Old Weather Forum

Old Weather: Classic => The Dockyard => Topic started by: Randi on 21 July 2013, 16:19:23

Title: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 July 2013, 16:19:23
Add your questions and comments to this topic.



If you need help transcribing see:
Albatross -- Reference: Transcription Example and Log Description (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3901.0)

Guides for US logs: drawing entry boxes, transcribing and editing (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3078.0)
Getting Your Sea Legs (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?board=4.0)
The Logs and FAQ (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?board=7.0)
Handwriting Help (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?board=8.0)
Technical Support (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?board=14.0)



If you are interested in the names of crew members see:
Albatross (1884) -- Crew Lists (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3902.0)

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 September 2013, 07:18:50
Example of what a weather page might look like when transcribing the last line of data:
Page link (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_011_0.jpg)

(http://imageshack.us/a/img202/9822/c1se.jpg)



Example of what an events page might look like after the data has been transcribed:
Page link (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_008_1.jpg)

(http://imageshack.us/a/img197/6274/cdg7.JPG)

The date is required.
You may transcribe more or less other information than is shown here.

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 September 2013, 17:18:01
"Extracts from the US Navy Regulations relative to Log-Book" (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_001_1_0.jpg)

"Directions for Keeping the ship's log - page 1 of 3" (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_001_1_1.jpg)
"Directions for Keeping the ship's log - page 2 of 3" (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_001_2_0.jpg)
"Directions for Keeping the ship's log - page 3 of 3" (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_001_2_1.jpg)


"Armament" (includes ship's boats) (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_006_1.jpg)

"Observations for determining the Local Deviation of the Standard Compass" (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_007_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 11 September 2013, 17:39:52
About the armament, what exactly is a "1 3-inch B.L.H. (steel) 350 lbs"?  Clearly not a warship here, which is fine, but what kind of pop-gun were they given to cover unexpected circumstances?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 September 2013, 17:53:57
This is a fisheries survey ship ;)
Maybe it is a harpoon :-\
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 11 September 2013, 17:59:24
That would cover the "H." but a 3" harpoon?


Found it, I think:  Bomb Lance Harpoon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bomb_Lance_Harpoon_for_whales.jpg) (launcher) I believe. :)

This picture, patented 1870, shows a shoulder gun to launch it.
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/75/Bomb_Lance_Harpoon_for_whales.jpg)

and this?
(http://cannonsuperstore.com/harpoon/90-22222.jpg)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 September 2013, 15:19:11
Note on first weather page:
Quote
All observations of barometer in this log book are of the Aneroid barometer.    Seaton Schroeder  Lieut, Navigator
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 September 2013, 10:26:37
Marine Railway

Quote
The patent slip or Marine Railway was invented[1] by Scot Thomas Morton[2] in 1818 as a cheaper alternative to a dry dock for ship repair. It consisted of an inclined plane, which extended well into the water, and a wooden cradle onto which a ship was floated. The ship was then attached to the cradle and hauled out of the water up the slip.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_slip

William Skinner and Sons Marine Railway (http://archive.mdhs.org/Library/Images/Mellon%20Images/Z24access/z24-01398.jpg)

Quote
... Baltimore, which holds a notable place in shipbuilding history as the birthplace of the world-famous type of vessel known as the American "clipper ship," ... The first vessel of that type was built at Baltimore in the yard which the late William Skinner established there about 1815...
The Baltimore Dry Docks Ship Building Co (http://www.marinelink.com/history/the-baltimore-dry-docks-ship-building-co)



Maps

David Rumsey Historical Map Collection: Northern Ports & Harbours in the United States. 1872 (http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~3447~390061:Northern-Ports-&-Harbours-in-the-Un?sort=Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No&qvq=w4s:/when/1872;q:baltimore%2C%2Bmaryland;sort:Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No;lc:RUMSEY~8~1&mi=0&trs=1)

David Rumsey Historical Map Collection: Delaware and Maryland. Baltimore. 1874 (http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~206960~3003078:Gray-s-Atlas-Map-of-Delaware-and-Ma?sort=Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No&qvq=w4s:/when/1874;q:baltimore%2C%2Bmaryland;sort:Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No;lc:RUMSEY~8~1&mi=2&trs=3)

David Rumsey Historical Map Collection: Baltimore. 1886 (http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~209692~5003637:Colton-s-Baltimore,-Maryland--Publi?sort=Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No&qvq=w4s:/when/1886;q:baltimore%2C%2Bmaryland;sort:Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No;lc:RUMSEY~8~1&mi=1&trs=3)

Coast Survey's Historical Map & Chart Collection: CHESAPEAKE BAY FROM HEAD OF BAY TO MAGOTHY RIVER (includes Baltimore). 1877 (http://historicalcharts.noaa.gov/historicals/preview/image/LC00136_06_1877)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 September 2013, 05:36:00
This is the same page as before:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_008_1.jpg

Can anyone read what's in that box in the lower right hand corner?  I have "The record of this ~ ~ from January 1st to Feb 4th 2pm is ~   Z. F. T."

Carolyn

I think it's "air wet-bulb" is "???" maybe un something or mis something.  I've come across similar notes on other ships, but usually with a line through the questionable data.  But it sure looks like air wet-bulb to me.

Copied here for the science team ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 October 2013, 06:55:52
Punx, Scrappe3, Ladyinred, and katoto
welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 October 2013, 10:21:18
T-M
welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 October 2013, 16:51:57
leelaht passes the 10,000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 22 October 2013, 15:59:59
Temperatureless bottom - what?  :o ;)
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_045_1.jpg
At 3.15 sounded in 2705 fthms yellow mud and fine shells. Took specimen of water from bottom; No bottom temperature; thermometer fouled by Water bottle.
(Ah! nothing worse than a foul water bottle.  :D Why didn't they re-measure?  :-\)


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_046_1.jpg
    sounded in 2844 fms., chocolate colored mud.
(Oh if only it were the real thing! Mud no! chocolate.)


Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 October 2013, 20:15:00
Feb. 7, 1884 

Instrument adjustment:

"At 3.15 sounded in 2705 fthms, yellow mud and fine shells. Took specimen of water from bottom; No bottom termperature; thermometer fouled by water bottle. At 3.25 compared aneroid Barom. with standard and set it ahead 12/100. "

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_045_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 26 October 2013, 21:13:57
Thanks for the notice on barometer adjustment.  The analysts read this forum.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 October 2013, 13:51:28
Thanks for posting it in the "Barometer" topic.  I just ran across a barometer reference for the Jamestown ! and have posted it to that ship's discussion and the barometer topic.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 27 October 2013, 15:33:42
 :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 28 October 2013, 13:18:30
8 Feb, 1884:

"At Mid. a bright meteor passed from W. to E., bear-ing S x E. " (posted in Nat. Phenom. topic, too)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_046_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 28 October 2013, 13:45:52
FYI, Carolyn, if you get any northern lights or magnetic compass notable deviations, the Solar Stormwatch (https://www.zooniverse.org/project/solarstormwatch) scientists look at our forum to note and use them in their data from this topic: Old Space Weather: sightings of aurorae and sunspots (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3670.0)

Also of interest, but not with it's own topic, are volcanoes.  Any time a ship notices an eruption, we notify by email one of Philip's co-scientists who is researching the effect of volcanoes on global weather - please always note this in your ship's discussion thread.  If said eruption is in Alaska, we also notify by email the AVO (https://www.facebook.com/alaska.avo); the state office updates their historic records based on our ship logs.  The USGS also gets notified.  And Kevin, our lead US climatologist, is studying all remarks about sea ice.  He is deeply involved in our forum conversations and does not need special notification.

Our weather data gets fed into 5 different global climate databases.  Our transcribed comments feed several science projects we did not anticipate.  It makes us feel our work is very much worth the effort. :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 28 October 2013, 14:40:37
Janet, I didn't realize that the weather data was used in soooo many projects! That's great :D  And how neat that the logs' first-hand observations of historic volcanic eruptions can be shared with the AVO so quickly!

I've posted about aurorae, meteors, and earthquakes, but have yet to see references to volcanoes or sea ice.  Both ships I'm transcribing now are in the tropics, so I'm not expecting any sea ice refs soon! ;D 
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 28 October 2013, 15:14:33
Kevin picked ship names that did spend time in the arctic sooner or later.  NARA then scanned all logs for that ship.  So we are still getting global coverage.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 28 October 2013, 20:42:16
For now, I'm enjoying my my vicarious trips to the tropics ;D   And did I say I hadn't seen any 'sea ice' references?!  How quickly I forgot the poor Jeannette!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 28 October 2013, 20:48:17
 ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 November 2013, 17:40:56
leelaht passes the 15,000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 17 November 2013, 11:49:12
Feb. 17, 1884.

Perhaps someone has listed this already, but here's the first mention I have seen in the logs of the Tanner (captain of the Albatross) sounding machine:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_055_1.jpg

The article linked below describes sounding techniques and mentions the Albatross and its Caribbean work, Tanner and his machine, and the Sigsbee sounding machine used on the Albatross:

http://www.history.noaa.gov/stories_tales/poletobeam.html
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 November 2013, 12:16:07
It is mentioned in the Reference topic (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3901.msg70638#msg70638) under Other information and comments ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 18 November 2013, 15:21:08
camiller passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 18 November 2013, 21:35:33
 :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 November 2013, 16:27:43
leelaht passes the 20,000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 November 2013, 16:28:33
eikwar
welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 December 2013, 03:32:08
jasony23
welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 December 2013, 17:28:03
listritz
welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 December 2013, 17:26:33
leelaht passes the 25,000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 12 December 2013, 09:54:22
27 Feb, 1884, off Santiago de Cuba:

The scientific crew plays tourist:

"At 9.10 got underway and stood out of Santiago de Cuba harbor. Stopped outside to take photograph of entrance."

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_065_1.jpg

I'd want to take a picture, too!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/18/Castillodelmorro.jpg/300px-Castillodelmorro.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 December 2013, 10:16:03
(http://pennymead.com/images/WINMP0845.jpg)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 12 December 2013, 12:00:33
 8)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 December 2013, 15:23:40
leelaht passes the 30,000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 December 2013, 12:43:18
Go, Captain!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 02 January 2014, 14:30:05
Just in case the scientific team is keeping track of individual instruments:

March 11, 1884, off Kingston, Jamaica, in the 8 PM to Midnight paragraph:

 "...ther-mometer 52,720 lost. "

If they're numbered sequentially, that's a lot of thermometers!
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_079_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 02 January 2014, 15:12:17
The PTB do look when their data tells them they had a change - I frequently see Philip's name at the bottom of the reading our stuff.

And the serial numbers are engraved into the instruments by the manufacturer.  They may have made that many over time, or it might be coded - 2 digits stand for year or plant, etc.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 02 January 2014, 15:27:17
 :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 January 2014, 16:29:42
muddgirl
welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 January 2014, 16:30:47
leelaht passes the 40,000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 January 2014, 16:31:48
listritz passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 19 January 2014, 17:20:07
March 25, 1884,  Aspinwall  U. S. of Columbia

Well, this location sent me into a couple of mini-history lessons, including a local connection (there is an Aspinwall Drive in our town)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_093_0.jpg

About the United States of Columbia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_of_Colombia

Aspinwall and its founder, William Henry Aspinwall, who was the brother of our local John Lloyd Aspinwall:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Col%C3%B3n,_Panama
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Henry_Aspinwall
http://archive.org/stream/aspinwallgenealo00aspi/aspinwallgenealo00aspi_djvu.txt
http://books.google.com/books?id=rkA9AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA337&lpg=PA337&dq=john+lloyd+aspinwall&source=bl&ots=CFqt0yWC8M&sig=8nhtmQq-GDG7K1sSxqqCgfh1R98&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_UHcUqOmMILKsQTaroLwDQ&ved=0CEQQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=john%20lloyd%20aspinwall&f=false
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: muddgirl on 22 January 2014, 13:40:28
March 29, 1884, Still in Aspinwall, US of Colombia:

Quote
Mail S.S. City of Para came in from the n'd

The City of Para (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/archive/5/5c/20090311172719!City_of_Para.jpg) was built by Delaware River Iron Ship Building and Engine Works (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delaware_River_Iron_Ship_Building_and_Engine_Works#Brazil_Line) to operate a new mail line between the US and Brazil. It proved to be too large to be competitive on that route, and it was sold to the Pacific Mail Steamship company (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_President_Lines#Pacific_Mail_Steamship_Company) in 1881. In 1898 it was briefly chartered as part of the Pacific Naval fleet (http://www.spanamwar.com/cityofpara.htm) to transport troops to the Philippines.

William Henry Aspinwall was the founder and first president of the Pacific Mail Steamship company.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 January 2014, 13:42:19
Welcome to the forum family, muddgirl!

Super first post!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: muddgirl on 22 January 2014, 15:53:13
Thanks Randi! It's amazing how much history is contained in these terse logs.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 January 2014, 16:09:34
Yes!

I found
Quote from: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3256.msg60823#msg60823
J.R. Sturley
Asst. Surgeon.
P.H. + M.H.S.
in a log book and spent hours trying to track P.H. + M.H.S. down.
It turned out to stand for: Public Health and Marine Hospital Service.
That was only mildly interesting, but when I did more searching, I discovered that it was the forerunner of NIH: http://history.nih.gov/exhibits/history/index.html !

See American: Health, Hygiene, Medicine, and Surgery (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3538.msg59092#msg59092) for more information.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 January 2014, 18:41:11
 ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 January 2014, 03:29:52
Here is a map that might be helpful:
http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~209784~5003672:Colton-s-Central-America---insets--?sort=Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No&qvq=q:aspinwall;sort:Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No;lc:RUMSEY~8~1&mi=5&trs=17

I am at the other end of the Panama canal from Aspinwall - in Panama Bay, but on Jamestown in 1866 ;)
We just saw passengers from New York arrive and transfer to a ship (PMSS Montana) for San Francisco ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 January 2014, 15:32:35
egrody
Welcome back !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 February 2014, 12:51:52
leelaht passes the 50,000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 01 February 2014, 17:01:20
 :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 05 February 2014, 12:17:41
Keep up the good work, leelaht  8)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 February 2014, 03:43:57
There are also 2600 photos taken of/on the Albatross (and many of the revenue cutters, officers and men) in the still pictures branch of the National Archives and in the Anchorage regional branch. If someone happens to be in the DC area or Anchorage and would like to experience a different sort of action on OW send me a PM.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 February 2014, 15:03:56
camiller passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 07 February 2014, 15:20:11
 :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 03 March 2014, 12:04:49
April 19, 1884, Key West, Fla.:

"At 4. Coast. Survey Steamer "Bache" came in and an officer was sent on board with offer of services. "

Who was the "Bache" and why did it need service?  The second USGS ship, charged with surveying the US east and Gulf coasts,  the Bache only served for about 30 years.  The ship seemed to be in constant need of repairs due to mechanical, structural, and meteorological problems!

This ship would have sailed past the street I  grew up on when it did 'emergency' surveys of levee breaks in the lower Mississippi River!  Thanks OW and Wikipedia for some history!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USC%26GS_A._D._Bache_%281871%29
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_118_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 March 2014, 03:27:07
bootnecksbs
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 March 2014, 14:30:12
egrody
Welcome back !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 27 March 2014, 08:53:56
29 Apr., 1884, Havana, Cuba:
"At 12.45 a magazine on shore exploded  There were two distinct reports, the second from two to three minutes after the first, this was much the louder of the two, debris was thrown into the harbor and a dense column of white smoke arose several thousand feet above the locality. The command-ing officer went ashore to make inquiries concerning the explosion. At the time of the second report there was a dense column of white smoke seen over the city to the westward."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_128_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 March 2014, 10:04:19
http://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=LAH18840430.2.9.3
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 March 2014, 03:19:49
listritz
Welcome back !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 March 2014, 17:48:25
eikwar
Welcome back !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 17 April 2014, 11:42:15
An entry for the Albatross'  "Boiler Problem Files"  :(
"The cause of blowing down port boiler in mid watch was a leaky socket bolt." 
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_140_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 25 April 2014, 18:09:17
May 26, 1884 -

"Lieutenant A. E. Baker left the ship in obedience to orders to report to Med. Insp. Suddards for physical examination preliminary to promotion."
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol009of055/vol009of055_156_1.jpg
An interesting detail in the life of an officer...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 April 2014, 18:34:17
 :-\
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 April 2014, 08:42:32
camiller passes the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 26 April 2014, 13:12:57
 :D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 May 2014, 16:10:33
jwhavrilla
Welcome to the top 12 !



 ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 May 2014, 14:44:56
bootnecksbs
Welcome back ! ! !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: camiller on 22 May 2014, 17:41:27
New log book for me:  July 1, 1884 - December 31, 1884   Volume 10 of 55
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol010of055/vol010of055_001_0.jpg

"Observations for determining local Deviations for the Standard Compass" page
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol010of055/vol010of055_007_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 May 2014, 06:31:43
jwhavrilla passes the 250 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 June 2014, 17:36:21
jwhavrilla passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 15 July 2014, 03:13:51
amaryrose
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 July 2014, 03:08:11
listritz
Welcome back !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 August 2014, 15:27:19
kp_mushu
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 August 2014, 14:28:57
kp_mushu passes the 250 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 August 2014, 17:05:58
kp_mushu passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 August 2014, 04:20:27
kp_mushu passes the 750 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 August 2014, 19:14:20
kp_mushu passes the 1000 mark!


WOW!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 August 2014, 04:12:12
Zovacor
Welcome to the top 12 !



We missed you ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 23 August 2014, 20:13:20
Thanks. I was working on Bear but not long enough to break into the Top 12.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 01 September 2014, 12:12:56
So I'm seeing lots of references to measurements taken at Stations. Are these fixed points on the ocean? Seems like an awful lot of points to measure.

I wonder if the sailors aboard the Albatross realized people 130 years in the future would be poring over their handwriting and going, "What is *that*?" :D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 01 September 2014, 13:48:25
Well, we haven't acquired a TARDIS yet, which is unfortunate - there are a number of things we would all like to fix. ;)

Can you give us a link to a page taking readings "at Stations"?  (See Posting Links and Images (A Guide) (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=536.0) )  My instinct is, "at Stations" usually refers to the crew's duty positions, but it has a number of other uses.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 01 September 2014, 19:42:18
Hmm. I think I may not have phrased my question clearly. It's more that the log will say something about taking a reading at "Station No 2251."

I've always associated dredging with clearing shipping channels of silt, but now I know it's also a way to learn about the sea floor. Pretty cool, reading these logs. :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 01 September 2014, 23:50:54
That almost certainly needs to be a channel marker, or some kind of fish trap to allow them to count fish types.  Makes sense if they are dredging or making navigational charts or measuring the quality of sea life.  This is a civilian science ship, after all.  ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 02 September 2014, 01:30:10
That makes sense. The past few days' logs are full of hauling out the trawl, heaving in the trawl, and changing course. Seems in a day that's done several times. Saw mention of meteors, which is neat.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 September 2014, 03:23:09
If you want to, you can note the meteors in Natural Phenomena (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=384.0) ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Danny252 on 02 September 2014, 07:33:26
Yep, the Albatross spent a lot of time dredging the sea floor and seeing what came up - the ship is credited with the discovery of many marine lifeforms. Depth data was also obtained at the same time.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 02 September 2014, 11:36:24
Added mention of the meteors in the other thread. :)

I spoke too soon about the logs being easy to read. Think they changed log recorders a couple days ago and I'm having a much harder time reading this person's handwriting. Nuts.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 02 September 2014, 11:49:04
Don't be afraid to give us a link to the jpg of the page and ask for help reading it.  :)

 Posting Links and Images (A Guide)  (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=536.0)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 September 2014, 14:04:15
...
I spoke too soon about the logs being easy to read. Think they changed log recorders a couple days ago and I'm having a much harder time reading this person's handwriting. Nuts.

 :'( We've all been through that ;D

Maybe the good guy will be back ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 02 September 2014, 15:24:19
You are also free to jump to another ship, or alternate between ships.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 September 2014, 15:50:25
I get too confused when I alternate between ships ::)

You do get used to it :-X
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 03 September 2014, 11:13:21
I get too confused when I alternate between ships ::)

You do get used to it :-X
It's getting better. I get used to reading a particular style of handwriting and switching between ships messes up that learning curve for me. :) Funny, but I think this is the only place I can see cursive with any regularity. Everything at work is either electronic or printed.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 September 2014, 11:21:51
 ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 03 September 2014, 11:34:56
OK, Uncle! This one is making me cross-eyed with squinting.

Full log page is here (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol010of055/vol010of055_100_1.jpg)

I can pick out what looks like "bent S~s boat's sails" and "she then got up agedor and steamed out," which doesn't make much sense.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kathy on 03 September 2014, 11:45:28
Hi kp_mushu -

wow - I'm not sure what they are doing with the ship's sails, but the word is anchor - the loop is actually coming from the letter R in the signature on the line below.

Good luck with this log -  :o
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 September 2014, 12:05:16
bent basically means attached.

Looking at http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol010of055/vol010of055_006_1.jpg, it shows that you have a Seine boat. I suspect that is it.

Sorry, but it is dinnertime here, I'll check back later.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 September 2014, 13:30:31
Sometimes there is some very helpful information at the beginning of the log and sometimes looking at the following pages can be helpful: How to look at log pages before and after the one you are working on (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3489.msg62863#msg62863)

The What Does THAT Mean? (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?board=9.0) board is a pretty good place to look up new words.
Elsewhere on the internet, The Sailor's Word-Book, by William Henry Smyth (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/26000/26000-h/26000-h.htm) is a favorite of mine.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 03 September 2014, 23:12:57
Sweet! I was banging my head on this one. "Anchor" makes a lot more sense, Kathy. And I had never heard of that usage for "bent;" when I hear "bent" I typically assume it's a Bart Simpson reference. Perhaps that's why when two ropes are joined it's called a bend?

Randi, thanks for the great info and links. Both sections make a lot more sense (though not necessarily any easier to read!).

Will try again now that I've had dinner and am not (yet) ready for bed. :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 September 2014, 07:04:16
jwhavrilla
Welcome back !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 06 September 2014, 12:13:16
And it appears the "easy-to-read" logkeeper is back, at least for most of the entries. Much easier. I came across an entry mentioning 3 folks who were AWOL. Then a later entry mentions that there's a $20 reward, each, for bringing them back on board. That was a fair chunk of money in those days.  :o
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 September 2014, 12:36:17
Very common practice on Revenue Cutter and Coast Guard ships back in the day, since all their enlisted crew were civilians.  Military rules and punishments don't work.  But the ransom or reward money enlisted the entire local police department to search and return any stray drunk sailors, saving the ship from having to hire a new crewman and giving the friendly cops a little extra - legally obtained! - cash.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 07 September 2014, 01:08:55
Looks like at least one of them returned, but is now in confinement. Wonder how long that will last?

So all these people on the ship are technically civilians and not part of the US Navy?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 07 September 2014, 04:07:50
The Albatross was built for the US Fish Commission - the first science ship of its kind and never a warship.  She did have Navy or Revenue Service officers to ensure safe seamanship (they didn't trust scientists to know how to sail!) but the enlisted crew were civilian sailors and the ship was not under the management of the Secretary of the Navy.  In common with all Coast Guard ships, in time of war she was commissioned into the Navy, but they never kept her in peace time.

http://naval-history.net/OW-US/Albatross/USFCS_Albatross.htm
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Danny252 on 07 September 2014, 07:40:22
Are you sure? On Albatross (1900), AWOL crew members are "declared deserters of this ship and the US Naval Service", and I've seen crew members transferred to/from to the naval base at Mare Island or to other US Navy ships. Additionally, Wikipedia states the ship was "a Navy-manned vessel".
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 September 2014, 08:21:23
Quote from: http://www.arcticwebsite.com/albatross.html The account of Jack L. McSherry, U.S.N. crew member of the Albatross 1911
The Albatross belonged to the Bureau of Fisheries, of what was then the Department of Commerce and Labor, and also had a crew on her that was loaned to that Department by the Navy.
...
The other man was a seaman and was on his second enlistment in the navy.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 07 September 2014, 11:16:33
kp_mushu passes the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 08 September 2014, 00:39:26
Huh. There's tons of history to learn by reading (and researching) and just chatting with everyone here. :) Very cool. Today's log mentioned issuing clean hammocks, for example. I guess it wouldn't have been practical to do much laundry while at sea.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 September 2014, 03:18:00
 ;D

I have seen "scrubbed hammocks" a number of times.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 08 September 2014, 11:34:25
And that appeared in today's log. So I guess they received clean hammocks first and then told the next day to start scrubbing the dirty ones. :)

Seems since landing in NYC, they've had several folks overstay their liberty and then get confined/discharged. Quite a lot of turnover. I guess the nature of the job and I would assume the bright lights of NYC are way too enticing.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Danny252 on 08 September 2014, 12:26:06
In 1901 quite a lot left in SF (the record being 4 days from enlistment to desertion) - at that point, contemporary news suggests that commercial shipping companies offered better pay than the navy. I wonder if that was a recurring theme?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 September 2014, 03:24:41
kp_mushu passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 September 2014, 03:38:08
kp_mushu passes the 2500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 September 2014, 03:39:12
odineagle
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 19 September 2014, 11:46:11
There's been a glitch in the software such that it added an extra 12 copies of the same page of weather reports, so it looks like I've been "extra productive" lately.  :o

And so many of the crew on this ship have been going AWOL while in port, particularly CF and the coal heavers. Guess they either weren't paid all that well and/or the jobs were less than desirable.  ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 September 2014, 11:56:21
I wonder if CF could be CP for Coal Passer?
Sounds much more civilized than coal heaver even if it is the same thing ;D

Quote from: http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq78-3.htm
Coal Heaver - Established 1842; changed to Coal Passer 1893.

Coal Passer - Changed from Coal Heaver 1893; changed to Fire 3c 1917.
(we've noticed that the official dates don't always correspond to use in the logs ;))
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 September 2014, 06:16:14
kp_mushu passes the 3000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 24 September 2014, 11:06:21
Agreed, I prefer the name "Coal Passer" rather than "Coal Heaver." Still not a glamorous job, I suspect.

The Albatross has been in port quite some time, with lots of painting, cleaning, and other maintenance happening (and crew turnover, too). Saw a reference to inspecting mattresses? I wonder what for?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 24 September 2014, 14:01:12
There is strong evidence that when the Navy changed a rating title, it changed only what was given to new men to that level.  All "coal heavers" in 1893 stayed that until they were promoted or discharged.  Younger men achieving that job would be "coal passers".
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 September 2014, 14:08:25
I can't help wondering how they asked for things that were not within reach at the mess table... ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: kp_mushu on 27 September 2014, 11:42:00
Perhaps they "heaved" things across the table?  :P

Just started a new log and there's a new list of crew, officers, armament, all sorts of fun stuff like compass deviation checks. Where do I put links to those pages? I assume I don't need to transcribe the deviation values ...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 27 September 2014, 12:51:58
Absolutely, you do not need to transcribe compass deviation checks.  These were critically necessary in real time to steer the ship but totally useless to historians and climatologists.

Everything else on those pages is an optional comment. 

The crew lists should be put in Albatross (1884) -- Crew Lists (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3902.0), but it is your choice to post what you transcribed or just the link for others to read.  (Transcribing onto an outside doc and the copy/pasting into interface and forum is not unheard of.)

The weather instrumentation is welcome in this board, for our climatologists - and that is something they find very helpful both in transcriptions and here.

Beyond that, include only what you find interesting.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 October 2014, 14:41:24
kp_mushu passes the 4000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 October 2014, 11:07:17
listritz
Welcome back !
(again ;D)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 October 2014, 11:20:24
NynkS2
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 October 2014, 11:22:38
NynkS2 passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 15 October 2014, 14:34:39
AnnikaC
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 October 2014, 03:44:37
DavidErskine
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 31 October 2014, 08:47:03
ladiablo
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 November 2014, 15:00:58
Jo Clarke
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 November 2014, 04:13:31
aikidomorph
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 04 December 2014, 15:41:41
Hi Moderators,
Had a go at some easy reading (compared to Patterson)- picked up June 1885. But the log keeper does not use a decimal point in the barometer readings. The ordinal numbers are merely separated by a small gap from the decimals. Please could you advise - should we put the decimal in?
Here's an example page:
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol011of055/vol011of055_103_0.jpg
 
(http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/640x480q90/912/rK29cj.jpg)

Thank you oh wise moderators!
Joan
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 December 2014, 15:47:48
Transcribe as written ;)

30 34
30 32
...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 December 2014, 15:54:42
Randi is faster than me - this one is in the Type What You See - Yes, but ...  (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3191.msg51625#msg51625)

Quote
No Decimal Point in Pressure Reading

Normally the pressure reading has a decimal point between the integer and decimal parts. However, you may occasionally simply see four digits.
For example, 29.63 may also be written as 2963.
Philip has asked us to enter it as it is written. He says that his software treats all those variants in the same way.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 04 December 2014, 16:15:46
Thank you ladies.
Wonderful! Turquoise Turtle and I are grateful for the clarity!
Joan
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 04 December 2014, 16:31:55
Hey! Why are you here, and not on the Patterson? Don't make me take away your dessert again, Joan!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 December 2014, 16:42:48
She is just showing a new hand the ropes!

Welcome, Turquoise Turtle !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 04 December 2014, 16:58:14
Oh. Well, that's OK!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 04 December 2014, 18:30:25
Sorry Hanibal - should have dropped you a note.  Frankly I do need to give up puddings - but won't stay with the Albatross just for that ;) ;D
Though it has been awful coming upon the handwriting of Mr Joachims in the Patterson June 1912 log...it's really horrid :o. Oh well - what must be must be...we have a planet to save (exits merrily singing 'Che sera sera') ;) 8)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Turquoise Turtle on 06 December 2014, 08:49:13
Hello Everyone!

I now understand what Joan has been talking about... this is actually surprisingly good fun. :)

This is such a vibrant community, I can't wait to get to know you all

Ro
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 December 2014, 08:53:46
Let's hope you don't change your mind when you get to know your fellow nutcases, err, dedicated transcribers ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 December 2014, 11:39:54
Nice to have you here, Ro.  Thanks for coming to help us.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Helen J on 06 December 2014, 12:52:59
Welcome aboard, Ro - I hope you're getting to get thoroughly hooked!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 December 2014, 04:18:59
DavidErskine
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 December 2014, 14:28:44
bjoret
Welcome to the top 12 !



We hope you will join the forum and share anything you find interesting with us. Also, feel free to ask questions.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 27 December 2014, 03:32:57
steeleye
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 December 2014, 14:41:12
Steeleye passes the 750 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 January 2015, 05:23:07
Steeleye passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 04 January 2015, 14:13:07
Steeleye passes the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Steeleye on 07 January 2015, 21:47:54
... and Steeleye is quite appalled by the behaviour of the gentlemen of the Albatross on 7 July 1885 (http://www.oldweather.org/transcriptions/54ade04e74f6ca56310004bf/edit (http://www.oldweather.org/transcriptions/54ade04e74f6ca56310004bf/edit)):
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol012of055/vol012of055_016_1.jpg

At this station put over lines and exploded two eight pound torpedoes placed on bottom. Caught 3 cod and 3 flounder with the lines and picked up two cod and one haddock after the explosion of the torpedoes. The dinghy was lowered to plant the torpedoes; also lowered dory, Capt Collins and Mr Lee pulled from the ship and shot several gulls.



Try getting away with that behaviour now.



Changed url to .jpg  JJ
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 07 January 2015, 22:36:34
Very expensive fish trap, among other ecological problems!!!  Little boys will play?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Steeleye on 08 January 2015, 03:05:53
The only difference between men and boys is the size of their toys.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 January 2015, 03:35:45
I wonder if the explosion was for the fish (the lines seem to have worked better) or to test something else...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 January 2015, 15:15:14
Steeleye passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 January 2015, 15:16:01
bjoret passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 January 2015, 15:18:29
eikwar passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 January 2015, 15:19:39
jd570b
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 January 2015, 15:09:42
Steeleye passes the 3000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 January 2015, 05:32:04
jd570b passes the 500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 23 January 2015, 16:27:03
Steeleye passes the 4000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Steeleye on 24 January 2015, 03:15:59
Not so loud, Randi !

There I was creeping up on kp_mushu, down to leeward and hoping to sneak past some time next week, and you've probably given the game away.  Shhh!

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 January 2015, 03:54:04
 ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Steeleye on 24 January 2015, 22:42:52
On leaving Woods Hole, Massachusetts, the Albatross makes reference to the 'Sow and Pigs light ship':
http://www.oldweather.org/transcriptions/54c456c574f6ca5fd90001af/edit (http://www.oldweather.org/transcriptions/54c456c574f6ca5fd90001af/edit)

On the other side of the world, there is a 'Sow and Pigs Reef' inside Sydney Harbour.  I'll bet they are both named after a pub of the same name in an quaintly named English village somewhere.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 25 January 2015, 04:06:20
That light ship is so old, I doubt anyone remembers why that is its calling name.  According to the Coast Guard, it is supposed to be titled "Vineyard Sound Lightship" built for that location in 1847.  And Sow and Pigs is a reef just off of Cuttyhunk Island, creator of multiple ship wrecks.
http://www.uscglightshipsailors.org/vineyard_sound_lightship_station_history.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuttyhunk_Island

(jpg link http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol012of055/vol012of055_111_1.jpg )
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 January 2015, 14:11:11
Steeleye passes the 5000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 January 2015, 14:12:09
jd570b passes the 750 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 January 2015, 14:15:59
michech
Welcome to the top 12 !



Welcome back to OW!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 January 2015, 14:16:34
michech passes the 750 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 February 2015, 14:15:50
Hanibal94
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 February 2015, 14:18:50
bjoret passes the 750 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 February 2015, 14:19:15
Hanibal94 passes the 750 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 02 February 2015, 09:35:31
Don't mind me - I just joined because of a sudden and very irrational fear that this ship would get completed before I could join in.
Now that my place in the top 12 is secure, I will turn my focus back to the Patterson.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 02 February 2015, 11:24:59
Of course, some mean person could knock you off your secure place  :P ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Steeleye on 03 February 2015, 05:23:33
They're a happy bunch on the Albatross in the 1880s.  Every time they are in port, people go missing ashore, get brought back drunk, abuse the officers, get clapped in double irons, given a week on bread and water (probably better than some of the regular food).

How could you go past them, Hannibal?

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 03 February 2015, 09:41:10
Because I'm too impatient to read all the boring text! It does not interest me nearly as much as biggering my WR count!

(No offense to you, Steeleye. Do as you like, and I will do as I like.)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 February 2015, 14:26:30
Steeleye passes the 6000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Steeleye on 07 February 2015, 05:56:02
... and Steeleye dawdles along at the pace (but without the stateliness) of a Clyde puffer.  At my current rate of progress, leelaht can worry about me coming up astern around early January 2016.

 ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 07 February 2015, 06:10:08
But only if there enough logs left in your stream for that!

leelaht started a good bit earlier than you did, therefore it is extremely likely she started at an earlier point in the logs than you did, and thus did more than you can possibly do now, even if you were to transcribe at my speed.
Ah well, main thing is getting the ship done (in my opinion). I think when I finish the Patterson, I will make this vessel my new secondary target - the one where I do just 5 dates (weather and events pages) per day.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 February 2015, 14:30:23
jd570b passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 February 2015, 14:51:27
Steeleye passes the 7000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 February 2015, 14:53:12
michech passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Steeleye on 13 February 2015, 15:31:03
Steeleye passes the 7000 mark!

More likely that the 7000 mark passed me going in a negative direction,

 ???
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 February 2015, 10:05:16
Steeleye passes the 8000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 February 2015, 10:06:37
michech passes the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 February 2015, 15:09:15
Steeleye passes the 9000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 March 2015, 15:52:54
jd570b passes the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 March 2015, 15:05:51
Steeleye passes the 10,000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 March 2015, 15:19:49
... 
I know from our assigned archivist that the Smithsonian definitely wants our completed logs to be linked to both its specimen collection and these Field Note Logbooks (http://www.biodiversityheritagelibrary.org/subject/Marine%20biology#/titles).  Another case of a different science than climatology valuing our work quite highly.  ;)

Mark said, "That [Albatross] is the ship the Smithsonian wants to link up with, they still have the specimens and want the logs connected.  Can you get them soon?"   8)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 March 2015, 08:48:19
soir d'hiver
Welcome to the top 12 !


Do drop in for a chat!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 15 March 2015, 15:01:54
Hanibal94 passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 March 2015, 14:42:07
jd570b passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 March 2015, 14:52:20
Hanibal94 passes the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 29 March 2015, 14:53:01
bjoret passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 10 April 2015, 12:20:06
Hanibal94 passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 10 April 2015, 19:59:39
You are starting to become a household name, Hanibal  - or should I say shiphold name  ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 11 April 2015, 05:19:28
I do get around, Craig - and so do you! You've got unfinished business on quite a few ships too.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 May 2015, 14:33:16
jd570b passes the 3000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 May 2015, 09:05:06
Hanibal94 passes the 3000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 May 2015, 09:07:43
soir d'hiver passes the 1000 mark!


Welcome back! ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 May 2015, 08:18:49
soir d'hiver passes the 1500 and 2000 marks!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 28 May 2015, 19:09:07
I have just done a couple of transcriptions in this log and the barometer readings are well outside the range I have transcribed before.  Can these be correct?
A huge barometer fall during the day
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol015of055/vol015of055_062_0.jpg
Very high readings
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol015of055/vol015of055_069_0.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 May 2015, 19:24:26
I can't judge the values, but the corresponding events page for the first does keep saying Bar. falling.
Also, there don't seem to be sudden big jumps.

All I can say is Type What You See :-[
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 28 May 2015, 19:28:23
I agree.  The comments confirm that the long fall is real and not a writer's error, we just don't know if it is bad weather coming near or a defective instrument.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 May 2015, 19:34:13
Or evidence of a sudden rise in sea level? ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 02 June 2015, 23:21:17
April 8, 1887 (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol015of055/vol015of055_103_1.jpg)
Hampton Roads, Virginia

8 A.M. to Meridian

The U.S.S. "Thetis" came down from Norfolk and anchored a short distance from this vessel. Transferred to her: [long list of stores]. Her Com?d?g Officer & several other officers came on board and were shown the dredging apparatus and its practical use, this vessel getting underway & working 2 hours for that purpose. At 11.50 came to anchor again.


Not sure if this meeting of OW ships has turned up elsewhere in the forum...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 03 June 2015, 01:39:40
The lessons on River Navigation did not go so well though
6/4/1887
Standing down the Potomac River, Com,d'g officer conning ship.  At 12, grounded in 10 feet of water off Maryland Point.  Backed off a few minutes later.
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol015of055/vol015of055_100_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 June 2015, 03:34:29
 ;D :-X
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 14 June 2015, 07:06:55
jd570b passes the 4000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 14 June 2015, 15:29:50
Nice one jd570b!  8) :D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jd570b on 14 June 2015, 20:37:03
Thank You, Thank You, Thank You... ;D 8) ;D 8) ::)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 15 June 2015, 10:22:03
I just found a seven letter weather code: bcutlqr, at 5 pm (and 6 pm, apparently) on this page:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol015of055/vol015of055_151_0.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 15 June 2015, 11:29:03
 :o
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 15 June 2015, 12:42:44
Sounds like a truly memorable isolated thunderstorm.  Very impressive events, those.  At least they were in port, not on the open sea.

(http://www.airphotona.com/stockimg/images/00921.jpg)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 15 June 2015, 18:53:59
 :o
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 June 2015, 12:45:55
Note:
Has anyone seen where the scientific staff is listed?

If you see any of the scientific staff listed, please post a link to the page in this topic or in Albatross (1884) -- Crew Lists (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3902.msg108011#msg108011)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 16 June 2015, 16:46:43
Note:
Has anyone seen where the scientific staff is listed?

If you see any of the scientific staff listed, please post a link to the page in this topic or in Albatross (1884) -- Crew Lists (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3902.msg108011#msg108011)

I did some searching on this, reply at http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3902.msg110314#msg110314

Thanks, Joan, for not letting it slide into oblivion.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 19 June 2015, 09:01:51
I just came across a page where several entries for the dry bulb have been edited in red:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_077_0.jpg

I decided to transcribe the red, because I noticed the overwritten values were identical to the wet bulb values next to them.
So my conclusion is that the copyist wrote the values for Wet in the Dry column by mistake, but spotted this and corrected it in time.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 June 2015, 09:20:54
Sounds reasonable.



Note to those who haven't seen this before: Sometimes people using the logbooks many years later make "corrections". The science team does not want these corrections. On the other hand, the science team does want corrections made by the log keepers. It is tricky to decide which is which. Just make your best guess - you can always ask on the forum.
It is very helpful to post a note for the scientists like Hanibal94 did.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 June 2015, 05:57:32
Hanibal94 passes the 4000, 5000, 6000, and 7000 marks!


As a consequence, Hanibal94 is now on sick leave for RSI :'(
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 21 June 2015, 13:49:14
 :'( :'( :'(
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 22 June 2015, 05:47:44
As a consequence, Hanibal94 is now on sick leave for RSI :'(

Sad, but true.
I tried transcribing by using only my left hand for typing and my right hand for just the mouse, but it took forever. I only got one page done.
So I will have to wait for at least 2 weeks, see how I'm feeling then.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 June 2015, 08:31:42
Patience is very hard to come by for something like this.  Take care of yourself.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 22 June 2015, 09:15:40
May 10, 1887
Columbian Iron Works, Baltimore, Maryland

Meridian to 4 P.M.   At 1.40 Lt. W.S. Hogg, U.S. Navy, - left the ship in charge of twenty one (21) men for Havre de Grace, Md. for the purpose of assisting in shad hatching at that place.

This was the random page that served up when I logged on this morning, and the mention of a familiar place caught my eye. Havre de Grace is 40 miles from Baltimore, up at the head of the Chesapeake, not a short trip in 1887. Not a short trip these days, either, depending on traffic.  ;)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol015of055/vol015of055_135_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 June 2015, 11:10:09
I'd guess the shad hatching is happening where it is happening and can't be moved closer to the ship.  I'm assuming they went by rail, as a 170 miles is not a quick day trip.

I'm glad the shad hatchlings got the manpower they needed to come into this world properly. :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 22 June 2015, 18:56:53
They might have used their steam launch for the journey.  The Shad were presumably being caught commercially at Havre de Grace as they came into the river to spawn.

One of the missions of the fisheries commission was to increase food fish production.  There were a large number of projects to increase dwindling fish stocks by assisting in hatching large numbers of food fish and transplanting them by rail to restock depleted stocks and also to start new populations that could be exploited.  Many species were also introduced from the atlantic coast to the pacific including salmon, oysters and shad. 

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 June 2015, 05:56:54
Hanibal94 passes the 8000 mark!


But it is more important that you take care of yourself!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 29 June 2015, 07:16:12
I just finished all of 1887 - only two years of logs left to go now!  8)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 04 July 2015, 20:02:33
The crew have started having suspicions about the new ships cook :D

At 1.30 hauled ship under sheers and put donkey boiler on board after which hauled back to original position + secured

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol015of055/vol015of055_185_1.jpg

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 July 2015, 03:30:16
 ;D
donkey boiler (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3209.msg52132#msg52132)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 July 2015, 09:40:23
Hanibal94 passes the 10,000 mark!



Don't hurt yourself!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 July 2015, 09:41:13
Hurlock
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 05 July 2015, 10:34:49
Don't hurt yourself!

Don't worry - I've been careful to hold my hands and forearms parallel to the table when typing, and never do more than 1000 WR per day.
I just wanna get this ship out of the way so I can focus on Concord and Patterson, and hopefully make good progress on both before the new interface and stuff turns up.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 July 2015, 10:39:04
OK ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 16 July 2015, 06:48:26
On this page, it looks like the three temperature columns have been moved up one row too high relative to the rest of the data,
but I entered it as literal TWYS because I didn't notice what was really going on until it was too late.
My apologies if I got it wrong - will fix it if necessary.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_142_0.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 July 2015, 08:50:48
It is a borderline case. If you think the data was accidentally started one row too high (that's what it looks like to me too) then the ideal would be to put it in the right boxes.
It is up to you if you want to go back and change what you have already done.



One of the rare exceptions to TWYS (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3191.0)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 16 July 2015, 09:49:56
Well, since I love to get everything just right, I went and corrected it.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 July 2015, 10:27:54
(http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_6524.gif)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 17 July 2015, 03:16:54
The Dry temperature for 4 pm on December 18th 1888 looks a bit high for this time of year in California, but I entered it anyway. Not my fault if they messed up.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_177_0.jpg



EDIT: I also noticed the 4 pm Air temperature for December 25th looks wrong - should be 57, not 75. But I followed TWYS.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_185_0.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 July 2015, 03:51:41
You are absolutely right!

Maybe eliminating flogging was a mistake...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 17 July 2015, 04:21:31
I just noticed the pages of January 1st - 4th 1889 have been logged twice: Once in the July - December 188 logbook (which does not mention them on the cover!), and once in the January-June 1889 logbook, where they should be.

Example:
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_194_0.jpg
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol019of055/vol019of055_009_0.jpg

Since it's just a few pages, and there are a few differences, I have decided to transcribe both copies. At least I get 96 more WR out of this.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 July 2015, 08:08:15
That would be great!
I know Philip had asked us to do that with the RN ships so that he could see the error rate of the original log keepers/copiers. It was just when started getting weeks of duplicate logs that he said it wasn't worth doing.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 17 July 2015, 10:19:03
On January 24th 1889, they used Polaris and Venus to calculate the 8 pm position!  8)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol019of055/vol019of055_029_0.jpg

I entered that location as Observed, because it is based on a set of observations, even if they are a different kind than usual.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 17 July 2015, 13:20:34
Perfect.  Philip was clear, it doesn't matter if the observation is based on sun, stars, or lighthouses - observed is more solid than DR.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 July 2015, 04:37:33
jd570b passes the 5000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 19 July 2015, 04:38:32
Hurlock passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 19 July 2015, 04:57:57
Good work, you two! We need more people in the third stream.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 19 July 2015, 09:21:17
Cor! more great numbers! Well done jd507b & hurlock
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jd570b on 21 July 2015, 22:44:36
Thanks All!!

Question....When we find a page that is obviously flawed, should we report it somewhere, ask for expert advice, or just post it here?

Case in point     http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_055_0.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_055_0.jpg)

I entered everything in the spirit of TWYS.

The problems are:


Soooo..........

Now that I have made it snow in Baltimore in the middle of August....
                           and .......
Since I just went back to "My Pages" to double-check the facts for this post and found that order of the hours are now scrambled in said spreadsheet thingy......(6pm....Mid....1pm....5am.....Noon.....9am.....8am.....etc.....etc.....etc.....)

I think I hear I glass o' Jack calling  >:( ??? :-\ ;D :o :o :o :o :o :o

Good night all!!!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 21 July 2015, 23:36:20
The log keeper was obviously having a very bad day.

You brought up several problems:
Quote
Question....When we find a page that is obviously flawed, should we report it somewhere, ask for expert advice, or just post it here?
In your example, the scan is fine - the log keeper was at fault - so reporting it at Faulty scanned and duplicate pages (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3383.0) is out.  Both the others work well, asking for expert advice gets you a moderator reading your actual transcription from the interface.  (We can't fix it tho, only you can edit in changes.)  Very complete, but you have to wait a little longer.  Posting it here like this gets you answers from almost everyone, much quicker.  And a range of solutions discussed.  And sometimes a moderator answering it this way instead.  :)

Quote
The 1 am barometer reading has 29 94 with a 2 written over the 4 (29 92) - I entered 29 94 because the 2 seems to be a different style of writing than the other twos on the page (The eye is not as pronounced and the tail is different)
Done correctly - corrections made at the time of the log are to be treated as the chosen original.  And virtually all later edits and additions are in blue or red pencil.

Quote
The ship was hauled into dry dock at 1000 am.  I entered "In dry dock" in the 10 am and 1 pm water temp readings and left the spaces following those entries blank.
This is not a temperature reading on any level.  It is a comment on why it got left out.  If you want to include it, give it its own box, around the comment, and transcribe it as an event.  Verbal descriptions of weather can go into the appropriate box, but nothing else.

Quote
In the 6 pm "State of the Weather" space I entered Cum Str.  (TWYS)  Which has had a very unusual affect on the weather column of the weather-temp-temp-temp spreadsheet thingy................
This is covered in  Type What You See - Yes, but ...   Exceptions (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3191.msg51628#msg51628).  This lovely document not only summarizes the answers to most TWYS questions, it quotes the experts who were originally asked to give a sense of context in using this info.

Quote
When the log keeper has CLEARLY entered the weather data in the wrong column, it should be put in the correct column.
Only correct entries if it is absolutely certain that they are in the wrong column - like 29.83 for wind direction or West for weather code.
... see link for whole answer.

And the sidebar has always been wonky.  First they send your data solidly set in its matrix to Philip.  Then they shunt some of it to the sidebar for the editors to see, and that never worked right.  And since it doesn't affect what you type or what Philip gets, we've never been able to bribe anyone to fix it.  Reopening a page for edit usually scrambles it, but does no harm to the real data.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 22 July 2015, 03:15:39
Only one logbook left to go (July-Dec 1889) for me! Woohoo!

My drive to pass the global 400.000 mark certainly helped!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 July 2015, 03:33:49
Take care of yourself!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 22 July 2015, 07:16:51
Take care of yourself!

I appreciate the concern, Randi, but....

(http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/38584163.jpg)

I want to finish this ship before the end of the month, so I will not stop unless my arms, hands or wrists start hurting.
And right now, they are all fine, so I will continue.

Trust me. I know my body better than anyone.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 July 2015, 08:50:15
Just wondering if this comment still applies:
...
And when my wrist has fully recovered, I will never do more than 1.000 WR per day. Never again. It's not worth it.
...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jd570b on 22 July 2015, 19:41:39
Thanks Janet  ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 July 2015, 19:55:00
You are welcome, jd570b.  8)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 25 July 2015, 03:37:02
Found an interesting entry from September 15th 1887:

"... At 10, when steering S by W 1/8 W (p.c.), ran aground abreast Thomas Pt Light. Failing to get off by backing engines, planted stream anchor on port quarter after taking sounding all around ship. At end of watch waiting for water to rise. At noon there were 10 1/2 feet water directly under bridge..."

They were stuck on the Thomas Point Shoal for about 4 and a half hours... and there's little doubt in my mind that there were cadets sneaking off to the West Road shoreline to watch them try and get off the rocks.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 25 July 2015, 03:55:16
The Albatross never passes up an opportunity to entertain and educate :)

They got stuck in the river last time they travelled down the Potomac too.

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 25 July 2015, 10:42:24
So first they get stuck on a shoal, then they lose a large beam trawl; but our plucky crew gains some good Karma, and rescues a survey ship that will later go on to make sailing in New England a much safer endeavor!

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_088_1.jpg

9/21/1887: the USC&GS "Eagre" breaks free of its moorings at Davis' Wharf in Woods Hole. Adrift and near to running aground, orders are given to the cutter and crew to take the "Albatross"' port bow anchor and a large hawser to assist the "Eagre". The cutter and crew then pull the "Eagre" into deeper water, where they can then safely transfer the anchor to the distressed ship.

Three years later, the "Eagre" would join the steamer "A.D. Bache", schooner "Scoresby", and steam tender "Daisy", under the command of Lt. E.M. Hughes. These four ships then conducted the first systematic survey of the notoriously dangerous Nantucket Shoals. Prior to this survey, the Nantucket Shoals (situated to the south, southeast, and east of Nantucket Island) were an area open for navigation, near a major shipping lane, but with the shoals being as near the surface as three feet in some places, numerous ships were lost. Thanks to the efforts begun by the "Eagre" and her companion ships, the Nantucket Shoals are now fairly well mapped, and the dangerous areas of the shoals are marked in NOAA navigational maps as areas to be avoided, and the entire area considered unfit for navigation.

Could the Nantucket Shoals survey have been completed without the "Eagre"? Almost certainly; but this single event on the part of our crew once more illustrates how the actions of one day can echo into the future, influencing events that the sailors aboard the "Albatross" would never have imagined.

I thought I'd bring this up, not because it's just an interesting piece of history, but because it illustrates a close parallel between our ship and the "Eagre", and her and our project. LtCdr Zera Luther Tanner was a great man with a brilliant mind, but I highly doubt that he would have thought much of how important the weather data from his ship's log books would be more than a century later.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 25 July 2015, 11:07:53
Fascinating and wonderful!
This is the heart of OW.

Greetings, fellow OWaholic ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 25 July 2015, 11:45:18
Fascinating and wonderful!
This is the heart of OW.

Greetings, fellow OWaholic ;D

Truly welcome, fellow addict.  :D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 26 July 2015, 05:17:07
On this page, the 1 pm line has another wind direction above it.
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_147_0.jpg

I decided this is simply human error - the copyist put the 1 pm wind direction in the wrong row, and then put a ditto in the 1 pm row.
So I didn't bother making an extra WR - I just wrote SSW in the 1 pm wind direction box.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 July 2015, 05:26:43
I have seen this a couple of times when there is no change in the wind direction between AM and PM. I suspect the log keeper has simply copied down the value that is being dittoed for clarity.

In any case, SSW or " in the 1 pm wind direction box are both fine since, here, they mean the same thing.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 26 July 2015, 06:21:06
Hanibal94 passes the 20,000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 26 July 2015, 10:55:58
Hanibal94 passes the 20,000 mark!

Not only that - I also completed the whole ship! Woohoo!
This is my 12th victory on Phase 3 of Old Weather!

I will do the Concord next - but not today. I did 4.5 months of logs in the past 3 days, so I really need a rest. So does my right arm.
Think I'll go read Dragon Ball on the couch. An awesome manga, it is.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 26 July 2015, 13:22:04
Enjoy your time off, make it long enough to be truly restful.  Good work!!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 30 July 2015, 03:07:55
10/19/1887

Albatross leaves Woods Hole (finally), and gets under way. Along the way, they catch sight of the North Atlantic Squadron, which, at the time, would have been under command of Rear Admiral Steven Bleecker Luce, aboard the USS Richmond.

While it's unfortunate that our crew appear to have been unable to obtain the compass data that they were trying to get from the Richmond and the Atlanta at this time, I thought it notable just on historical grounds.

Rear Admiral Luce, at this time, would have only been in command of the North Atlantic Squadron for a year, having spent the two years prior to assuming command of the Home Fleet (as they're more commonly known) founding and presiding over the Naval War College at Newport, Rhode Island (along with Tasker Bliss, who would later become Army Chief of Staff; James Soley, the first civilian faculty member at any United States military college, and future Assistant Secretary of the Navy; and most famously, then Captain, but future Rear Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan, who would go on to shape naval strategy still in use today).

I could go into great detail over how influential Rear Admiral Luce was, but I'll try to limit myself, if for no other reason than to not come off like a raving fanboy. Shortly after leaving the Naval War College's presidency, and while serving aboard the Richmond that our crew came across, he also was instrumental in the founding, and became first president of the US Naval Institute (the military think tank, not to be confused with the US Naval Academy, although both are located in Annapolis, Maryland) and its publication Proceedings. Luce's legacy stretches even to this day, and beyond not only the borders of our own nation (Former Lebanese President Emile Lahoud is a graduate of the Naval War College) but has touched the stars, and walked on the moon (Alan Shepard was *also* a graduate of the Naval War College).

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_116_1.jpg

It's a shame that our crew weren't able to get the data they needed, but a voyage at sea is hardly an adventure if everything works the way it's supposed to.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 July 2015, 03:32:50
 8)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 30 July 2015, 04:49:37
Little bit of action visible from the Perseid meteor shower before getting caught in a storm.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_117_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 01 August 2015, 07:13:48
Landsman D. Rodges, I'll remember you always as my first deserter. 15 times AWOL is pretty impressive, even in the drunken glory days of the Navy (i.e. pre WWI).

On a whim, I looked up our mister Rodges, and discovered that he had remained in Norfolk, under an alias of John Rodges. In 1897, he was arrested for carrying a concealed weapon, but the case was dismissed. As far as I can find, there are no more records, not even of his passing (although this could be for any number of reasons).

Not so sneaky edit: forgot the link >.> http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_143_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 01 August 2015, 09:28:03
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_148_1.jpg

I can make out the name D. Regan, but I'm having a bit of trouble deciphering that rank abbreviation.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 01 August 2015, 09:37:59
2'nd Class Fireman ?

Quote from: http://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/organization-and-administration/ranks/enlisted-personnel/enlisted-ratings-in-u-s-navy-1775-1969.html#anchorf
Fireman - Established 1842; pay grades 1c and 2c established 1847; pay grade 3c established 1917. Re-established as Fireman 1948. Fireman 3c changed to Fireman Recruit 1948; Fireman 2c changed to Fireman Apprentice 1948.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 August 2015, 04:35:30
HatterJack
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 August 2015, 04:36:17
HatterJack passes the 1000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 02 August 2015, 14:15:28
2nd Class Fireman makes sense, just got scribbled together a little too closely for me to really see it after burning through so many entries lately. Eyes go a little funny after a while.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Michael on 02 August 2015, 15:00:41
2nd Class Fireman makes sense, just got scribbled together a little too closely for me to really see it after burning through so many entries lately. Eyes go a little funny after a while.

That's one of the Signs of OW Addiction (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=1432.0)!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 05 August 2015, 05:28:05
Step one in recovery is admitting it's a problem, which it isn't. :D Guess I won't be recovering any time soon.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 05 August 2015, 05:46:19
Problem? What problem?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 05 August 2015, 16:10:08
Step one in recovery is admitting it's a problem, which it isn't. :D Guess I won't be recovering any time soon.

Great decision, not to recover, very good decision indeed!  ;)
As Hanibal94 says 'Problem? What problem?'  ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 05 August 2015, 16:58:14
Recover?!
Recover from WHAT?
I seem to be missing something here ???
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 06 August 2015, 01:25:11
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_163_1.jpg

As a lifelong lover of the sea -particularly the Pacific, when a massive arctic storm is raging to the north, while a typhoon/hurricane is devouring all of the heat from the sea to the south, and your ship is caught in the middle (I've only ever heard stories, but I've been caught in some pretty gnarly weather myself), but I digress- any time I come across references to bioluminescence/phosphorescence, I get giddy. Sailing in dead calm seas at night, seeing nothing but blackness ahead, but your wake lit up in blues and greens (and probably other colors too, but those are the only ones I remember ever seeing) is just an absolutely amazing sight. If only I had a time machine and could set sail with ancient mariners (assuming I could keep up with them) and hear the stories they come up with for why it happens, I'd be a very happy man.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 August 2015, 02:56:34
What lovely memory pictures you bring us.  Thank you, HatterJack.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 August 2015, 03:22:33
If you want to, bioluminescence/phosphorescence can be noted in: Natural Phenomena (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=384.0).

Lots of animal life too! I'm jealous. I hardly ever get anything for the Animal tab :'(
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 06 August 2015, 04:21:17
I think one of my favorite things about having picked this ship is when I contacted an acquaintance that works at the Smithsonian to settle whether or not that this was *the* Albatross, built to go anywhere, operate in any sea, and almost singularly responsible for what we know of our commercial fishing grounds today (I hadn't looked at any of the logs prior), and her reaction was, "If you had any idea how important that ship was to science, you wouldn't even be asking. We haven't actually counted the number of discoveries that Tanner and Moser and Aggasiz and the rest made over the course of her 45 years of service, but it has to be close to a thousand. If you guys ever manage to get your hands on the 1906 logs, you'll be in for a treat, too."

I don't know if we'll ever see the 1906 logs, but it turns out she was right, because on the morning of April 18th 1906, Albatross was in San Francisco, the day that California earned its reputation as the earthquake state, and 80% of San Francisco burned to the ground.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 06 August 2015, 04:57:14
You are then wanting the Albatross (1900) (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3901.0), the reference page indicates it extends to 1908.  Our assigned NARA archivist says the Smithsonian still has many of their specimens and field logs, and is salivating waiting for us to give them access to the whole 45 year transcriptions.  I hope they are very patient. 

 8)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 06 August 2015, 05:15:53
Oh man, if it goes out that far, I'm *really* looking forward to reading that whole year, so much happened in the world and to the crew of the Albatross in 1906 it's going to be a real emotional ride.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 06 August 2015, 09:11:19
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol016of055/vol016of055_170_1.jpg

Last watch observes the Geminid meteor shower.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 09 August 2015, 05:13:22
HatterJack passes the 1500 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 13 August 2015, 02:52:41
Found an entry about an Argentine warship that's got me scratching my head.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_012_1.jpg

I can't for the life of me decipher the Captain of the Parana's surname.

Also, since we're on the subject of the Parana, I thought I'd bring up what I think is an interesting observation.

She's referred to as a "man-of-war", but upon a bit of investigation, I'm not really sure that she qualifies as such. Using the classic definition of man-of-war (as opposed to Sir John Hawkings' Ships of the Line rated man-of-war design), Parana is simply too small to even be a rated ship. With only 7 guns and displacing only 500 tons, she's too small to be even a Corvette.

I realize that the *modern* definition of the term applies to literally any warship that's a part of an established navy, but given that it had only recently been phased out by the British admiralty (relatively speaking), and evokes, to me anyway, a class of ship, rather than any boat that can put a hole in another boat without ramming it, I simply find it curious that Albatross would have crew referring to it in writing as a man-of-war rather than a warship or gunboat, when either of the latter are shorter to write (and there's so often little enough space in the single log book page to write on).

As an additional, less nit-picky note, 2 years after this meeting between Albatross and Parana, the Argentine brig was renamed Piedrabuena and converted to a transport ship until she was wrecked in April of 1921. Her sister ship, Uruguay, was reconstructed in 1954 (after having been hulked in 1926) and now stands as a memorial at Puerto Madero, Buenos Aires.

Sadly, there's very little I can find on Parana herself, with all of the accomplishments of her sister ship Uruguay (which was quite possibly the single most important ship Argentina has ever had in its navy).
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 August 2015, 03:31:00
My best guess is "Lazara Y Tunieta" :-\

I have seen "man-of-war" a number of times, but I don't remember seeing "warship". Maybe something to do with tradition?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 13 August 2015, 04:23:40
That's what I was seeing for his name as well, so hopefully we're correct there.

I'm pretty sure it's tradition, it's just a little strange to me to see it applied to a ship as small as Parana. At only 46.3 meters, Parana was tiny even compared to Albatross, which wasn't a terribly large ship to begin with. Albatross being 36% longer, 20% more massive, and hosting a larger crew compliment, it just seems odd to me. It's really just a semantic argument, though, and my opinion is largely colored by my over-familiarity with British, Spanish, Portuguese, Ottoman and Dutch line-of-battle ships.

And now I'm once again (this happens a few times a year) struck by the sudden urge to build a seaworthy replica of HMS Surprise (the real one, not the Aubrey-Maturin fictional one) and sail her to Puerto Cabello, just for giggles.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 August 2015, 08:27:15
I see your point. Maybe out of courtesy? :-\
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 13 August 2015, 09:31:11
It appears that it's just how they refer to any armed naval vessel. If it weren't so modern, I suspect that they'd refer to a dinghy with a breech loading bow gun and a half inch swivel as a man-of-war, and honestly, that kind of makes me smile. After all, we do have some modern examples of what a tiny boat can do against a battleship many times its own size. It's not the size of the boat in the fight, but the size of the fight in the boat and all that. If anything, it's more of a measure of respect for both vessel and crew that I had forgotten existed in ample measure not so long ago.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 13 August 2015, 10:28:02
They are also looking at warships from the POV of a science ship.  Almost anything from gunboat up could out shoot them.  Showing - and feeling! - respect is probably very survival positive.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 14 August 2015, 08:06:00
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_016_1.jpg

A couple important visitors from foreign navies, and some meteors. Given the date, it's pretty likely that these are part of the Quadrantid annual meteor shower.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 14 August 2015, 11:11:46
Sounds like a fancy morning coffee party was convened  :D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 15 August 2015, 02:51:28
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_025_1.jpg

Couple days after the fancy coffee party, and we've got our crew sitting in the Strait of Magellan, with a shooting party on Elizabeth Island, while LtCdr Tanner lands a second party on Santa Marta (not Martha, no matter how much he'd like it to be). While everybody's out playing, we get a German ship with a famous name (not because of the ship... Cambyses II was a Persian king who sent a 50,000 man army to conquer Siwa, that was literally swallowed by the desert) steam past, and salute.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 15 August 2015, 02:59:59
A very busy day!!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 15 August 2015, 10:01:14
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_030_1.jpg

Strange day aboard the old girl; sighting a ship from New York that was probably named after a sailing legend that would have still been fresh in the minds of sailors of the era, a Seaman being shipped for special service, a Seaman thrown in the brig for being drunk (not really anything new for our crew), and 6 crewmen AWOL after a liberty (one of which is a junior officer, no less).

I can't imagine LtCdr Tanner being pleased overall by the day.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 August 2015, 04:39:10
HatterJack passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 19 August 2015, 06:26:49
Not really worth a blog post, but still worth mentioning:

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_034_1.jpg

Mention of the German Steamer "Titania". Titania was a small arms transport ship, which, only two years after this, was forced to offload her cargo of 7000 rifles and ammunition for the Chilean government in Punta Arenas, rather than Valparaiso under orders from the Magallanes colonial governor. There was a civil war going on at the time, and had the Chilean government had the desire to do so, they could easily have blockaded the straits of Magellan. Considering the Panama Canal wasn't opened until an additional 20 years later (in 1914). Thankfully they didn't.

Alright, I lied... here's the blog post :D http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4388.msg114119#msg114119
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 20 August 2015, 05:32:42
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_043_1.jpg

7 February, 1888 gives us a hat trick and something that reminds us how impressive the sea can be.

8 am to Meridian: ... three whales spotted during watch. [yeah yeah, no big deal, just a hat trick of whales]

And my personal favorite!

4 to 6 PM: ... stopped alongside of an iceberg and took aboard about six tons of ice

Literally the first mention of ice (I know it's not sea ice, but still) I've seen aboard Albatross, and it amounts to "oh hey, let's cut a chunk of it out and bring it aboard, no big deal, just an iceberg". I suddenly can't help but wonder how many icebergs and swaths of pack ice they've steamed past without bothering to put it in the log.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 20 August 2015, 18:22:23
Only glacier ice -- growlers and bergy-bits -- in those channels (so not missing any sea ice : ) ). It is still a weird and wonderful landscape...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 20 August 2015, 18:26:20
FYI HatterJack.

Kevin is our US NOAA team climatologist and a master mariner who goes up into arctic waters.  ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 21 August 2015, 00:49:34
Only glacier ice -- growlers and bergy-bits -- in those channels (so not missing any sea ice : ) ). It is still a weird and wonderful landscape...

I've sailed all over the place, but never managed to make it to the Straits of Magellan. Maybe next time I'm in a position to chart my own course I'll have to make the voyage down.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 21 August 2015, 03:12:51
Only glacier ice -- growlers and bergy-bits -- in those channels (so not missing any sea ice : ) ). It is still a weird and wonderful landscape...

Not missing any sea ice, eh?
Well, that's a relief - because I never transcribed any for this ship!
I guess I got too used to the Patterson (which NEVER mentions ice) and the Concord (where Stuart and Michael P. look at the events pages, so I can skip them).
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 21 August 2015, 07:09:55
I'm reasonably sure that someone eventually learned how to spell the name of the country, but every time I see this in the log, it makes me hungry.

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_051_0.jpg

I think I should whip up a batch of Chile after my next hunting trip ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 21 August 2015, 07:14:52
Log keepers frequently can't spell names - places or ships.  Just TWYS and go with the flow.  And maybe let it steer you for your next supper menu. ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 21 August 2015, 09:08:18
I always do, but this is seriously making me want...

a Lota, Chili.

 8) *cue "Who Are You" by the Who*

I'll walk myself to the pungeon now.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 August 2015, 09:11:07
 :P :P :P
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 21 August 2015, 13:22:33
Well, what a coincidence - I'm making chili this weekend!

I eat chili quite frequently because it's not that hard to make, is good tasting and healthy and you only need to cook once, but have plenty leftover for future meals - the last one is very good for a college student like me!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 August 2015, 14:27:49
 ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 21 August 2015, 14:59:59
Heard back from AVO and USGS

Quote
Subject: Re: Mt. Akutan has erupted in 1895...

Thank you Janet!
I will get this added ? nice to see reports from a ?new? ship!
-cheryl

From: @usgs.gov

Thanks for your continuing sleuthing, Janet!

Tina

It may take a day or more for the new report to appear online. 
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 21 August 2015, 15:10:05
(http://www.desismileys.com/smileys/desismileys_4547.gif)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 22 August 2015, 01:14:18
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_057_1.jpg

Any time I see a vessel's namesake sighted by the crew, it makes me smile. I must be twelve years old.

"Meridian to 4PM... Saw several albatrosses during watch"
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 22 August 2015, 02:24:55
In later logs they usually refer to Albatross as Gonies.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 22 August 2015, 03:49:45
That doesn't surprise me, really. The black-footed albatross, in particular, is pretty well known for its lack of ground-based coordination and grace, and has long been called a gooney (goony and goonie are also also acceptable) bird as a result.

The more I think on it, the more the name Albatross is incredibly fitting for the role that the ship was meant to fill, as well as with some of the rather clumsy way she would leave port from time to time. She needed to be fast, and be able to range anywhere, so long as she was in her element. She'd end up a bit banged up from some rather questionable helmsmanship, but once she was in open water, the whole world was her playground, much as when the gooney bird takes to the skies.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 August 2015, 07:30:17
 :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 26 August 2015, 07:04:54
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_070_1.jpg

Nothing particularly interesting, really, but a fine example that my birthday was a cursed day long before I was born.

Quote
Hove up trawl at 7:12, it having fouled upon a rocky ledge and been badly torn.

Netting hanging up on rocks is one of the reasons I don't trawl on my birthday anymore. Happens every time  :'(
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 26 August 2015, 07:44:14
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_071_1.jpg

Some time between 3:10 and 4 PM, an officer from a Columbian gunboat advised that the port of Panama Roads was closed to Chilean vessels.

Interesting to note that this would have been around the same time that Jose Manuel Balmaceda was named president of Chile, and only three years after this Chile would see itself torn asunder by an 8 month long civil war. Also, this was just before Columbia's Thousand Days' War, which would eventually see Panama secede from Columbia, thus the reason why a Columbian gunboat would be addressing Albatross.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 26 August 2015, 08:03:12
Sounds like rough times ahead. I'd be feeling a very alert about what was going on if I were the Albatross!  :o
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 28 August 2015, 02:54:12
In later logs they usually refer to Albatross as Gonies.

hmmm

Just had a logbook sighting of 2 Albatross and several Gonies.  Different species maybe?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 28 August 2015, 03:07:53
Gooney or goney birds seem be applied to North Pacific albatrosses.

Quote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albatross
The albatrosses comprise between 13 and 24 species (the number of species is still a matter of some debate, 21 being the most commonly accepted number) in four genera. These genera are the great albatrosses (Diomedea), the mollymawks (Thalassarche), the North Pacific albatrosses (Phoebastria), and the sooty albatrosses or sooties (Phoebetria).
Quote
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gooney+bird
gooney bird
any of several albatrosses, especially the black-footed albatross and the Laysan albatross, occurring on islands in the Pacific Ocean, often near naval bases.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 28 August 2015, 03:41:19
That doesn't surprise me, really. The black-footed albatross, in particular, is pretty well known for its lack of ground-based coordination and grace, and has long been called a gooney (goony and goonie are also also acceptable) bird as a result.
...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 28 August 2015, 04:21:50
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_097_1.jpg

I'm not sure if I should be saddened by something logged in the 4am-8am comment or thoroughly impressed. All in all a lot of animal mentions for this day, but harpooning a porpoise in the early hours of the morning, certainly isn't easy, but given their location, I can't help but wonder how many of the animals seen by our crew have now gone extinct... strangely sobering thought this early in the morning.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 August 2015, 04:50:19
jd570b passes the 6000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 30 August 2015, 04:52:56
HatterJack passes the 3000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 02 September 2015, 09:33:09
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol017of055/vol017of055_141_1.jpg

Sometimes I wonder how the Albatross crew ever got any of their work done. I grew up sailing in and out of the San Francisco bay (and Fiddler's Bay on Coronado in San Diego), and I have no idea how anyone could manage to get an anchor so fouled that it has to be dropped into the bay. There's just nothing really down there to get hung up on.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 September 2015, 09:43:03
I suspect that you did your sailing about 100 years later? :-\
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 02 September 2015, 10:29:23
Give or take a few years, yes. There's a bunch of junk along the seabed now; bits of the few ships that have broken up in the bay over the years (surprisingly few, considering how busy it's been historically, and for how long it's been an active port). There are some rocks, but these were well known, even back then (wreck reports for all but 1 of the 9 ships lost in the general area of the SF Bay had the rock formations named when there were rocks involved). There's a rock pile near the Golden Gate that's kind of like a reef, but it's close enough to the surface that it's hard to not see it unless it's dead calm (which actually caused a wreck in 1901), so it's hard to imagine that Tanner would have anchored anywhere near it.

All that aside, though, it could have been a looser rock that they dislodged from the mud, and got carried out to sea as the tide went out. Stranger things have certainly happened.

I don't really have time to do it now, but this has inspired a new post to the blog, about the 9 ships that were lost. Some of the stories are pretty spectacular (looking at you SS City of Chester).
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 02 September 2015, 11:08:54
It sounds interesting indeed.  Between ordinary usage and strong storms, I have to believe that the floor of the Bay has changed significantly of a century - not to mention the massive change to the shore line as the bay was filled in and the debris of the 1906 earthquake added.  It only takes one strange object in the right/wrong place to create a problem.  :)

(Instinct says this - after the 1871 Great Fire, the same thing happened in Chicago when the fire debris was pushed into the lake.  Modern-day Michigan Avenue is a straight line approximation of the original shoreline.)

http://sfwater.org/index.aspx?page=625

(http://sfwater.org/modules/showimage.aspx?imageid=1746)
(http://sfwater.org/modules/showimage.aspx?imageid=1748)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 02 September 2015, 23:50:53
I knew they filled in a lot of new coastline, but I never really thought about just how far they pushed the coastline out into the bay. It certainly does appear to be a lot more navigable now than it was in 1883, and 1915, without all the wrecks buried in the middle of the bay. I wish they had marked their position in the bay... would be interesting to know which wreck she fouled on. I was going to do my blog post about City of Chester, but given the time of the fouling, I wonder if it might not have been Caroline Amelia.

It's hard to say with any certainty, given that it's estimated that nearly 150 ships have been lost along the Bay Area coastline, although only 9 went down within the boundaries of the Bay itself (and if I recall correctly, not all of the ~150 ships that went down near San Francisco were identified, although I seem to remember that most of them have been in the years afterward).
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 03 September 2015, 01:31:25
I gets interesting when the very geography of a region is greatly changed.  An interesting history indeed.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 06 September 2015, 10:34:10
Zovacor
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 September 2015, 08:16:57
HatterJack passes the 4000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 16 September 2015, 11:38:45
Here is a photo of the Albatross from the Library of Congress, recently digitized by Robert Hanshew, Nat'l Museum of the US Navy.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/127906254@N06/21173744410/in/album-72157658065235699/
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 16 September 2015, 11:46:59
Thanks!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 17 September 2015, 00:02:32
Oh my, until now I'd only ever seen her with her hull painted white, and I think I much prefer this Albatross.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 17 September 2015, 03:07:48
Its a black footed albatross! :)

Must be an early picture of the ship.  Before the US ships became the white fleet.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 17 September 2015, 07:47:34
I was planning on posting this on the anniversary of his passing, but then I realized I won't be near a computer on that day.

So... I was looking through the logs of late September 1888, admiring the handwriting of Lieutenant Commander Tanner and Ensign Parmenter (and cringing at the rest of the officers' signatures) so I took some initiative and dug into the history of our  Ensign Henry Earl Parmenter.

I wasn't able to come up with much in the way of his actual career in the Navy, although his grave site at Arlington National Cemetery does list his rank as Commander, so he definitely continued to move up the ranks after his contributions to the voyages of Albatross.

His personal life, however, I was able to find more information about, and find to be rather fascinating.

Ensign Parmenter was born in Rhode Island on 10 April, 1861. He would grow up to become a Navy man (obviously), and eventually marry one Grace Lee Taylor, a niece of Rear Admiral John Irwin (Commander of both the Asiatic and Pacific Squadrons, and great-great step-grandson of Benjamin Franklin through his stepmother). So far, pretty tame stuff, but this is where it really gets fascinating (to me at least)

In 1901, Grace was found to have fallen or jumped from the window of their fourth story apartment in Washington, D.C. She died an hour later. All of this was after being treated for melancholia (or what would be diagnosed today as clinical depression). As the granddaughter of a US Congressman, this would have no doubt been pretty controversial for the time.

This marriage also speaks to Parmenter's station in life, as the post-war New England replaced its antebellum slave trade and racism with classism. Henry would not have been allowed to marry Grace, with her pedigree, unless he was equally established on his own merit (or descended from reputable stock).

Regardless, after Grace's fall (or suicide leap, as the coroner's report claims it was suicide, but police interviews with friends and neighbors claim her death to be accidental), Henry appears to have focused on his career while mourning the loss of his wife, although he did remarry some time between 1910 and 1920 (it's unclear which, as there was no marriage license issued) in California. His second wife being Helen Frances Bartlett.

Henry eventually passed away on 29 September, 1941. His grave marker is located in the West section of Site 519 at Arlington National Cemetery, where he was buried beside both Grace and Helen (who lived until 1959). He had no siblings, and no children, thus ending his direct lineage (which is likely part of the reason why any information about the man is so scarce).

(http://image2.findagrave.com/photos/2011/182/49348055_130966251547.jpg)

Helen's inscription on the monument is on the northwest side of it, facing the street, so it's not visible in this picture.

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 September 2015, 09:21:35
Not very helpful, but he is in this list: http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/AMH/USN/Naval_Registers/1921.pdf - number 48 on page 264.
I suspect that you already know about this one: http://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/organization-and-administration/historical-leadership/navy-and-marine-corps-officers-1775-1900/navy-officers-1798-1900-p.html
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 17 September 2015, 10:02:04
Seems he skipped a couple ranks. He must have been a fine sailor, beyond the penmanship. I'm a bit curious as to what other vessels he served on, and how he ended up not actually receiving a command of his own, despite the rank. It's possible he just rode out his career aboard Albatross, given that she was active until 1921, and he had retired by then. Still would be great to pick a sailor and just kind of go with it.

As an aside, I found a record of a guy named Charles Goldstein who was in possession of a box of photographs and other stuff that belonged to Henry and Helen, but it was dated 2002. I wonder what happened to that box.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 17 September 2015, 10:40:08
Quote
I'm a bit curious as to what other vessels he served on, and how he ended up not actually receiving a command of his own, despite the rank.

I googled "Parmenter, Henry ships served on" and got stuff - there are reports to congress every year of which officers are serving on which ships.  Some are digitized on Google Books just titled "Congressional Serial Set" which is truly not helpful.

This news article says in 1902 he was in command of the the navy's only prison ship of all things.
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2249&dat=19020411&id=oqM-AAAAIBAJ&sjid=XloMAAAAIBAJ&pg=3934,1491862&hl=en
He was on Gunboat Wheeling, second in command, in 1903.  And the following says he was retired by 1907.

His marriage to Helen is recorded in San Francisco County Courthouse.
https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XLCG-63Y

Also, Army-Navy-Air Force Register and Defense Times, Volume 41 listed a death:
(http://s6.postimg.org/4rwpnyhrl/Parmenter_junior.jpg)
and this link says a sister before him also died in childhood.
http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=104580398

Not an easy life.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 September 2015, 11:53:39
Seems he skipped a couple ranks.
The confusion is because http://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/organization-and-administration/historical-leadership/navy-and-marine-corps-officers-1775-1900/navy-officers-1798-1900-p.html only goes to 1900.
After that you need http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/AMH/USN/Naval_Registers/. I used that but I only looked at 1921. 1900-1920 and 1922 on are available if you are curious - and patient.
 ;D



If I am reading the 1921 entry correctly, he retired 30 June 1906.



http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/AMH/USN/Naval_Registers/1906.pdf
p 20 (#85) Lieut Commander - Navy-yard, Boston
p 172 on active list

http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/AMH/USN/Naval_Registers/1907.pdf
p 148 Retired list - Commander - Navy-yard, Boston
p 178 He seems to have retired as Lieut Commander :-\
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 17 September 2015, 14:07:32
I believe from novels, it may be a custom to promote with retirement if they wish to offer honor and help, in order to be given higher retirement pay.  I think.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 September 2015, 14:32:07
I have that impression too, but I also can't give any source ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jil on 17 September 2015, 17:44:55
I'm a bit curious as to what other vessels he served on

Thetis has an Ensign H.E. Parmenter who joined Nov 19th 1891 from USS Mohican
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Thetis/vol013of024/vol013_004_0.jpg

and was detached July 9th 1892 and ordered home
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Thetis/vol014of024/vol014_004_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 17 September 2015, 17:56:52
Henry was an Ensign at that point in time...
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 18 September 2015, 08:25:36
Given that the Navy at the time was fond of single year enlistments, that would make sense. It would put him aboard Albatross in 1888, then Mohican in either '89 or '90, before shipping to Thetis in '91. With the additional finding that he retired in 1906 attached to the Boston Navy Yard, I wouldn't be surprised if he served the 15 years between Thetis and his retirement dockside. At a minimum, it would have been at least the last 5 years, as he was in Washington DC when his first wife passed away (although apparently he wasn't at home when she fell/leapt).
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 20 September 2015, 06:31:34
Zovacor passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 22 September 2015, 13:45:36
Escape from Alcatrazbatross!

15th November 1888 Union Iron Works, San Francisco
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_144_1.jpg

F.Smith (C.H) escaped confinement during the night, the lock on the Brig having been forced.

Frankie may still be at large.

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 22 September 2015, 14:04:08
Maybe that just makes the navy's jog easier -
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_142_1.jpg
says he was confined for safe keeping "until he can be claimed as a deserter."  So he chose to desert!!  Makes sense to me.   ::)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 23 September 2015, 08:09:48
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_159_1.jpg

8am to Meridian: JJ Downs released from confinement... then placed right back in confinement... I know being a Coal Heaver would have been backbreaking, horrible work, but you'd think a man could go four hours without getting tossed back into the brig.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 24 September 2015, 04:57:04
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_174_0.jpg

Missing all the a.m Clear sky readings (should all be 0).  Last 3 pm barometer readings should be 30.30 not 30.00

Transcribed as in log.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 24 September 2015, 06:15:08
Somehow, I seriously doubt the 4PM temperature on this log (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_176_0.jpg). I grew up in the bay area and have a really hard time believing that
Also, my apologies for the oddball numbering of the bullet points... I get a little goofy after a third energy drink (it's been a long night)

edit: The next day (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_177_0.jpg) has similar massive jumps followed by a 17 degree drop over the course of an hour. I'm not sure if the log keeper is mixing up pruno somewhere below decks, or if we've got some faulty thermometers aboard ship.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 24 September 2015, 06:52:33
Link to a post about one of our crewmen being rather bad at performing his duty.

http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4426.msg116278#msg116278
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 24 September 2015, 10:52:13
What are the chances that where the ship is moored it is letting direct sun coming thru a window to bake the thermometer for 50 minutes before that hourly read? A narrow sunbeam that moves away quickly?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 24 September 2015, 11:26:54
That sounds quite plausible - especially since it repeats!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 25 September 2015, 01:26:31
Odds are, given the time, that it's entirely possible that it's related to being heated by the sun, although it's strange that it only seems to have occurred on those two days. That said... it's hard to really have a definite answer, because Albatross was listed as being at anchor in the bay, rather than moored at a dock somewhere, but there are no mentions on the events page of the ship swinging with the tide so there *is* a chance that they could have been bearing southeast by east, so that only one of the thermometers in the psychrometer would be exposed to direct sunlight at the time. I bring that up, by the bye, because my understanding is that the meteorological instruments were mounted in the after deck of the wheelhouse rather than actually *in* the wheelhouse.

All of that aside... I did the math (probably incorrectly, I'm not a math guy) and if I'm calculating it correctly, it's basically saying rather simply that there's a relative humidity of ~65% (a little less, but for simplicity's sake), which is actually pretty accurate for San Francisco in the December, so *apparently* I jumped the gun on that one. Or I should just stick to history and leave the meteorology to meteorologists.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Kevin on 25 September 2015, 17:55:52
Mounted on the side of the boiler?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 25 September 2015, 19:25:28
They are
anchored off foot of Washington St in 12 fathoms water with 30 fathoms on starboard chain. on 12/12/1888

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol018of055/vol018of055_171_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 25 September 2015, 20:07:45
Just started what I think is the last logbook- Jan 1, 1889 to June 30, 1889.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 25 September 2015, 20:38:14
That you are finishing that voyage is good - we are breaking up the long service voyages of ships into bits of 10 years or less, so we can feel success and send finished chunks of data to Philip faster.  This one will be done very soon.

Next is Albatross (1890) and after that Albatross (1900).  The years between 1910ish and 1921 are coming later I think, maybe.
http://naval-history.net/OW-US/Albatross/USFCS_Albatross.htm
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 26 September 2015, 00:18:33
Kevin, looking at a picture of Albatross as she was at the time, they'd have been mounted on the outside of the wheelhouse aft wall, between the wheelhouse and the smokestack, putting it a bit fore of the boiler.

Edit: the wheelhouse, in the pictures I've seen of her, was directly aft of the foremast, about ten yards fore of the stack, which was nearly on the beam (it may have actually been directly on the beam, but all the pictures I've seen of her are angled slightly and make it appear that the stack is close to, but a bit abaft the beam.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Danny252 on 26 September 2015, 08:04:45
I came across something similar when sat in Sausalito in the logs from 1901 - every day like clockwork, the temperature would shoot up between 10am and midday, before dropping to more believable temperatures. I put that one down to sunlight as well.

AI think we can say fairly definitely that the instruments weren't inside, or at least in the same room as the barometer, given the incident with the barometer being unreadable due to wet paint, whilst the other instruments were still accessible! I also have a vague recollection of an entry about the instruments being moved to allow the wall to be painted, but I can't remember any details.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 26 September 2015, 12:36:40
Just started what I think is the last logbook- Jan 1, 1889 to June 30, 1889.

Actually, that's the second to last logbook. The very last one is July 1st - December 31st 1889.
Sorry to disappoint you, but you're VERY close, and this is the third stream - so once it's done, the whole ship is done. Keep it up!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 06 October 2015, 13:37:45
April 12th 1889 San Bartolome Bay (aka Turtle Bay)

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol019of055/vol019of055_110_1.jpg

Brought 42 turtles on board from yesterday's seining.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 08 October 2015, 09:05:24
It seems our newest log keeper is a bit lazy (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol019of055/vol019of055_140_0.jpg). As a skipper, I get it, writing log entries isn't the most exciting thing you can do aboard, but it takes more pen strokes to scribble a ditto than to just write down the number "0".
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 October 2015, 09:13:55
I'm not quite sure where on the page you are referring to, but in older logs I have seen a lot of zeros that looked like dittos. I have also seen sixes that looked like an l followed by an i without a dot...

See: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3534.msg58942#msg58942
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 08 October 2015, 09:25:54
There's a few spots where, when it's zoomed in on the page, there's gaps in the top and bottom of the zero. At it's native size it does look a lot more like a zero than a ditto, but when it's zoomed in it looks more like a ditto than a zero. Kind of quirky, although it does speak to being in a hurry to write it down (as opposed to trying to write in rough seas and nasty weather).

Addendum: On my next trip out, whenever that is, I think I'll amuse myself by keeping a log more similar to these ones in addition to my usual logbooks and see if I end up suffering similar handwriting quirks.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 08 October 2015, 09:34:21
I wonder if it is simply the style (double down stroke) - like the "p" for a double s also in my example-link above :-\
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 08 October 2015, 09:50:35
There's a few spots where, when it's zoomed in on the page, there's gaps in the top and bottom of the zero.

This style is common in the Jamestown 1844 logs. I've always attributed it to being easier to make a pair of down stroke arcs with the old style pen nibs, versus pushing it upwards to complete the circle. You've got both styles here, though, even on the same line.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 08 October 2015, 09:52:59
Well... after doing a little bit of research on the double s thing, I'm wondering if that's not just the last vestiges of the old "long s" that fell out of favor right around the time that our crew here would have been first learning their letters. They're most certainly not using it correctly if that's the case, but after looking at so many examples of it being used in the positions where a long s would have been taught, perhaps they forgot exactly how it was intended to be used.

Honestly, I'm just glad we're dealing with English logs, and not German ones... modern Germans handwriting can get pretty atrocious when eszetts get involved. I'm not really sure why they got to have an actual letter for it whereas we used the concept of an eszett, but instead of wrapping the long s over the top of the minuscule s we just kind of jumbled them next to each other leading to an abomination of handwriting that gave rise to the rather hilarious "Greenfleaves" or my personal favorite, "In the perfuit of happinefs".

Aaaaand now I'm actually boring myself so I'm going to cram some chips in my face and think about what I've done.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 08 October 2015, 09:56:23
And to Bob: I hadn't even thought about that. I'm too spoiled with my fancy ball points and whatnot. Maybe I should bring a fountain pen along with my logbook.

That's probably exactly what's going on.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 08 October 2015, 10:05:15
Honestly, I'm just glad we're dealing with English logs, and not German ones... modern Germans handwriting can get pretty atrocious when eszetts get involved. I'm not really sure why they got to have an actual letter for it whereas we used the concept of an eszett, but instead of wrapping the long s over the top of the minuscule s we just kind of jumbled them next to each other leading to an abomination of handwriting that gave rise to the rather hilarious "Greenfleaves" or my personal favorite, "In the perfuit of happinefs".

Are you talking about this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwabacher)?
From what I've seen, modern German handwriting depends on the person. Some are very good at writing clearly and neatly, some are not.
But Schwabacher is terrible, as are some other old German fonts.
The small s looking like small f is well known to me - in fact, I don't buy used books that use such fonts, because it's just so hard to deal with.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 08 October 2015, 15:25:25
He's talking about this (http://s1.postimg.org/qt7fz094b/Eszett.png) for a double 'ss'.

The last time I saw fraktur was some time ago when we were going thru my grandparents papers after their deaths.  They still had their baptism certificates, printed out in fraktur calligraphy fit to be framed and hung on the wall.  I swear, the only words I could read on those papers were the hand lettered names and dates of baptism.  Those were fraktur also, but at least decipherable.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 October 2015, 11:36:46
jd570b passes the 7000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 October 2015, 11:37:53
HatterJack passes the 5000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 October 2015, 11:38:37
Zovacor passes the 4000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 October 2015, 11:40:09
Hurlock passes the 2000 mark!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 11 October 2015, 11:41:36
kimma001 (Bob)
Welcome to the top 12 !
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 11 October 2015, 12:15:21
Five people working on one stream? Wow!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 11 October 2015, 15:28:58
I was only trying to break into Top 12, it's 'just' four now.  ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 11 October 2015, 23:13:23
Just 6 1/2 months to go with this voyage. I think I'll stick around with these ships to allow time for the bugs to be worked out in OW Whaling.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 October 2015, 00:21:45
A bunch of us need to spend time over there or we won't know what problems to report and therefore the devs won't know what problems need fixing.  Nor will we know when to thank them for fixing stuff.  My hope is that we will continue to visit there and do a bit every so often before coming back home. 
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 12 October 2015, 14:20:36
I've been working on this ship for a few days now, so I'll post some logs I found interesting.

This first one is from May 29 1889. Towards the bottom, it looks like it says "Enlisted M Lynch (1CF) for one year." I think I got the rating right, but I'm not positive. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol019of055/vol019of055_157_1.jpg

This second one is from June 2 1889. Sometime between 8 AM and 12 PM, J Binney (can't make out his rating) was released from confinement. I wonder what he did? http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol019of055/vol019of055_161_1.jpg

June 3 1889 must have been a cleaning day, because they had to scrub their hammocks. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol019of055/vol019of055_162_1.jpg

There were a few other old logs I transcribed that were interesting to me, but I guess they were more than 10 logs ago. I remember one mentioned someone being placed on bread and water, and another mentioned a Senatorial party. I just remembered one more, that mentioned they lowered the colors to half-staff because a funeral party passed by. I wish I could get access to those logs.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 October 2015, 14:26:34
M Lynch is probably a First-class Fireman: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol019of055/vol019of055_004_0.jpg

I read J Binney as C.H. - Coal Heaver
According to http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol019of055/vol019of055_155_1.jpg it was for disobedience of orders.

If you want to look at other log pages, see: How to look at log pages before and after the one you are working on (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3489.msg62863#msg62863). That is how I discovered why J Binney was being punished.
To look at log pages that you have transcribed, in the transcribing interface click on your name at the top right and select "My pages" from the list. Then click on View logs for the ship.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 12 October 2015, 14:33:26
When I was first transcribing the log, I kept staring at M Lynch's rating and just couldn't figure it out. Now I looked at it and it looked so much clearer. It's interesting how much easier it can be to read something when you have a clear mind. Now that you mention it, I agree it looks like J Binney's rating is CH. It's funny that you posted that last log, because that is one of the ones I transcribed that I could no longer find.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 October 2015, 14:39:32
If you transcribed it, it will be in My Pages ;)

Sorry, I updated my previous post just after you posted your comment. Take another look at: http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3903.msg118163#msg118163 ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 12 October 2015, 14:44:06
I hadn't noticed that tab before. Thanks for pointing it out.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 12 October 2015, 17:38:53
Looks like July 1 1889 was a good day for N. B. Miller. He was appointed as an Assistant in Laboratory by Col. Marshall McDonald. It also says Y. Mi~ and M. Essova(?) were shipped for one year. Note that the question mark is only for this post, I didn't transcribe it. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_006_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 October 2015, 18:28:11
Give it your best guess when presented with names for the first time.  These science ships tend to have Navy officers (do NOT trust scientists to know how to sail or navigate!), scientists keeping their own field logs on what they are finding and samples of what they are dredging up (in the Smithsonian now) and civilian mariners for crew - which means there is no official register of their names outside of these log books.

Names look to me like Y. Mezumma and M. Enova, but there are other possibilities.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 October 2015, 18:43:50
Names are always hard, but some people (not me) have a remarkable talent for them.

The first might be Mezumura or Mizumura?
I think Janet is right with Enova on the second.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Michael on 12 October 2015, 19:03:01
Names are always hard, but some people (not me) have a remarkable talent for them.

The first might be Mezumura or Mizumura?
I think Janet is right with Enova on the second.

I copied the image, and really enlarged it in another viewer. It definitely looks like Enova on the second one, and most likely Mezumura on the first. (I notice that the log writer is good about dotting his is and there is no dot over Mezumura. And his r looks like the one in light airs.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 12 October 2015, 19:09:16
As you can see, lots of people are willing to help!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 12 October 2015, 19:23:57
Here's yet another example of crew disobedience. On July 2 1889, W. Stilwell was absent from the ship without permission. I wonder if he will return? http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_007_1.jpg

As an aside, I'll go back and change the names to Enova and Mezumura. Those seem like they might be the best guesses.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 12 October 2015, 22:37:13
It looks like on July 4 1889 between 4 and 8 PM the crew got a visit from a captain. I can't make out the first name (Ron? Ken?), but the last name appears to be Pilot. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_009_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 12 October 2015, 22:59:51
I checked both the list of Navy and Coast Guard (Revenue Cutter Service) and there are no 19th century officers of any grade named "Pilot".  (See our Helpful Links to Outside Information (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=1054.0) in the Library Reference Desk, in its 'Officers and Personnel' section for resources of historic officers.)

But, at 4pm there is a notation on the weather page "standing in for anchorage".  It is possible they took on board the pilot for the Ca~t Run entering Port Townsend.  Modern NOAA chart for PT is at http://www.nauticalchartsonline.com/chart/zoom?chart=18464 - they do not seem to have an older chart among their historical collection.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 12 October 2015, 23:24:48
Thanks for trying to help figure this out. There's so many different links, it's hard to keep track of them. I guess this Mr. Pilot is one mystery we just won't be able to solve.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 13 October 2015, 02:57:00
It looks like on July 4 1889 between 4 and 8 PM the crew got a visit from a captain. I can't make out the first name (Ron? Ken?), but the last name appears to be Pilot. http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_009_1.jpg

I think it might be Capt. Keen Pilot.
As a long shot it might be Captain James W Keene an Alaskan pioneer
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 13 October 2015, 03:23:49
Hurlock, I think you got it.  http://www.explorenorth.com/library/yafeatures/bl-Keene.htm

Quote
...
from 1869 to 1879 was in the employ of the Government, five years of that period having been spent on the revenue cutter Lincoln.
...
He afterward served as master or pilot on the steamers ...
Since 1889 he has made frequent trips to Alaska in the government service, his last employment having been with the Richard Rush, on which he was stationed in Bering Sea during the season of 1894.

He was a qualified ship's captain and pilot in government employ.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 13 October 2015, 08:25:02
I guess I'll go with Capt Keen Pilot. I'm amazed at how all of you can figure these names out. And not only that, but you can find so much information about some of these people.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 October 2015, 08:34:42
We all had trouble in the beginning.
I asked lots of questions! As people answered my questions I learned where the information is in the forum and accumulated my own list of information sources.

The Reference topic for Albatross (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=3901.0) includes a basic list of sources ;)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Craig on 13 October 2015, 09:33:27
And having ocd helps  ;D :P
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 October 2015, 11:03:50
 ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 13 October 2015, 12:17:02
And having ocd helps  ;D :P

Or, in my case, just being plain crazy.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 October 2015, 14:05:21
That's MY excuse! ;D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 13 October 2015, 15:42:53
July 4 must have been a party day for the crew, because one crew member was drunk, and another was absent from the ship on July 5. Sometime between 4 and 8 AM,
Quote
Placed J Douglas (CH) in confinement for safe keeping, he being drunk and disorderly by order of the Commanding Officer
Then at 12:15 pm, one of the crew members was brought back on board the ship.
Quote
John Dunn (2.CF) brought on board at 12:15 by a Police Officer.
In addition, another crew member never returned from liberty.
Quote
Peter Dow (CH) absent from the ship not having returned from liberty

I wonder if I will get to find out if Peter Dow ever makes it back to the ship?
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_010_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 13 October 2015, 16:27:38
By the way, in your troublesome crew you might run across people being reduced one class. That is generally Conduct Classes (http://forum.oldweather.org/index.php?topic=4198.msg102526#msg102526).
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 13 October 2015, 19:26:27
I haven't come across those terms yet, but thanks for the heads-up.
July 7 1889 seems to have been another interesting day. At 9:00 AM, a number of important visitors boarded the ship. They were mostly Senators. The record-keeper seemed to have a tough time with spelling today, because there seem to be a number of errors in this log (unless I'm having a tough time with reading)
Quote
8 A.M. to Meridian Clear and pleasant. Calm to light breeeze from NW. At 10:00 got underway and stood out of harbor and northward through Puget Sound. Put over log at 10:30 reading 40.1 Steam 70. Rev 72. Log at noon 54.4. The following passengers ^came aboard at 9:00 Senator H. L. Daws, Mrs. H. L. Daws, Senator J. K. Jones, Mrs. J. K. Jones, Senator C. F. Manderson, Mrs. C. F. Manderson, Senator F. M. Stockbridge, W. P. Canaday, Sergent at Arms US. Senate. W. M. Olin Clerk of Committe on Indian affairs of US. Senate, J. H. Marshalt, Messenger, A. Smith Supt. Dockument Room US. Senate, N. Packer, Servant, and Capt. P. H. Ray U.S. Army.
Looks like Peter Dow hasn't made it back to the ship, because he was declared a deserter, along with W. F. Stilwell.
Quote
Declared W. F. Stilwell (1CF) and Peter Dow (CH) deserters from this date
It looks like Stilwell was missing since July 2, and Dow was missing since July 5. I wonder if they will ever return?
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_012_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 13 October 2015, 19:53:09
At this point in time, the US Navy had big problems with deserting sailors.  As a Fish Commission science ship, the crew are apparently representative.

Quote
http://www.historynet.com/the-u-s-navys-sea-change.htm
Between 1900 and 1908, the U.S. Navy lost an average of slightly more than 15 percent of its enlisted force each year to desertion.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 13 October 2015, 20:05:52
Wow, that is quite an impressive desertion rate. It's amazing how much I am learning by transcribing these logs. I'm actually starting to get attached to the crew, also. I love seeing what is happening to them, who is getting drunk, and who is deserting.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 13 October 2015, 20:28:08
I know.  The ships and and crews become real and are "ours".  Welcome to OW addiction.  :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 15 October 2015, 09:40:56
And this is precisely the reason why a smart captain keeps a stock of booze on hand to provide a ration for the crew. An occasional swallow of rotgut keeps crews on an even enough keel that they don't feel the need to get blind drunk whenever they go ashore...

http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_020_1.jpg

At 3:30 Marine Guard brought aboard W. Douglas (C Hr) and J. Dunn (2nd C.T.) they being drunk and disorderly. At 3:45 J. Binney came aboard drunk. By order of Commanding Officer placed W Douglas, J Dunn, and J Binney in confinement in single irons for safe keeping.

I find it hard to believe that Commander Tanner was a teetotaler, but he appears to have had little tolerance for drunkenness even if the ship was in dry dock. I get this feeling that the old man was equal parts Gunnery Sergeant Hartman, Lord Nelson, and George Carlin... except with both hands, and far more flamboyant facial hair. He would almost have to be this maritime Frankenstein, as sailors of the day (who am I kidding, we're still every bit as bad as ever) were notorious for jumping ship at every opportunity unless there's something that needs to be shelled into oblivion within range of the guns.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: JNapoli on 15 October 2015, 20:37:18
They weren't in confinement very long. The next day (July 16 1889) all 3 were released.
Quote
8 A.M. to Meridian. Overcast with rain. Calm and light variable airs. By order of Comd'g Officer released John Dunn (2.C.F) W. Douglas ^(CH) and John Binney
 (CH) from confinement. Senatorial Party visited Indian Village.
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_021_1.jpg
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 21 October 2015, 10:47:24
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_039_1.jpg

If memory serves, this is a day off the mark, but all these references to it being smoky may be regarding the Spokane Fire of 1889. If it's not the Spokane Fire, I wonder if there was a wildfire burning somewhere around Garibaldi that I can't find records of.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 21 October 2015, 11:12:12
I don't it was Spokane.

First, the fire started at 18:00 pm on August 4th, but this is August 3rd.
Second, Spokane is about 500 km away from Departure Bay, British Columbia - so it would take something like a volcanic eruption for the smoke to go THAT far!

Therefore, my guess would be some obscure wildfire that ain't recorded anywhere that we know of.

Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Danny252 on 21 October 2015, 13:30:34
Therefore, my guess would be some obscure wildfire that ain't recorded anywhere that we know of.

Yeah, I doubt people will have much luck in pinning smoke reports down to any specific fire - BC has about 1100 natural wildfires per year, e.g. 2014: http://bcwildfire.ca/History/FireAtlas/?year=2014&type=L
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 22 October 2015, 09:22:14
10 August 1889
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_046_1.jpg

A near collision in the fog?
At 12.30 heard Cape Flattery fog whistle bearing NE 1/2 E (mag)
At 1.00 sighted Duncan Rk. bearing ENE (mag) distant 3/10 miles log 21.0.  Stopped and backed engines.


Can you really get a bearing on a whistle?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 22 October 2015, 09:39:39
I could believe NE, but that 1/2 E seems a bit much :-\
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 22 October 2015, 16:27:51
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_039_1.jpg

If memory serves, this is a day off the mark, but all these references to it being smoky may be regarding the Spokane Fire of 1889. If it's not the Spokane Fire, I wonder if there was a wildfire burning somewhere around Garibaldi that I can't find records of.

There are regular mentions of it being smoky in the logs for weeks afterward.  They seem to have seasons of forest fires in this region.  I am also transcribing Albatross 1890 which is experiencing a similar thing in this area in October 1895.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: HatterJack on 28 October 2015, 09:11:17
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_086_1.jpg

Placed JW Douglas (CH'r) prisoner at large in confinement in double irons by order of commanding officer for committing an assault with a deadly weapon.

Oddly enough, I went through a couple weeks worth of the "Daily Morning Astorian" which was the local paper at the time, and find no mention of an attack by a crewman. In fact, the only mention of the Albatross at all is from their arrival, in a fluffy piece of propaganda. Given that the paper seems to have been used as a recruiting tool for the Navy (multiple articles on various days going on about the luxuriousness of the accommodations aboard ship), I'm not really surprised, but I still find it odd that in a small port town like Astoria that something like this wouldn't have been front page news (or rather third page news, since the front page was advertisements, and the second page was for national and international news).
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 31 October 2015, 04:06:53
25th October 1889 Mare Island Navy Yard
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_122_1.jpg

Transferred James W.Douglas (C.Hr) to the prison at Marine Barracks for safe keeping
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 31 October 2015, 07:46:52
safe keeping - sounds like a very precious item. Presumably he's been a very bad boy...  ;) ;) :D
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 31 October 2015, 18:47:06
The progress bar has hit 100% - but we all know that really means 99.5%. The last day is Dec 31st 1889.

Keep it up, people! The end is in sight!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 31 October 2015, 18:51:49
I just did October 31, two months to go!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 01 November 2015, 17:44:10
21st November 1889
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_149_1.jpg
By order of Comd'g Officer released from confinement John Dunn (2CF) and discharged him from the Naval Service by reason of drunkeness
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 02 November 2015, 05:19:23
27th November 1889
http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_155_1.jpg

J.W.Parker (oil) alias Wm Padgett (1CF) was received on board from the U.S.R.S. Independence, as a deserter from this vessel and he was confined in double irons by order Comd'g Officer.  By authority of Commodore A.E.K. Benham, Commandant, J.W.Parker (oil) alias Wm Padgett (1CF) was transferred to the Marine Barracks for safe keeping, to await trial by Court Martial.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 02 November 2015, 08:37:00
I hope you are not going to pick up any bad habits from doing this ship!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 02 November 2015, 08:39:39
I don't think he will - Stuart and Michael P. have been through way more on the Concord, and they're both doing fine!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 02 November 2015, 23:03:15
Seems like more than one of us is working on it (December 22, last page I did) so I will bow out and let it roll into the new year!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 02 November 2015, 23:08:22
That's me, I thought you were done for the day.

Seems like more than one of us is working on it (December 22, last page I did) so I will bow out and let it roll into the new year!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Bob on 02 November 2015, 23:09:01
December 23, 1889
Mare Island Navy Yard

4 to 8 P.M.

About 7.05 the collecting boat was swamped while making a passage from the ship to Vallejo and the following men were drowned: R.S. Padgett (Mach) J. Enright (Sea) W.W. Lee (Sea) and Phillipi, a citizen newspaper peddler. The survivors were picked up by the whale boat of the U.S.S. Thetis. The collecting boat was picked up and towed ashore by a boat from Vallejo.


http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_181_1.jpg (http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/Albatross/vol020of055/vol020of055_181_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 02 November 2015, 23:40:16
This write-up in the
     San Francisco Chronicle (San Francisco, California) 25 Dec 1889, Wed - Page 6
gives more detail on the events and the people.

(https://img0.newspapers.com/img/img?id=27592962&width=557&height=3678&crop=1019_2898_622_4183&rotation=0&brightness=0&contrast=0&invert=0&ts=1446521151&h=83f2a22e9a066f5c9890a5df79e88051)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Randi on 03 November 2015, 03:50:09
Great find, Janet!

Here is the entry from Thetis's log: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ow3/final/USS%20Thetis/vol009of024/vol009_153_1.jpg
(about halfway the 8am-midnight entry starting "At 7.10")
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Zovacor on 03 November 2015, 23:11:28
Yay! So I tried to transcribe a log and it jumped me over to the Yorktown.  Looks like its truly finished. Good job everyone.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 03 November 2015, 23:49:33
True - I tried and no newbie has access to transcribing that voyage.

Albatross 1884 is COMPLETE!!

(https://breaaire.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/confetti_canon.gif)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 04 November 2015, 03:51:40
Hooray! Another victory for us!

Great job, 3rd stream team - you really picked up speed towards the end there!

P.S. Will someone please ask the PTB to manually set it to Complete?
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: jil on 04 November 2015, 06:11:04
Congrats to all the crew!!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 November 2015, 07:19:50
P.S. Will someone please ask the PTB to manually set it to Complete?

Done - but they are on Chicago time.  Have patience, Hanibal. :)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 04 November 2015, 07:31:08
So the British team does not have the power to do this? That's a pity.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Janet Jaguar on 04 November 2015, 11:07:04
Both Oxford and Adler have the power to do it all - but only half the manpower and time to do it in.  This kind of necessary clerical work goes solely to our project manager, who happens to be part of the Adler team.  It avoids inefficient interruptions to other work while we explain our explicit needs to a stranger.

I was serious when I said to have patience so the right people can do their job well, Hanibal.  It makes life easier for everyone. 8)
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hanibal94 on 06 November 2015, 04:02:58
And it's done - she's now VAL. Thanks project manager!

I've already done all the clerical work here - Dockyard indexes updated, my guestimations and the program that makes them updated, OW's Wiki page updated, and the usual glass of victory grog passed round to all the crew. Very nice!
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: Hurlock on 06 November 2015, 13:17:02
A unexpectedly tragic end to the logs with those drownings.  It does not get a mention in other literature I have read on the Albatross.
Title: Re: Albatross (1884) -- Discussion: Questions and Comments
Post by: AvastMH on 06 November 2015, 14:30:19
well said Hurlock - very very sad  :'(

Well done the 1884 Albatross team!  ;D