time I came across a pressure value with a fraction - 6 pm, this page.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_052_1.jpg

I entered it as 29.47 1/2. Hope this is OK.

Noon: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_079_1.jpg
I decided to follow your system and do 29.22 1/2
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 18 September 2015, 16:11:24
Noon: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_079_1.jpg
I decided to follow your system and do 29.22 1/2

I'd say that 29.475 would be correct too.

I've been entering these as decimal equivalents...  :-\
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 September 2015, 16:14:06
OK, I'll go with decimal equivalent ;D
That is probably more in keeping with the rules - faster too!!!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 18 September 2015, 16:43:07
OK, I'll go with decimal equivalent ;D
That is probably more in keeping with the rules - faster too!!!

Yes, I've switched to decimals too.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 September 2015, 16:49:06
Good!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 19 September 2015, 13:15:24
Randi passes the 7000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 September 2015, 14:31:14
Thanks ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 19 September 2015, 14:43:07
Pass around the tea!  8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 September 2015, 14:49:49
;D ;D

Milk and sugar, please.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 19 September 2015, 15:36:43
February 23, 1852
Buenos Ayres


From 4 to 8   At 8. hoisted the Spanish Ensign at the Fore in honor of the birth day of the Queen of Spain's eldest daughter

From 8 to Mer.   At 12 fired a salute of 21 guns in honor of the anniversary of the birth day of the Queen of Spain's eldest daughter



The Queen of Spain at this time was Isabella II, and her oldest daughter was Maria Isabel (Isabella), Princess of Asturias, who was born on December 20, 1851. The second entry mistakes it as the anniversary of her birth, probably written out of habit after the Washington's Birthday entry from the day before.

Here's an interesting tidbit from the Wiki article:

On February 2, 1852, Isabella II was making a traditional visit to the church of the Virgin of Atocha, introducing her daughter to the public, when she was stabbed by a mad priest. The Queen was saved by the thickness of her corset and the injury was not life-threatening.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_103_1.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isabella,_Princess_of_Asturias_(1851%E2%80%931931)&redirect=no

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 September 2015, 07:22:41
Hanibal94 passes the 6000, 7000 and 8000 marks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 20 September 2015, 12:47:11
It's amazing what a man can get done even if he only invests every 2nd day in this ship.
But I wanna finish the Concord and the Patterson before the end of 2015, so I will take a break from this vessel for now.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 September 2015, 15:35:37
March 17, 1852

From 8 to Mer.   At 9.40 standing in for the anchorage off St. Catherines.

This would actually be the Ilha de Santa Catarina, near Florianopolis, Brazil.

http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4120.msg87081#msg87081

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_112_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 24 September 2015, 20:46:39
April 26, 1852

They say they're at anchor in the roads of "Pernambuco, Brazil", which is the name of the local Brazilian State, but appeared to be what the port was called in English language documents at the time. Based on their mention of the "Bishops Palace, Olinda" in the comments, they're anchored off the city of Recife.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_129_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 24 September 2015, 21:06:14
Our Latin American and Caribbean Place Names -- Reference (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4120.0) in Geographical Help has some good historic maps, and what others have named from other ships.  They list a very nice navigational chart from 1856 showing both the approaches and a detail of the port.
http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~3689~340031:General-chart-of-the-coasts-of-Bras

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 24 September 2015, 21:19:49
Love the chart! I read maps the same way normal people read magazines...  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 24 September 2015, 22:15:27
Then you really really really will like the David Rumsey site - literally thousands of historical maps and atlases all online.  :)
http://rumsey.mapranksearch.com/
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 24 September 2015, 22:20:16
 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 September 2015, 03:44:44
Caro found this one just recently: http://www.oldmapsonline.org/

To enlarge on Janet's comment, in Geographical Help: Welcome to Geographical Help and all the Reference topics have lists of maps ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 September 2015, 17:42:25
I know the month and year, do I have to leave them out just because they forgot to enter them?

Missing or Incorrect Day, Month, or Year

If all or part of the date is incorrect or missing, please do not fix it.


Month and year missing from this page:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_142_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 27 September 2015, 18:42:16
Yep - when the editors' get at the finished transcriptions, they can straighten the problem out.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 29 September 2015, 20:52:44
June 5, 1852
Rio De Janeiro

From Meridian to 4.

The Emperor of Brazil visited a Brazil Steam Frigate - The Men of War (except ourselves) saluted and manned yards -


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_149_1.jpg

So, the Queen of Spain's new daughter rates 21 guns (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg115909#msg115909), but the Emperor of Brazil gets nada?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 30 September 2015, 08:24:57
June 11, 1852

From Meridian to 4.

Sent to the U.S. Store Ship "Relief" the following Men condemned by Medical Survey " W'm Angus (~) James Martin (OS) and Henry Edmunds (Lds).


At least they weren't dumped overboard like they would do with 'condemned' food stuffs.  :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_152_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 September 2015, 09:08:07
 :o ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 October 2015, 16:53:52
What's this, an actual temperature recorded in the 4 to 8 AM entry?  :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_166_1.jpg


For those not up on Jamestown 1844 proceedings, there are very few temperature records in this volume of the logs, although they have been pretty diligent with recording the barometric pressure.  ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 October 2015, 17:35:57
Well, at least they didn't do something as drastic as putting it in the weather table ::) ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 October 2015, 17:39:24
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 04 October 2015, 13:18:37
July 21, 1852
Montevideo

From 8 to meridian   At 11.20 sent a board on board the Congress in obedience to Signal 131.

 ???

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_171_0.jpg

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 October 2015, 14:13:38
I think the writer making the clean copy of the log had his brain stutter. ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 October 2015, 12:17:19
kimma001 (Bob) passes the 8000 mark!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 14 October 2015, 11:37:40
October 10, 1852
Buenos Ayres

From 4 to 8 [AM]   At 8 the Spanish Sloop of War dressed ship and fired a salute of 21 guns in honor of the birth day of the Queen of Spain - joined in the ceremony by hoisting the Spanish flag at the fore.

October birthdays are the best...  ;) :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 14 October 2015, 12:51:25
Yay, I'm through Vol 6. Vol 7 is over a year and a half squeezed into about 346 log pages, which means lots of time in port with two-day pages, again.  :-\

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 14 October 2015, 13:25:11
Volume 7 is the last of the ultra-weird formats.

The ones after that follow a grid, even if it's not the "standard" grid, and still have incomplete WR.
Example: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_013_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 14 October 2015, 20:14:51
That will be a relief, to get weather slightly more organized.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 October 2015, 12:49:48
November 9, 1852
Buenos Ayres

From 4 to 8 [PM]

Issued an extra allowance of grog to the Carpenters and Armorers who are engaged during most of the daytime repairing damages and to be continued until said repairs are finished by order of Captain Downing.
  :D

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_008_0.jpg

A couple of days earlier a steamer swung around during a storm and collided with her, causing extensive damage to the rigging and side rails; 4 to 8 a.m. entry for November 7:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_007_1.jpg

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 22 October 2015, 18:29:05
November 19, 1852
Buenos Ayres

At meridian fired a salute of 21 guns in honor of the anniversary of the patron saint of Spain's Queen.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_010_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_010_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 24 October 2015, 12:14:03
December 7, 1852

From 4 to 8 [AM] Fresh moderate and light winds from the N.W, West'd and South'd and cloudy with squally appearances

 ::)

I guess I could assume that the forces and directions are respective and enter three separate WR distributed over the watch period, or go for maximum WR credits and do all nine combinations, or just type the whole mess into the Weather box (which is what I actually did  :P).

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_015_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_015_0.jpg)

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 October 2015, 14:32:11
OR...
Wind force: Fresh moderate and light winds
Wind direction: N.W, West'd and South'd
Weather: cloudy with squally appearances

Lots of combinations ;D - including pretending that you didn't see that watch
After all, this is optional! ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 24 October 2015, 18:33:07
Lots of combinations ;D - including pretending that you didn't see that watch

 :o

Why, I'm absolutely certain that someday somebody will need a detailed English language account of the hourly weather in Buenos Aires during the 1852-53 period. ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 October 2015, 18:45:43
You are just trying to prove that you are as crazy as I am ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 25 October 2015, 10:03:04
 ;D 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 October 2015, 08:44:18
I think that with the all the new ships and the proliferation of transcribing opportunities, I'm going to fall back to the basic intent for this ship, and concentrate on the quantitative data. (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg63682#msg63682 (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3513.msg63682#msg63682))

Typing things like 'wind increasing from the N'd and W'd with lightning thunder and rain' takes effort I could devote to also working on the new stuff. Not giving up on the ship, just planning to make more efficient use of my time.

OR...
Wind force: Fresh moderate and light winds
Wind direction: N.W, West'd and South'd
Weather: cloudy with squally appearances

Lots of combinations ;D - including pretending that you didn't see that watch
After all, this is optional! ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 October 2015, 09:39:07
Makes sense ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 27 October 2015, 09:40:54
In that case, I will focus on the quantitative data too - once I get back to this ship, that is.
First I am gonna finish Patterson, then the Albatross 1890 and 1900, since I won't have any particular preferences after the Patterson.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 02 November 2015, 12:15:30
March 14, 1853
Buenos Ayres

From 4 to 8   At 8 dressed ship with the Brazilian Flag at the Fore in commemoration of the anniversary of the birth day of the Empress of Brazil

From 8 to Meridian   At Meridian fired a salute of 21 guns in commemoration of the anniversary of the birth day of the "Empress" of Brazil



Dona Teresa Cristina (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teresa_Cristina_of_the_Two_Sicilies), nicknamed "the Mother of the Brazilians", was the Italian-born Empress consort of Emperor Dom Pedro II of Brazil. Full name: Teresa Cristina Maria Giuseppa Gaspare Baltassare Melchiore Gennara Francesca de Padova Donata Bonosa Andrea d'Avelino Rita Luitgarda Geltruda Venancia Taddea Spiridione Rocca Matilde  :)


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_039_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_039_1.jpg)

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Helen J on 02 November 2015, 12:57:31
It's just as well she lived before the era of online forms - with a name like that she would have caused meltdown all over the place!   :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 02 November 2015, 14:07:19
March 14, 1853
Buenos Ayres

From 4 to 8   At 8 dressed ship with the Brazilian Flag at the Fore in commemoration of the anniversary of the birth day of the Empress of Brazil

From 8 to Meridian   At Meridian fired a salute of 21 guns in commemoration of the anniversary of the birth day of the "Empress" of Brazil



Dona Teresa Cristina (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teresa_Cristina_of_the_Two_Sicilies), nicknamed "the Mother of the Brazilians", was the Italian-born Empress consort of Emperor Dom Pedro II of Brazil. Full name: Teresa Cristina Maria Giuseppa Gaspare Baltassare Melchiore Gennara Francesca de Padova Donata Bonosa Andrea d'Avelino Rita Luitgarda Geltruda Venancia Taddea Spiridione Rocca Matilde  :)


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_039_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_039_1.jpg)


You know that moment when your parents say 'you should be able to spell your name by now'.... :o

Oh! We've met Dom Pedro II before! Perhaps the Patterson...let me see...ah yes!

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USCS%20Patterson/Book%201/IMG_4852_1.jpg

9th October 1884:
At 11.40 His Imperial Majesty Dom Pedro II of Brazil and his personal staff came on board and inspected the ship...

(http://i.imgur.com/bw1AIoL.png)

(From Wiki: A savant in his own right, the Emperor established a reputation as a vigorous sponsor of learning, culture and the sciences. He won the respect and admiration of scholars such as Charles Darwin, Victor Hugo and Friedrich Nietzsche, and was a friend to Richard Wagner, Louis Pasteur and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, among others.)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 02 November 2015, 15:07:14

'Before' being a relative thing to an event that occurred 31 years earlier.  ;) 8)

Oh! We've met Dom Pedro II before! Perhaps the Patterson...let me see...ah yes!

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USCS%20Patterson/Book%201/IMG_4852_1.jpg

9th October 1884:
At 11.40 His Imperial Majesty Dom Pedro II of Brazil and his personal staff came on board and inspected the ship...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 02 November 2015, 17:53:57
oh my goodness bob - I didn't notice the dates at all!!  You might have caught him early in his reign? He didn't last much after the Patterson event if I recall correctly, and I believe ended his days in Europe in relative obscurity :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 04 November 2015, 11:59:21
April 18, 1853
Buenos Ayres

From 4 to 8 [PM]

Boarded one of the vessels of the Argentine Squadron to make inquiries relating to the action between that squadron and the one under Commodore Coe which came off this morning, was informed that the action lasted 3 1/2 hours and that the Argentine squadron had sustained a loss of two of their vessels.



Jonas Halstead Coe (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonas_Coe) was the American-born commander of the Argentine
Confederation fleet then blockading Buenos Aires ('Ayres' in the Jamestown logs). Here's the bit from the Wikipedia article:

With the war in Uruguay over and Rosas overthrown in Argentina, Coe was appointed by Justo Jose de Urquiza commander of the Confederation fleet which blockaded the city of Buenos Aires, after the later seceded from the central government in September 1852. Coe, aboard the steamer Constitucion, defeated a Buenos Aires flotilla 30 miles off Martin Garcia island on April 18, 1853, when his squadron captured the enemy brigs Enigma and 11 de Septiembre, with 22 officers and 200 men. On June 26, however, Coe deserted to the United States aboard the American sloop USS Jamestown after being bribed by Buenos Aires' citizens.

I'll be looking for the record of his desertion in the June logs.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_048_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 04 November 2015, 16:00:54
that's an exciting thing to find and look out for  :D History in the making ...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 06 November 2015, 12:35:13
It's now late July, they've sailed to Rio de Janeiro, and I didn't see any mention of Commodore Coe coming aboard. Assuming I didn't miss the entry, I'm guessing he might have actually gone to the USS Congress, the flag ship in the area at the time.

The Jamestown spent many months anchored off Buenos Aires before this trip to Rio de Janeiro. After arriving in Rio the crew was immediately employed caulking the outside of the ship.  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 06 November 2015, 21:43:50
August 20, 1853
Rio de Janeiro

From 8 to Midnight   Sent an Officer and a Guard of Marines on board the American Ship "Vanolinta" to quell a disturbance among the passengers

 :o

I believe the ship's name was probably "Van Olinda" (http://archon.mainemaritimemuseum.org/index.php?p=collections/findingaid&id=36&q=van+olinda&rootcontentid=540#id540)


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_082_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_082_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 07 November 2015, 10:43:01
sounds like a few too many grogs on the table at tea time on the Van Olinda  :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 18 November 2015, 22:06:09
May 11, 1854

From 8 to Mer.   Light breezes from the S'd & W'd and pleasant. This day Hauled down the Colors and put the ship out of commission, and turned her over to the yard.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_175_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_175_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 November 2015, 08:03:23
 :'(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 19 November 2015, 08:20:06
February 22, 1855
Philadelphia, Delaware River

At 10 Commander John Marston delivered the ship over to the command of Francis B Ellison. Hoisted the Colors and put the ship in commission.
 :D

At 11 Commodore Tho's Crabbe came on board and was received by Commander F.B. Ellison and the officers of the ship. At 11 15 on the last of the ebb, cast off from the Navy Yard in tow of a steam tug. Parted the Hawser in towing and grounded immediately. At 12 cast off from the steam tug finding it impossible to move the ship.
 :-[

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_003_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_003_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 19 November 2015, 08:57:36
Good grief, less than an hour into his command Commodore Crabbe got to watch his flagship go to ground and get stuck there. If I didn't know her final fate, I'd fear for the Jamestown at this point.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 19 November 2015, 10:44:58
I'm putting that one on Darren's Daily Zoo list.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 November 2015, 12:48:57
Here are a couple of odd-ball pages:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_017_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_017_0.jpg)
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_017_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_017_1.jpg)

Several single-day entries on each page while they're in dry dock. I put the daily weather data as 'Noon' entries under the separate dates. They go back to grid format after these.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 November 2015, 13:07:28
If there is no time given, it may be best to leave the hour field blank.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 November 2015, 13:25:40
OK, I'll do that.

If there is no time given, it may be best to leave the hour field blank.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 22 November 2015, 14:37:48
April 14, 1855
Near Havana

From 8 to Meridian

At 8.15 returned the salute of H.B.M ship with 13 guns. filled away and made sail
The Barometer in the Cabin was broken by the shock of the guns.


 ::)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_026_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_026_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 22 November 2015, 16:59:08
April 16, 1855
Havana

From 8 to Midnight.   Rec'd in the Masters Department a new Barometer.

 8)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_027_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_027_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 November 2015, 17:56:47
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 23 November 2015, 11:30:59
April 24, 1855
Key West

From Meridian to 4.   At. 3 arrived the U.S Coast Survey Steamer Corwin

A shout-out to the more famous vessel's predecessor.   8)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_031_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_031_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 23 November 2015, 14:44:10
I'm about two months into their first consistent use of the grid format for recording data, and they've occasionally been using the 'Water' temperature column like here:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_023_1.jpg

However, I just came to this page:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_033_1.jpg

Note the tiny 'Att' written over the first entry in the Water temperature column. There are older discussions on the forum that suggested assuming Attached if it was written adjacent to the pressure, etc. This is the first time I've seen this label used in these logs, and the alleged water temperatures have looked unusually warm, but I thought they might be reasonable considering they've been operating in the Caribbean area.

So, should I continue recording the data in the 'Water' column, TWYS, even if it's just recorded with the pressure like this page? I honored the 'Att' and put that reading in as Attached, but the others as Water.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 November 2015, 15:00:31
For http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_023_1.jpg, it is every hour and pressure is every 4 hours, so it seems likely that it is water.

For http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_033_1.jpg, I think it would be valid to list both as Att - a possible "Weather Data in the Wrong Column" exception to TWYS :-\
However, I will check with Philip.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: philip.brohan on 23 November 2015, 18:00:27
Please enter the data into the correct column. If it's actually attached temperature input it as such, even if it's in the 'water' column.

That's the principle, but there is the complication of not knowing what the data is. Is it attached (makes more sense), or water (it's in the water column). Please use your best judgement on this point. Sometimes this will mean guessing - please do guess, guess enthusiastically.

Your guess will not be perfect, but it's as good as anyone's. Almost certainly now better than mine. Don't worry about being wrong, just make your best guess at what the log-keeper was trying to do on the page, and move on to the next.  It probably now too late to court-martial the log-keeper for vague and confusing record-keeping.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 November 2015, 18:08:16
It probably now too late to court-martial the log-keeper for vague and confusing record-keeping.
 ;D

Thanks!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 25 November 2015, 15:32:26
May 29, 1855
Key West

From 8 to Midnight.

Nath'l Cromwell (~~) deserter was brought on board and confined in double irons. James White (OS) deserter arrested on shore with Nathl. Cromwell resisted and attempted the life of the 1st Lieutenant, and was shot by him in self-defense. Jas. White was taken to the Marine Hospital on shore.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_049_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_049_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 25 November 2015, 15:47:00
Nathl. Cromwell (Cox.)?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 25 November 2015, 15:59:38
Looks like that might be it...

Thanks!

Nathl. Cromwell (Cox.)?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 26 November 2015, 15:13:42
June 15, 1855
32 35 N, 78 35 15 W
(about 85 miles ESE of Charleston, South Carolina)

At Meridian a strange fish or animal was discovered some distance from the Ship._ Its length was about 40 feet, and its movements in the water were undulatory like that of a Serpent._

 :o


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_057_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 November 2015, 15:15:26
or a Kraken !?
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 26 November 2015, 15:43:34
I'll put that in the Animal mention entry.  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 29 November 2015, 11:15:31
July 16, 1855
Funchal

From Meridian to 4   Commander F.B. Ellison left the Ship to return to the U.S via England on sick leave and Leiut Ja's F. Armstrong appointed to the command of the Ship by order of Commmodore Crabbe

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_073_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_073_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 01 December 2015, 12:20:15
I made Captain!
 8)

The ship's entry page still shows gastcra in the Captain's banner!
 >:(

The Transcribe page header says the Captain has 18,202 WR, which doesn't match my or gastcra's total!
 :o

The interface is deprecated, so this outrage will never be fixed!
 :'(

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 01 December 2015, 12:56:17
Quote
The interface is deprecated, so this outrage will never be fixed!
 :'(

The interface has rarely if ever gotten all the counts right, and that part of it was ignored for years before it was deprecated.  There is a limited number of devs around, and that apparently doesn't deserve a fix. :'(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jil on 01 December 2015, 13:00:01
Congratulations Captain Bob!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 December 2015, 13:18:21
* Piping aboard Captain kimma001 *
(Bob)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 01 December 2015, 14:04:33
Try going further - I think you need to put some distance between you and him before the ship's home page shows you in the captain's banner.

Congratulations on making it! I've updated my guestimations to show that you are the captain.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 04 December 2015, 17:43:15
August 30, 1855
Eastern Atlantic

From Meridian to 4   Condemned one
Keg Butter    lbs as unfit for issue
Inspection of R.B. Hitchcock Sept 1853-4
Gilbert Davis Contractor


Must have been pretty ripe after at least a year in that keg.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 05 December 2015, 16:11:21
Indeed, it's now reset.  ;) ;D

Try going further - I think you need to put some distance between you and him before the ship's home page shows you in the captain's banner.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 07 December 2015, 15:55:36
I don't mind playing second captain to you, Bob  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 07 December 2015, 18:34:08
Back on reply 36 there was a question about dueling in the USN. I found some old notes I took from a book "The Wooden World" NAM Rodgers It seems in the US Navy the number of officers killed in duels equaled 2/3 of those killed in action before 1848. you can see why they put a stop to it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 07 December 2015, 18:37:49
;D

I don't mind playing second captain to you, Bob  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 December 2015, 10:15:42
June 15, 1855
32 35 N, 78 35 15 W
(about 85 miles ESE of Charleston, South Carolina)

At Meridian a strange fish or animal was discovered some distance from the Ship._ Its length was about 40 feet, and its movements in the water were undulatory like that of a Serpent._

 :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_057_1.jpg

Oarfish?

Here be sea monsters (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3542.msg59258#msg59258)
(Thanks to Tegwen was looking at this topic ;))
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 08 December 2015, 10:58:13
"Best possible image." It's Rorschach time! ;)

(http://i394.photobucket.com/albums/pp29/rcl111/Misc/bestpossible_zpsl6rgczer.png)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_110_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 08 December 2015, 11:13:53
Wow, never heard of those things. The Wiki article says they're a deep sea fish, rarely seen on the surface.  Maybe they saw one that wasn't healthy? It certainly fits the description.

Oarfish?

Here be sea monsters (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3542.msg59258#msg59258)
(Thanks to Tegwen was looking at this topic ;))
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 08 December 2015, 13:06:35
I believe every oarfish that has beached itself was ill or dying.  If you aren't a biologist, those are indeed "sea dragons" - especially if you get an old one around 40 feet (12 meters) long.  I find them fascinating, how accurately they match some myths about dragons in the deep oceans.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 12 December 2015, 11:47:09
October 28, 1855
Porto Grande

This is a pretty severe sentence, which must have been associated with a capital crime of some sort. The charges weren't described, and I didn't see any previous references to anything of that magnitude. I wonder if it might have been related to this death (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3377.msg122211#msg122211).

From 8 to Mer'd

At 1020 Called all hands to muster and read to
the crew the General Order with regard to
the sentence of W'm Bulger (Sea) of this Ship
who was tried by the General Court Martial
recently convened on board the USS "Dale". The
sentence awarded was as follows; Viz:

The Court do therefore sentence the said
W'm Bulger (Sea) to be sent to the United
States by the first opportunity - securely ironed,
and delivered to the US Marshal at the Port
in which the vessel may arrive, to be confined
in the Penitentiary in the District of
Columbia for the term of five years at hard
labor, to forfeit to the United States, all pay
and emoluments, now due, and which may
become due for the unexpired term of his
enlistment in the Navy of the United States, with a
prohibition of his further enlistment in the
Navy, and that the finding and sentence of the
Court to be read on the Quarter Deck of all vessels
of the US Navy in Commission, in the presence
of the Officers and crew therof.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_124_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 13 December 2015, 07:56:29
That's very serious. Very sobering. Perhaps those two events are related then. I think that 5 years hard labour would be very hard in deed. And what could he do after the end of the sentence (if he survived it)? If he did not receive the death sentence he cannot have intended to cause death?  :-\
That's a really tough entry into the log.  :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 13 December 2015, 11:19:37
Black Whale (Kroomen) is a black African native.  IF the two are related, I can see the short sentence for someone definitely seen back then as not equal - and it says well of the Navy that it wasn't ignored. 

A very shameful attitude that embarrasses me to say, but very true back then.  It took 3 amendments to the constitution to make blacks legally equal, and a hundred years to get to the civil rights movements to enforce them.  This is NOT a good side of the US.

http://www.blackpast.org/primary/reconstruction-amendments
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 16 December 2015, 18:19:37
November 23, 1855
Off Sierra Leone

From 4 to 8. [AM]

Saw a number of "Swallows"
flying about the Ship + saw a
small "Butterfly" on board.


Nice, light-hearted entry. The use of quotation marks is a bit amusing, I keep imagining somebody using air-quotes when reading that.  :P

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_137_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 16 December 2015, 18:49:07
very sweet that they "appear"..I suppose they are useful in indicting land being near?  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 16 December 2015, 21:12:13
November 26, 1855
Liberia

From Mer'd to 4.

At 3.30 President Roberts of
Liberia came on board. At 3.50 Saluted
with 21 guns the Liberian Flag at the Fore.


This would have been Joseph Jenkins Roberts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Jenkins_Roberts), the American-born first president of Liberia.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_138_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_138_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 17 December 2015, 08:00:05
November 30, 1855
Liberia

From 8 to Meridian

Shipped the following Kroomen viz
Black Whale. John Davis. Pea Soup
After Breakfast Peter Warman. Jack
Friday. Jack Purser. Jack Crowbar
Inside Out. Upside Down. Jack
Savage. Tom Walker. Jim Crow. Jack
Everyday. Tom Dollar. Jack Haultaut
Jack Two Gun. John Doe + After
Supper. + Ben Coffee



http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_140_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_140_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 17 December 2015, 08:42:33
Some Africans have a fine sense of humor about their English choice of names, obviously.  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 17 December 2015, 09:57:47
I had doubts that very many of these were chosen by the men themselves. This is from the Krumen Wiki article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krumen_people):

"They were given Western names by the men on the ships, leading to names that are amusing to the Western eye, Tom Ropeman and Will Cockroach amongst them. They were clearly commonly employed, and the names bestowed were not original, since the cemetery contains for example the remains of Tom Smith Number 1, to distinguish him from another Tom Smith."

There's a 'Black Whale' on the new list here; recall that another man called Black Whale died on board (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3377.msg122211#msg122211) a few weeks back.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 17 December 2015, 12:49:00
I think you are right - I've seen the same on the factory floor, names totally foreign to English speakers get warped into something familiar and pronounceable.  Although in that case, fully half of the name bearers prefer that to having their real names mangled, and more than one of them has asked me to stop using their legal name because they want to get used to being American.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 December 2015, 14:07:35
Done with Volume 8

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 20 December 2015, 14:29:32
 :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 December 2015, 22:27:34
February 6, 1856
At Sea, Atlantic Ocean

From Meridian to 4. Called the
First division of Small arm men
to quarters for purpose of exer-
cising at target, but not being
able to get the muskets off got
in the target and commenced clean-
ing muskets.


 :o

At least there's no mention of any of the other Divisions putting the target to use with them in it.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_020_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 08 January 2016, 23:35:47
April 29, 1856
At Sea

From 8 to Merid.

Burnt a blue light, in order to light a match.


 ??? Seems like an odd detail for the log.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_061_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_061_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 January 2016, 03:21:15
Quote from: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/26000/26000-h/26000-h.htm#BLUE_LIGHT
BLUE LIGHT. A pyrotechnical preparation for signals by night. Also called Bengal light.

I wonder what they lit with the match!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 10 January 2016, 14:19:53
May 13, 1856
At sea, about 150 miles west of Madiera

From 8 to Meridian

A Quail flying about the Ship


Emphasis theirs...  ;)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_068_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 10 January 2016, 14:29:51
What had they been drinking the night before? A quail? That's very odd indeed  8) :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 10 January 2016, 18:39:30
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Quail  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 January 2016, 20:10:56
July 20, 1856
Funchal, Madeira

From 8 to Meridian

John Kelley (Sea) reported that the time for which he shipped expired to day and is detained under the Law of March 1837


I'm sure he was thrilled.

Text of said law:

(https://books.google.com/books?id=rYtPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA659&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&sig=ACfU3U0Xdn-rphh4VHK1LADb1yvzpO886g&ci=66%2C931%2C705%2C174&edge=0)


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_102_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 January 2016, 03:29:21
Thanks for digging that out!
I have seen that happen a few times.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 21 January 2016, 05:03:39
July 20, 1856
Funchal, Madeira

From 8 to Meridian

John Kelley (Sea) reported that the time for which he shipped expired to day and is detained under the Law of March 1837


I'm sure he was thrilled.

Text of said law:

(https://books.google.com/books?id=rYtPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA659&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&sig=ACfU3U0Xdn-rphh4VHK1LADb1yvzpO886g&ci=66%2C931%2C705%2C174&edge=0)


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_102_1.jpg

Ooooooh, wasn't this the American version of the Wills Act? If memory serves this was a subsection that was included in a much more comprehensive act (that is still largely in use today) that sprang up in light of the Supreme Court decision in the Decatur v. Paulding case (the wife of Commodore Stephen Decatur was denied a portion of her husband's pension upon his death by James Kirke Paulding, then Secretary of the Navy). There's a lot of pretty serious ramifications that sprang up in light of that decision.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 January 2016, 10:12:23
July 22, 1856
Funchal, Madeira

From 4 to 8
A boat from H.B.M Brig "Elk" came alongside to enquire about saluting

From 8 to Meridian
At 8. H.B.M. Brig "Elk" fired a salute of 13 guns with the American Ensign at the Fore. Which was returned by this Ship with the same number of Guns with the English Ensign at the Fore.


I suppose sometimes you just had to ask.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_103_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 January 2016, 10:46:23
Protocol ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 22 January 2016, 00:31:20
Protocol ::)

It *is* a little strange that the request was made, rather than simply done on the fly. The whole history behind the gun salute was a sign of good faith that your ship had come in peace. Cannon aren't quick to reload, and firing a powder charge meant leaving a ship vulnerable. It's generally pretty obvious when a foreign ship raises your national ensign at the fore and you don't get pelted by hundreds of pounds of lead a few seconds *before* you hear the boom of  cannon fire (contrary to popular belief, cannonballs have been fired at supersonic velocities for hundreds of years), you're receiving a salute and not under attack. Further, if you're not actively at war with another country, opening fire on a warship is a great way to start a war, and outside of the Lusitania and Athenia, there aren't really many clear examples of naval forces attacking indiscriminately without already being formally at war.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 22 January 2016, 11:20:59
July 29, 1856
At Sea, Eastern Atlantic

From 8 to Meridian

At 9 30 inspected the Crew at quarters, and exercised the 2'd Division at fighting both sides and extreme pointing_


I didn't know they had a debate team!  :D

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_107_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_107_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 28 January 2016, 09:21:59
September 3, 1856
Santa Cruz, Tenerife

From 8 to Meridian

At 9.40 Beat to General Quarters - Exercised Small Armed Men at the Manuel, and the Carbineers at Target practice, the Target by Triangulation distant 160 yards fired four rounds (180 shots) 9 Balls hit the Target - Size of the Target 1 foot wide and 3 feet long


Best case 20% of the shooters hit the target once, worst case 5% of the shots overall.   ;)

The first bit about exercises reads like it should be a Fawlty Towers episode...

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_126_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_126_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 28 January 2016, 10:03:36

The first bit about exercises reads like it should be a Fawlty Towers episode...


I can picture this all too well for some reason... Somehow I can see Cleese having a bunch of short guys doing calisthenics in a circle around Sachs.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 28 January 2016, 16:35:22
 :D :D :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 05 February 2016, 19:13:23
October 25, 1856
Porto Playa, St. Iago

From Meridian to 4

Caught a Shark measuring 10 feet


 :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_151_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_151_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 05 February 2016, 19:45:11
OK, who wants this one:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_152_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_152_1.jpg)

Which, after further thought, and another glass of liquid fortitude, yielded from a marathon (for me) transcription...

Called all hands to muster + read the finding of the Summary Court Martial in the case of Bernard McKenna (OSea) who was Guilty of the Charge Scandalous Conduct the sentence was Solitary Confinement in single irons on Bread + Water to day but the particular time of carrying out the sentence into execution + whether or not the period of confinement shall be continuous or broken to be regulated by the discretion of the Commander of the ship according to the convenience of the Ship and the health of the Prisoner provided however that the condition of the sentence be fulfilled within the space of ninety day from the date or from which it may be approved - read also the following Reccommendation from the Court, Considering the intimidation under which the witness Cromwell, and to some extent others appeared to labor from apprehension perhap of future violence on the part of the Prisoner McKenna feel bound for the protection of those of the prosecution who were compelled in the case to testify to reccommend that for this reason the said McKenna should not be discharged with the others at the end of the cruise but be transferred to serve the whole or a portion of the remainder of his term of enlistment at the Port of the Ships arrival - Also read the finding of the Court Martial in the case of John D. Gorman (Lds) who was guilty of the charge Scandalous Conduct the sentence was as follows Solitary Confinement in double irons on Bread + Water thirty days and the loss of three months pay, but the particular time of carrying the Sentence into execution + whether or not the period of his confinement shall be continuous or broken to be regulated by the discretion of the Commander of the Ship according to the convenience of the Ship and the health of the prisoner provided however that the conditions of this sentence be fulfilled within the space of ninety days from the date on which into it may approved also read the following Reccommendation Approval + Remittal. In view of the circumstances as it appears that just previously to the commission of the offence to which the accused of has pleaded Guilty he had been invited to the room alluded to in the specification, by its occupants and from the hand of one there, had received a glass of Liquor as stated in his defense substantiated by evidence admitted subsequently in the proceedings at his request and the affects probaly produced by that circumstance, would reccommend the accused to the clemency of the Commander. The foregoing sentence and reccommendation in the Case of John D. Gorman (Lds) are approved - In consideration of the said reccommendation to clemency and of the testimony on which it is based extenuating in its carachter admitted in accordance with Paragraph 6 General Orders April 4 - 1855 after the plea of Guilty the said sentence is remitted altogether - And the accused John D Gorman restored to his duty as Master at Arms Confined Bernard McKenna (OSea) in double irons in the cells in accordance with his sentence

Phew.  :P
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 February 2016, 03:49:39
Quite a history!
I'm glad the court thought to protect the witnesses from Mr. McKenna 
I hope Mr. Gorman has learned his lesson.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 11 February 2016, 10:35:48
November 30, 1856
Monrovia, Liberia

From 8 to Meridian

Discharged the following Kroomen viz Tom Pepper
Jack Twodollar, Jim Dre, Jim Crow, Black Whale
Jack Crowbar, Tom Dollar, Tom ~~~ibley, Jack Poorfellow
Jack Friday, Inside Out, John Lewis, Jack Savage
Jack Two Gun, Rob Roberts, Tom Dale, Jack Purser,
Jack Haultaut, Pea Soup, Tom Walker, After Supper
Jack Davis, Palm Tree, Upside Down, Ben Coffee
After Breakfast + Jack Everyday - Shipped
the following Kroomen viz John Adams, Flying Jib
Boat Plug, Brace Aback, Fill Away, Main Bowline
Hot Coppers, Clear Hawse, Lock String, Hen Coop
Jack Fopey, Tom Freeman, Tom Coffee, Two Forty
Hard Tack, Yellow Whale, Bill Jumbo, Bow Gun
Jim Jack, Jack Smart, Port Anchor, Bean
Hickman, Tar Bucket, Sea Breeze, Cat Fall
Top Light, Last One


 ::)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_169_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol009of067/vol009of067_169_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 19 February 2016, 20:29:42
On to Volume 11  :D , no Volume 10...  ???

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 20 February 2016, 12:43:03
I couldn't get to volume 10 via URL editing - at the time, I thought it might have a different URL format than the other logs. Looks like it's missing entirely.
But her history does include this:

Quote
22 February 1855 - Recommissioned. Departed Key West 9 June as flagship of Commodore Crabbe with African Squadron, returned to Philadelphia 2 June 1857 and decommissioned.

16 December 1857 - Recommissioned, and served with Home Squadron in the West Indies.

So maybe that's why volume 10 never got scanned: It was considered too short to be worth it - would have been less than 6 months.
But this is just pure speculation - your guess is as good as mine.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 February 2016, 13:11:48
I think you may be right. So, they assigned volume numbers to the physical logs, not the scanned sets?

So maybe that's why volume 10 never got scanned: It was considered too short to be worth it - would have been less than 6 months.
But this is just pure speculation - your guess is as good as mine.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 20 February 2016, 14:10:44
So, they assigned volume numbers to the physical logs, not the scanned sets?

Correct. The Patterson's log numbers go past 120, even though there's less than 100 logs total.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 February 2016, 16:24:42
I have no idea why it isn't available here, but it has been scanned.
Some volumes were scanned out of order because they needed special treatment before scanning. Maybe it just has a different URL format. In the early days I don't think they had established a naming convention.

If you go to http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/rediscover/us-navy-logbooks, you can see the ships that have been (will be?) scanned.

Click on Metadata RG 24.xlsx to download the spread sheet with the links.

Here is volume 10: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7284437
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 February 2016, 16:49:55
Is this the rough log? It's a very different format.  :o

Here is volume 10: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7284437
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 February 2016, 17:19:34
I don't know, but I suspect so.

We have a lot of logbooks in very different formats :o :o :o
That's why they need humans.
A computer would have a nervous breakdown ;) ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 February 2016, 20:25:36
December 20, 1857

They've made some cloud-type reports in the last couple of days, but here we have cloud types and a 'sky' number reported for the first time.  8)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_005_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_005_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 February 2016, 02:37:25
I wonder if that means the sky is 9 tenths covered with clouds :-\
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 23 February 2016, 20:41:42
This page appears to have instructions to transcribers, complete with a big red arrow pointing them out.  ::)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_009_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_009_1.jpg)

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 24 February 2016, 16:21:22
I'm not entirely sure: is this set of instructions related to some surveying at all? I wouldn't expect her to be doing geodetic surveying though.



Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 24 February 2016, 16:57:30
It doesn't look contemporary. Going forward that are blue pencil mark-ups and 'corrections' of the weather data, along with numbers that I think are map grid references. There was a bunch of this in the 1866 log set, too. I think somebody beat us to the data!  :)

I'm not entirely sure: is this set of instructions related to some surveying at all? I wouldn't expect her to be doing geodetic surveying though.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 March 2016, 19:56:58
February 18, 1858
Aspinwall (modern day Colon, Panama)

From 8 to Merid
Exercised "Awkward Section" of 2nd Division at small arms

From Merid to 4
Exercised "Awkward Squad" of small arms - men of 3rd Division


 ???

From the Wiki article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awkward_squad):

It is commonly accepted that shortly before his death in 1796 Robert Burns uttered the words "Don't let the awkward squad fire over me". At this time the phrase was in use in military slang for a group of recruits who seemed incapable of understanding discipline or not yet sufficiently trained or disciplined to properly carry out their duties.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 04 March 2016, 00:33:58
I don't know; maybe it's just that my family (or at least the portion of it that I interact with the most) is horribly antiquated or something, but, I can think of a half dozen or so people who still use Awkward Squad in this way. It's frightening to me that they don't just have an Awkward Squad, but an Awkward Section. There's a little bit of a weird catch in how it was phrased this way.

For those not super familiar with military jargon, in modern usage, a squad and a section, outside of France, are essentially the same thing; a group of two or three fireteams, consisting of eight to twelve individual soldiers. However, it used to be more common, particularly among Navy and Marine detachments to use the French definition, which is equivalent to a platoon (sub-division of a company, consisting of more than two, but less than ten squads).

The implication is that their command structure breakdown was that a large portion of the 2nd Division was so badly trained (or incapable of learning) that they were as much a danger to themselves as they would have been to enemy forces. And this happening at a time when the Third Seminole War was still being fought.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 06 March 2016, 10:34:51
March 10, 1858
Aspinwall

From Merid to 4.

Called all hands to muster and
read the finding and sentence of
the late Summary Court Martial
in the Case of Pvt Johnson, as
follows; Charge, "Neglect of duty."
Specification, "Sleeping on Watch"
proved, and the sentence "5
days solitary confinement
on bread and water in single
cell, with door closed, from
daylight to 8 P.M. and from
8 P.M. to daylight in his hammock in the brig, with
loss of pay from 5th to 15th inst., inclusive". But the
Commanding Officer disapproved of the proceedings of the Court,
on the ground of informality; the record not showing
that the recorder was "sworn", as is provided by law. The prisoner,
Pvt Johnson was therefore discharged.


He seems to have dodged the formal punishments, but I'm guessing the officers had other ways to make sure he paid.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_045_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_045_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 March 2016, 11:29:41
I dare say that the officers will be a bit more careful about details the next time ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 08 March 2016, 13:35:01
This is interesting, a page of decoded signals traffic.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_053_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_053_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 March 2016, 14:05:50
 8) 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 10 March 2016, 21:13:01
April 3, 1858
Aspinwall

From Merid to 4.

At 3.30 called
all hands to Muster, and read the
findings of the late summary Court
Martial as follows. Fred'k Stewart
(Cabin Cook) charged with dissolute +
immoral practices, and with provoking
and threatening language, Sentenced to
"Loss of one months pay and deprivation
"of liberty on shore for the space of 6 mos"
Robert Gregory (Cox), Henry McCullen (Sea) and J Wiley (Cap Top), charged with dissolute
and immoral practices. Sentenced "to one months loss of pay. Henry M. El~~s
(Sea) Drunkenness + treating with contempt, his supervisor, whilst in the execution of
his office. Sentenced to "Solitary Confinement in single cell on bread and water for
10 days from 6 A.M. to 8 P.M.,+ from 8 P.M. to 6 A.M. in his hammock
in charge of a sentinel, with loss of two months pay." These sentences were
approved by Capt Kennedy, and ordered to be carried into execution


It appears that the Court's officers got all the procedural details correct this time.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_058_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_058_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 13 March 2016, 10:10:32
April 22, 1858
Greytown, Nicaragua

Beach assault, 1858-style. Here are some interesting details from a training exercise.

From 4 to 8.

At 4.30 PM, called away Launch 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Cutters,
armed + fitted them out for a distant expedition _
At 4.52 boats left the ship in a line ahead, for
the beach of "Punta Arenas" (A heavy sand
beach) distant about 750. yds. Before reaching
the beach, the boats drew up in a line abreast
the Launch covering the landing. At 5.02 the launch fired her last shot, grounded 20 yds
from beach + made the following time in landing the 12 pdr.
howitzer; Viz - from time of last fire, the gun shifted from boat to field
carriage, landed + fired in 3 minutes. In embarking, fired, embarked
the gun mounted on field carriage; shifted to boat carriage + fired
in 4 minutes.


I'm guessing the 12-pounder might have been one of these:
https://markerhunter.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/dahlgren-12-pdr-small-bh/ (https://markerhunter.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/dahlgren-12-pdr-small-bh/)

I also found a link to a company that builds and sells fully operational replicas if anybody wants one of their own.  :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_068_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_068_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 19 March 2016, 10:58:17
May 19, 1858
Greytown, Nicaragua

From 4 to 8

Received the following stores from the "relief" viz -

15 Bbls Sugar
1 Do Vinegar
12 Do Whiskey
49 Do Beef
6 Do Pickles
12 Do Pork
3 Do Molasses
80 Boxes Soap
10 Packages Grass
2 Bbls Bread
22 Boxes Tobacco
1 Bbl Butter
2 Do Cheese
17 Boxes Mustard
94 Pans (small)
14 Mess Pans (large) and
144 Small tin pans


 ???
Does that really say 'Grass'?: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_081_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_081_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 March 2016, 11:05:55
It does seem to...

I was thinking maybe it was for scrubbing.

I did find this but it doesn't seem likely since the log says packages:
Quote from: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/26000/26000-h/26000-h.htm#G
GRASS. A term applied to vegetables in general.

Rope making: http://www.hnsa.org/resources/manuals-documents/age-of-sail/textbook-of-seamanship/rope/
But, again, it doesn't seem likely since the log says packages.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JamesAPrattIII on 21 March 2016, 16:36:50
I have a problem I can't seem to find the Jamestown 1844 or any other ships logs any more. Can anyone help me?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 March 2016, 16:51:45
Try starting from: http://classic.oldweather.org/ships/
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 22 March 2016, 06:58:04
June 8, 1858
Greytown, Nicaragua

From Merid to 4

Called all hands to muster, the Captain addressed some pertinent remarks, on the impropriety and danger of giving food to the sick, without consulting the Surgeon.


 :-X ::)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_091_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jil on 22 March 2016, 12:53:39
I love the term 'pertinent remarks'.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 25 March 2016, 13:02:00
July 2, 1858
Off Matanzas, Cuba

From 8 to Merid

Showed our colors to several Spanish schr's - Passed close to a schooner - our colors flying - she passed without showing any nationality - gave chase + fired a gun to windward - Schooner then showed Spanish colors. Tacked ship + went upon our course again.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_103_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_103_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 April 2016, 09:47:47
September 8, 1858
Portsmouth, New Hampshire

From 8 to Midnight

At 9 discovered a man swimming away from the Ship, who was picked
up, at the moment of discovery, by a boat lying in wait for him, and was
pulled rapidly for shore - useless to pursue. Called all hands to muster +
discovered Franklin S Bryan (App) had deserted as above stated.



http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_137_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_137_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 April 2016, 13:28:01
At least someone who had the brains to plan ahead ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 16 April 2016, 11:41:02
November 18, 1858
Greytown, Nicaragua

At 11.30 HM Steamer "Valorous" Saluted the American Flag with 7 Guns. At 11.50 the "Savannah" Saluted the English Flag with 15 Guns. The "Valorous" returned the Salute. At Meridian the English Minister Sir William Gore Ousely came on board + on leaving was Saluted with 15 Guns English Flag at the fore, which was returned by the "Valorous" with an equal number.

Sir William Gore Ouseley (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Gore_Ouseley) was a diplomat, author and artist, at that time looking after British interests in the area as a Special Envoy.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_173_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol011of067/vol011of067_173_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 20 April 2016, 22:54:43
Through Volume 11. I'm on a 1 log week per day quota, so I should easily finish this set within a year if I can maintain that.

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 23 April 2016, 14:43:35
January 14, 1859
At sea, off Nicaragua

From 8 to Meridian

At 9.30 spoke + boarded the American
Barque "White Cloud" A.M. Miller
Master, one day from Greytown, bound
to New York, Capt Miller came on
board, and gave news of the wreck of the
American Schooner "Susan" Some where
on the Coast to the Northward, and that
the Passengers + Crew had been rescued
+ taken to Mobile by a British Steamer
of War.


It's an interesting story about the Susan:

http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1859/01/08/page/2/article/wreck-of-the-schooner-susan

It seems that there was some doubt about their intentions.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol012of067/vol012of067_010_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 April 2016, 15:49:17
I followed your link to the article, but it was too blurry for me to be able to read it :'(
(zooming didn't help)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 23 April 2016, 17:03:29
Sorry to hear that, I was able to make it out at full zoom. Maybe I'll transcribe it.  ;)

I followed your link to the article, but it was too blurry for me to be able to read it :'(
(zooming didn't help)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 April 2016, 17:15:59
Sorry to hear that, I was able to make it out at full zoom. Maybe I'll transcribe it.  ;)

I'm not that interested ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 May 2016, 16:39:38
I'm pretty sure that says wind Nouthd in the first entry.  ???

Want to I don't. Type it I will.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol012of067/vol012of067_099_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 May 2016, 16:57:47
Yup :'(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 27 May 2016, 17:54:49
I think it's a very badly written small r, but I'm probably just biased towards getting a sensible solution.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 May 2016, 18:29:31
I think you're probably right, but I put in a 'u' as the first thing I saw.  ;)

I think it's a very badly written small r, ...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 05 June 2016, 16:21:51
September 10, 1859
Off Nicaragua

At 3 Boxhauled Ship to Westd.

Quote
boxhaul (v)
Definition: To tack a square-rigged vessel short round. To perform this maneuver, the sails were backed to take way off with the helm held to weather, causing the ship to go astern until the eye of the wind was on the other side. Then the sails were handled around to the new tack. This method of tacking required split second crew coordination, and was used only when absolutely necessary, such as when caught under a lee shore in light winds.

Sounds like a neat trick, and tricky to pull off.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol012of067/vol012of067_133_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 June 2016, 17:08:12
 8)
I've seen plenty of 'wore ship', but this is the first time I heard of boxhauling.

Quote from: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/26000/26000-h/26000-h.htm#B
BOXHAULING. Is an evolution by which a ship is veered sharp round on her heel, when the object is to avoid making a great sweep. The helm is put a-lee, the head-yards braced flat aback, the after-yards squared, the driver taken in, and the head-sheets hauled to windward; when she begins to gather stern-way the helm is shifted and sails trimmed. It is only resorted to in emergencies, as a seaman never likes to see his ship have stern-way. With much wind and sea this evolution would be dangerous.
(That escapes me!)

Quote from: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/26000/26000-h/26000-h.htm#VEER
VEER, To. To let out, to pay out, to turn or change. Also, to veer or wear, in contradistinction from tacking. In tacking it is a necessary condition that the ship be brought up to the wind as close-hauled, and put round against the wind on the opposite tack. But in veering or wearing, especially when strong gales render it dangerous, unseamanlike, or impossible, the head of the vessel is put away from the wind, and turned round 20 points of the compass instead of 12, and, without strain or danger, is brought to the wind on the opposite tack. Many deep-thinking seamen, and Lords St. Vincent, Exmouth, and Sir E. Owen,[711] issued orders to wear instead of tacking, when not inconvenient, deeming the accidents and wear and tear of tacking, detrimental to the sails, spars, and rigging.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Dean on 06 June 2016, 15:08:16
In a 'fore & aft rig' the veer is also called a gybe. One of the results of that wind shift is that the boom swings 'solidly & quickly' across the deck.

Tough on the rigging. Any heads in the way can be bruised or damaged!!!!!! :o
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 June 2016, 16:12:45
Thanks, Dean!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 June 2016, 03:51:30
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_127_1.jpg
4-6: sprinkling rain ?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 07 June 2016, 07:30:33
That's what I see...

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_127_1.jpg
4-6: sprinkling rain ?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 15 June 2016, 01:04:48
November 30, 1859
At anchor off Nicaragua

From 8 to Midnight
A heavy swell from the Northd+Eastd, and Ship rolling Guns under.
  :o ...urp.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol012of067/vol012of067_176_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 15 June 2016, 08:38:47
Oh wow... I've seen ships roll hard enough to go guns under, but every time I see it my mind drifts to the famous battle between the HMS Guerriere and the USS Constitution near the onset of the War of 1812.

Post Script Editorial: the "too long; didn't read" version is that the image of a ship in heavy seas with her gun deck going underwater makes me think of Constitution, because it happened to Guerriere during their famous battle. I didn't realize how long this was going to end up being when I first started writing it  ;D

*ahem* to set the stage...

At the start of the war, the Royal Navy had a naval presence in North America consisting of 85 ships, including ships of the line. The U.S. Navy was outnumbered nearly four to one (with 22 ships in total), with their strongest ships being frigates (which made up the bulk of the USN at the time).

The chief fighting strength of the USN was a small squadron under the command of Commodore John Rodgers, consisting of three frigates, and two sloops of war, which he commanded from the deck of the USS President, sailing out of New York. Constitution was not normally part of this squadron.

A week after the United States declared war, Secretary of the Navy Paul Hamilton issued orders to Rodgers' squadron to sail out of New York harbor, rendezvous with Constitution, and then make way to Nova Scotia to engage the Royal Navy. Rodgers, however, did not wait long enough to receive those orders, and sailed out of New York immediately after receiving word of the declaration of war. Constitution, under the command of Captain Isaac Hull, was stuck in Annapolis, taking on new crew, while Rodgers left New York and headed East to cross the Atlantic in an effort to catch a British convoy from the West Indies before it could reach England, and to engage Royal Navy targets of opportunity along the way.

Rodgers almost immediately ran across and engaged HMS Belvidera, but Belvidera escaped when one of the cannons on the gundeck of USS President exploded, wounding Rodgers (not mortally). In the confusion and chaos, Belvidera slipped away from Rodgers, and reported to Vice Admiral Herbert Sawyer.

Sawyer feared that the USN was amassing the bulk of their fleet in the area off the eastern seaboard of the United States, and dispatched a squadron of five ships (the 64 gun ship of the line HMS Africa, and the frigates Shannon, Aeolus, Belvidera, and Guerriere) to concentrate specifically in the waters off New York, under the command of Captain Philip Bowes Vere Broke. This concentration on such a small area had the unintended side effect of allowing dozens of American merchant vessels to escape from the guns of the Royal Navy, so Rodgers' failure to sink the Belvidera in that first exchange was a bit of a blessing in disguise for the USN.

Meanwhile, Captain Hull had received Hamilton's orders, finished replenishing the crew of Constitution, and made for New York to rendezvous with Rodgers and the rest of the squadron. Of course, Rodgers was half way across the Atlantic by this point, and Broke's squadron was already in the waters off New York looking for revenge.

When entering the waters off New York, Hull spotted four ships sailing west, with a fifth headed directly for Constitution. He believed that this may have been Rodgers' squadron, but was cautious, as he was uncertain what had caused the fifth ship to become separated from the others. It was beginning to get dark, so Hull ordered signal lights to be shown, but the approaching ship did not identify herself, but there was sufficient distance to wait until morning to further assess the situation.

The oncoming ship was HMS Guerierre, under the command of Captain James Richard Dacres. Dacres quickly realized that Constitution was a hostile vessel, but became confused when his signals to the rest of is squadron went unanswered. Fearing that he was sailing into a trap, he put as much space between his own squadron, Guerriere, and Constitution as possible.

By some miracle, the ships evaded each other for a week, until Hull was able to escape south, and made for Boston. Dacres made for Halifax for a much-needed refit, while Broke and Rodgers played cat and mouse in bad weather in a positional duel over the previously mentioned British convoy; Broke won that engagement without a shot fired by either side (at each other; Rodgers managed to secure seven British merchant ships on the voyage, but this was after failing to stop the convoy)

Three weeks later, Constitution stopped the American privateer Decatur, and was told that they had missed being spotted by a British frigate the day before. Hull decided to take up the chase, and the chess game that is naval warfare began in earnest.

In the early afternoon of 19 August, the crew of Constitution spotted a strange, large ship to leeward, and moved in to investigate in heavy seas. As Hull closed in, he realized that the ship was Guerriere, right around the same time that Dacres recognized that he was about to be trading broadsides with the same ship that had eluded him three weeks prior.

Dacres hove to while both ships were still in the process of making ready for battle, and fired a broadside that fell short. Constitution held at Guerriere's quarter for nearly an hour, with Dacres occasionally yawing to fire generally inaccurate broadsides, while Constitution's fore guns returned fire to little effect. At one point, one of Guerriere's broadsides managed to put a cannonball to Constitution, but it bounced off doing virtually no damage to the ship. Famously, one of her crew then exclaimed, "Huzzah! Her sides are made of iron!" earning Constitution the nickname "Old Ironsides" which she still bears proudly to this day (and would later go on to earn in less comedic fashion, in her duel with the HMS Cyane and HMS Levant).

Over the course of the battle, Hull gained the advantage as the two ships circled each other, and he made the decision to loose additional sail. Constitution closed the distance between the two, and the two vessels traded broadsides for fifteen minutes. Guerriere had taken massive damage in the exchange, while Constitution remained largely unharmed. Dacres could only watch in horror as Guerriere's mizzenmast shattered and fell overboard to the starboard, spinning her round, and allowing Constitution to cross ahead of the crippled ship. Hull ordered a raking broadside, which brought down the main yard.

Hull attempted to repeat the maneuver, but cut too close, and Guerriere's bowsprit got caught in the rigging of Constitution's mizzen. At this point, the marine attachments aboard both ships began trading musket fire, using Guerriere's bowsprit as a gangway between the ships, but both sides deciding it was unsafe due to the heavy seas. After several long minutes with the two ships locked together, the rigging of Constitution's mizzen gave way, and Guerriere's bowsprit broke free. The shock to the already damaged ship shattered the fore and mainmasts and both fell by the board, leaving her utterly helpless, and with her starboard gun deck underwater as she rolled under a heavy swell.

Hull seized the moment, and ran Constitution downwind for a several minutes, repairing the damage to the mizzen rigging, before turning once more to Guerriere, determined to sink her if she would not surrender. While closing the gap and swinging round to prepare another, likely fatal broadside, Dacres ordered all guns on the opposite side to be fired. Hull took this as a sign of surrender, and sent a lieutenant to Guerriere. When the lieutenant asked Dacres if he was prepared to surrender, Dacres famously replied, "Well, Sir, I don't know. Our mizzen mast is gone. Our fore and main masts are gone. I think, on the whole, you might say we have struck our flag."

Thus ends the battle that earned Constitution the nickname Old Ironsides, although there is some further interesting information that came to light in the aftermath.

Dacres was escorted to Constitution to offer his sword as surrender, but Hull refused it, stating that he could not accept the sword of a man who had fought so valiantly. Further, Guerriere was clearly sinking, so the survivors were taken aboard Constitution, where it was discovered that ten men had been pressed into service aboard her. However, Dacres, being an honorable man, ordered that the Americans aboard Guerriere remain below deck so that they would not be faced with firing upon their own countrymen.

While the victory of Constitution over Guerriere was militarily and logistically unimportant, it proved a pivotal moment in American history. Guerriere was just one of 600 ships in the Royal Navy. She was old, half-rotted, had fewer guns (of smaller caliber), and had nearly a third less crew than Constitution. Yet in the eyes of the American public, Constitution had proved that the United States had the ability to go toe to toe with the most powerful naval force in the history of the world, and not just hold their own, but actually be victorious. This single, insignificant victory, led to a policy still held by the US Navy, in that focusing on building relatively fewer ships of superior quality, and having them crewed by volunteers who felt they were paid fairly for their duty, was a natural path to victory over any opposition.

The United States would, arguably, go on to lose the war of 1812, although the war ended with the treaty of Ghent largely because neither side saw a reason to continue fighting with one another. I say arguably lost because of the fact that Ross had managed to capture, occupy, and largely destroy the United States capitol. I'd count that as a crippling tactical loss, much in the same vein as the hypothetical scenario of the United States capturing London and burning Parliament, Westminster Abbey, and Buckingham Palace to the ground. That said, it's hard to say that the war of 1812 was anything more than an extension of the Napoleonic Wars (even as an American), although the outcome of the war set the stage for the unfolding of global politics for the next two centuries.

I could go on about that particular conflict for *hours* but I'll stop here, lest I bore you all to tears. If you've read all of this, I commend your dedication :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 15 June 2016, 08:55:28
TL;DR = more coffee...  ;D 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 16 June 2016, 00:08:18
Done with Volume 12. Volume 13 is a short one, after that, the Civil War!

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 June 2016, 23:31:17
February 14, 1860
Philadelphia Navy Yard

At 12.30 the Ships company left the ship with their bags and hammocks - also the Marine Guard - At 2.30 Hauled down the Ensign and pennant and put the ship out of commission.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol013of067/vol013of067_030_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 June 2016, 23:32:32
Done with the very short Volume 13.

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 June 2016, 04:22:59
Quote from: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_143_1.jpg
24/05/1852
dressed ship
Fired a salute of 21 guns, in honor of the anniversary of the birth of H. B. Majesty
That would have been Queen Victoria.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 June 2016, 15:31:44
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_144_1.jpg

4 PM wind direction: SE b E 1/2 E
5 PM wind direction: Sd + Ed
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 28 June 2016, 12:42:58
They must have had their rum ration after 4 PM.  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Dean on 28 June 2016, 14:14:03
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_144_1.jpg

4 PM wind direction: SE b E 1/2 E
5 PM wind direction: Sd + Ed

I'd seen that  a couple times in the ships I have worked on.  Usually meant 'Southward by Eastward?!'   (but the rum is a better suggestion!) ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 29 June 2016, 05:21:10
SE by E 1/2 E doesn't... really make a lot of sense. S by E 1/2 E is literally the same thing as ESE, which is a lot easier to write. But at least they didn't get *really* drunk and write down something like Levante-Scirocco (which also means the same thing) just to throw off anyone reading the log.

Sd by Ed could be South by East, which is one point east of south on a standard 32 point compass.

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 June 2016, 09:32:44
I see Sd + Ed so often that it seems unlikely to be something as specific as South by East :-\
I suspect that there is some slight variation but it is centered around SE :-\ :-\



Ed is popular too... http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_145_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 29 June 2016, 10:39:35
So did I. I always thought it was a wet-finger-in-the-air type measurement.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 29 June 2016, 21:38:31
August 5, 1861
Off Amelia Island, Florida


At 5.40 discovered a sail bearing about S by W. At 5.50 called all hands got under way

All sail set by the wind in chase of the "Strange Sail"

The Strange Sail in sight proved to be a "Barque", when hull in sight. She went on shore near the Light House. Lowered boat & communicated with ~~~~. Numbers of people seen on the beach. Cleared away the gratings from amidship in readiness for getting boats out.

Hoisted out Launch + 1st Cutter, Armed Launch, 1st & 4th Cutter & sent them in shore after strange sail

At 3.45 boats boarded strange sail, which proved to be the American barque "Alvarado" from Cape Town ~ From papers found on board we ascertained the "Alvarado" was captured on the 20th of June by the Privateer brig "Jeff Davis", Lat. 25 North, Long 55 West. At 3.50 an armed Steamer being seen from ship approaching boats, fired a gun, hoisted Cornet, hove up anchor and stood in to Cove then ~ At 4.05 the Steamer drawing near, the Cornet flying + the barque being aground, under cover of the enemys batteries, which had been firing at the boats for an hour, the boats left her, first setting her on fire in three places. At 5.25 the Launch, the last of the Boats, reached the Ship.



http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_034_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 30 June 2016, 04:58:20
That was the first of five ships to be captured by the Jamestown:

Quote
After the outbreak of the Civil War, Jamestown re-commissioned on 5 June 1861 and was assigned to the Atlantic Blockading Squadron, where she compiled a record of outstanding efficiency. The sloop chased the bark Alvorado ashore off Fernandina, Florida and set her on fire on 5 August, and captured the schooner Aigburth off the coast of Florida on 31 August 1861. Four days later she captured, dismantled, and scuttled the schooner Colonel Long. Next she captured the schooner Havelock on 15 December. Her final prize was the brig Intended, taken off Wilmington, North Carolina on 1 May 1862.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 30 June 2016, 08:33:16
And all of them in this volume of the logs. Should make for interesting reading!  8)

That was the first of five ships to be captured by the Jamestown:
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 02 July 2016, 10:39:02
50% Complete!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 02 July 2016, 11:30:15
The officer's signature for the last entry on this page (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_044_1.jpg) caught my eye because it looked like an unusual name. I made it out to be 'Phythian', which is a name I'd never heard of. A quick trip to Google found that this was Robert L. Phythian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_L._Phythian), a young officer who would go on to have a very successful Navy career, which included a term as Superintendent of the U.S. Naval Academy.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 July 2016, 12:14:57
http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/NHC/Callahan/ is very helpful ;)

Phythian, Robert L.
Acting Midshipman, 28 January, 1853. Midshipman, 20 June, 1856. Passed Midshipman, 29 April, 1859. Master, 5 September, 1859. Lieutenant, 25 December, 1860. Lieutenant Commander, 16 July, 1862. Commander, 13 July, 1870. Captain, 15 November, 1881. Commodore, 7 September, 1894. Retired List, 21 July, 1897.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 02 July 2016, 18:26:48
August 31, 1861

The capture of the schooner Aigburth. Not a lot of drama, they fired warning shots and the Aigburth hove to under their guns. The Jamestown sent a nine man prize crew aboard ("all armed with Cutlasses and Pistols"), along with twelve days of provisions, and they parted company.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_047_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 July 2016, 12:21:11
September 4, 1861
Off South Carolina

From 3. to 6. Boarded the Schooner "Col Long"
previously boarded by us off Fernandina, from
Savannah bound to Key West the Captain pre-
senting himself as a poor destitute fisherman
supplied him with provisions and allowed him
to pass; at 3.30 brought on board Capt Mo~
Frederick Mortimer; Wm Perry; Chas W. Fa~
Wm Smith; Thomas Kelly; Chas Williams
Peter Riley. Brought the Schooner alongside and
dismantled her taking everything of any value
from her; At 4.45 "Scuttled", and "Cast Loose"
her, found the Schooners papers secreted beneath the cabin floor.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_049_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 July 2016, 13:29:28
ARRIVAL OF THE UNITED STATES SLOOP. OF WAR JAMESTOWN. (http://www.nytimes.com/1861/09/14/news/arrival-of-the-united-states-sloop-of-war-jamestown.html)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 04 July 2016, 12:00:16
September 10, 1861
Hampton Roads

From 3 to 6.
Distributed the Arrowroot and Whiskey taken from
the "Col Long" to the different vessels of the squadron
by order of Flag Officer Stringham


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_052_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 July 2016, 12:31:18
I bet that was a popular decision!

I'm a bit surprised about the Arrowroot (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrowroot) though.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 04 July 2016, 12:40:24
Me too, that's what caught my attention. The wiki article says it was popular during the Victorian era, though.

I'm a bit surprised about the Arrowroot (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrowroot) though.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 06 July 2016, 22:49:33
According to notes on the log pages, the position records for Oct 5 and Oct 6 are reversed. I transcribed them per the date correspondence in the notes (i.e. swapped pages for position). The Obs and DR Latitudes are also noted as reversed on the Oct 6 page (Oct 5 position), so transcribed Obs Latitude per the strike-through notes.

 ::)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_064_1.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_065_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 July 2016, 02:51:45
Distributed the Arrowroot and Whiskey taken from
the "Col Long" to the different vessels of the squadron
Maybe a little too much to Jamestown ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 10 July 2016, 11:06:41
November 1, 1861

From 8 to Midnight.   Broke the barometer.

Last entry was at 10 pm.  ::)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_078_0.jpg

Edit: Barometric pressure recording resumes at 8 pm on November 5 without explanation. They were tied up to the "Young Rover (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Young_Rover_(1861))" that afternoon to transfer water to her, maybe they got a new barometer in trade?

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_080_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 10 July 2016, 12:18:43
November 4 precedes November 3 in the log book. I'm typing it as I see it.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_079_0.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_079_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 July 2016, 16:10:45
That's I will do - if I ever get there ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 15 July 2016, 19:41:48
December 15, 1861
On blockade duty off South Carolina

...after "standing in chase" of a vessel...

From 4 to 8. [AM] At 4.40 hauled up
the courses and hove to, sent the 4th
Cutter on board of the sloop, cutter re-
-turned with Captain. At 5.15 made
all sail. At 6.45 sail in sight bearing
ESE. At 7 sail reported from aloft
bearing about NNE. 4th Cutter on board
of the sloop. Sloop proved to be
the "Havelock" with British
papers - but her muster roll showed
that she had shipped her crew in
Charleston S.C. on the 6th of October
from which port she had no clear-
-ance.


They later sent a six man prize crew aboard with twelve days provisions, received two men from the sloop's crew, and parted company.

They also noted entering the Gulf Stream at 3.20, which is evident from the rather abrupt rise in water temperature for a few hours.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_100_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 18 July 2016, 11:41:31
January 17, 1862
Hampton Roads

This day's remarks + columns
was accidentally erased from the
log slate before being copied.



 :o  They're keeping the rough log on a chalkboard?

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_116_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 18 July 2016, 12:24:25
Perhaps the crew wanted to use the slate board to keep score for their dart game  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 July 2016, 12:28:37
:o  They're keeping the rough log on a chalkboard?

Very surprising and interesting!
I guess a chalkboard might be easier to deal with on deck than paper and quill pen :-\
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jil on 18 July 2016, 17:21:33
It's great to find out a bit more about how they were working from a mistake made over 150 years ago!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 July 2016, 17:46:48
March 7, 1862
Off the Carolinas

From 8 to Meridian

Several water spouts in sight
Battened down the hatches


Seems the prudent thing to do.  ;)


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_141_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 26 July 2016, 23:22:26
May 1, 1862
Off the Carolinas

From Meridian to 4. [...] boarded the Brig "Intended" flying British colors. Sent a prize crew [...] on board her, supplied her with 8 pair hand + 8 pair leg irons, also provisions + water for 12 days.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_168_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 July 2016, 22:17:38
May 8, 1862
Hampton Roads

From Meridian to 4 PM

The U.S. Steamer "Monitor" and four other steamers got underway and stood up towards Sewell's Point. At 0h30m the vessels commenced firing. The shore batteries returned the fire. At 2.45 an Enemy "Steamer" appeared when the "Minnesota" and five other Steamers got underway and stood up  At 3.30 the enemy disappeared and the steamers commenced returning.


This was two months after the Monitor (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Monitor)'s famous encounter with the CSS Virginia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSS_Virginia) in the first battle of ironclad ships, in this same area. The Minnesota (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Minnesota_(1855)) was damaged in that fighting.

The enemy "Steamer" mentioned here may well be the CSS Jamestown (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSS_Jamestown), which apparently tried to make a run into Norfolk on this day and was rebuffed. She was scuttled up the James River a week later to block the channel.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol014of067/vol014of067_172_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 July 2016, 17:58:10
The cardinal directions on Jamestown are Nd, Sd, Ed, and Wd ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 29 July 2016, 19:07:17
Sometimes you'll get 'North', 'South', etc., but it's rare.  ;)

The cardinal directions on Jamestown are Nd, Sd, Ed, and Wd ::)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 30 July 2016, 11:22:23
Done with Volume 14.

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 30 July 2016, 17:23:27
July 3, 1862
Philadelphia Navy Yard

From 8 to Meridian

Received from
Sail Loft twenty-five
National flags, 9 pendants
twenty-five American flags
and four pendants. Two sets
of Naval Signals, one set of
Roger's Signals; one quarantine
flag, and one Church pendant.



http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol015of067/vol015of067_007_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 01 August 2016, 18:45:26
Well, here I am, several log-weeks into this volume before I noticed that there are horizontal rules printed on the sheets, and the log keepers are actually (mostly) using them!   :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol015of067/vol015of067_022_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 02 August 2016, 21:07:43
September 25, 1862
Philadelphia Navy Yard

From 8 to Meridian

Capt. C. Price assumed command of the ship -


'C.' as in Cicero Price (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicero_Price), it turns out. Captain Price's daughter Lilian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lily_Spencer-Churchill,_Duchess_of_Marlborough) would eventually marry George Spencer-Churchill (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Spencer-Churchill,_8th_Duke_of_Marlborough), uncle to Winston Churchill.  ;) 8)


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol015of067/vol015of067_049_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 August 2016, 19:45:32
October 22, 1862

Another accidental erasure of the log slate before copying it...   ;)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol015of067/vol015of067_063_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 16 August 2016, 09:23:32
April 25, 1863

They report their position in the Meridian to 4pm entry as bearings to Princess Island (ESE 1/2 E) and Cockatoo Island (NE by E). From their last reported coordinates they should be near the Sunda Strait. Princess Island would be Panaitan (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panaitan), and the island to the NE by E would probably be Krakatoa, although I could only find one possible reference (https://books.google.com/books?id=p3w6AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95&dq=cockatoo+island+java+-sydney&source=bl&ots=4YaLvdEl97&sig=dcWXBR9nsZ9yzTI_6eaawdYH29c&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAvI317sXOAhWEKB4KHQReA44Q6AEIJzAD#v=onepage&q=cockatoo%20island%20java%20-sydney&f=false) to that.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol015of067/vol015of067_155_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 August 2016, 15:07:20
Wonder if that is Princes Island as in the possessive?

Maybe they don't know either, I see two Princes and one Princes seemingly corrected to Princess :-\
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 August 2016, 15:23:56
Done with Volume 15.

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 August 2016, 16:05:46
30/09/1852 - http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol006of067/vol006of067_189_0.jpg
Quote
Her B.M. Steamer "Locust" went down the river
This was the time of Queen Victoria (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Victoria)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 25 August 2016, 03:41:32
April 25, 1863

They report their position in the Meridian to 4pm entry as bearings to Princess Island (ESE 1/2 E) and Cockatoo Island (NE by E). From their last reported coordinates they should be near the Sunda Strait. Princess Island would be Panaitan (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panaitan), and the island to the NE by E would probably be Krakatoa, although I could only find one possible reference (https://books.google.com/books?id=p3w6AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95&dq=cockatoo+island+java+-sydney&source=bl&ots=4YaLvdEl97&sig=dcWXBR9nsZ9yzTI_6eaawdYH29c&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAvI317sXOAhWEKB4KHQReA44Q6AEIJzAD#v=onepage&q=cockatoo%20island%20java%20-sydney&f=false) to that.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol015of067/vol015of067_155_1.jpg

It almost has to be Krakatau, and it's almost frightening to know that just a short 20 years later the whole island would blow itself apart. I could see English speaking sailors distorting the name Krakatau into Cockatoo, as they sound somewhat similar (although really nothing at all alike).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 25 August 2016, 22:52:55
Second or third stream (not sure which I'm on) is done with volume 6.

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 25 August 2016, 23:56:13
 8)

Second or third stream (not sure which I'm on) is done with volume 6.

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 August 2016, 02:54:44
I am in the same stream. I think it is third stream.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 26 August 2016, 05:57:14
I think you're right - whenever I asked for a page, I always got the first weather page of volume 7.
In other words, the third stream has now caught up to the second, so one of you will end up in stream 2 while the other will stay in stream 3.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 August 2016, 12:48:29
I currently get the first weather page of volume 7: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_002_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 August 2016, 09:07:47
Just did: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_003_0.jpg
19/10/1852 & 20/10/1852
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 27 August 2016, 09:40:11
Now I get 21st October 1852 - so it looks like Zovacor is in stream 2, and Randi is in stream 3.

Should be fine as long as no one else joins - I most certainly won't!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 August 2016, 10:03:16
 ;D

Should be fine as long as no one else joins - I most certainly won't!

I think d0cent drops in for a few from time to time.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 August 2016, 11:19:22
Yes
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 27 August 2016, 15:26:22
USS Jamestown
October 5, 1863
Yokohama

At 12. a "Regatta" took place in the harbour between Naval + other boats - our Gig, 1st Cutter & Launch were entered to run in the regatta.

At 4 pm our "Boats" which entered to pull in the regatta returned --- having won "Three prizes" - viz - "First Cutter" 1st prize -- "Gig" & "Launch" each 2nd prizes.


Hurray for Team Jamestown!  ;D

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol016of067/vol016of067_047_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 August 2016, 15:53:06
We're the best! ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 28 August 2016, 09:26:53
Of course we are the best  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 August 2016, 10:00:33
moderate breezes from S by W and E by S
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_003_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 29 August 2016, 10:52:28
I don't miss that log format.  ::) ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 01 September 2016, 20:39:17
December 19, 1863
Yokohama, Japan

At 7.45 passenger bark "Vampyr" got under weigh and left for sea.

 :o


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol016of067/vol016of067_084_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 04 September 2016, 10:54:51
January 31, 1864
Amoy, China

At 9 A.M. put James Savage in the sweat box, for throwing a bucket at the capt of the main top and bruising him.

With temperatures in the 50's (F), chill box was probably more apt.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol016of067/vol016of067_106_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 September 2016, 12:39:46
It might be something like this...
Quote from: Barometers, Instrumentation and Specifications by Ship
The box, also known as a hot box or sweatbox, is a method of solitary confinement used in humid and arid regions as a method of punishment. Anyone placed in one would experience extreme heat, dehydration, heat exhaustion, even death, depending on when and how long one was kept in one.
...
The technique was used by prisons in the Southern United States until later in the 19th century
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 05 September 2016, 18:55:48
They appear to have completely skipped the February 28 and 29, 1864, entries.  ???

Feb 27:
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol016of067/vol016of067_119_1.jpg

March 1:
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol016of067/vol016of067_120_0.jpg

I guess 1864 was one of those rare reverse-leap years.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 September 2016, 19:40:06
 ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 06 September 2016, 21:43:20
I noticed that the lat/long data for the map on the ship's page is embedded in the page code in a relatively easy format to use. I grabbed that, did some quality control on the wayward entries, and made my own map, without all those distracting ship icons.  ;)

The voyages of the Jamestown, more or less, up through March, 1864:

(http://imgur.com/7OIxq8u.png)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 September 2016, 03:04:46
 8)

Some of those dots look VERY familiar ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 14 September 2016, 20:53:36
Done with Volume 16...

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 18 September 2016, 14:05:36
September 29, 1864
Yokohama, Japan

Uh oh. There was a death (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3377.msg133215#msg133215) from smallpox a week before this.  :(

From 8 to Meridian

During the watch sent Alex Caesar (1st CBoy) Peter Franklin (Sea) Samuel Graham (2nd CBoy) Geo W. Rogers (C.Mate) Wm Clawson (Lds) and Gardener Parker (2nd CBoy) on shore to Small Pox Hospital in charge of Dr Walton, with Lucius Whittaker (Lds) and Joseph Lightkep as his assistants.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol017of067/vol017of067_034_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 19 September 2016, 19:16:18
Terrible end for the poor chap. I hope the smallpox didn't spread too far  :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 October 2016, 21:15:32
April 22, 1865
Inbound to Macao

Expended one can of Beef for pilot by order of Captain.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol017of067/vol017of067_140_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 04 October 2016, 16:15:46
Was the Dan Dare needing a whole cow pie?  :o
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 05 October 2016, 20:23:24
June 1, 1865
Macao

Stood James Lomax on deck one hour from 9 to 10 pm, for misbehavior on duty, in playing the same tune over several times.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol017of067/vol017of067_160_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 06 October 2016, 13:45:15
So wish they had named the tune that drove them nuts :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 07 October 2016, 14:10:20
Must have been like the bard in the Asterix comics who always ended up tied to a tree and gagged at communal feasts.  ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 07 October 2016, 14:51:43
James Lomax - a descendant of Cacofonix? Could be...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 07 October 2016, 17:00:08
He is Assurancetourix to me because I used to read them in French to improve my vocabulary  ;D

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 07 October 2016, 17:07:43
 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 09 October 2016, 12:03:29
Nice of them to mention it.  ;)

This day crossed the Meridian so will have to have two days of the same date

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol017of067/vol017of067_184_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 09 October 2016, 13:20:24
July 22, 1865

They've been away a long time...

Course and Dist to San Francisco South 77 1/2 Deg East 2160 Miles

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol017of067/vol017of067_186_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 09 October 2016, 16:56:12
July 22, 1865

They've been away a long time...

Course and Dist to San Francisco South 77 1/2 Deg East 2160 Miles

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol017of067/vol017of067_186_0.jpg

I must have missed something here - is 2160 a silly distance? Sorry to ask. Of course it must just be that my brain is longing for bedtime!  :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 09 October 2016, 17:10:50
I think Bob just means that the ship has been away for the US of A for a long time, and is now finally heading home.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 09 October 2016, 17:15:23
 ;) I've forgotten when they left Philadelphia, but I think it was well over a year before this.

I think Bob just means that the ship has been away for the US of A for a long time, and is now finally heading home.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 10 October 2016, 20:47:05
August 11, 1865
Mare Island Navy Yard

From 8 to Meridian:
At 12, called all hands to muster and read General Order concerning the lamentable death of the President.


President Lincoln was shot on April 14 and died the following day.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol017of067/vol017of067_196_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 10 October 2016, 21:31:38
August 13, 1865
Mare Island Navy Yard

A very long list of charts, mostly by number, sent to the USS Saranac.  :o

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol017of067/vol017of067_197_0.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 11 October 2016, 13:36:23
Wow - can we have them too please?  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 11 October 2016, 16:40:09

Done with the Jamestown...  ;)

6: 15 Apr 1851 - 16 Oct 1852
7: 17 Oct 1852 - 11 May 1854
8: 22 Feb 1855 -  31 Dec 1855
9: 1 Jan 1856 - 25 Jan 1857
11: 16 Dec 1857 - 31 Dec 1858
12: 1 Jan 1859 - 22 Dec 1859
13: 23 Dec 1859 - 14 Feb 1860
14: 5 June 1861 - 23 June 1862
15: 24 June 1862 - 9 July 1863
16: 10 July 1863 - 27 July 1864
17: 28 July 1864 - 17 Sep 1865
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 11 October 2016, 16:59:18
Congratulations!

What are you gonna do next?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 11 October 2016, 17:16:41
That's getting to be a tough call these days. Do you know of any that have the third stream unworked?

What are you gonna do next?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 11 October 2016, 17:47:03

Done with the Jamestown...  ;)


Woweee!  ;D ;D ;D Congratulations Bob! Thumbs up!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 12 October 2016, 14:31:25
That's getting to be a tough call these days. Do you know of any that have the third stream unworked?

The Thetis, Unalga and Patterson are definitely full, so that leaves just the Albatross 1890, Albatross 1900 and Yorktown.
But I suspect those are also taken - I only do the Albatross 1890 on even days, and every time I log on, the stream has advanced another few days from where I left it.
Albatross 1900 has Silvia, Hurlock and Stuart.
Yorktown has Maikel, Silvia and Craig.

Sorry Bob - there may not be anything left by this point.  :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 12 October 2016, 15:56:59
If necessary I could limit myself to Albatross 1900. I am currently doing August 1897 and May 1908 on the Albatross but I am only managing about 50 WRs per day now.
Albatross 1890 should have a stream vacant though.  Only Lollia and myself seem to be active on it.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 12 October 2016, 16:08:12
I'll work Albatross 1890 for a while then, or at least until I hear complaints.  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 14 October 2016, 01:24:11
Congrats!  Just 10 logbooks to go on the second (and perhaps third) stream(s).

Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jil on 14 October 2016, 12:03:37
Congrats, Bob!

I only do the Albatross 1890 on even days, and every time I log on, the stream has advanced another few days from where I left it.
Some of that might be me, I've done a few pages on Albatross 1890

I'll work Albatross 1890 for a while then, or at least until I hear complaints.  ;)
but I'm not going to complain!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 14 October 2016, 13:20:02
 ;D Thanks!

I'll work Albatross 1890 for a while then, or at least until I hear complaints.  ;)
but I'm not going to complain!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 20 October 2016, 03:42:02
The Albatross 1890 stream (Aug 1897) I was working has not had any more transcriptions done on it so I shall do a few more.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 15 November 2016, 22:48:09
I'll be back on Jamestown 1844 in a day or two!

When I ask for a page I get: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_013_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 16 November 2016, 08:37:39
 8)

Just thirteen years to go.  ;)

I'll be back on Jamestown 1844 in a day or two!

When I ask for a page I get: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_013_1.jpg
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 November 2016, 12:16:51
Wind direction(s): NW, Westd and Southd
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 November 2016, 16:40:57
Quote from: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_019_0.jpg
Surveyed, condemned, and threw overboard 125 lbs of bread dust and 204 lbs bread
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 28 November 2016, 16:48:18
:o

That must have been some really stale bread...
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 November 2016, 17:01:20
I was hoping they meant flour, but...
Quote from: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/26000/26000-h/26000-h.htm
DUST. The refuse of biscuit in the bread-room.

Urp
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 28 November 2016, 17:02:47
That's what happens when the worms get at your hardtack.  :(
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 November 2016, 17:08:00
Reminds me of a scene from a Hornblower book.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 December 2016, 11:43:26
Quote from: https://www.smashwords.com/extreader/read/266938/20/one-hundred-eighty-landings-of-united-states-marines-1800-19
General Urquiza approved of the landing of the foreign troops, their action in firing upon those bent upon pillage, and requested that these forces remain until such time as he had perfected arrangements for the proper policing of the city and had reestablished tranquility. Commodore McKeever states, relative to the service rendered by the American Marines: "Great credit it due to our gallant Marines for their share in the restoration of comparative safety to life and property. They were under the command of Captain Taylor of the Congress and Lieutenant Tattnall of the Jamestown." General Rosas, after his defeat at the hands of General Urquiza is said to have entered the city in disguise, and made his escape in the night to H.B.M. Centaur and later on a steamer bound for England.

Quote from: https://www.smashwords.com/extreader/read/266938/21/one-hundred-eighty-landings-of-united-states-marines-1800-19
On the 11th of September of this same year another outbreak occurred which necessitated the landing of another detachment of American Marines. This new outbreak was caused by reason of the action of General Urquiza in deposing the officials of the provisional government whom he had previously appointed, and the assuming himself of the office of Governor of that province. Just prior to this insurrection, Commodore McKeever arrived at Montevideo, and on the 3rd of August despatched Captain Samuel W. Downing, in the Jamestown, to Buenos Ayres to observe conditions. He arrived, and was present when the outbreak occurred. This affair did not reach the proportions that the earlier one had. Nevertheless, a Marine guard at the American Consulate was deemed advisable, and on the 17th of September a guard was so landed for the protection of American interests. The exact date those Marines returned to their ship is as yet unascertainable. However, it is believed to be sometime in April, 1853.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 09 December 2016, 14:05:12
I recall Jamestown spending a lot of time in Montevideo and Buenos Aires in those years.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 December 2016, 16:59:14
Yes... :P
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 December 2016, 12:50:52
Quote from: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_026_1.jpg
At 8 the French Sloop of War, and Brig commenced and fired a salute of 106 guns
...
At 11 the French and English Steamers and Spanish Corvette fired 21 guns in honor of the Coronation of the Emperor Napoleon 3'rd

At the end of the 4 to 8 watch, the pressure was 28.14
At the end of the 8 to Meridian watch, the pressure was 29.10

Coincidence?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 December 2016, 13:27:44
That was a lot of booms.  :o
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 December 2016, 16:46:26
12 Feb 1853
Quote from: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol007of067/vol007of067_032_0.jpg
From Meridian to 4

Sent the Aneroid Barometer on board H.B.M. Steamer "Centaur" for comparison _ found the difference to be one inch and three tenth . regulated it to correspond _

For the 8 to Meridian watch the pressure was 28.25
For the Meridian to 4 watch the pressure was 29.90

 :o :o :o
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 25 December 2016, 20:25:02
Yep- the readings were all in the 28.XX for almost a year.  The recalibration makes the values more realistic (perhaps still not accurate though) for a while and then the barometer goes back down into the high 28.XXs after half a year or so.  Not sure whats wrong with their equipment for it to migrate like that.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 12 January 2017, 22:52:27
Finished the log that ends May 11, 1854. The next log is much more data rich, with an actual working barometer and, for the first time, a thermometer!. Even a sea ice recording on the first log page (in the Delaware River...).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 12 January 2017, 22:55:13
 8) ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 January 2017, 22:59:31
a thermometer!.

WOW!
I don't know if I will be able to stand the excitement!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 01 February 2017, 15:40:03
Who else is working on the stream that is currently at August-September 1853?
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 February 2017, 19:17:47
Me - although I fear that saying that I am "working on" that stream is a bit optimistic :-[

Albatross 1900 needs transcribers ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 01 February 2017, 23:57:05
As soon as you get to the next logbook (starting 1855), the recordkeeping becomes much more systematic. I'd say 1 or 2 stars. I think the 4 star logbooks are behind us now.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 02 February 2017, 13:16:11
Okay - I think it's actually leelaht in my stream, as her WR count has increased by a lot recently, and my stream advanced by a whole month in two days when I was not working on it.
I'll move over to Albatross 1900.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: leelaht on 02 February 2017, 19:45:58
yep, Jamestown is my new home
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 02 February 2017, 22:46:48
Awesome. It will be nice to get it done!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 February 2017, 11:38:18
Quote from: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_026_1.jpg
16/04/1855
Received in the Masters Department a new Barometer
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 February 2017, 12:40:09
Nothing like a little international cooperation ;)

Quote from: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Jamestown/vol008of067/vol008of067_027_1.jpg
At 5 received on board the Pilot  At 5.30 Called all hands to up Anchor  got underway and was towed to the mouth of the Harbour _ by the Boats from the English French + Spanish Men of Warandour own  At 7.30 discharged the Pilot
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 18 May 2017, 23:45:31
The wind is to the backs of those two cutters that just blew by.  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 21 July 2017, 21:35:16
On to the last logbook! 1 year of entries to go.

Its also rough to see on the note from the first page of the logbook that they were scanned in November of 2012. We've been at this a long time.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Michael on 21 July 2017, 21:42:07
On to the last logbook! 1 year of entries to go.
:) :) :)
Quote
Its also rough to see on the note from the first page of the logbook that they were scanned in November of 2012. We've been at this a long time.
:'(

Mind you, a lot of other ships have been done!  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 21 July 2017, 22:07:18
On to the last logbook! 1 year of entries to go.

Almost to the finish!  8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 03 August 2017, 08:56:05
'100% Complete'

Getting close!

 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Michael on 03 August 2017, 12:36:56
'100% Complete'

Getting close!

 8) 8) 8)

Bravo!  I looked a few days ago and the page that came up was 1 April. The page that comes up now is 8 June. It won't be long until it's done.  :) :) :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: leelaht on 03 August 2017, 19:00:13
Ha, I stayed up late last night to finish May.  I have 2 hours to get as much of June as I can (plus eat dinner).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Michael on 03 August 2017, 19:07:26
Ha, I stayed up late last night to finish May.  I have 2 hours to get as much of June as I can (plus eat dinner).

Hmmmph. If you were really addicted to OW, thoughts of dinner wouldn't even cross your mind!

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 03 August 2017, 21:48:32
Put the babies to sleep- dishes then OW.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 August 2017, 23:38:34
Some candidates for the addiction topic? ;D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: leelaht on 05 August 2017, 18:19:33
I think Jamestown is finished. 
It's feeding me a bunch of miscellaneous log pages from other ships (Yorktown, Albatross).
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 05 August 2017, 18:41:47
Oh my!! I tried it and got other ships too. Is anyone else working on Jamestown (1844) please?  :)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Michael on 05 August 2017, 19:17:56
Nope, you're done!!!!    :) :) :) :) :)

I logged in and I got a page for Albatross 1900.

Fireworks please!

So, it's Albatross 1900 or Yorktown.

I'll let, you, Leelaht, make the official announcement on Chat, or wherever.  ;)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 05 August 2017, 19:27:46
That means the entire Jamestown is finished - hooray!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: leelaht on 05 August 2017, 19:46:11
(http://scholarsatwright.org/gulliver.gif)

 :-*
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 August 2017, 20:38:20
I'll notify the PTB ;D

Well done, everyone!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 05 August 2017, 21:15:03
Wow! Nicely done, all!

 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 05 August 2017, 22:51:31
Awesome! Way to go!
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 06 August 2017, 01:50:33
Well done everyone.
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 06 August 2017, 10:07:41
Makes me feel all collywobbly - the big log-books that appeared endless when they arrived - nearly all done. What amazing work.

Well done team Jamestown 1844!  :D  :-* :D
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 19 August 2019, 18:57:48
I've been wondering why the Jamestown was pulled from blockade duty in the middle of the Civil War and sent to the Far East. This would appear to be the reason (page down to 'domestic disturbances'): https://books.google.com/books?id=y5uFUVMxus0C&lpg=PA750&ots=nIo8BSWe6a&dq=USS%20Jamestown%20Shimonoseki&pg=PA745#v=onepage&q&f=false

See also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Amity_and_Commerce_(United_States%E2%80%93Japan)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taikun
Title: Re: Jamestown (1844) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 August 2019, 19:22:02
Unexpected Enemies in the Civil War: The Japanese (Part One) (http://hamptonroadsnavalmuseum.blogspot.com/2015/10/unexpected-enemies-in-civil-war.html)

Unexpected Enemies in the Civil War: The Japanese (Part Two) (https://hamptonroadsnavalmuseum.blogspot.com/2015/11/unexpected-enemies-in-civil-war.html)
Quote
The situation in Japan remained uncertain for many months in late 1863 and early 1864. The Choshu and other anti-foreign factions were opposing the Japanese government in many places. The situation was dangerous for non-Japanese, as they were attacked in many instances (the American minister to Japan had to be protected by troops). Various foreign governments attempted to negotiate with the Prince of Nagato (Choshu), but met with little success. By May 1864, the American minister to Japan requested Captain Cicero Price to bring the Gosport-built USS Jamestown to Yokohama as soon as possible "in view of the probability of a combined movement against the Prince of Nagato."* It seemed at this point that the Europeans and Americans were getting tired of fruitless negotiations as the Shimonoseki Straits remained closed. In July, Price reported that war was being threatened, as the British and Dutch were massing ships and troops. The next month, an American steamer was attacked near the Choshu lands, which did not surprise Price: "[He] is the most rebellious of the daimios, and it is he whom the combined treaty powers propose to attack."

Deeming that the straits could "only be opened by force," the treaty powers planned their attack. The British had nine ships, the Dutch had four and the French had three, but Jamestown was the only available American ship. However, the strong currents at Shimonoseki meant that the sailing sloop, lacking steam engines, would be nearly worthless in fleet maneuvers in those tight quarters. Yet the other foreign governments "wished...that the American flag should appear in the strait on the occasion of the attack...to show that we were in accord with the movement."